Variation in end-of-life decision making between critical care consultants

Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-ethical or unethical?

Rationing in health care is controversial, and even more so in pediatrics. Children are an inherently vulnerable group because they are reliant on their parents and caregivers to make decisions in their best interests and have no political voice. Historically, there has been general acceptance of the need to ration healthcare at a systems level, however there is controversy over whether healthcare professionals should be involved in rationing at the bedside. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that bedside rationing is unavoidable, at least in times of extreme resource scarcity. Internationally, there has been significant ethical analysis and guideline development to guide intensive care rationing decisions in the event that resources are overwhelmed. This paper explores the principles underlying distributive justice in healthcare rationing and discusses how these were operationalized in ethical guidelines for the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, rationing is unavoidable and occurs constantly in everyday nursing and medical ICU practice, often in mundane and uncontroversial ways. Some argue that these everyday decisions are not true rationing decisions, but resource allocation, or stewardship decisions. We argue there are no clear lines between resource allocation and rationing decisions, rather that they occur on a spectrum. These everyday rationing decisions are particularly susceptible to personal biases that are often implicit. Due to the subtle and constant nature of most everyday rationing decisions, specific guideline development will rarely be practical or appropriate. However, it is possible to develop other processes to improve decision making. There are a variety of strategies we recommend for this including, encouraging reflective practice; developing explicit frameworks that promote collaborative decision making; being transparent about resource allocation and rationing decisions with colleagues, patients, and families; and promoting a workplace culture of speaking up and accessing support in identifying and managing everyday rationing decisions.

Impact of Physicians' Personalities and Behavioral Traits on Treatment-Related Decision-making for Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be treated with intensive therapy, low-intensity therapy, or best supportive care. Medical decision-making might be affected by physicians' occupational and non-occupational factors.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of physicians' personalities and behavioral traits on treatment-related decision-making for elderly AML patients.

DESIGN

A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Hematologists in mainland China (N = 529; response rate 64.5%).

MAIN MEASURES

The medical decision-making for elderly AML patients was evaluated using 6 clinical vignettes. Hematologists' attitudes toward risk and uncertainty, Big Five personality traits, and decision-making styles were assessed using binary lottery choices and well-recognized self-report inventories.

KEY RESULTS

The resulting binary regression model in predicting treatment intensity contained professional title group (OR = 0.012, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.136, P < 0.001), conscientiousness (OR = 0.336, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.932, P = 0.036), extraversion (OR = 0.403, 95% CI 0.166 to 0.974, P = 0.044), conscientiousness by title group (OR = 2.009, 95% CI 1.100 to 3.667, P = 0.023), and extraversion by title group (OR = 1.627, 95% CI 0.965 to 2.743, P = 0.068) as predictors of therapy intensity preference. Junior physicians with a higher level of extraversion (mean difference = 0.27; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45; P = 0.009) or conscientiousness (mean difference = 0.19; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.36; P = 0.028) tended to prescribe more intensive therapy. Meanwhile, no significant correlation was found between physicians' personalities or behavioral traits and treatment-related decision-making in senior physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' personalities contribute to treatment-related decision-making for elderly AML patients, depending on the professional titles. More extravert or conscientious attending physicians tended to prescribe more intensive therapy. Meanwhile, the decisions made by chief and associate chief physicians were not impacted by their personal traits. Junior physicians should be aware of such potential influence when making medical decisions.

Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

To develop a consensus framework that can guide the process of decision-making on continuing or limiting life-sustaining treatments in ICU patients, using evidence-based items, supported by caregivers, patients, and surrogate decision makers from multiple countries.

How is life support withdrawn in intensive care units: A narrative review

PURPOSE

Decisions to withdraw life-sustaining therapy (WDLS) are relatively common in intensive care units across Canada. As part of preliminary work to develop guidelines for WDLS, we performed a narrative review of the literature to identify published studies of WDLS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The results were reviewed and only articles relevant to WDLS were included. Any references within these articles deemed to be relevant were subsequently included.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 3687 articles. A total of 100 articles of interest were identified from the initial search and a review of their references. The articles were primarily composed of observational data and expert opinion. The information from the literature was organized into 6 themes: preparation for WDLS, monitoring parameters, pharmacologic symptom management, withdrawing life-sustaining therapies, withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, and bereavement.

CONCLUSIONS

This review describes current practices and opinions about WDLS, and also demonstrates the significant practice variation that currently exists. We believe that the development of guidelines to help increase transparency and standardize the process will be an important step to ensuring high quality care during WDLS.

Balancing professional tension and deciding upon the status of death: Making end-of-life decisions in intensive care units

This study investigated how intensivists make decisions regarding withholding and withdrawing treatment for patients at the end of their lives. This involved completing in-depth interviews from two sites of the South of England, United Kingdom by twelve intensivists. The data collected by these intensivists were analysed using thematic analysis. This resulted in the identification of three themes: intensivists' role, treatment effectiveness, and patients' best interest. Transcending these were two overarching themes relating to the balance between quantity and quality of life, and the intensivists' sense of responsibility versus burden. The results are considered in terms of making sense of death and the role of beliefs in the decision-making process.

End-of-life care in UK critical care units--a literature review

AIM

To appraise literature concerning end-of-life care (ELC) in adult critical care units in the UK in order to improve clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the interplay between legal and ethical, political, societal aspects of ELC for sustainable quality care.

BACKGROUND

Significant changes in health care policy for the critically ill patient have occurred since 1999. Simultaneously, the government is committed to improving care for the dying by integrating the palliative care ethos across the National Institutes of Health (NHS) to include non-cancer sufferers. Death continues to be a feature of critical illness, particularly following the decision to withhold/withdraw life-prolonging treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of MEDLINE, BNI, CINAHL and PSYCinfo using key words revealed very few results; consequently, the search was broadened to include ASSIA, King's Fund, TRIP, Healthstar, NHS Economic Evaluation Data, Cochrane, professional journals and government documents.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature reveals a paradigm shift from critical to palliative care, in other words, from a reductionist approach to a more humanistic approach in the acute setting. When treatment is deemed futile, quality ELC involving the assessment, ongoing assessment and care after death becomes the new goal for the critical care team. To practice ELC competently, nurses require organizational and educational support at local and national levels.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Although medico-legal decision-making is not part of their professional role, critical care nurses have an extraordinary opportunity to make a difference to the dying patient and their family and their acceptance of death.