The effects of aminophylline on bispectral index during inhalational and total intravenous anaesthesia

The effect of aminophylline on the recovery profile after hysterectomy: A randomized controlled double-blinded study

Background and Aims

In anesthesia practice, aminophylline is clinically used to treat bronchospasm. However, due to its antagonistic effect on adenosine, studies have recently focused on the drug's ability to enhance the recovery profile. The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that the administration of aminophylline leads to better recovery after general anesthesia in hysterectomy.

Methods

This randomized controlled double-blinded study, was conducted at Alzahra academic hospital in Guilan, Iran. During December 2022 to March 2023, 70 eligible women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy were divided into two groups. Group A: received 3 mg/kg IV aminophylline diluted in 100 mL of normal saline and Group C: received 100 mL IV normal saline. The time to recovery of consciousness, tracheal extubation and discharge from post anesthesia care unit were recorded. In addition, heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure were measured at 10 point times including; baseline (T0), immediately before the administration of aminophylline (T1), every 5 min until the end of the surgery(T2,T3,T4,T5,T6), and every 15 min in PACU(T7,T8,T9).

Results

There was no significant difference in terms of demographic data between the study groups. Comparing the two groups, the time of ROC was shorter in Group A than group C; 5.95 ± 1.12 and 8.5 ± 1.77 for Groups A and C, respectively (p < 0.001). The extubation time was shorter in Group A than group C; 7.79 ± 1.48 and 10.55 ± 3.02, for Groups A and C, respectively (p < 0.001). In addition, the discharge time was also shorter in group A than Group C; 30.17 ± 5.24 and 37.57 ± 4.41 for Groups A and C, respectively (p < 0.001). Not serious side effects were reported among 71.4% of cases in Group A and 51.4% in Group C (p = 0.086).

Conclusion

Administration of aminophylline at a dose of 3 mg/kg IV improves the recovery profile after abdominal hysterectomy without serious adverse effects.

The effect of preoperative aminophylline on the recovery profile after major pelvic-abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled double-blinded study

Background

This study compared the effects of premedication with different doses of aminophylline on the recovery profile after general anaesthesia.

Methods

Forty-five patients scheduled for pelvic-abdominal surgeries were divided into 3 groups: Group C: the patients received 100 ml of IV normal saline, Group A1: the patients received 2 mg/kg IV aminophylline, and Group A2: the patients received 4 mg/kg IV aminophylline 30 min before induction of general anaesthesia. The following data were recorded: demographic data, ASA physical status, duration of anaesthesia and surgery, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, propofol dose, fentanyl dose, times to reach BIS (48 ± 2) after induction of anaesthesia and to reach a value of 80 after discontinuation of sevoflurane anaesthesia, time to recovery of consciousness and to tracheal extubation and to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit, and side effects of aminophylline.

Results

The time to reach a BIS of 48 ± 2 was significantly lower for the control group than group A2 (70.67 ± 22.50 and 106.67 ± 34.77 s for groups C and A2, respectively, p -value =0.01). The time to reach a BIS of 80 was significantly longer for the control group than group A1 andA2 (5.6 ± 1.40,3.5 ± 1.93and 2.53 ± 1.72 min for groups C,A1 and A2, respectively, p -value < 0.01). The time to ROC was significantly longer for the control group than groups A1 and A2 (8.93 ± 0.92, 5.6 ± 2.47 and 4.53 ± 3.33 min for groups C, A1 and A2, respectively; p -value < 0.01). The extubation time was significantly longer for the control group than groups A1 and A2 (12.4 ± 1.08, 7.87 ± 3.27 and 6.6 ± 2.47 min for groups C, A1 and A2, respectively; p -value < 0.01).

Conclusion

Premedication with aminophylline enhanced the recovery profile after pelvic-abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia without cardiovascular complications.

Clinical trial registration

Name of the registry: Register@ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04151381.

Date of registration, November 5, 2019, ‘Retrospectively registered’.

Caffeine reverses the unconsciousness produced by light anesthesia in the continued presence of isoflurane in rats

Currently no drugs are employed clinically to reverse the unconsciousness induced by general anesthetics. Our previous studies showed that caffeine, when given near the end of an anesthesia session, accelerated emergence from isoflurane anesthesia, likely caused by caffeine’s ability to elevate intracellular cAMP levels and to block adenosine receptors. These earlier studies showed that caffeine did not rouse either rats or humans from deep anesthesia (≥ 1 minimum alveolar concentration, MAC). In this current crossover study, we examined whether caffeine reversed the unconsciousness produced by light anesthesia (< 1 MAC) in the continued presence of isoflurane. The primary endpoint of this study was to measure isoflurane levels at the time of recovery of righting reflex, which was a proxy for consciousness. Rats were deeply anesthetized with 2% isoflurane (~1.5 MAC) for 20 minutes. Subsequently, isoflurane was reduced to 1.2% for 10 minutes, then by 0.2% every 10 min; animals were monitored until the recovery of righting reflex occurred, in the continued presence of isoflurane. Respiration rate, heart rate and electroencephalogram (EEG) were monitored. Our results show that caffeine-treated rats recovered their righting reflex at a significantly higher inspired isoflurane concentration, corresponding to light anesthesia, than the same rats treated with saline (control). Respiration rate and heart rate increased initially after caffeine injection but were then unchanged for the rest of the anesthesia session. Deep anesthesia is correlated with burst suppression in EEG recordings. Our data showed that caffeine transiently reduced the burst suppression time produced by deep anesthesia, suggesting that caffeine altered neuronal circuit function but not to a point where it caused arousal. In contrast, under light anesthesia, caffeine shifted the EEG power to high frequency beta and gamma bands. These data suggest that caffeine may represent a clinically viable drug to reverse the unconsciousness produced by light anesthesia.

Caffeine Accelerates Emergence from Isoflurane Anesthesia in Humans: A Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Study

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC

WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: There are currently no drugs clinically available to reverse general anesthesia. We previously reported that caffeine is able to accelerate emergence from anesthesia in rodents. This study was carried out to test the hypothesis that caffeine accelerates emergence from anesthesia in humans.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind crossover study with eight healthy males. Each subject was anesthetized twice with 1.2% isoflurane for 1 h. During the final 10 min of each session, participants received an IV infusion of either caffeine citrate (15 mg/kg, equivalent to 7.5 mg/kg of caffeine base) or saline placebo. The primary outcome was the average difference in time to emergence after isoflurane discontinuation between caffeine and saline sessions. Secondary outcomes included the end-tidal isoflurane concentration at emergence, vital signs, and Bispectral Index values measured throughout anesthesia and emergence. Additional endpoints related to data gathered from postanesthesia psychomotor testing.

RESULTS

All randomized participants were included in the analysis. The mean time to emergence with saline was 16.5 ± 3.9 (SD) min compared to 9.6 ± 5.1 (SD) min with caffeine (P = 0.002), a difference of 6.9 min (99% CI, 1.8 to 12), a 42% reduction. Participants emerged at a higher expired isoflurane concentration, manifested more rapid return to baseline Bispectral Index values, and were able to participate in psychomotor testing sooner when receiving caffeine. There were no statistically significant differences in vital signs with caffeine administration and caffeine-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous caffeine is able to accelerate emergence from isoflurane anesthesia in healthy males without any apparent adverse effects.

The effects of intravenous aminophylline on level of consciousness in acute intentional benzodiazepines poisoning in comparison to flumazenil

AIM

Acute intentional benzodiazepine poisoning is marked by a significant loss of consciousness, aspiration pneumonia, and increased rates of mortality and morbidity, especially in older patients with underlying heart or lung disease. These patients may need flumazenil to reverse the respiratory effects of benzodiazepines. The positive effects of aminophylline on respiration and neonatal apnea improvement have been shown previously. However, its possible effects on increasing the level of consciousness have never been evaluated.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled study, we assessed the effectiveness of aminophylline on increasing the level of consciousness.

RESULTS

Time to full awakening was significantly shorter in those who received aminophylline (72 min vs. 881 min, p = 0.001), compared to those who received a placebo.

CONCLUSION

When "flumazenil" is contraindicated or unavailable, intravenous aminophylline can be used as a second choice.

The effects of Aminophylline on clinical recovery and bispectral index in patients anesthetized with total intravenous anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

Aminophylline, which is clinically used as a bronchodilator, antagonizes the action of adenosine, so it can be used to shorten the recovery time after general anesthesia. Therefore, we wanted to test the hypothesis that the administration of aminophylline leads to an increase in bispectral index (BIS) and clinical recovery in patients anesthetized with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Methods : Ninety two patients who were scheduled for elective inguinal herniorrhaphy were enrolled in this study. All patients were premedicated with midazolam and morphine. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg /kg and remifentanil 2.5 µg/kg without muscle relaxant. For maintenance of anesthesia we used propofol 100µg/kg/min, remifentanil 0.2µg/kg/min and 100% oxygen with stable BIS readings in the range 40-60. After skin closure, aminophylline 4mg/ kg was given to Group A and an equivalent volume of normal saline to Group P. BIS values, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation and End tidal CO2(ETco2) were determined. Time to eye opening, extubation time and response to command were measured. Results : There were no significant differences in SpO2, ETco2 and anesthesia time. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were found to be statistically higher (p<0.001) in Group A. Time to eye opening, hand grip and extubation were significantly shorter (p<0.001) in Group A. Bispectral index scores were significantly higher in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of aminophylline at emergence time led to significant increase in BIS and shortening recovery time from anesthesia.

Impact of aminophylline on the pharmacodynamics of propofol in beagle dogs

This study aimed to characterize pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and aminophylline. Nine beagle dogs were randomly allocated at the propofol rates of 0.75 (group A), 1.00 (group B), and 1.25 (group C) mg/kg/min. During period 1, propofol only was infused, while during period 2, aminophylline only, at the rate of 0.69 (group A), 1.37 (group B), and 2.62 (group C) mg/kg/h. During periods 3-5, the two drugs were co-administered. The aminophylline infusion rate was 0.69 (period 3), 1.37 (period 4), and 2.62 (period 5) mg/kg/h. The aminophylline was infused from 0 to 30 h, and the propofol was infused at 24 h for 20 min. Blood samples and electroencephalograms were obtained at preset intervals. In the linear regression between log-transformed doses of aminophylline and AUC inf, the slope was 0.6976 (95% CI 0.5242-0.8710). Pharmacokinetics of aminophylline was best described by a one-compartment, with enzyme auto-induction, model. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol were best described by a three-compartment model and a sigmoid Emax model, respectively. Pharmacodynamic parameter estimates of propofol were: k(e0) = 0.805/min, E0 = 0.76, Emax = 0.398, Ce(50 na) = 2.38 μg/mL (without aminophylline-exposure), C(e50 wa) = 4.49 μg/mL (with aminophylline-exposure), and γ = 2.21. Propofol becomes less potent when exposed to aminophylline. Pharmacodynamic antagonistic interaction of aminophylline with propofol sedation, may occur, not in a dose-dependent manner, but in an all-or-none response.

Comparison of the recovery and respiratory effects of aminophylline and doxapram following total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of aminophylline and doxapram on recovery, respiration, and bispectral index (BIS) values in patients after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial.

SETTING

Operating room of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

90 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

TIVA was performed with the induction target of remifentanil 3 ng/mL and propofol 6 μg/mL, followed by the maintenance target of remifentanil 1-3 ng/mL and propofol 3-5 μg/mL at the effect site, and with BIS scores in 40-50 range. Patients were randomized to three groups to receive intravenous (IV) aminophylline 3 mg/kg (n = 30), IV doxapram 1 mg/kg (n = 30), or normal IV saline (control; n = 30).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After administration of the study drugs, return to spontaneous ventilation differed significantly among the three groups. The times to eye opening and hand squeezing on verbal command were similar. The time to extubation was shortened in both the doxapram and aminophylline groups (P < 0.05). Tidal volumes were increased in the doxapram group at 5-14 minutes and the aminophylline group at 5-12 minutes (P < 0.05). Respiratory rates were increased at 2 to 8 minutes and then showed a decrease at the 12 to 14-minute mark in both the doxapram and aminophylline groups (P < 0.05). No difference was noted between the two groups. BIS values were increased in both the doxapram and aminophylline groups at 4-10 minutes (P < 0.05). Heart rates were increased in the doxapram group for the first 8 minutes and at 1-2 minutes in the aminophylline group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Aminophylline 3 mg/kg or doxapram 1 mg/kg shortened the time to spontaneous ventilation and improved early recovery from TIVA without appreciable side effects. The more rapid emergence correlates with higher BIS values when compared with the saline control group. The arousal and respiratory effects of aminophylline were comparable to those of doxapram.

Effects of aminophylline on cognitive recovery after sevoflurane anesthesia

PURPOSE

Aminophylline accelerates the recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia. We studied the effects of escalating doses of aminophylline on cognitive and clinical recovery after sevoflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

After ethical approval and informed consent, 150 patients scheduled for elective surgery under sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive saline or 2, 3, 4 or 5 mg/kg of aminophylline (n = 30 for each) at the end of anesthesia (T (0)). Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test (SOMCT) scores, entropy values, end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (EtSevo), times to eyes opening and extubation, respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (TV) were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, patients receiving 2, 3, 4 and 5 mg/kg of aminophylline had higher SOMCT scores [median (25th percentile/75th percentile) 20.6 (19/23), 21.5 (21/22), 24.5 (24-25), 25.5 (25/26), respectively, vs. 13.5 (13/14) at 30 min after extubation, and 24 (22/26), 25 (24/26), 27.5 (27-28), 27.5 (27/28), respectively, vs. 18.5 (18/19) at 45 min after extubation], higher entropy values for the first 10 min after T (0), lower EtSevo for the first 4 min after T (0), shorter times to eyes opening [5 (4.0/6.0), 5 (4.0/6.0), 4 (2.0/5.5), and 4 (2.0/6.0), respectively, vs. 9.8 (8.0/11.0) min], shorter times to extubation, shorter times to home discharge (P < 0.001), and higher RR and larger TV values. Patients who received 4 and 5 mg/kg of aminophylline showed higher SOMCT scores, 6 min shorter times to eyes opening and to extubation, and 58 min shorter times to home discharge.

CONCLUSION

The administration of escalating doses of aminophylline accelerates postoperative cognitive recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia, as measured by the SOMCT, due to increased ventilatory elimination of sevoflurane.

The effect of aminophylline on loss of consciousness, bispectral index, propofol requirement, and minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane in volunteers

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is a soporific neuromodulator; aminophylline, which is clinically used as a bronchodilator, antagonizes the action of adenosine in the central nervous system. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that aminophylline delays loss of consciousness (LOC) and speeds recovery of consciousness (ROC) with propofol anesthesia, and that aminophylline increases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane.

METHODS

In this double-blind crossover study, volunteers were randomized to either aminophylline or saline on different days. Aminophylline 6 mg/kg was given IV, followed by 1.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) throughout the study day. After 1 h of aminophylline or saline administration, propofol 200 mg was given at a rate of 20 mg/min. The bispectral index was continuously monitored, as were times to LOC and ROC. After recovery from propofol, general anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and subsequently maintained with desflurane. The Dixon "up-and-down" method was used to determine MAC in each volunteer after repeated tetanic electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

Eight volunteers completed both study days. Time to LOC was prolonged by aminophylline compared with saline (mean +/- SD) (7.7 +/- 2.03 min vs 5.1 +/- 0.75 s, respectively, P = 0.011). The total propofol dose at LOC was larger with aminophylline (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg/kg, P = 0.01), and the time to ROC was shorter (6.18 +/- 3.96 vs 12.2 +/- 4.73 min, P = 0.035). The minimum bispectral index was greater with aminophylline (51 +/- 15 vs 38 +/- 9, P = 0.034). There was no difference in MAC.

CONCLUSION

Aminophylline decreases the sedative effects of propofol but does not affect MAC of desflurane as determined by tetanic electrical stimulation.