Lessons learnt in the pharmacokinetic analysis of the effect of haemoperfusion for acute overdose with sustained-release diltiazem

Hemoadsorption Therapy for Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose at a Tertiary-level Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To describe the burden of calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose at a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU).

Design and setting

Retrospective study of patients admitted to the ICU with CCB overdose from 2020 to 2022.

Participants

Adult participants with clinically confirmed CCB overdose.

Main outcome

Admission frequency, management strategies, and patient outcomes.

Results

A total of 1719 ICU admissions over the study period, 24 (1.4%) had CCB overdose with a case fatality rate of 12.5% (3/24). Interventions included mechanical ventilation (MV) (71%), vasopressors (92%), high-dose insulin euglycemic therapy (HIET) (71%), calcium (42%), methylene blue (4%), and fluid therapy (100%). Thirteen patients (54%) received hemoadsorption therapy (HA), and eleven received standard of care (SoC) based on current guidelines. The resin hemoadsorption group had a higher SAPS II score (p = 0.002), and a greater total maximal vasopressor dose (p = 0.001) than SoC group. The HA group also had a lower admission mean arterial pressure (MAP), (p = 0.014), a greater MAP increase at 48 hours (p = 0.044), and a longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.004) compared to the SoC group. There was one death in the HA group (7.7%) and two in the SoC group (18.2%).

Conclusion

Calcium channel blocker overdose is an important and life-threatening cause of toxicology admissions in the ICU. Modern resin HA may contribute to improved hemodynamic stability providing a safe and important rescue therapy in cases with refractory shock. Well-designed studies are required to confirm its role in enhancing drug clearance thereby improving the hemodynamic state and clinical outcomes.

How to cite this article

Omar S, Shukla V, Khan AB, Dangor Z. Hemoadsorption Therapy for Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose at a Tertiary-level Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(2):130-136.

Hemoadsorption Therapy for Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Modern resin hemoadsorption/hemoperfusion for calcium channel blocker overdose is yet to be reported. The characteristics of calcium channel blockers make them unamenable to removal by hemodiafiltration or charcoal hemoperfusion; however, elimination, using styrene bead adsorption in an ex vivo model, has been demonstrated. Its clinical use is described.

CASE REPORT

A man in his 20s was admitted with shock into the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) after an overdose of amlodipine and risperidone. Resuscitation and supportive care were administered, but hypotension did not resolve despite the administration of intravenous fluids, infusions of calcium, adrenaline, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic therapy. Methylene blue was then administered to maintain the mean arterial pressures. However, the hemodynamic effect did not allow the weaning of the adrenaline. Drug clearance using hemoadsorption/hemoperfusion was attempted using a styrene resin filter (Jafron HA230; Jafron Biomedical Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China). During the two hemoperfusion sessions (6 h duration each, and 18 h apart) the patient had successfully weaned off all supportive measures, with lactate levels returning to normal and was later discharged home. At the end of each session, significant amlodipine concentrations were detected in blood aspirated from both filters, suggesting enhanced clearance. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Our case illustrates a temporal relationship between resin hemoperfusion therapy, resolution of hemodynamic instability, and shock without proving causation. Significant amlodipine elimination was suggested by high concentrations found in blood from the filter. At the same time, shock resolution after initiation of hemoperfusion occurred in less than one elimination half-life of amlodipine.

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for diltiazem removal: An in vitro study

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) vs continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Diltiazem poisoning was simulated in a central compartment consisting in a 5L dialysis solute spiked with diltiazem at two different toxic concentrations: 750 and 5000 µg/L. For CVVHDF, mean extraction coefficients (EC = (in concentration - out concentration)/in concentration) were concentration-dependent with a decrease all along the dialysis. At the end of the sessions the mean amounts remaining in the central compartment were 8% and 7% of the initial dose at 750 and 5000 µg/L, respectively. The mean cumulative amounts found in the effluent were 60% and 75% of the initial dose, respectively. The missing amounts accounted for 32% and 18% of the initial dose, respectively, corresponding to an adsorption to the dialysis membrane. In contrast, the different compartments of the MARS resulted in undetectable output concentration earlier that the end of the session. The mean concentrations of diltiazem remaining in the central compartment were <1 µg/L at the end of the sessions. Global ECs were around 50% all along the experiment at both concentrations, and the average charcoal cartridge ECs was 80% throughout the experiments.CVVHDF system in the developed model was efficient for diltiazem removal, mainly by diffusion, convection and to a lesser extent by adsorption to the dialysis membrane. In MARS system, resin cartridge and hemodialysis components are ineffective, charcoal cartridge is responsible for almost all drug removal.

Are vasopressors useful in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock?

OBJECTIVE

Overdoses with cardio-depressive medications can result in toxin-induced cardiogenic shock (TICS), a life-threatening condition characterized by severe hypotension and ineffective tissue perfusion. Vasopressors are often employed in the treatment of shock to increase heart rate and blood pressure. We sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of vasopressors in improving hemodynamic function and survival in the treatment of TICS.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, TOXLINE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies evaluating the use of vasopressors in humans or animals with TICS. We limited human study types to randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports.

DATA EXTRACTION

Our search yielded 913 citations and 144 of these met our inclusion criteria. 130 were human case reports and 14 were animal studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Human case report data showed vasopressors were ineffective more often than they were partially or fully effective. In the majority of animal studies, vasopressor treatment failed to improve hemodynamic parameters and resulted in decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Human case reports and controlled animal experiments lead to different conclusions about vasopressors in TICS. Most animal studies indicate that vasopressors impair hemodynamic function and increase mortality. In contrast, human case reports suggest that vasopressors are often ineffective but not necessarily harmful.

Treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Calcium channel blocker poisoning is a common and sometimes life-threatening ingestion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reported effects of treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and hemodynamic parameters. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital, length of stay in intensive care unit, duration of vasopressor use, functional outcomes, and serum calcium channel blocker concentrations.

METHODS

Medline/Ovid, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, TOXLINE, International pharmaceutical abstracts, Google Scholar, and the gray literature up to December 31, 2013 were searched without time restriction to identify all types of studies that examined effects of various treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning for the outcomes of interest. The search strategy included the following Keywords: [calcium channel blockers OR calcium channel antagonist OR calcium channel blocking agent OR (amlodipine or bencyclane or bepridil or cinnarizine or felodipine or fendiline or flunarizine or gallopamil or isradipine or lidoflazine or mibefradil or nicardipine or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or prenylamine or verapamil or diltiazem)] AND [overdose OR medication errors OR poisoning OR intoxication OR toxicity OR adverse effect]. Two reviewers independently selected studies and a group of reviewers abstracted all relevant data using a pilot-tested form. A second group analyzed the risk of bias and overall quality using the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) checklist and the Thomas tool for observational studies, the Institute of Health Economics tool for Quality of Case Series, the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and the modified NRCNA (National Research Council for the National Academies) list for animal studies. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence. Of 15,577 citations identified in the initial search, 216 were selected for analysis, including 117 case reports. The kappa on the quality analysis tools was greater than 0.80 for all study types.

RESULTS

The only observational study in humans examined high-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support. The risk of bias across studies was high for all interventions and moderate to high for extracorporeal life support. High-dose insulin. High-dose insulin (bolus of 1 unit/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5-2.0 units/kg/h) was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and lower mortality, at the risks of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia (low quality of evidence). Extracorporeal life support. Extracorporeal life support was associated with improved survival in patients with severe shock or cardiac arrest at the cost of limb ischemia, thrombosis, and bleeding (low quality of evidence). Calcium, dopamine, and norepinephrine. These agents improved hemodynamic parameters and survival without documented severe side effects (very low quality of evidence). 4-Aminopyridine. Use of 4-aminopyridine was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal studies, at the risk of seizures. Lipid emulsion therapy. Lipid emulsion was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal models of intravenous verapamil poisoning, but not in models of oral verapamil poisoning. Other studies. Studies on decontamination, atropine, glucagon, pacemakers, levosimendan, and plasma exchange reported variable results, and the methodologies used limit their interpretation. No trial was documented in humans poisoned with calcium channel blockers for Bay K8644, CGP 28932, digoxin, cyclodextrin, liposomes, bicarbonate, carnitine, fructose 1,6-diphosphate, PK 11195, or triiodothyronine. Case reports were only found for charcoal hemoperfusion, dialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella device and methylene blue.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning is supported by low-quality evidence drawn from a heterogeneous and heavily biased literature. High-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support were the interventions supported by the strongest evidence, although the evidence is of low quality.

Circulatory Support with Venoarterial ECMO Unsuccessful in Aiding Endogenous Diltiazem Clearance after Overdose

Introduction. In cardiovascular collapse from diltiazem poisoning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may offer circulatory support sufficient to preserve endogenous hepatic drug clearance. Little is known about patient outcomes and diltiazem toxicokinetics in this setting. Case Report. A 36-year-old woman with a history of myocardial bridging syndrome presented with chest pain for which she self-medicated with 2.4 g of sustained release diltiazem over the course of 8 hours. Hemodynamics and mentation were satisfactory on presentation, but precipitously deteriorated after ICU transfer. She was given fluids, calcium, vasopressors, glucagon, high-dose insulin, and lipid emulsion. Due to circulatory collapse and multiorgan failure including ischemic hepatopathy, she underwent transvenous pacing and emergent initiation of venoarterial ECMO. The peak diltiazem level was 13150 ng/mL (normal 100-200 ng/mL) and it remained elevated at 6340 ng/mL at hour 90. Unfortunately, the patient developed multiple complications which resulted in her death on ICU day 9. Conclusion. This case describes the unsuccessful use of ECMO for diltiazem intoxication. Although past reports suggest that support with ECMO may facilitate endogenous diltiazem clearance, it may be dependent on preserved hepatic function at the time of cannulation, a factor not present in this case.

Transmembrane pH-gradient liposomes to treat cardiovascular drug intoxication

Injectable scavenging nanocarriers have been proposed as detoxifying agents when there are no specific antidotes to treat pharmacological overdoses. They act by capturing the drug in situ, thereby restricting distribution in tissues. In the clinic, the only systems used for that purpose are parenteral lipid emulsions, which are relatively inefficient in terms of uptake capacity. In this study, we investigated long-circulating liposomes with a transmembrane pH gradient as treatment for diltiazem intoxication. The unique ion-trapping properties of the vesicles toward ionizable compounds were exploited to sequester the drug in the bloodstream and limit its pharmacological effect. After in vitro optimization of the formulation, the in vivo scavenging properties of the liposomes were demonstrated by examining the drug's pharmacokinetics. The reduced volume of distribution and increased area under the plasma concentration versus time curve in animals treated with liposomes indicated limited tissue distribution. The vesicles exerted a similar but more pronounced effect on deacetyl-diltiazem, the principal active metabolite of the drug. This in vivo uptake of both drug and metabolite altered the overall pharmacological outcome. In rats receiving an intravenous bolus of diltiazem, the liposomes tempered the hypotensive decline and maintained higher average blood pressure for 1 h. The detoxifying action of liposomes was even stronger when the rats received higher doses of the drug via perfusion. In conclusion, the present work provided clear evidence that liposomes with a transmembrane pH gradient are able to change the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diltiazem and its metabolite and confirmed their potential as efficient detoxifying nanocarriers.