Profound hypocalcaemia in a patient being anticoagulated with citrate for continuous renal replacement therapy

Anticoagulation in renal replacement therapies: Why heparin should be abandoned in critical ill patients?

Extracorporeal circuits used in renal replacement therapy (RRT) can develop thrombosis, leading to downtimes and reduced therapy efficiency. To prevent this, anticoagulation is used, but the optimal anticoagulant has not yet been identified. Heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant in RRT, but it has limitations, such as unpredictable pharmacokinetics, nonspecific binding to plasma proteins and cells, and the possibility of suboptimal anticoagulation or bleeding complications, specifically in critically ill patients with acute renal failure who are already at high risk of bleeding. Citrate anticoagulation is a better alternative, being considered a standard for continuous renal replacement therapy, since it is associated with a lower risk of bleeding complications and better efficacy, even in patients with acute renal failure or liver disease. The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of the different strategies of anticoagulation in renal replacement therapies that can be implemented in critical scenarios, focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of each one and the beneficial aspects of using citrate over heparin in critical ill patients.

Regional citrate anticoagulation for RRTs in critically ill patients with AKI

Hemorrhagic complications have been reported in up to 30% of critically ill patients with AKI undergoing RRT with systemic anticoagulation. Because bleeding is associated with significantly increased mortality risk, strategies aimed at reducing hemorrhagic complications while maintaining extracorporeal circulation should be implemented. Among the alternatives to systemic anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation has been shown to prolong circuit life while reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic complications and lowering transfusion needs. For these reasons, the recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury have recommended regional citrate anticoagulation as the preferred anticoagulation modality for continuous RRT in critically ill patients in whom it is not contraindicated. However, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation is still limited because of concerns related to the risk of metabolic complications, the complexity of the proposed protocols, and the need for customized solutions. The introduction of simplified anticoagulation protocols based on citrate and the development of dialysis monitors with integrated infusion systems and dedicated software could lead to the wider use of regional citrate anticoagulation in upcoming years.

Citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy in pediatric critical care

OBJECTIVE

To provide the pediatric intensivist an in-depth understanding of citrate as regional anticoagulant during continuous renal replacement therapy.

DATA SOURCES AND DATA SELECTION

We searched the PubMed.gov database using the initial key words: citrate anticoagulation [title] AND continuous; citrate [title] AND pediatric AND continuous; prospective pediatric renal replacement AND citrate; and regional citrate anticoagulation. Additional searchers were performed using EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS with similar keywords and limits. Further articles were gathered from bibliographic references of relevant studies and reviews. Only articles published in English were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS

In the pediatric population, there are no prospective interventional or randomized studies comparing regional versus systemic anticoagulation. However, there are 11 (retrospective and prospective observational studies) in the pediatric population using citrate anticoagulation. These studies have shown that regional citrate anticoagulation in the pediatric population can be effective, provide equivalent circuit survival, and decrease bleeding compared with heparin anticoagulation. In the adult population, there are six prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation versus heparin. Two systematic reviews with meta-analysis of these six trials have been performed. The adult data on the use of regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy show a decreased risk of bleeding and at the least equivalent circuit survival as compared to heparin. Current pediatric and adult studies support regional citrate anticoagulation as an effective alternative to systemic heparin anticoagulation in most patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous renal replacement therapy is the most common modality of renal replacement in the critical care setting. Regional anticoagulation is an ideal option in a critically ill child after recent surgery or with coagulopathy. Therefore, regional citrate anticoagulation in the pediatric critical care population requiring renal replacement therapy is commonly employed. Complications of citrate anticoagulation can be avoided with a greater understanding of the properties and clearance of citrate. Continued reporting of observational data and the development of prospective multicenter trials using citrate anticoagulation are needed to ensure safe and standardized care in the pediatric population.

Patient factors associated with frequent clotting of dialysers during haemodiafiltration in critically ill patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled study

Continuous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is the main form of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury. Clotting of the dialysers during CVVHDF is frequent, because most patients with acute kidney injury have an increased risk of bleeding and cannot be systemically anticoagulated. Using data from a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of CVVHDF by placing the dialysis catheter tip at the right atrium or superior vena cava, this study assessed the patient factors associated with an increased risk of frequent clotting of the dialysers-defined by >1 dialysers clotted per day of CVVHDF. Of the 94 patients included in this study, a higher body mass index, a higher platelet count and a lower International Normalized Ratio were associated with an increased risk of frequent clotting of dialysers in the univariate analyses. Use of aspirin or clopidogrel, causes of acute kidney injury and daily dose of unfractionated heparin used were not significantly associated with the risk of frequent clotting of dialysers. In the multivariate parsimony model, only a high body mass index (odds ratio 1.06 per point increment, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.13; P=0.036) and a high platelet count (odds ratio 1.84 per 100x10(9)/l increment, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.91; P=0.009), both in a relatively linear fashion, were independently associated with an increased risk of frequent clotting of dialysers. Optimising the position of the tip of the dialysis catheter may be particularly important for patients with a high body mass index and platelet count in order to reduce frequent clotting of dialysers during CVVHDF.