Cefpiramide kinetics and plasma protein binding in cholestasis

An Overview of the Protein Binding of Cephalosporins in Human Body Fluids: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Protein binding can diminish the pharmacological effect of beta-lactam antibiotics. Only the free fraction has an antibacterial effect. The aim of this systematic literature review was to give an overview of the current knowledge of protein binding of cephalosporins in human body fluids as well as to describe patient characteristics influencing the level of protein binding.

Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the following search terms: “protein binding,” “beta-lactam antibiotic,” and “body fluid.” Only studies were included where protein binding was measured in humans in vivo.

Results: The majority of studies reporting protein binding were performed in serum or plasma. Other fluids included pericardial fluid, blister fluid, bronchial secretion, pleural exudate, wound exudate, cerebrospinal fluid, dialysate, and peritoneal fluid. Protein binding differs between diverse cephalosporins and between different patient categories. For cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefpiramide, and cefonicid a non-linear pattern in protein binding in serum or plasma was described. Several patient characteristics were associated with low serum albumin concentrations and were found to have lower protein binding compared to healthy volunteers. This was for critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery. While mean/median percentages of protein binding are lower in these patient groups, individual values may vary considerably. Age is not likely to influence protein binding by itself, however limited data suggest that lower protein binding in newborns. Obesity was not correlated with altered protein binding.

Discussion/Conclusion: Conclusions on protein binding in other body fluids than blood cannot be drawn due to the scarcity of data. In serum and plasma, there is a large variability in protein binding per cephalosporin and between different categories of patients. Several characteristics were identified which lead to a lower protein binding. The finding that some of the cephalosporins display a non-linear pattern of protein binding makes it even more difficult to predict the unbound concentrations in individual patients. Taken all these factors, it is recommended to measure unbound concentrations to optimize antibiotic exposure in individual patients.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021252776).

Quantitation of plasma and biliary cefpiramide concentrations in human samples using high-performance liquid chromatography

Cefpiramide is frequently used to treat biliary infections. However, no bioanalytical method has been validated to quantitate cefpiramide in human samples, particularly in bile. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop a simple, selective and validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method to determine cefpiramide in human plasma and bile. A protein precipitation procedure was used to extract cefpiramide and cefoperazone (internal standard, IS) from 200 μl of plasma and bile. Utilizing a Capcell Pak C₁₈ column (4.6 × 250 mm), cefpiramide and IS were separated using the timed-gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1 m sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with photodiode array detector (wavelength set at 273 nm). The calibration curves showed linearity at concentrations ranging from 1 to 150 μg/ml in both plasma and bile (r²  > 0.999). The within- and between-run coefficients of variation (CVs) for plasma samples were 0.570-4.43 and 1.10-2.76%, respectively; for bile samples, the within- and between-day precision (CV) was 0.814-6.34 and 2.05-4.00%, respectively. Our newly developed bioanalytical method was successfully employed to quantify cefpiramide concentrations in both plasma and bile at multiple time points in patients with acute cholangitis.

The organ extraction and splanchnic haemodynamic effects of octreotide in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Intravenous octreotide is an established treatment of oesophageal variceal haemorrhage in the cirrhotic patient.

AIM

To examine the organ extraction and splanchnic haemodynamic effects of octreotide in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with cirrhosis had hepatic venous catheterization performed. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), indocyanine green (ICG) clearance and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were determined in the basal state and during 60 min of octreotide infusion by bolus injection (0.75 microg/kg) followed by continuous infusion of 0.75 microg/kg x h. Blood samples were simultaneously drawn from the femoral artery and the hepatic and renal veins.

RESULTS

The extraction fraction of octreotide in the liver was 0.05 (-0.01 - 0.14) (median (interquartile range)) and in the kidneys 0.16 (-0.06 - 0.35). The extraction fraction ratio (E(liver)/E(kidney)) was 0.69 (-0.20 - 1.06). Hepatic clearance was 47 mL/min (3-88) (n = 11). No correlations were found between liver biochemistry or galactose elimination capacity (GEC; a metabolic measure of liver function) and renal extraction fraction or liver clearance. Octreotide had no effect on HVPG or wedged hepatic venous pressure although free hepatic venous pressure increased during octreotide infusion: 6 mmHg (5-9) vs. 7 mmHg (6-10) (P = 0.02). No effect on HBF was observed while ICG clearance decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide is extracted in cirrhotic patients by both the liver and the kidney, the latter being the most important organ of elimination. Octreotide decreases liver metabolic activity determined by the ICG clearance technique, but no significant effects of octreotide on HVPG or HBF could be demonstrated.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in patients with liver disease. An update

The effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are highly variable, and difficult to predict as the mechanisms of these effects are not well understood. Since the majority of the published literature is concerned with cirrhotic liver disease, this review also focuses mainly on this area. Four different theories have been proposed to account for the effects of chronic liver disease with cirrhosis on hepatic drug elimination: the sick cell theory; the intact hepatocyte theory; the impaired drug uptake theory; and the oxygen limitation theory. While some data in support of each of the first 2 theories have been published recently, a large amount of clinical data would appear to refute both of these theories. These clinical data are substantially consistent with the latter 2 theories, which regard the decreased permeability of the capillarised sinusoid as the critical feature in cirrhosis. Further work is required to determine the applicability of each of these theories. In cirrhosis, drug glucuronidation is spared relative to oxidative drug metabolism; however, in advanced cirrhosis this pathway may also be impaired substantially. There is evidence that in cirrhosis other conjugation pathways may also be impaired to variable degrees. Growing evidence suggests that biliary drug excretion is impaired in cirrhosis. Recent studies with several racemic drugs indicate that the disease can have different effects on the hepatic elimination of individual enantiomers, which may lead to a change in the concentration-response relationships of racemic drugs in cirrhosis. A major finding which has emerged in recent years is that, even with moderate degrees of hepatic impairment, there is a decrease in clearance of drugs or active metabolites normally cleared by the kidney. The effect on renal clearance of unbound drug may be masked if there is a concomitant decrease in plasma protein binding of the drug. Neither serum creatinine levels nor creatinine clearance are useful markers of the renal dysfunction associated with cirrhosis. Both may greatly overestimate renal function in patients with cirrhosis due to increased fractional renal tubular secretion of creatinine. Altered receptor sensitivity has been observed with some drugs in cirrhosis, while for other drugs there is no change in pharmacodynamics. Precise determination of drug dosage in cirrhosis requires information on changes in pharmacodynamics and plasma protein binding in addition to changes in drug elimination. Pharmacokinetic investigations in a variety of chronic liver diseases without cirrhosis (e.g. carcinoma, schistosomiasis and viral hepatitis) suggest that in the absence of cirrhosis, impairment of drug elimination is not sufficient to warrant reduction of drug dosage. However, if cirrhosis is present, 'safe' drug use requires an awareness of the possibility of multiple interactions between changes in hepatic and renal disposition and pharmacodynamics. In chronic liver disease with cirrhosis, dosage reduction is the general rule regardless of the route of elimination of drug or metabolite.