Meloxicam pharmacokinetics in renal impairment

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of meloxicam in different CYP2C9 genotypes

Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP3A4 are major and minor enzymes involved in the metabolism of meloxicam. Impaired enzyme activity of CYP2C9 variants increases the plasma exposures of meloxicam and the risk of adverse events. The objective of our study is to develop and validate the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of meloxicam related to CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism using the PK-Sim^® software. In vitro k_cat of CYP2C9 was optimized in different CYP2C9 genotypes. The demographic and pharmacokinetic dataset for the development of the PBPK model was extracted from two previous clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Thirty-one clinical datasets, representing different dose regimens and demographic characteristics, were utilized to validate the PBPK model. The shapes of simulated plasma concentration-time profiles in each CYP2C9 genotype were visually similar to observed profiles. The predicted exposures (AUC_inf) of meloxicam in CYP2C9*1/*3, CYP2C9*1/*13, and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes were increased by 1.77-, 2.91-, and 8.35-fold compared to CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype, respectively. In all datasets for the development and validations, fold errors between predicted and observed pharmacokinetic parameters were within the two-fold error criteria. As a result, the PBPK model was appropriately established and properly described the pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in different CYP2C9 genotypes. This study is expected to contribute to reducing the risk of adverse events of meloxicam through optimization of meloxicam dosing in different CYP2C9 genotypes.

Relative risk of end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis in treated ankylosing spondylitis patients compared with individuals without ankylosing spondylitis: A nationwide, population-based, matched-cohort study

Objective

To examine the relative risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis among treated ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients compared with non-AS individuals.

Methods

We used claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database obtained between 2003 and 2012, and enrolled 37,070 newly treated AS patients and randomly selected 370,700 non-AS individuals matched (1:10) for age, sex and year of index date. Those with a history of chronic renal failure or dialysis were excluded. After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, IgA nephropathy, frequency of serum creatinine examinations, use of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, ciclosporis, corticosteroid, aminoglycoside, amphotericin B, cisplatin, contrast agents and annual cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of traditional NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2i) and preferential COX-2i, we calculated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals using the Cox proportional hazard model to quantify the risk of ESRD in AS patients. We re-selected 6621 AS patients and 6621 non-AS subjects by further matching (1:1) for cDDDs of three groups of NSAIDs to re-estimate the aHRs for ESRD.

Results

Fifty-one (0.14%) of the 37,070 AS patients and 1417 (0.38%) of the non-AS individuals developed ESRD after a follow-up of 158,846 and 1,707,757 person-years, respectively. The aHR for ESRD was 0.59 (0.42–0.81) in AS patients compared with non-AS individuals. However, after further matching for cDDD of NSAIDs, the aHR of ESRD was 1.02 (0.41–2.53). Significant risk factors included hypertension, IgA nephropathy and use of COX-2i.

Conclusions

The risk of ESRD was not significantly different between treated AS patients and non-AS individuals matched for age, sex, year of index date and dose of NSAID.

Intravenous meloxicam for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain: a pooled analysis of safety and opioid-reducing effects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the safety and tolerability of intravenous meloxicam compared with placebo across all phase II/III clinical trials.

METHODS

Safety data and opioid use from subjects with moderate to severe postoperative pain who received ≥1 dose of intravenous meloxicam (5-60 mg) or placebo in 1 of 7 studies (4 phase II; 3 phase III) were pooled. Data from intravenous meloxicam 5 mg, 7.5 mg and 15 mg groups were combined (low-dose subset).

RESULTS

A total of 1426 adults (86.6% white; mean age: 45.8 years) received ≥1 dose of meloxicam IV; 517 (77.6% white; mean age: 46.7 years) received placebo. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in intravenous meloxicam and placebo-treated subjects was 47% and 57%, respectively. The most commonly reported TEAEs across treatment groups (intravenous meloxicam 5-15 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg and placebo, respectively) were nausea (4.3%, 20.8%, 5.8% and 25.3%), headache (1.5%, 5.6%, 1.6% and 10.4%), vomiting (2.8%, 4.6%, 1.6% and 7.4%) and dizziness (0%, 3.5%, 1.1% and 4.8%). TEAE incidence was generally similar in subjects aged >65 years with impaired renal function and the general population. Similar rates of cardiovascular events were reported between treatment groups. One death was reported (placebo group; unrelated to study drug). There were 35 serious adverse events (SAEs); intravenous meloxicam 15 mg (n=5), intravenous meloxicam 30 mg (n=15) and placebo (n=15). The SAEs in meloxicam-treated subjects were determined to be unrelated to study medication. Six subjects withdrew due to TEAEs, including three treated with intravenous meloxicam (rash, localized edema and postprocedural pulmonary embolism). In trials where opioid use was monitored, meloxicam reduced postoperative rescue opioid use.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous meloxicam was generally well tolerated in subjects with moderate to severe postoperative pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT01436032, NCT00945763, NCT01084161, NCT02540265, NCT02678286, NCT02675907 and NCT02720692.

Meloxicam in the management of post-operative pain: Narrative review

Oral formulations of meloxicam, a preferential cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, have long been used to treat osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, as well as various pain syndromes of skeletomuscular origin (e.g., low back pain). However, these preparations are rarely indicated for the treatment of acute pain due to a poor dissolution rate and consequently a slow onset of action. The recent introduction of an intravenous (IV) NanoCrystal Colloidal Dispersion formulation opens up the possibility of using this drug during the perioperative period. The present review summarizes the pharmacologic properties of meloxicam, including its pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, and tolerability. In addition, we critically examined a number of recently completed clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of meloxicam IV in the treatment of post-operative pain. Literature retrieval was performed through PubMed and Medline (through March 2018) using combinations of the terms meloxicam, acute pain, and pharmacology. In addition, bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was requested from the company developing the drug. Clinical trials suggest that single IV doses of 30 mg meloxicam significantly reduce post-operative pain as well as opioid requirements. We conclude that meloxicam IV is an effective and well-tolerated analgesic agent for the management of moderate to severe post-operative pain.

Retrospective Case—Control Study of the Effects of Long-Term Dosing with Meloxicam on Renal Function in Aged Cats with Degenerative Joint Disease

Medical records (2005–2009) of a feline-only practice were searched for cats with degenerative joint disease (DJD) treated using meloxicam. DJD was diagnosed by the presence of at least two of the following: (i) altered mobility (observed by the owner), (ii) abnormal physical findings, (iii) characteristic radiographic changes. The primary study cohort consisted of cats older than 7 years that had received meloxicam for variable intervals in excess of 6 months, and for which complete records were available. These cats were subdivided according to whether detectable chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present (‘renal group’), or not (‘non-renal group’), and, for the ‘renal group’, according to the cat's IRIS category. Serum biochemistry, urinalysis (including urine specific gravity [USG]), body mass and condition score were monitored regularly. Progression of CKD in the ‘renal group’ and ‘non-renal group’ of cats was compared to two groups of age- and IRIS-matched control cats not receiving meloxicam (from the same clinic, over the same time period). The study was thus a case—control design, with two study groups. Thirty-eight cats with DJD receiving long-term meloxicam therapy met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 22 cats had stable CKD at the start of treatment (stage 1, eight cats; stage 2, 13 cats; stage 3, one cat). No cats initially had an elevated urinary protein to creatinine ratio. The remaining 16 cats initially had normal renal analytes and adequately concentrated urine. The median age of the ‘renal’ and ‘non-renal’ meloxicam groups was 15.5 and 13.4 years, respectively. The median treatment duration was 467 days in the ‘renal group’ and 327 days in the ‘non-renal group’. After titration (to the lowest effective dose), the median maintenance dose was 0.02 mg/kg/day in both groups (range 0.015–0.033 mg/kg/day). There was no difference in sequential serum creatinine concentration or USG measurements between the ‘non-renal group’ treated with meloxicam compared to control cats not treated with meloxicam. There was less progression of renal disease in the ‘renal group’ treated with meloxicam compared to the age- and IRIS-matched cats with CKD not given meloxicam. These results suggest that a long-term maintenance dose of 0.02 mg/kg of meloxicam can be safely administered to cats older than 7 years even if they have CKD, provided their overall clinical status is stable. Long-term meloxicam therapy may slow the progression of renal disease in some cats suffering from both CKD and DJD. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Meloxicam: a reappraisal of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety

The discovery of two distinct isoenzymes of COX has led to the development and clinical introduction of COX-2 inhibitors with increased selectivity onto the market. Meloxicam is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the oxicam class, and is a preferential inhibitor of COX-2, demonstrating effectiveness with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic activity. Meloxicam is therapeutically utilised in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Trials have examined the risk of gastrointestinal ulceration of meloxicam when compared with traditional non-specific COX-inhibiting NSAIDs with mixed results; meloxicam seems to have a greater gastrointestinal risk than the highly specific COX-2 NSAIDs. Meloxicam has a plasma half-life of approximately 20 h and is convenient for once daily administration. Neither moderate renal nor hepatic insufficiency significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in short-term studies. Furthermore, dose adjustment is not required in the elderly. Recent drug-drug interaction studies have demonstrated that meloxicam interacts with some medications, including cholestyramine, lithium and some inhibitors of cytochrome P450 -2C9 and -3A4. Consequently, increased clinical vigilance should be maintained when coprescribing some medications with meloxicam. Concentration-dependent therapeutic and toxicological effects have yet to be extensively elucidated for meloxicam. Long-term safety in various organ systems, especially in the heart and vascular system and with concomitant drug administration, remains to be proven. The pharmacokinetics of meloxicam enables once daily application, which increases compliance compared with some shorter acting NSAIDs; however, long-term clinical data clearly demonstrating safety and efficacy advantages are lacking.

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of meloxicam tablets (promotion® and mobicox®): pharmacokinetics in a healthy female Mexican population

We conducted a randomized, crossover study in 23 healthy young female volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two brands of meloxicam (7.5 mg) tablets and to obtain pharmacokinetic parameters of this molecule in Mexican population not reported previously. Two tablets (15 mg) were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 1-week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 72 h. Plasma harvested was analyzed for meloxicam by a modified and validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method previously reported. Pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-alpha), C(max), T(max), k(e), MRT and t(1/2) were determined from plasma concentrations of both formulations, resulting in a C(max) 120% larger than and a T(max) 65% faster than those reported in other populations. AUC(0-t), AUC(0-alpha), and C(max) were statistically tested for bioequivalence after log transformation data in a non-balanced design, and no significant differences were found either in 90% classical confidence interval (90% CI) or in Schuirmann test (p < 0.05); thus, we concluded that bioequivalence existed between both formulations.

Meloxicam

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary® Monograph Service receive five to six researched monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. The monographs are published in printed form and on diskettes that allow customization. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board called The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X). All topics pertinent to clinical pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The July 2000 Formulary monographs are linezolid, insulin glargine, rivastigmine, pemirolast, and tacrolimus ointment. The DUE is on linezolid.