Repeated dosing with donepezil does not affect the safety, tolerability or pharmacokinetics of single-dose thioridazine in young volunteers

A systematic and prospectively validated approach for identifying synergistic drug combinations against malaria

Background

Nearly half of the world’s population (3.2 billion people) were at risk of malaria in 2015, and resistance to current therapies is a major concern. While the standard of care includes drug combinations, there is a pressing need to identify new combinations that can bypass current resistance mechanisms. In the work presented here, a combined transcriptional drug repositioning/discovery and machine learning approach is proposed.

Methods

The integrated approach utilizes gene expression data from patient-derived samples, in combination with large-scale anti-malarial combination screening data, to predict synergistic compound combinations for three Plasmodium falciparum strains (3D7, DD2 and HB3). Both single compounds and combinations predicted to be active were prospectively tested in experiment.

Results

One of the predicted single agents, apicidin, was active with the AC50 values of 74.9, 84.1 and 74.9 nM in 3D7, DD2 and HB3 P. falciparum strains while its maximal safe plasma concentration in human is 547.6 ± 136.6 nM. Apicidin at the safe dose of 500 nM kills on average 97% of the parasite. The synergy prediction algorithm exhibited overall precision and recall of 83.5 and 65.1% for mild-to-strong, 48.8 and 75.5% for moderate-to-strong and 12.0 and 62.7% for strong synergies. Some of the prospectively predicted combinations, such as tacrolimus-hydroxyzine and raloxifene-thioridazine, exhibited significant synergy across the three P. falciparum strains included in the study.

Conclusions

Systematic approaches can play an important role in accelerating discovering novel combinational therapies for malaria as it enables selecting novel synergistic compound pairs in a more informed and cost-effective manner.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2294-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Dynamic imaging of adaptive stress response pathway activation for prediction of drug induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury remains a concern during drug treatment and development. There is an urgent need for improved mechanistic understanding and prediction of DILI liabilities using in vitro approaches. We have established and characterized a panel of liver cell models containing mechanism-based fluorescent protein toxicity pathway reporters to quantitatively assess the dynamics of cellular stress response pathway activation at the single cell level using automated live cell imaging. We have systematically evaluated the application of four key adaptive stress pathway reporters for the prediction of DILI liability: SRXN1-GFP (oxidative stress), CHOP-GFP (ER stress/UPR response), p21 (p53-mediated DNA damage-related response) and ICAM1 (NF-κB-mediated inflammatory signaling). 118 FDA-labeled drugs in five human exposure relevant concentrations were evaluated for reporter activation using live cell confocal imaging. Quantitative data analysis revealed activation of single or multiple reporters by most drugs in a concentration and time dependent manner. Hierarchical clustering of time course dynamics and refined single cell analysis allowed the allusion of key events in DILI liability. Concentration response modeling was performed to calculate benchmark concentrations (BMCs). Extracted temporal dynamic parameters and BMCs were used to assess the predictive power of sub-lethal adaptive stress pathway activation. Although cellular adaptive responses were activated by non-DILI and severe-DILI compounds alike, dynamic behavior and lower BMCs of pathway activation were sufficiently distinct between these compound classes. The high-level detailed temporal- and concentration-dependent evaluation of the dynamics of adaptive stress pathway activation adds to the overall understanding and prediction of drug-induced liver liabilities.

Whole-Body Distribution of Donepezil as an Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor after Oral Administration in Normal Human Subjects: A 11C-donepezil PET Study

Objective(s):

It is difficult to investigate the whole-body distribution of an orally administered drug by means of positron emission tomography (PET), owing to the short physical half-life of radionuclides, especially when ¹¹C-labeled compounds are tested. Therefore, we aimed to examine the whole-body distribution of donepezil (DNP) as an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor by means of ¹¹C-DNP PET imaging, combined with the oral administration of pharmacological doses of DNP.

Methods:

We studied 14 healthy volunteers, divided into group A (n=4) and group B (n=10). At first, we studied four females (mean age: 57.3±4.5 y), three of whom underwent ¹¹C-DNP PET scan at 2.5 h after the oral administration of 1 mg and 30 µg of DNP, respectively, while one patient was scanned following the oral administration of 30 µg of DNP (group A). Then, we studied five females and five males (48.3±6.1 y), who underwent ¹¹C-DNP PET scan, without the oral administration of DNP (group B). Plasma DNP concentration upon scanning was measured by tandem mass spectrometry. Arterialized venous blood samples were collected periodically to measure plasma radioactivity and metabolites. In group A, ¹¹C-DNP PET scan of the brain and whole body continued for 60 and 20 min, respectively. Subjects in group B underwent sequential whole-body scan for 60 min. The regional uptake of ¹¹C-DNP was analyzed by measuring the standard uptake value (SUV) through setting regions of interest on major organs with reference CT.

Results:

In group A, plasma DNP concentration was significantly correlated with the orally administered dose of DNP. The mean plasma concentration was 2.00 nM (n=3) after 1 mg oral administration and 0.06 nM (n=4) after 30 µg oral administration. No significant difference in plasma radioactivity or fraction of metabolites was found between groups A and B. High ¹¹C-DNP accumulation was found in the liver, stomach, pancreas, brain, salivary glands, bone marrow, and myocardium in groups A and B, in this order. No significant difference in SUV value was found among ¹¹C-DNP PET studies after the oral administration of 1 mg of DNP, 30 µg of DNP, or no DNP.

Conclusion:

The present study demonstrated that the whole-body distribution of DNP after the oral administration of pharmacological doses could be evaluated by ¹¹C-DNP PET studies, combined with the oral administration of DNP.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Donepezil is a highly selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and one of the only four drugs currently approved for treatment of Alzheimer's dementia. Providing high bioavailability and a very long half-time, donepezil is regarded as effective and well tolerable in Alzheimer's disease patients, even in difficult clinical conditions such as hepatic or renal impairment. It moderately improves cognitive and global functioning scores in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease over the course of 6 - 12 months, with open-label extension studies suggesting effects of even longer duration.

AREAS COVERED

We summarized relevant pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, clinical trial and neuroimaging data of donepezil. A literature search was performed in the PubMed database; articles published until October 2013 have been considered for this review. Moreover, references from original work and reviews have been searched for further relevant literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Donepezil is one of the most frequently prescribed anti-dementia drugs. The recent additional approval of the 23 mg formulation will expand its use in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. After numerous Phase III study failures of novel disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease, donepezil is likely going to stay a first-line therapeutic option in Alzheimer's disease in the upcoming years.

Donepezil in Alzheimer's disease: From conventional trials to pharmacogenetics

Donepezil is the leading compound for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in more than 50 countries. As compared with other conventional acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), donepezil is a highly selective and reversible piperidine derivative with AChEI activity that exhibits the best pharmacological profile in terms of cognitive improvement, responders rate (40%-58%), dropout cases (5%-13%), and side-effects (6%-13%) in AD. Although donepezil represents a non cost-effective treatment, most studies convey that this drug can provide a modest benefit on cognition, behavior, and activities of the daily living in both moderate and severe AD, contributing to slow down disease progression and, to a lesser exetnt, to delay institutionalization. Patients with vascular dementia might also benefit from donepezil in a similar fashion to AD patients. Some potential effects of donepezil on the AD brain, leading to reduced cortico-hippocampal atrophy, include the following: AChE inhibition, enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission and putative modulation of other neurotransmitter systems, protection against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, activation of neurotrophic mechanisms, promotion of non-amyloidodgenic pathways for APP processing, and indirect effects on cerebrovascular function improving brain perfusion. Recent studies demonstrate that the therapeutic response in AD is genotype-specific. Donepezil is metabolized via CYP-related enzymes, especially CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP1A2. Approximately, 15%-20% of the AD population may exhibit an abnormal metabolism of AChEIs; about 50% of this population cluster would show an ultrarapid metabolism, requiring higher doses of AChEIs to reach a therapeutic threshold, whereas the other 50% of the cluster would exhibit a poor metabolism, displaying potential adverse events at low doses. In AD patients treated with a multifactorial therapy, including donepezil, the best responders are the CYP2D6-related extensive (EM)(*1/*1, *1/*10) (57.47%) and intermediate metabolizers (IM)(*1/*3, *1/*5, *1/*6, *7/*10) (25.29%), and the worst responders are the poor (PM) (*4/*4)(9.20%) and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM) (*1xN/*1) (8.04%). Pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic factors may account for 75%-85% of the therapeutic response in AD patients treated with donepezil and other AChEIs metabolized via enzymes of the CYP family. The implementation of pharmacogenetic protocols can optimize AD therapeutics.