Paracetamol: a haemorrhagic risk factor in patients on warfarin

COVID-19 Medical and Pharmacological Management in the European Countries Compared to Italy: An Overview

(1) Background: Italy accounts for more than 150,000 deaths due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading the top rank in SARS-CoV-2-caused deceases in Europe. A survey on the different ways by which the COVID-19 pandemic emergency was managed in the foreign European countries compared to Italy is the purpose of this paper. (2) Methods: A literature search and various mathematical algorithms to approach a rank scoring scale were used to describe in detail the different approaches used by European countries to manage the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. (3) Results: The study showed that Italy stands at the bottom ranking for COVID-19 management due to its high mortality rate. Possible causes of the observed huge numbers of hospitalization and deaths were (a) the demographic composition of the European country; (b) its decentralized healthcare system organization; (c) the role of correct pharmacology in the early stages before hospitalization. Post-mortem examinations were of paramount importance to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of COVID-19 and to tailor a suitable and proper therapy in the early symptomatic stages of COVID-19, preventing hospitalization. (4) Conclusions: Factors such as the significant impact on elderly people, the public health organization prevalently state-owned and represented mainly by hospitals, and criticism of the home therapy approach toward SARS-CoV-2-infected people, may have concurred in increasing the number of COVID-19 deaths in Italy.

Risk of bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in patients exposed to antithrombotic therapy: a case-crossover study

Concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) and antithrombotic drug use is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, mainly gastrointestinal. The goal of this study was to quantify the transient increase in the risk of hospitalization for bleeding associated with NSAID use in patients treated with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants. We performed an unidirectional case-crossover study using the EGB (Échantillon généraliste de bénéficiaires), a permanent random sample of the French nationwide health database. Patients receiving antithrombotic therapy and hospitalized for bleeding between 2009 and 2017 were included. We compared their NSAID exposure during a 15-day hazard window immediately prior to hospital admission to three earlier 15-day control windows. The risk of hospitalization for bleeding associated with the recent use of NSAIDs was estimated using conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios. During the study period, 33 patients treated with anticoagulants and 253 treated with antiplatelet agents received NSAIDs and were included in the case-crossover analysis. We found an increased risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding after exposure to NSAIDs with an adjusted OR of 3.59 (95%CI, 1.58;8.17) in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy and 1.44 (95%CI, 1.07;1.94) in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The risk of non-gastrointestinal bleeding was also increased after exposure to NSAIDs with an adjusted OR of 2.72 (95%CI, 1.23;6.04) in patients exposed to anticoagulant therapy. The risk of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal bleeding increases after NSAID use in patients treated with anticoagulants, while the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding increases, but to a lesser extent in those treated with antiplatelets. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion: Who will develop coagulopathy?

Introduction:

Development of coagulopathy after anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion varies among patients. This study aimed to identify factors that were associated with coagulopathy after anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted in the Hong Kong Poison Information Centre. All patients who reported rodenticide exposure and presented to the Accident and Emergency Department from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019 were recruited. Coagulopathy was defined as International Normalized Ratio of 1.3 or above.

Results:

One hundred sixty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 44 years old. Forty-nine patients developed coagulopathy (International Normalized Ratio ⩾1.3). Univariate analysis (at p < 0.05) showed that age (p = 0.003), ingestion of first-generation anticoagulant rodenticide (p = 0.017), ingestion of more than one pack (p < 0.001), intentional ingestion (p = 0.002), hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.001), elevated alanine aminotransferase level (p = 0.041) and abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.005) on presentation, and co-ingestion with paracetamol (p = 0.018) were associated with coagulopathy after anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion. Among these, ingestion of more than one pack (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 19.8; 95% confidence interval = 6.78–65.7), ingestion of first-generation anticoagulant rodenticide (p = 0.006; odds ratio = 5.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.96–15.2), hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.001; odds ratio = 22.4; 95% confidence interval = 6.17–99.0) and elevated alanine aminotransferase level on presentation (p = 0.039; odds ratio = 7.11; 95% confidence interval = 1.58–33.1) were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusion:

Ingestion of more than one pack and ingestion of first-generation anticoagulant rodenticides were significantly associated with the development of coagulopathy after anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion. Patients who developed hypoalbuminemia or elevated alanine aminotransferase level as a result of anticoagulant rodenticide ingestion were also significantly associated with the development of coagulopathy.

Comparison of Prothrombin Time and Aspartate Aminotransferase in Predicting Hepatotoxicity After Acetaminophen Overdose

Despite decades of experience with acetaminophen (APAP) overdoses, it remains unclear whether elevated hepatic transaminases or coagulopathy develop first. Furthermore, comparison of the predictive value of these two variables in determining hepatic toxicity following APAP overdoses has been poorly elucidated. The primary objective of this study is to determine the test characteristics of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and the prothrombin time (PT) in patients with APAP toxicity. A retrospective chart review of APAP overdoses treated with IV N-acetylcysteine at a tertiary care referral center was performed. Of the 304 subjects included in the study, 246 with an initial AST less than 1000 were analyzed to determine predictors of hepatic injury, defined as an AST exceeding 1000 IU/L. The initial AST >50 was 79.5 % sensitive and 82.6 % specific for predicting hepatic injury. The corresponding negative and positive predictive values were 95.5 and 46.3 %, respectively. In contrast, an initial abnormal PT had a sensitivity of 82.1 % and a specificity of 63.6 %. The negative and positive predictive values for initial PT were 94.9 and 30.2 %, respectively. Although the two tests performed similarly for predicting a composite endpoint of death or liver transplant, neither was a useful predictor. Initial AST performed better than the initial PT for predicting hepatic injury in this series of patients with APAP overdose.

Adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with over-the-counter NSAIDs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen have a long history of safe and effective use as both prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics/antipyretics. The mechanism of action of all NSAIDs is through reversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including gastrointestinal bleeding as well as cardiovascular and renal effects have been reported with NSAID use. In many cases, ADRs may occur because of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the NSAID and a concomitant medication. For example, DDIs have been reported when NSAIDs are coadministered with aspirin, alcohol, some antihypertensives, antidepressants, and other commonly used medications. Because of the pharmacologic nature of these interactions, there is a continuum of risk in that the potential for an ADR is dependent on total drug exposure. Therefore, consideration of dose and duration of NSAID use, as well as the type or class of comedication administered, is important when assessing potential risk for ADRs. Safety findings from clinical studies evaluating prescription-strength NSAIDs may not be directly applicable to OTC dosing. Health care providers can be instrumental in educating patients that using OTC NSAIDs at the lowest effective dose for the shortest required duration is vital to balancing efficacy and safety. This review discusses some of the most clinically relevant DDIs reported with NSAIDs based on major sites of ADRs and classes of medication, with a focus on OTC ibuprofen, for which the most data are available.

Delayed bleeding and pelvic haematoma after low-energy osteoporotic pubic rami fracture in a warfarin patient: an unusual cause of abdominal pain

Introduction. Acute abdominal pain may be the presenting symptom in a wide range of diseases in the elderly. Acute abdominal pain related to a delayed bleeding and pelvic haematoma after a low-energy pubic rami fracture is rare and can have important consequences; to the best of our knowledge, only one case has been previously described. Case Report. We present an unusual case of an 83-year-old woman taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation, admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) with acute abdominal pain and progressive anemia related to a delayed bleeding and pelvic haematoma 72 hours after a low-energy osteoporotic pubic rami fracture. Warfarin was withheld, anticoagulation was reversed by using fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K, and concentrated red blood cells were given. Haemoglobin level gradually returned to normal with a progressive resorption of the haematoma. Conclusion. Delayed bleeding and pelvic haematoma after osteoporotic pubic rami fracture should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in the elderly. This case indicates the need for hospital admission, careful haemodynamic monitoring, and early identification of bleeding in patients with "benign" osteoporotic pubic rami fracture, especially those receiving anticoagulants, to provide an adequate management and prevent severe complications.

The impact of interacting drugs on dispensed doses of warfarin in the Swedish population: A novel use of population based drug registers

To investigate the impact of interacting drugs on the dispensed doses of warfarin in the Swedish population. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional population based register study of patients being dispensed warfarin. Warfarin doses were estimated in different age groups, in men and women, and in patients using interacting drugs. The influence of interacting drugs on the dispensed warfarin dose was analyzed using multiple regression. All 143,729 patients dispensed warfarin were analyzed. The dispensed dose of warfarin was highest in patients 30-39 years old and decreased with age. Co-medication with carbamazepine, simvastatin, paracetamol, amiodarone, fluconazole, lactulose, or bezafibrate was associated with significant changes in dispensed warfarin doses, by +40%, -3.4%, -7.3%, -8.2%, -8.8%, -9.0%, and -9.7%, respectively. After adjustment for age and gender, sulfamethoxazole was also found to significantly alter the dispensed warfarin dose (-6.1%). We provide new support for the previous scarce evidence of interactions between warfarin and carbamazepine, bezafibrate, and lactulose. Initiation or discontinuation of bezafibrate or lactulose in a patient on warfarin should warrant close clinical monitoring. The marked increased warfarin requirement associated with carbamazepine use supports moving from a more conservative reactive towards a proactive strategy including preventive warfarin dose adjustments to avoid potential adverse effects.

A Review of Warfarin Dosing With Concurrent Acetaminophen Therapy

Warfarin is frequently used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism, yet it is associated with numerous drug interactions. Regarding over-the-counter pain medications, the preferred analgesic for those patients who are taking warfarin is acetaminophen. There are, however, reports of elevation in the international normalized ratio (INR) in those patients taking concurrent warfarin and acetaminophen. For those practitioners who manage warfarin therapy, there is little guidance regarding management of the drug–drug interaction between warfarin and acetaminophen. This review seeks to evaluate the drug interaction between warfarin and acetaminophen and provides recommendations for concurrent use of these drugs.

Effect of acetaminophen on international normalized ratio in patients receiving warfarin therapy

Warfarin is known to have extensive interactions with many classes of drugs. The literature suggesting a relevant interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin is inconsistent. Considering the ubiquitous use of acetaminophen, a review of the effects on international normalized ratio (INR) in patients taking warfarin was necessary. Thus, we performed a search of the PubMed (1966-November 2010) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-November 2010) databases to review the available literature addressing an acetaminophen-warfarin interaction and its possible mechanisms. A sample of case reports, in addition to all English-language studies were evaluated, and relevant references were examined for additional articles. Reports of nonwarfarin coumarin anticoagulants were excluded. Published documentation reporting an interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin is limited. Small prospective studies of various designs and case studies describe aberrant INR results in patients using acetaminophen while receiving warfarin. These INR elevations typically involved acetaminophen ingestion of at least 2 g/day for several consecutive days. In several small prospective studies, INR results were elevated to a statistically significant extent that would require a change in warfarin dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. The mechanism for this interaction remains to be elucidated yet is suggested to occur through alterations in hepatic metabolism. The use of moderate-to-high doses of acetaminophen while receiving warfarin results in supra-therapeutic INRs in some patients. The characteristics that may predispose a patient to this interaction are unclear, yet the widespread use of acetaminophen calls for enhanced clinician awareness and reinforcement of patient education about this interaction.

Warfarin and acetaminophen interaction: a summary of the evidence and biologic plausibility

Ms TS is a 66-year-old woman who receives warfarin for prevention of systemic embolization in the setting of hypertension, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. She had a transient ischemic attack about 4 years ago when she was receiving aspirin. Her INR control was excellent; however, over the past few months it has become erratic, and her average dose required to maintain an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 appears to have decreased. She has had back pain over this same period and has been taking acetaminophen at doses at large as 650 mg four times daily, with her dose varying based on her symptoms. You recall a potential interaction and wonder if (1) her acetaminophen use is contributing to her loss of INR control, and (2) does this interaction place her at increased risk of warfarin-related complications?

Adverse interaction of warfarin and paracetamol: evidence from a post-mortem study

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to establish the prevalence and nature of potential adverse drug combinations of warfarin in a large post-mortem toxicology database. The concomitant use of warfarin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was of interest as these drugs have been associated with internal bleeding both in clinical and post-mortem study settings. Another purpose was to obtain facts related to the questioned safety of warfarin-paracetamol and warfarin-tramadol combinations.

METHODS

The post-mortem database was searched for a 1-year period. All warfarin-positive cases and cases containing interacting drugs, as defined by the SFINX interaction database (Swedish, Finnish, Interaction X-referencing), were included. For controls, all cases containing paracetamol or tramadol were also included, and for each warfarin-positive case, an age-, sex- and alcohol-matched control case was sourced. The contribution of anticoagulant use to the deaths was evaluated from the death certificates based on medico-legal autopsies.

RESULTS

In 33% of the 328 warfarin-positive cases, at least one interacting drug was present, and paracetamol was the most abundant, accounting for 49% (n = 53). When paracetamol and warfarin were detected simultaneously, the number of fatal bleeds was 4.6 and 2.7 times higher compared to paracetamol or warfarin use alone respectively. The presence of an NSAID in combination with warfarin was rare, as only six cases were identified. A majority (66%) of the post-mortem blood samples had a warfarin concentration below 0.5 mg/l, and for the rest of the cases, the mean concentration was 0.70 mg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the clinical evidence suggesting that warfarin-paracetamol interactions may create significant life-threatening conditions. It also accentuates the significant role post-mortem database research can have in improving drug safety.

Drug interactions in oncology: how common are they?

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) comprise an important problem in medical oncology practice. We systematically reviewed the frequency of DDIs in oncology.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for eligible articles and on-line databases for abstracts of major oncology meetings.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported on the frequency of DDIs: six evaluated the frequency of potential DDIs, while two studies reported on real DDIs, i.e. interactions that had clinical consequences. Studies of potential DDIs found that approximately one-third of patients are exposed to dangerous drug doublets, with the most common ones involving warfarin and anticonvulsants. One study of real DDIs found that 2% of hospitalized cancer patients had a DDI as the cause of admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interactions comprise an important issue in oncology, with approximately one-third of ambulatory cancer patients being at risk of DDIs. Data are limited on the clinical consequences of drug interactions among cancer patients.

Life-threatening retroperitoneal bleeding due to warfarin-drug interactions

Warfarin-drug interactioions, which can result in life-threatening bleeding, are preventable. A 53-year-old man was admitted to hospital with exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease, cor pulmonale, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and acute pulmonary embolism. His pulmonary thromboemobolism was initially treated by low-molecular-weight-heparin and heparin. After a loading dose of 5 mg for 2 days, warfarin was given in a daily dose of 2 mg. On the fifth day of warfarin therapy, the last dose of Enoxaparin was given in the morning. He had a fall in the bathroom with blunt injury to the right flank. He complained of right thigh numbness and increasing pain and swelling over his right flank and abdomen. A tender mass was noted over the right flank. His Hb level dropped to 9.7 g/dl. His INR increased from 2.46 to 3.49-3.71 one day later. On further questioning, he admitted self applications of 20 g of Analgesic balm (50% methyl salicylate) over his right calf for 3 days. CT scan showed a large right retroperitoneal haematoma and right iliacus intramuscular haematoma. Warfarin was withheld. He was given fresh frozen plasma, packed cells and vitamin K(1). Inferior vena cava filter was inserted. The haematomas were resolving. He was subsequently discharged to convalescence hospital for continuation of anticoagulant therapy and close monitoring. Significant usage of topical methyl salicylate ointment can potentiate the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. The over-anticoagulation and the presence of platelet dysfunction increase the risk of severe bleeding, which can be provoked by trauma.

Peri-operative use of paracetamol

This article is a review of the peri-operative use of paracetamol. It reviews the pharmacology of paracetamol, highlighting new information about the mechanism of action, and examines its therapeutic use in the peri-operative period, focusing on efficacy, route of administration, and the use of a loading dose to improve early postoperative analgesia.

Potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving supportive care exclusively

Cancer patients at the end of life often take many medications and are at risk for drug interactions. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving supportive care exclusively. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of consecutive adult cancer outpatients attending palliative care clinics at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Drugs were screened for interactions by the Drug Interaction Facts software, which classifies interactions by levels of severity (major, moderate, and minor) and scientific evidence (1-5, with 1=the strongest level of evidence). Among 372 eligible patients, 250 potential drug interactions were identified in 115 patients (31%, 95% confidence interval 26%-36%). The most common involved warfarin and phenytoin. Most interactions were classified as being of moderate severity (59%) and 42% of them were supported by Levels 1-3 of evidence. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (P<0.001), presence of comorbidity (P=0.001), cancer type (brain tumors, P<0.001), and increasing number of drugs (P<0.001) were associated with risk of drug interactions. Potential drug interactions are common in palliative care and mostly involve warfarin and anticonvulsants. Older patients, those with comorbid conditions, brain tumor patients, and those taking many medications are at greater risk of drug interactions.

Adverse drug interactions involving common prescription and over-the-counter analgesic agents

BACKGROUND

Eight analgesic preparations with approved indications for acute pain were among the top 200 drugs prescribed in the United States in 2006. In addition, an estimated 36 million Americans use over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics daily. Given this volume of use, it is not surprising that a number of drug interactions involving analgesic drugs have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

This article examines the pharmacologic factors that enhance the clinical relevance of potential drug interactions and reviews the literature on drug interactions involving the most commonly used analgesic preparations in the United States.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published between January 1967 and July 2007. Among the search terms were drug interactions, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, NSAIDs, hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine, tramadol, OTC analgesics, alcohol, ethanol, antihypertensive drugs, methotrexate, warfarin, SSRIs, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, serotonin syndrome, MAOIs, and overdose. Controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, and case reports were included in the review.

RESULTS

A number of case reports and well-controlled clinical trials were identified that provided evidence of the relatively well known drug-drug interactions between prescription/OTC NSAIDs and alcohol, antihypertensive drugs, high-dose methotrexate, and lithium, as well as between frequently prescribed narcotics and other central nervous system depressants. In contrast, the ability of recent alcohol ingestion to exacerbate the hepatotoxic potential of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen is not supported by either case reports or clinical research. Use of ibuprofen according to OTC guidelines in patients taking cardioprotective doses of aspirin does not appear to interfere with aspirin's antiplatelet activity, whereas chronic prescription use of ibuprofen and other NSAIDs may interfere. Low-dose aspirin intake appears to abolish the gastroprotective effects of cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors, including celecoxib. There is evidence of other less well known and potentially clinically significant drug-drug interactions, including the ability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to inhibit the analgesic activity of tramadol and codeine through inhibition of their metabolic activation, to induce serotonin syndrome when used chronically in the presence of high doses of tramadol through synergistic serotonergic action, and to increase the potential for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAID therapy through additive or supra-additive antiplatelet activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the widespread use of analgesic agents, the overall incidence of serious drug-drug interactions involving these agents has been relatively low. The most serious interactions usually involved other interacting drugs with low therapeutic indices or chronic and/or high-dose use of an analgesic and the interacting drug.

Potentiation of fluindione or warfarin by dexamethasone in multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with primary systemic (AL) amyloidosis or multiple myeloma are frequently treated with cyclic dexamethasone (DXM) courses and often require oral anticoagulants. We previously reported a strong potentiation of oral anticoagulants with intravenous methylprednisolone and observed a similar potentiation with DXM in 3 patients, which led us to prospectively investigate the interaction between DXM and oral anticoagulants.

METHODS

Nine patients with multiple myeloma (n=6) or AL amyloidosis (n=3), including 6 prospective patients, taking fluindione (n=8) or warfarin (n=1), were studied for a total of 10 cycles. DXM (40 mg/day for 4 days every 28 days) was administered alone (n=4) or with melphalan (n=5). One patient was studied for 2 consecutive cycles after a moderate increase in the international normalized ratio (INR) during the first course of DXM. International normalized ratio (INR) was measured serially during DXM administration. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations were measured for 5 cycles.

RESULTS

The mean INR increased from 2.75 (range: 1.80-3.6) at baseline to 5.22 (3.09-7.07) after DXM. Oral anticoagulants were transiently stopped during 8 cycles and 1 mg oral vitamin K was given during 2. No serious bleeding was observed. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations increased after DXM administration. In controls receiving DXM without oral anticoagulants, DXM alone did not increase prothrombin time.

CONCLUSION

High dose DXM can potentiate oral anticoagulants and elevate INR substantially. INR should therefore be monitored repeatedly during concomitant administration of these 2 drugs to allow individual adaptation of oral anticoagulant doses.

The Effect of Acetaminophen on the International Normalized Ratio in Patients Stabilized on Warfarin Therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an interaction exists between acetaminophen and warfarin that alters the international normalized ratio (INR).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Anticoagulation clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six adult patients receiving warfarin with stable INRs, defined as two consecutive INRs at least 3 weeks apart that were within the therapeutic range.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to receive acetaminophen 1 g twice/day along with matching placebo twice/day (12 patients), acetaminophen 1 g 4 times/day (12 patients), or matching placebo 4 times/day (12 patients) for 4 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was the difference in mean INR between groups at weekly intervals. Secondary end points were the percentages of patients in each group with supratherapeutic (INR > or = 0.3 above the upper limit of their therapeutic range) or subtherapeutic (INR > or = 0.2 or 0.3 below the lower limit of their respective therapeutic range of 2.0-3.0 or 2.5-3.5) INRs, and the difference in mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels between groups at biweekly intervals. Slow enrollment and a preliminary observation that 15 patients experienced an elevated INR prompted early termination of the study. At week 2, the group receiving acetaminophen 2 g/day had a significantly higher mean INR versus the placebo group (p=0.01). At weeks 1, 2, and 3, the acetaminophen 4-g/day group had significantly higher mean INRs compared with those in the placebo group (p=0.04, p=0.01, p=0.01, respectively). In addition, 13 (54%) of 24 patients in the acetaminophen groups combined exceeded the upper limit of their therapeutic range by 0.3 or greater compared with only 2 (17%) of 12 patients in the placebo group. No statistically significant differences in serum ALT or AST levels between either acetaminophen group versus the placebo group were found at week 4; however, there was a statistically significant increase in mean ALT level at week 2 in the acetaminophen 4-g/day group versus the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the existence of a clinically significant interaction between warfarin and daily use of acetaminophen 2-4 g, necessitating close monitoring of patients who receive this drug combination. Whether this interaction occurs when acetaminophen is taken in lower doses or is used sporadically requires further study.

Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients receive numerous medications, including antineoplastic agents, drugs for supportive care, and medications for comorbid illnesses. Therefore, they are at risk for drug interactions and duplicate prescribing.

METHODS

A questionnaire eliciting information on demographics and medications taken in the previous 4 weeks was given to adult outpatients receiving systemic anticancer therapy for solid tumors. The Drug Interaction Facts software, version 4.0, was used to identify potential drug interactions and to classify them by level of severity (major, moderate, or minor) and the strength of scientific evidence for them (using categories [1-5] of decreasing certainty). Summary statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 405 patients. We observed 276 potential drug interactions, and at least one potential interaction was identified in 109 patients (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 23% to 31%). Of the potential interactions, 25 (9%) were classified as major and 211 (77%) as moderate. Nearly half (49%) of potential interactions were supported by level 1 or 2 scientific evidence. Most potential drug interactions (87%) involved non-anticancer agents such as warfarin, antihypertensive drugs, corticosteroids, and anticonvulsants, but some (n = 36, 13%) involved antineoplastic agents. In multivariable analysis, increased risk of receiving drug combinations in which there were potential drug interactions was associated with receipt of increasing numbers of drugs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4 per additional drug, 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.58, P<.001 from the Wald chi-square test), type of medication (drugs to treat comorbid conditions versus supportive care medications only; OR = 8.6, 95% CI = 2.9 to 25, P<.001), and the presence of brain tumors. Thirty-two (8%) patients were exposed to duplicate medications, most often corticosteroids, proton pump inhibitors, or benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSION

Potential drug interactions were common among cancer patients and most often involved medications to treat comorbid conditions. Duplicate medications were infrequent.

Investigation of the effects of herbal medicines on warfarin response in healthy subjects: a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach

Systematic evidence regarding herb-drug interactions is lacking. This study investigated herb-drug interactions with warfarin. S-warfarin concentration and response (prothrombin complex activity) data from healthy subjects (n = 24) who received a single warfarin dose (25 mg) and either St John's wort, Asian ginseng, Ginkgo biloba, or ginger were analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach. The ratio of S-warfarin apparent clearance (CL/F) compared to control was 1.39 +/- 0.06 and 1.14 +/- 0.04 after St John's wort and Asian ginseng pretreatment, respectively. Other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were unaffected. Coadministration of St John's wort significantly increased S-warfarin CL/F, whereas treatment with Asian ginseng produced only a moderate increase in CL/F. Ginkgo and ginger did not affect the pharmacokinetics of warfarin in healthy subjects. None of the herbs studied had a direct effect on warfarin pharmacodynamics. Studies in anticoagulated patients are warranted to assess the clinical significance of these herb-drug interactions.

State of the art of paracetamol in acute pain therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights new insights into the mechanism of action of paracetamol (acetaminophen) and therapeutic schemes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Paracetamol, a centrally acting inhibitor of cyclooxygenases, has weak peripheral effects recently demonstrated. Paracetamol is nevertheless devoid of side effects commonly observed with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Paracetamol is available by the oral, rectal, and, more recently, intravenous routes of administration. Paracetamol efficacy is surgical procedure dependent. The analgesic efficacy of a 2-g starting dose of intravenous paracetamol is superior to the recommended dose of 1 g in terms of magnitude and duration of analgesic effect. The usual scheme of administration (1 g every 6 hours) has a less than 10-mg sparing effect on 24-hour morphine consumption and consequently does not significantly reduce morphine side effects. The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol is more effective than paracetamol alone, but the benefit is unclear when compared with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used alone.

SUMMARY

Further studies are required to assess the opioid-sparing effect and complementary analgesic effect of new intravenous paracetamol therapeutic schemes.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Warfarin is highly effective at reducing the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. The benefit of oral anticoagulant therapy strongly outweighs the risk in most patients with atrial fibrillation. More data are needed to define better the overall risk-to-benefit ratio for patients age 80 years and greater. Because a significant proportion of elderly individuals may not be optimal candidates for anticoagulant therapy, alternative stroke prevention strategies must continue to be evaluated while redoubling efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation and thrombogenesis.