Interindividual variability in the concentration-effect relationship of antilymphocyte globulins - a possible influence of FcgammaRIIIa genetic polymorphism

Model-informed precision dosing to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy is pivotal for sustained allograft and patient survival after renal transplantation. However, optimally balanced immunosuppressive therapy is challenged by between-patient and within-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This could warrant the application of personalised dosing strategies to optimise individual patient outcomes. Pharmacometrics, the science that investigates the xenobiotic-biotic interplay using computer-aided mathematical modelling, provides options to describe and quantify this PK variability and enables identification of patient characteristics affecting immunosuppressant PK and treatment outcomes. Here, we review and critically appraise the available pharmacometric model-informed dosing solutions for the typical immunosuppressants in modern renal transplantation, to guide their initial and subsequent dosing.

The FcγRIIIA-158 VV genotype increased the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in T-cell-depleted kidney transplant recipients - a retrospective study

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication in organ transplant recipients. The use of T lymphocyte-depleting antibodies (TLDAb), especially rabbit TLDAb, contributes to PTLD, and the V158F polymorphism of Fc gamma receptor IIIA (FcγRIIIA) also named CD16A could affect the concentration-effect relationship of TLDAb. We therefore investigated the association of this polymorphism with PTLD in kidney transplant recipients. We characterized the V158F polymorphism in two case-control cohorts (discovery, n = 196; validation, n = 222). Then, we evaluated the binding of rabbit IgG to human FcγRIIIA-158V and FcγRIIIA-158F. The V158F polymorphism was not linked to PTLD in the overall cohorts, but risk of PTLD was increased in VV homozygous recipients receiving TLDAb compared with F carriers in both cohorts, especially in recipients receiving TLDAb without muromonab (discovery: HR = 2.22 [1.03-4.76], P = 0.043, validation: HR = 1.75 [1.01-3.13], P = 0.049). In vitro, we found that the binding of rabbit IgG to human NK-cell FcγRIIIA was increased when cells expressed the 158-V versus the 158-F allotype. While the 158-V allotype of human FcγRIIIA binds rabbit immunoglobulin-G with higher affinity, the risk of PTLD was increased in homozygous VV kidney transplant recipients receiving polyclonal TLDAb.

Influence of Antigen Mass on the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Antibodies in Humans

Therapeutic antibodies are increasingly used to treat various diseases, including neoplasms and chronic inflammatory diseases. Antibodies exhibit complex pharmacokinetic properties, notably owing to the influence of antigen mass, i.e. the amount of antigenic targets to which the monoclonal antibody binds specifically. This review focuses on the influence of antigen mass on the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies quantified by pharmacokinetic modelling in humans. Out of 159 pharmacokinetic studies, 85 reported an influence of antigen mass. This influence led to non-linear elimination decay in 50 publications, which was described using target-mediated drug disposition or derived models, as quasi-steady-state, irreversible binding and Michaelis-Menten models. In 35 publications, the pharmacokinetics was apparently linear and the influence of antigen mass was described as a covariate of pharmacokinetic parameters. If some reported covariates, such as the circulating antigen level or tumour size, are likely to be correlated to antigen mass, others, such as disease activity or disease type, may contain little information on the amount of antigenic targets. In some cases, antigen targets exist in different forms, notably in the circulation and expressed at the cell surface. The influence of antigen mass should be soundly described during the early clinical phases of drug development. To maximise therapeutic efficacy, sufficient antibody doses should be administered to ensure the saturation of antigen targets by therapeutic antibodies in all patients. If necessary, antigen mass should be taken into account in routine clinical practice.

[Pharmacokinetic variability of therapeutic antibodies]

Therapeutic antibodies have been increasingly used for the treatment of various diseases, including cancers and chronic inflammatory diseases. The pharmacokinetic interindividual variability of mAbs is large and influences, at least in part, the clinical response to antibody treatment. This variability is explained by a number of individual sources of variability, which are reviewed here. Some of them are major because they are frequently reported to greatly influence the interindividual variability; notably, increased body size, the presence of anti-drug antibodies, and high antigen mass are associated with decreased antibody concentrations. Other individual sources of variability are of less critical importance. They include sex, age, co-treatments, or genetic polymorphisms of IgG Fc receptors (FcgRs). The interindividual variability of antibody pharmacokinetics should be soundly described in order to design optimal dosing strategy.

Immunosuppression for in vivo research: state-of-the-art protocols and experimental approaches

Almost every experimental treatment strategy using non-autologous cell, tissue or organ transplantation is tested in small and large animal models before clinical translation. Because these strategies require immunosuppression in most cases, immunosuppressive protocols are a key element in transplantation experiments. However, standard immunosuppressive protocols are often applied without detailed knowledge regarding their efficacy within the particular experimental setting and in the chosen model species. Optimization of such protocols is pertinent to the translation of experimental results to human patients and thus warrants further investigation. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding immunosuppressive drug classes as well as their dosages and application regimens with consideration of species-specific drug metabolization and side effects. It also summarizes contemporary knowledge of novel immunomodulatory strategies, such as the use of mesenchymal stem cells or antibodies. Thus, this review is intended to serve as a state-of-the-art compendium for researchers to refine applied experimental immunosuppression and immunomodulation strategies to enhance the predictive value of preclinical transplantation studies.

A multisystem investigation of raltegravir association with intestinal tissue: implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis and eradication

OBJECTIVES

Recent clinical data have suggested high raltegravir concentrations in gut tissue after oral administration, with implications for treatment and prevention. We have used in silico, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models to further investigate the accumulation of raltegravir in gut tissue.

METHODS

Affinity of raltegravir for gut tissue was assessed in silico (Poulin-Theil method), in vitro (Caco-2 accumulation) and ex vivo (rat intestine) and compared with the lipophilic drug lopinavir. Finally, raltegravir concentrations in plasma, gut contents, small intestine and large intestine were determined after oral dosing to Wistar rats 1 and 4 h post-dose. Samples were analysed using LC-MS/MS and scintillation counting.

RESULTS

Gut tissue accumulation of raltegravir was less than for lopinavir in silico, in vitro and ex vivo (P < 0.05). After oral administration to rats, raltegravir concentrations 4 h post-dose were lower in plasma (0.05 μM) compared with small intestine (0.47 μM, P = 0.06) and large intestine (1.36 μM, P < 0.05). However, raltegravir concentrations in the contents of both small intestine (4.0 μM) and large intestine (40.6 μM) were also high.

CONCLUSIONS

In silico, in vitro and ex vivo data suggest low raltegravir accumulation in intestinal tissue. In contrast, in vivo animal data suggest raltegravir concentrates in intestinal tissue even when plasma concentrations are minimal. However, high raltegravir concentrations in gut contents are the likely driving factor behind this observation, rather than blood-to-tissue drug distribution. The methods described can be combined with clinical investigations to provide a complete strategy for selection of drugs with high gut accumulation.