Spironolactone use and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a population-based case-control study

Spironolactone in dermatology: uses in acne and beyond

Spironolactone is a synthetic aldosterone receptor antagonist, with a role off-label in various dermatological conditions. Its antiandrogenic properties make it suitable for diseases in which excess androgen production results in unwanted and psychologically distressing manifestations in susceptible females. Treatment with spironolactone aims to attenuate androgen-mediated conditions including acne, hidradenitis suppurativa, female pattern hair loss and hirsutism. We discuss the emerging utility of spironolactone in dermatology, its potential adverse effects and considerations for monitoring.

Hormonal Treatment Strategies Tailored to Non-Binary Transgender Individuals

Introduction: To date no standardized hormonal treatment protocols for non-binary transgender individuals have been described in the literature and there is a lack of data regarding their efficacy and safety. Objectives: To suggest possible treatment strategies for non-binary transgender individuals with non-standardized requests and to emphasize the importance of a personalized clinical approach. Methods: A narrative review of pertinent literature on gender-affirming hormonal treatment in transgender persons was performed using PubMed. Results: New hormonal treatment regimens outside those reported in current guidelines should be considered for non-binary transgender individuals, in order to improve psychological well-being and quality of life. In the present review we suggested the use of hormonal and non-hormonal compounds, which—based on their mechanism of action—could be used in these cases depending on clients’ requests. Conclusion: Requests for an individualized hormonal treatment in non-binary transgender individuals represent a future challenge for professionals managing transgender health care. For each case, clinicians should balance the benefits and risks of a personalized non-standardized treatment, actively involving the person in decisions regarding hormonal treatment.

Presentation of a meningioma in a transwoman after nine years of cyproterone acetate and estradiol intake: case report and literature review

The administration of cyproterone acetate (CPA) and estradiol is a common regimen used by male-to-female transsexuals (transwoman) to adjust their body to their gender identity. Major adverse events are uncommon in these subjects in spite of long-term, high dose cross-sex steroid treatments. We describe the occurrence of a meningioma in a transwoman treated with estrogens and CPA over a period of nine years. The meningioma was revealed during a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan performed as follow-up of a previous surgery for ganglioglioma. CPA intake was discontinued and tumor resection was performed. Histological diagnosis confirmed a strong progesterone receptor-positive and slight estrogen positive meningioma. After surgery, the patient continued her treatment with leuprorelina acetate and estradiol. At one-year follow-up, the MRI scan reveals no recurrence of the tumor. This is the ninth case in literature of a meningioma in a transwoman treated with estrogens and CPA, confirming a possible association between female sex steroids and meningioma. Although there is no still strong evidence of an association between meningioma and CPA, this report may suggest use of alternative treatment for transwomen. This report highlights the importance to record all the cases of meningiomas in high dose CPA-users, in order to improve data.

Bleeding risk under selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been reported to be potentially associated with an increased risk of bleeding. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted to quantify this risk. Case-control and cohort studies investigating bleeding risk under SSRI therapy were retrieved by searching the Medline, Pascal, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Case-control studies were included if they reported bleeding incidents with and without the use of SSRIs and cohort studies were included if they reported the rate of bleeds among SSRI users and non-users. The main outcome was severe bleeding, whatever the site. Only data concerning SSRI belonging to the ATC class N06AB were used. For both case-control and cohort studies, we recorded the adjusted effect estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates were computed for case-control and cohort studies using an inverse-variance model. Meta-analysis of the adjusted ORs of 42 observational studies showed a significant association between SSRI use and the risk of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.27-1.57), random effect model, p<0.0001]. The association was found for the 31 case-control studies (1,255,073 patients), with an increased risk of 41% of bleeding [OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.25-1.60)], as well as for the 11 cohort studies including 187,956 patients [OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.64)]. Subgroup analyses showed that the association remained constant whatever the characteristics of studies. This meta-analysis shows an increased risk of bleeding of at least 36% (from 12% to 64%) based on the high-level of observational studies with SSRIs use.

SFE/SFHTA/AFCE consensus on primary aldosteronism, part 7: Medical treatment of primary aldosteronism

Spironolactone, which is a potent mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, represents the first line medical treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA). As spironolactone is also an antagonist of the androgen and progesterone receptor, it may present side effects, especially in male patients. In case of intolerance to spironolactone, amiloride may be used to control hypokaliemia and we suggest that eplerenone, which is a more selective but less powerful antagonist of the mineralocorticoid receptor, be used in case of intolerance to spironolactone and insufficient control of hypertension by amiloride. Specific calcic inhibitors and thiazide diuretics may be used as second or third line therapy. Medical treatment of bilateral forms of PA seem to be as efficient as surgical treatment of lateralized PA for the control of hypertension and the prevention of cardiovascular and renal morbidities. This allows to propose medical treatment of PA to patients with lateralized forms of PA who refuse surgery or to patients with PA who do not want to be explored by adrenal venous sampling to determine whether they have a bilateral or lateralized form.

Endocrine care of transpeople part II. A review of cross-sex hormonal treatments, outcomes and adverse effects in transwomen

The treatment of transwomen relies on the combined administration of anti-androgens or GnRH analogues to suppress androgen production and thereby reduce male phenotypic characteristics together with oestrogens to develop female characteristics. In transwomen, synthetic oestrogens such as ethinyl oestradiol, as well as conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE), should be avoided to minimize thromboembolic risks especially in older transwomen and in those with risk factors. Currently, available short- and long-term safety studies suggest that cross-sex hormonal therapy (CHT) can be considered safe in transwomen improving the well-being and quality of life of these individuals. Long-term monitoring should aim to decrease cardiovascular risks and should include prostate and breast cancer screenings.

A review of the physical and metabolic effects of cross-sex hormonal therapy in the treatment of gender dysphoria

This review focuses on the effect that cross-gender sex steroid therapy has on metabolic and hormonal parameters. There is an emphasis on those changes that result in significant clinical effects such as the positive effects of the development of secondary sexual characteristics and negative effects such as haemostatic effects and thromboembolism in transwomen or dyslipidaemia in transmen. There is also a description of the current hormonal regimens used at the largest UK gender identity clinic. The overall safety of these treatments in the context of long-term outcome data is reviewed.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding from different drug combinations

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Guidelines suggest avoiding certain drug combinations, yet little is known about the magnitude of their interactions. We estimated the risk of UGIB during concomitant use of nonselective (ns)NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase -2 selective inhibitors (COX-2 inhibitors), and low-dose aspirin with other drugs.

METHODS

We performed a case series analysis of data from 114,835 patients with UGIB (930,888 person-years of follow-up) identified from 7 population-based health care databases (approximately 20 million subjects). Each patient served as his or her own control. Drug exposure was determined based on prescriptions of nsNSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin, alone and in combination with other drugs that affect the risk of UGIB. We measured relative risk (incidence rate ratio [IRR] during drug exposure vs nonexposure) and excess risk due to concomitant drug exposure (relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI]).

RESULTS

Monotherapy with nsNSAIDs increased the risk of diagnosis of UGIB (IRR, 4.3) to a greater extent than monotherapy with COX-2 inhibitors (IRR, 2.9) or low-dose aspirin (IRR, 3.1). Combination therapy generally increased the risk of UGIB; concomitant nsNSAID and corticosteroid therapies increased the IRR to the greatest extent (12.8) and also produced the greatest excess risk (RERI, 5.5). Concomitant use of nsNSAIDs and aldosterone antagonists produced an IRR for UGIB of 11.0 (RERI, 4.5). Excess risk from concomitant use of nsNSAIDs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was 1.6, whereas that from use of COX-2 inhibitors with SSRIs was 1.9 and that for use of low-dose aspirin with SSRIs was 0.5. Excess risk of concomitant use of nsNSAIDs with anticoagulants was 2.4, of COX-2 inhibitors with anticoagulants was 0.1, and of low-dose aspirin with anticoagulants was 1.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a case series analysis, concomitant use of nsNSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs significantly increases the risk of UGIB. Concomitant use of nsNSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, but not COX-2 inhibitors, with corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants produces significant excess risk of UGIB.

Spironolactone, eplerenone and the new aldosterone blockers in endocrine and primary hypertension

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are commonly used to reduce blood pressure, left-ventricular hypertrophy, and urinary albumin excretion in patients with essential hypertension or primary aldosteronism. Effects of MRAs on hypertensive organ damage seem to occur beyond what is expected from the mere reduction of blood pressure. This suggests that activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor plays a central role in the development of cardiac and renal abnormalities in hypertensive patients. However, broad use of classic MRAs such as spironolactone has been limited by significant incidence of gynecomastia and other sex-related adverse effects. To overcome these problems, new aldosterone blockers have been developed with different strategies that include use of nonsteroidal MRAs and inhibition of aldosterone synthesis. Both strategies have been designed to avoid the steroid receptor cross-reactivity of classic MRAs that accounts for most adverse effects. Moreover, inhibition of aldosterone synthesis could have an additional benefit due to blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor-independent pathways that might account for some of the untoward effects of aldosterone. The new aldosterone blockers are currently having extensive preclinical evaluation, and one of these compounds has passed phase 2 trials showing promising results in patients with primary hypertension and primary aldosteronism. This narrative review summarizes the knowledge on the use of classic MRAs in hypertension and covers the evidence currently available on new aldosterone blockers.

Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding

Bleeding is the most common complication of peptic ulcer. Recent studies have suggested that male sex, blood type O, smoking, ulcer size and location, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and meteorological factors were risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding, while age, Helicobacter pylori infection, psychological-social factors, and economic and educational levels were controversial risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding.

Spironolactone for hypertension

BACKGROUND

Spironolactone is an aldosterone antagonist, considered fourth line therapy for hypertension in patients already treated with multiple medications.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to determine the effect of spironolactone on patient mortality, morbidity, and to quantify the magnitude of blood pressure lowering effect of spironolactone monotherapy.Secondary: to determine the prevalence of adverse reactions observed with spironolactone monotherapy and to determine if there is a blood-pressure lowering dose response with spironolactone.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (3rd Quarter 2009), MEDLINE (2005 - Sept. 2009), and EMBASE (2007 - Sept. 2009). References from retrieved studies were reviewed to identify any studies missed in the initial search. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected RCTs studying patients with primary hypertension. We excluded studies of patients with secondary or gestational hypertension, and studies where patients were receiving multiple antihypertensives.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently reviewed the search results for studies meeting our criteria. Three reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality using a standardized data extraction form. Data synthesis and analysis was performed using RevMan 5.

MAIN RESULTS

Meta-analysis of the 5 cross-over studies found a reduction in SBP of 20.09 mmHg (95%CI:16.58-23.06,p<0.00001) and a 6.75 mmHg (95%CI:4.8-8.69,p<0.00001) reduction in DBP. These results were statistically significant and there was no evidence of heterogeneity between the studies. There may be a dose response effect with spironolactone up to 50 mg/day, but the confidence intervals around the mean end-of-study blood pressure for doses ranging 25-500 mg/day all overlapped. In other words, it appears that doses >50mg/day do not produce further reductions in either SBP or DBP. One cross-over study found that spironolactone 25 mg/day did not statistically significantly change SBP or DBP compared to placebo, SBP: -9.9 (95%CI:-21.15,1.35); DBP -2.34 (95%CI:-7.92,3.06).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

From the limited available evidence, spironolactone appears to lower blood pressure compared to placebo to a similar degree in patients with primary (essential) hypertension when doses of 100-500 mg/day are given. A dose of 25 mg/day did not statistically significantly reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure, compared to placebo. Given the lack of a dose-response, coupled with a possible increased risk in adverse events with higher doses, doses of 25 to 100 mg/day are reasonable. There is no evidence of the effect of spironolactone on clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.

Ex-drinking may be a surrogate for unmeasured risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: reappraisal and an additional survey of subjects from a case-control study in Japan

In our recent case-control study on the association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), the risk of UGIB was higher in non-drinkers than in heavy-drinkers. To explore this unexpected finding, we re-analyzed the data to test whether non-drinking represented risk factors for UGIB and also conducted an additional survey to find any disagreement with the original study that might suggest information bias. In the re-analysis, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) of UGIB by classifying 183 non-drinkers in the original study into 39 ex- and 144 never-drinkers. We also measured the prevalence of potential risk factors of UGIB in controls. In the new survey, we sent a self-administered questionnaire on previous alcohol consumption. In the re-analysis, the OR for ex-drinking (5.4) was higher and the OR for never-drinking (2.6) was lower than the OR for non- (ex- plus never-) drinking (3.2) in the original study. Ex-drinkers had higher prevalence of H. pylori infection, history of previous ulcer and use of GI drugs than other types of drinkers. The answers on their previous alcohol consumption were consistent between the original and new surveys both in cases (kappa = 0.74) and controls (kappa = 0.73). Ex-drinking may represent unmeasured risk factors for UGIB such as undiagnosed ulcer. In an observational study of UGIB, ex-drinking may be distinguished from never-drinking as a potential surrogate for UGIB risk. When prescribing an NSAID to an ex-drinker in clinical practice, one may make sure to explore whether an ex-drinker has a history of ulcer.