Immunohistochemical characterization of the 'intimal proliferation' phenomenon in Sneddon's syndrome and essential thrombocythaemia

Combination therapy for Sneddon syndrome to reduce the incidence of cerebrovascular complications

BACKGROUND

Sneddon syndrome is an occlusive vasculopathy that presents clinically with generalized livedo racemosa on the skin and transient ischemic attacks, strokes, and cognitive or motor deficits in the central nervous system. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is recommended. Due to the limited therapeutic efficacy and the resulting serious complications, we propose combination therapy with additional infusion cycles of alprostadil and captopril and report initial long-term results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic retrospective analysis of all patients with primary Sneddon syndrome who received combination therapy in our clinic between 1995 and 2020. Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated using descriptive statistics compared to historical controls receiving monotherapy. We also analyzed the event rate of complications when combination therapy was discontinued.

RESULTS

During the 99.7 patient-years of follow-up, there were no transient ischemic attacks and the stroke rate dropped to 0.02 per patient-year. In comparison, the rates of transient ischemic attacks and strokes in the historical controls ranged from 0.08 to 0.035 per patient-year. After discontinuation of alprostadil therapy, eight events occurred in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy reduces the long-term incidence of ischemic events in patients with primary Sneddon syndrome.

The Relevance of Skin Biopsies in General Internal Medicine: Facts and Myths

INTRODUCTION

Non-dermatology medical specialties may refer patients for skin biopsies, searching for a particular diagnosis. However, the diagnostic impact of the skin biopsy is not clearly established. This article aims to assess the indications for, and evaluate the clinical relevance of, skin biopsies in non-dermatology medical specialties.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 23 non-dermatology specialty departments in a university medical center, requesting a list of indications for skin biopsies, as well as to 10 staff dermatologists to collect the indications of skin biopsies requested by non-dermatology specialties. Once the indications were collected, a literature search was performed to evaluate their clinical value and relevance.

RESULTS

Eleven non-dermatology specialties provided a list of skin biopsy indications, to which staff dermatologists added seven more indications. A literature search revealed evidence-based medicine data for six diseases, that is, amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Results were questionable concerning infectious endocarditis, acute graft-versus-host-disease, and the lupus band test. Skin biopsy were not evidenced as useful for the diagnosis of calciphylaxis, systemic scleroderma, Behçet's disease, or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. For the diagnosis of Alport's syndrome, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, skin biopsy is currently outperformed by genetic analyses. For diagnoses such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura and Sjögren's syndrome, skin biopsy represents an additional item among other diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSION

The usefulness of skin biopsy as requested by non-dermatology specialties is only evidenced for amyloidosis, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, Sneddon's syndrome, intravascular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, chronic graft-versus-host-disease, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and Sjögren's syndrome.

Pattern of organ remodeling in chronic non-communicable diseases is due to endogenous regulations and falls under the category of Kauffman's self-organization: A case of arterial neointimal pathology

Clinical diagnosis is based on analysis of pathologic findings that may result in perceived patterns. The same is true for diagnostic pathology: Pattern analysis is a foundation of the histopathology-based diagnostic system and, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory findings, forms a basis for the classification of diseases. Any histopathology diagnosis is based on the explicit assumption that the same diseased condition should result in formation of the same (or highly similar) morphologic patterns in different individuals; it is a standard approach in microscopic pathology, including that of non-communicable chronic diseases with organ remodeling. During fifty years of examining diseased tissues under microscopy, I keep asking the same question: Why is a similarity of patterns expected for chronic organ remodeling? For infection diseases, xenobiotic toxicity and deficiencies forming an identical pathologic pattern in different individuals is understandable and logical: The same infection, xenobiotic, or deficiency strikes the same target, which results in identical pathology. The same is true for Mendelian diseases: The same mutations lead to the same altered gene expressions and the same pathologic pattern. But why does this regularity hold true for chronic diseases with organ remodeling? Presumable causes (or risk factors) for a particular chronic disease differ in magnitude and duration between individuals, which should result in various series of transformations. Yet, mysteriously enough, pathological remodeling in a particular chronic disease always falls into a main dominating pattern, perpetuating and progressing in a similar fashion in different patients. Furthermore, some chronic diseases of different etiologies and dissimilar causes/risk factors manifest as identical or highly similar patterns of pathologic remodeling. HYPOTHESIS: I hypothesize that regulations governing a particular organ's chronic remodeling were selected in evolution as the safest response to various insults and physiologic stress conditions. This hypothesis implies that regulations directing diseased chronic remodeling always preexist but normally are controlled; this control can be disrupted by a diverse range of non-specific signals, liberating the pathway for identical pathologic remodeling. This hypothesis was tested in an analysis of arterial neointimal formation, the identical pathology occurring in different diseases and pathological conditions: graft vascular disease in organ transplantation, in-stent restenosis, peripheral arterial diseases, idiopathic intimal hyperplasia, Kawasaki disease, coronary atherosclerosis and as reaction to drugs. The hypothesis suggests that arterial intimal cells are poised between only two alternative pathways: the pathway with controlled intimal cell proliferation or the pathway where such control is disrupted, ultimately leading to the progressive neointimal pathology. By this property the arterial neointimal formation constitutes a special case of Kauffman's self-organization. This new hypothesis gives a parsimonious explanation for identical pathological patterns of arterial remodeling (neointimal formation), which occurs in diseases of different etiologies and due to dissimilar causes/risk factors, or without any etiology and causes/risk factors at all. This new hypothesis also suggests that regulation facilitating intimal cell proliferation cannot be overwritten or annulled because this feature is vital for arterial differentiation, cell renewal, and integrity. This hypothesis suggests that studying numerous, and likely interchangeable, non-specific signals that disrupt regulation controlling intimal cell proliferation is unproductive; instead, a study of the controlling regulation(s) itself should be a priority of our research.

[Livedo: from pathophysiology to diagnosis]

PURPOSE

We propose a diagnostic approach when facing a livedo. First, the pathophysiology of the livedo is reviewed using key articles barely quoted in the literature. Then the topic is handled in two ways. Figures and tables allow a rapid reading convenient "at the patient's bedside". The subject is also reviewed thoroughly, and we emphasize the intricacy of the various pathophysiological mechanisms involved for each livedo's related disease. Diseases associated with livedo are then briefly described with emphasis on the key diagnostic features and prevalence. Usefulness of the main diagnostic procedures is discussed.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

A livedo is a usually purplish-blue erythema, reticulated (small and complete meshes) or racemosa (large broken circular segments) which is related to a slowdown of the blood flow in the dermic venules. These venules form adjacent circles communicating with each other, parallel to the skin surface. The blood flow slowdown may be due to a local vasoconstriction (vasomotor livedo) or to an arteriolar occlusion. Arteriolar occlusion may be related to blood abnormalities (thrombosis, high viscosity, embolus) or to increased parietal thickness (vasculitis, calcic deposition, intimal hyperplasia). It is not always possible to clinically distinguish a vasomotor livedo from those associated with diseases. Diagnostic procedures should be oriented by the medical history, the features of the livedo, and associated symptoms. Usefulness of the skin biopsy is usually limited to the situations where the livedo is infiltrated or necrotic.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

To raise controversy about their importance and implications, some pathophysiological data are presented: intimal pseudohyperplasia in Sneddon's syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome, and white cell activation in essential thrombocythemia.

The spectrum of differential diagnosis in neurological patients with livedo reticularis and livedo racemosa. A literature review

Livedo is a cutaneous sign of striking violaceous netlike patterned erythema of the skin. This dermatological phenomenon is of special interest in the differential diagnosis in neurological patients. In 1907 Ehrmann distinguished two different patterns of livedo: the pathological livedo racemosa and the physiological livedo reticularis. Despite important clinical differences, in the English language literature the heading livedo reticularis is still used for all types of livedo. A literature review about the spectrum of differential diagnosis in patients with livedo reticularis (especially cutis marmorata and amantadine-induced livedo reticularis) and livedo racemosa (especially Sneddon's syndrome, Divry-van Bogaert syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, polyarteritis nodosa, cholesterol embolization syndrome, livedoid vasculopathy and haematological diseases) is provided.

Diagnostic impact and sensitivity of skin biopsies in Sneddon's syndrome. A report of 15 cases

BACKGROUND

Sneddon's syndrome is defined as a combination of idiopathic livedo racemosa generalisata and symptoms of cerebrovascular defect. The disease usually starts with vascular symptoms in the epidermis, with neurological deficits becoming evident later. For this reason, histological examination of skin biopsies and determination of arteriolar occlusion is of particular importance for reliable categorization and early diagnosis. To date, these methods have been considered to be too insensitive.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the sensitivity of skin biopsies in Sneddon's syndrome.

METHODS

We took a total of five deep punch biopsies (4 mm) from different areas of the livedo (three from white and two from red areas) in 15 patients. Present knowledge of the pathogenic relationships and the particular anatomical features of the skin were taken into account.

RESULTS

The method had a sensitivity of 27% with one biopsy, 53% with two biopsies and 80% with three biopsies taken from white areas in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin biopsies using the method presented achieved a high sensitivity, suggesting that the diagnosis in clinically suspected cases could be confirmed in the majority of cases with this technique.