Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa is not associated with frequentFLGgene mutations

Epidermolysis Bullosa—A Different Genetic Approach in Correlation with Genetic Heterogeneity

Epidermolysis bullosa is a heterogeneous group of rare genetic disorders characterized by mucocutaneous fragility and blister formation after minor friction or trauma. There are four major epidermolysis bullosa types based on the ultrastructural level of tissue cleavage: simplex, junctional, dystrophic, and Kindler epidermolysis bullosa. They are caused by mutations in genes that encode the proteins that are part of the hemidesmosomes and focal adhesion complex. Some of these disorders can be associated with extracutaneous manifestations, which are sometimes fatal. They are inherited in an autosomal recessive or autosomal dominant manner. This review is focused on the phenomena of heterogeneity (locus, allelic, mutational, and clinical) in epidermolysis bullosa, and on the correlation genotype–phenotype.

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa: a new case series of a rare phenotype unveils skewed Th2 immunity

BACKGROUND

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (DEB-Pr) is a rare subtype of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa, with a poorly understood pathogenesis and no satisfactory treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical and biological features, genetic basis and therapeutic management, to better characterize this rare genodermatosis.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective study, reviewing the clinical presentation, genetic diagnosis, immunohistopathological findings and biological characteristics and management of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa. This study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology at Saint-Louis Hospital and the Department of Genetics at Necker Hospital (Paris, France). All patients with a diagnosis of DEB-Pr seen between 2010 and 2020 were included.

RESULTS

Seven patients were included, the average age of 50.1 years [range 36-76]. Pruriginous-lichenified papules, plaques or nodules appeared at 27.6 years on average [range 7-66] on pretibial areas and forearms, associated with milia and toenails dystrophy. All patients received multiple treatments, but none could sustainably reduce pruritus. Immunohistopathological analysis of lesion skin revealed subepidermal blister with fibrosis, milia and mast cell infiltration. Serum TNFα, IL1β and IL6 levels were elevated in 2/6 patients. Total serum IgE levels were increased in 7/7 patients, with no history of atopy. Immunophenotyping of circulating T-cells revealed an increased Th2 subset in 4/4 patients, with reduced Th1 and Th17 subpopulations. Genetic analysis of COL7A1 identified 7 distinct causative mutations, six of which were new. Intra-familial clinical variability was documented in 5/7 patients and was associated with the co-inheritance of a recessive COL7A1 mutation or an FLG2 mutation in 2 families.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the stereotyped presentation of DEB-Pr with large intra-familial variability in disease expression. Mast cell infiltration, elevated IgE and increased Th2 subset without atopy strongly support a role of Th2-mediated immunity in DEB-Pr, and further argue for new targeted therapeutic options such as dupilumab.

Prevalence, pathophysiology and management of itch in epidermolysis bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a highly diverse group of inherited skin disorders, resulting from mutations in genes encoding proteins of the dermoepidermal junction. Itch (pruritus) is one of the most common symptoms across all EB subtypes. It occurs in blistered or wounded sites, or manifests as a generalized phenomenon, thereby affecting both intact skin and healing wounds. The mechanism of pruritus in EB is unclear. It is likely that skin inflammation secondary to barrier disruption, wound healing cascades and dysregulated activation of epidermal sensory nerve endings are all involved in its pathophysiology on the molecular and cellular level. Understanding these mechanisms in depth is crucial in developing optimized treatments for people with EB and improving quality of life. This review summarizes current evidence on the prevalence, mechanisms and management of itch in EB.

Whole exome sequencing identified two point mutations of COL7A1 and FLG in a Chinese family with dystrophic epidermolysis bullous pruriginosa and ichthyosis vulgaris

We report a 21-year-old man with recurrent bullous eruptions and severe itching on the lower legs and feet since 5 years of age. Dry, dirty brown, tile-like scales covered his lower legs with dystrophic toenails. Nodular prurigo-like lesions, scarring papules and milia remitted after the bullous eruptions. His father and another two family members had similar but mild presentations with recurrent bullae on the lower legs. Whole exome sequencing detected the heterozygous variants of COL7A1 c.6698G>A and FLG c.7249C>T in this pedigree. COL7A1 c.6698G>A was reported in bullous dermolysis of the newborn and FLG c.7249C>T was reported in ichthyosis vulgaris. Thus, the diagnosis of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa associated with ichthyosis vulgaris was made.

Epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa: a systematic review exploring genotype-phenotype correlation

INTRODUCTION

Epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (EBP) is a clinical variant of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB), characterized by intense pruritus and hypertrophic, lichenified, prurigo-like papules, plaques, and nodules secondary to scratching. These clinical findings have been attributed to various mutations in the COL7A1 gene. Previous reports have yielded inconsistent findings regarding a possible genotype-phenotype relationship in EBP.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to conduct a systematic review aimed at assessing the genotype-phenotype correlation in EBP.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all reports of mutation-verified EBP, published from 1946 to September 2014. Statistical comparison of clinical findings between mutation types was performed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The review included a total of 28 articles with 74 individuals, which consisted of level 4 non-controlled case series (grade C) and level 5 case reports (grade D). Previous reported mutation types included glycine substitution (GS, 52.7%), in-frame skipping (IFS, 33.8%), non-glycine substitution (NGS, 8.1%), and premature termination codon (PTC, 5.4%). The most common clinical findings were extremities involvement, linear configuration, and nail dystrophy. In comparison with GS mutation carriers, IFS carriers had a higher likelihood of (1) being male (OR 2.99; p = 0.043; 95% CI 1.27-11.4) and (2) presenting with blisters (OR 4.10; p = 0.013; 95% CI 1.34-12.5).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review examining the relationship between mutation type and clinical presentation in EBP. The findings in this review (1) identify common clinical characteristics of EBP that may help in the assessment of patients with possible EBP; and (2) indicate that certain mutation carriers may have a higher likelihood of exhibiting particular phenotypes. In the case of potential diagnostic challenge, assessment for presence of common clinical findings as well as molecular testing may facilitate correct identification and prognostication.

[The many facets of inherited skin fragility]

The inherited skin fragility encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders, collectively designated as epidermolysis bullosa, characterized by recurrent mechanically induced blisters, erosions or wounds. The spectrum of clinical manifestations is broad, as well as the molecular background. Besides the skin, mucosal membranes and other organs can be affected. In real-world practice, patients with mild genetic skin fragility usually do not require medical care and often remain underdiagnosed. In contrast, the well-defined severe EB subtypes are recognized based on typical clinical features. The molecular diagnostics is usually performed in order to allow genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. Besides wound care and careful management of the disease complications, new experimental targeted therapies are being developed. New very rare forms of inherited skin fragility have been identified with modern sequencing methods.

An incompletely penetrant novel mutation in COL7A1 causes epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa and dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa phenotypes in an extended kindred

Epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (EBP) is a rare subtype of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) characterized by intense pruritus, nodular or lichenoid lesions, and violaceous linear scarring, most prominently on the extensor extremities. Remarkably, identical mutations in COL7A1, which encodes an anchoring fibril protein present at the dermal-epidermal junction, can cause both DEB and EBP with either autosomal dominant or recessive inheritance. We present one family with both dystrophic and pruriginosa phenotypes of epidermolysis bullosa. The proband is a 19-year-old Caucasian woman who initially presented in childhood with lichenoid papules affecting her extensor limbs and intense pruritus consistent with EBP. Her maternal grandmother saw a dermatologist for similar skin lesions that developed without any known triggers at age 47 and mostly resolved spontaneously after approximately 10 years. The proband's younger brother developed a small crop of pruritic papules on his elbows, dorsal hands, knees, and ankles at age 13. Her second cousin once removed, however, reported a mild blistering disease without pruritus consistent with DEB. Genetic sequencing of the kindred revealed a single dominant novel intron 47 splice site donor G>A mutation, c.4668 + 1 G>A, which we predict leads to exon skipping. Incomplete penetrance is confirmed in her clinically unaffected mother, who carries the same dominant mutation. The wide diversity of clinical phenotypes with one underlying genotype demonstrates that COL7A1 mutations are incompletely penetrant and strongly suggests that other genetic and environmental factors influence clinical presentation.

The international dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patient registry: an online database of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients and their COL7A1 mutations

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a heritable blistering disorder that can be inherited autosomal dominantly (DDEB) or recessively (RDEB) and covers a group of several distinctive phenotypes. A large number of unique COL7A1 mutations have been shown to underlie DEB. Although general genotype-phenotype correlation rules have emerged, many exceptions to these rules exist, compromising disease diagnosing and genetic counseling. We therefore constructed the International DEB Patient Registry (http://www.deb-central.org), aimed at worldwide collection and sharing of phenotypic and genotypic information on DEB. As of May 2011, this MOLGENIS-based registry contains detailed information on 508 published and 71 unpublished patients and their 388 unique COL7A1 mutations, and includes all combinations of mutations. The current registry RDEB versus DDEB ratio of 4:1, if compared to prevalence figures, suggests underreporting of DDEB in the literature. Thirty-eight percent of mutations stored introduce a premature termination codon (PTC) and 43% an amino acid change. Submission wizards allow users to quickly and easily share novel information. This registry will be of great help in disease diagnosing and genetic counseling and will lead to novel insights, especially in the rare phenotypes of which there is often lack of understanding. Altogether, this registry will greatly benefit the DEB patients.

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: pathogenesis and clinical features

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is relatively well understood. Potential therapies are in development. This article describes the pathogenesis and clinical features of DEB. It also describes therapeutic options and the future of molecular therapies.

[Epidermolysis bullosa. An update]

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) represents a group of diseases characterized by skin fragility usually developing blisters after minimal trauma. The clinical picture ranges from mild subtypes with minor skin reactions to severe forms with lethal outcome within the first months of life. In the severe generalized subtypes, complications such as aggressive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, anemia, esophageal stenosis and cardiomyopathy can occur so that multidisciplinary patient care is necessary. EB can be divided in four types--EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler syndrome. All together 33 subtypes can be distinguished. In 2008 a revised EB classification was introduced. Several eponyms for EB subtypes were replaced by descriptive names. The review presents the EB subtypes based on the new EB classification system, the molecular background and new therapeutic options.

Forty-two novel COL7A1 mutations and the role of a frequent single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP1 promoter in modulation of disease severity in a large European dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa cohort

BACKGROUND

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a severe genetic skin blistering disorder caused by mutations in the gene COL7A1, encoding collagen VII. Recently, the MMP1 promoter single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1799750, designated as 1G 2G, was shown to be involved in modulation of disease severity in patients with recessive DEB (RDEB), and was proposed as a genetic modifier.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the molecular basis of DEB in 103 individuals and to replicate the results of the MMP1 promoter SNP analysis in an independent patient group, as verification is necessary in such a rare and heterogeneous disorder.

METHODS

To determine the molecular basis of the disease, we performed COL7A1 mutation screening, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR. The status of the MMP1 SNP was analysed by PCR and restriction enzyme digestion and verified by sequencing.

RESULTS

We disclosed 42 novel COL7A1 mutations, including the first large genomic deletion of 4 kb affecting only the COL7A1 gene, and three apparently silent mutations affecting splicing. Even though the frequency of the high-risk allele was increased in patients with RDEB, no statistically significant correlation between disease severity and genotype could be made. Also, no correlation was observed with development of squamous cell carcinoma, a severe complication of DEB.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the results suggest that the MMP1 SNP is not the sole disease modifier in different forms of DEB, and other genetic and environmental factors contribute to the clinical phenotype.