Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides) relapsed with different immunological phenotype after bone marrow transplant

Phenotypic switch in mycosis fungoides: A tertiary cancer center experience

BACKGROUND

Changes in immunophenotype in mycosis fungoides (MF) are rarely reported, making this phenomenon a diagnostic challenge with unclear significance for the disease's biological behavior. This study examines a large series of MF patients who exhibited a phenotype switch (PS) and analyzes their clinical and histopathologic characteristics.

DESIGN

Institutional files were searched for MF cases exhibiting PS between 2010 and 2020. Clinical, follow-up, and histopathological data were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-two biopsies from 32 patients (13 women and 19 men, median age 67.5) showed PS. Eight patients (25 %) experienced multiple PS during their disease course. The median time for PS was 22 months from the initial diagnosis. In 5 cases tested, identical TCR clone peaks were detected in the immunophenotypically distinct lesions. Median follow-up was 14.5 months. Among deceased patients, median time from MF diagnosis to PS was 20.6 months, while among the patients who were still alive, median time was 44.1 months.

CONCLUSION

MF biopsies can show PS during the course of the disease and may indicate a change in clinical behavior. 28.1 % of patients displayed more than one PS, further indicating high plasticity of MF cells. No obvious association was found between PS and therapy initiation or response. Features that appeared to portend a worse clinical course were earlier PS in the course of the disease and PS from CD4-/CD8-to CD8+, and CD8+ to CD4-/CD8-. Awareness of this phenomenon is crucial to avoid misdiagnosing phenotypically distinct lymphomas as second primaries and to alert clinicians about potential changes in the disease's clinical course.

Transformed Mycosis Fungoides with a Cytotoxic T-Cell Phenotype

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and occasionally undergo large cell transformation (transformed MF, TMF), resulting in a poorer clinical outcome. We describe a case of TMF with an immunophenotypic shift. MF showed the CD4 + CD8- T-cell phenotype, while TMF exhibited the CD4-CD8 + T-cell phenotype. Moreover, TMF expressed cytotoxic markers of TIA1 and Granzyme B. A PCR analysis of T-cell receptor genes revealed peak sizes that were the same in both biopsies, indicating that these two lymphomas were derived from the same clone.

Immunophenotypic switch in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A series of three cases and review of the literature

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) comprises a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with variable clinical behavior. Immunophenotypic switch (IS) is a phenomenon that occurs during lymphoma progression and is defined by an alteration in the immunophenotypic expression of a tumor with retention of its genotypic signature. This has been well-recognized in hematopoietic neoplasms; however, it has been rarely reported in CTCL and its clinical implications are not well understood. We present the clinical, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic findings of three cases of CTCL that demonstrated IS post treatment with variable outcomes. We add our cases to the small number previously reported to increase awareness of this phenomenon and its diagnostic challenge.

Histopathologic Characterization of Mogamulizumab-associated Rash

Rash is one of the most common adverse events observed with mogamulizumab, an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 monoclonal antibody approved for previously treated mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). Given the nonspecific clinical presentations of this rash, histopathologic distinction from MF/SS is critical for informing clinical management. We performed a comprehensive characterization of the histopathologic findings in mogamulizumab-associated rash (MAR) with the integration of high-throughput sequencing of T-cell receptor (TCR) genes. Fifty-two biopsy specimens from 19 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Three major histologic reaction patterns were identified: spongiotic/psoriasiform dermatitis (33/52), interface dermatitis (11/52), and granulomatous dermatitis (8/52). Almost half of the specimens (21/52) showed at least 2 of these reaction patterns concurrently. Dermal eosinophils were not a consistent feature, being present in only half (27/52) of specimens and prominent in only 3. Features mimicking MF/SS, including lymphocyte exocytosis, lamellar fibroplasia, and adnexal involvement, were commonly seen but tended to be focal and mild. In 38/43 specimens with available immunohistochemistry, intraepidermal lymphocytes demonstrated a CD4:CD8 ratio ≤1 : 1. Low background levels of the patient's previously identified MF/SS-associated TCR sequence(s) were demonstrated in 20/46 specimens analyzed by high-throughput sequencing of TCR. We conclude that MAR may demonstrate diverse histologic features. Findings that may distinguish MAR from MF/SS include the inverted or normalized CD4:CD8 ratio within intraepidermal lymphocytes and demonstration of absent or nondominant levels of disease-associated TCR sequences. Correlation with the clinical findings and immunohistochemical and molecular characterization of the patient's MF/SS before mogamulizumab, when possible, may facilitate recognition of MAR.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus conventional therapy for advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) belong to the group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and usually run an indolent course. However, some patients progress to advanced tumour or leukaemic stages. To date, there is no cure for those cases. In the last few years, several publications reported durable responses in some patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011 and updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional therapies with allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2013), Internet-databases of ongoing trials, conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO, 2009 to July 2013) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH, 2009 to July 2013). We also contacted members of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force to check for ongoing study activities. We handsearched citations from identified trials and relevant review articles. In addition, we handsearched randomised controlled trials from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and International Conference on Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, ASCO and ASH up to July 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials eligible for inclusion were genetically randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alloSCT plus conditioning therapy (regardless of agents) with conventional therapy as treatment for advanced CTCL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors would have extracted data from eligible studies and assessed their quality. The primary outcome measure was overall survival; secondary outcomes were time to progression, response rate, treatment-related mortality, adverse events and quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any randomised controlled trials from the updated search in January 2013. In 2011, we found 2077 citations but none were relevant genetically or non-genetically randomised controlled trials. All 41 studies that were thought to be potentially suitable were excluded after full text screening for being non-randomised, not including CTCL or being review articles.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We planned to report evidence from genetically or non-genetically randomised controlled trials comparing conventional therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, we did not identify any randomised controlled trials addressing this question. Nevertheless, prospective genetically randomised controlled trials need to be initiated to evaluate the precise role of alloSCT in advanced CTCL.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus conventional therapy for advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) belong to the group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas and usually run an indolent course. However, some patients progress to advanced tumour or leukaemic stages. Up to now, no curative treatment has been established for those cases. In the last few years, several publications have reported durable responses in some patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional therapies with allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.

SEARCH METHODS

The search strategy included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1950 to May 2011), Internet-databases of ongoing trials (www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov), conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO, 2009 to present) and the American Society of Hematology (ASH, 2009 to present). We also contacted members of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force to check for ongoing study activities. We handsearched citations from identified trials and relevant review articles. In addition, randomised controlled trials from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and International Conference on Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, ASCO and ASH up to 2010 were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Genetically randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing alloSCT plus conditioning therapy regardless of agents with conventional therapy as treatment for advanced CTCL were eligible to be included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

From eligible studies data would have been extracted by two review authors and assessed for quality. Primary outcome measures were overall survival, secondary criteria were time to progression, response rate, treatment-related mortality, adverse events and quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 2077 citations but none were relevant genetically or non-genetically randomised controlled trials. All 41 studies that were thought to be potentially suitable were excluded after full text screening for being non-randomised, not including CTCL or being review articles.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We planned to report evidence from genetically or non-genetically randomised controlled trials comparing conventional therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, no randomised trials addressing this question were identified. Nevertheless, prospective genetically randomised controlled trials need to be initiated to evaluate the precise role of alloSCT in advanced CTCL.