1
|
Pascual JC, Hernández-Quiles R, Sánchez-García V, Viudez-Martínez A, Belinchón Romero I, Sivera Mascaró F. Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2024; 115:T433-T448. [PMID: 38423507 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS. MATERIALS AND METHODS We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study. RESULTS We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs. CONCLUSION The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Pascual
- Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (Isabial), Alicante, España.
| | - R Hernández-Quiles
- Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (Isabial), Alicante, España
| | - V Sánchez-García
- Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (Isabial), Alicante, España
| | - A Viudez-Martínez
- Servicio de Farmacia. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (Isabial), Alicante, España
| | - I Belinchón Romero
- Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (Isabial), Alicante, España; Departamento de Medicina Clínica. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, España
| | - F Sivera Mascaró
- Departamento de Medicina Clínica. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, España; Servicio de Reumatología. Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Alicante, España
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pascual JC, Hernández-Quiles R, Sánchez-García V, Viudez-Martínez A, Belinchón I, Sivera F. Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2024; 115:433-448. [PMID: 38159839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS. MATERIALS AND METHODS We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study. RESULTS We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs. CONCLUSION The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Pascual
- Department of Dermatology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
| | - R Hernández-Quiles
- Department of Dermatology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - V Sánchez-García
- Department of Dermatology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - A Viudez-Martínez
- Department of Pharmacy, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain
| | - I Belinchón
- Department of Dermatology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain; Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - F Sivera
- Department of Rheumatology, General University Hospital of Elda, Alicante, Spain; Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chernyshov PV, Zouboulis CC, Tomas-Aragones L, Jemec GB, Svensson A, Manolache L, Tzellos T, Sampogna F, Pustisek N, van der Zee HH, Marron SE, Spillekom-van Koulil S, Bewley A, Linder D, Abeni D, Szepietowski JC, Augustin M, Finlay AY. Quality of life measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa: position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology task forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33:1633-1643. [PMID: 31037773 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This paper is organized jointly by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and the EADV TF on acne, rosacea and hidradenitis suppurativa (ARHS). The purpose of this paper was to present current knowledge about QoL assessment in HS, including data on HS-specific health-related (HR) QoL instruments and HRQoL changes in clinical trials, and to make practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in people with HS. HS results in significant quimp that is higher than in most other chronic skin diseases. HS impact in published studies was assessed predominantly (84% of studies) by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). There is a lack of high-quality clinical trials in HS patients where HRQoL instruments have been used as outcome measures. One double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial on infliximab with low number of participants reported significantly better HRQoL improvement in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Well-designed clinical studies in HS patients to compare different treatment methods, including surgical methods and assessing long-term effects, are needed. Because of lack of sufficient validation, the Task Forces are not at present able to recommend existing HS-specific HRQoL instruments for use in clinical studies. The EADV TFs recommend the dermatology-specific DLQI questionnaire for use in HS patients. The EADV TFs encourage the further development, validation and use of other HS-specific, dermatology-specific and generic instruments but such use should be based on the principles presented in the previous publications of the EADV TF on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P V Chernyshov
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - C C Zouboulis
- Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Dessau Medical Center, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Dessau, Germany
| | - L Tomas-Aragones
- Department of Psychology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - G B Jemec
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Health Sciences Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Svensson
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - L Manolache
- Dermatology, Dali Medical, Bucharest, Romania
| | - T Tzellos
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital of North Norway, Troms, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - F Sampogna
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - N Pustisek
- Children's Hospital Zagreb, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - H H van der Zee
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Marron
- Department of Dermatology, Royo Villanova Hospital, Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group (GAI+PD), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - S Spillekom-van Koulil
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bewley
- Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.,The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Linder
- Unit of Dermatology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - D Abeni
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - J C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - M Augustin
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Y Finlay
- Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robert E, Bodin F, Paul C, Konstantinou MP, Gall Y, Grolleau JL, Laloze J, Chaput B. Non-surgical treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review. ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH 2017; 62:274-294. [PMID: 28457725 DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2017.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of hidradenitis suppurativa is multidisciplinary, involving general measures, medical treatment and surgery. Non-surgical treatments, often first-line procedures, mainly concern forms of low-to-moderate severity or, conversely, very severe forms in non-operable patients or those refusing surgery. While many treatments have been attempted, few randomized controlled trials have been conducted, so the choice of treatments is most often based on the personal experience of the clinicians. The objective of this systematic review is to propose a synthetic analysis of the currently available non-surgical procedures. METHODS This systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. We searched for articles in the Medline®, PubMed Central, Embase and Cochrane databases published between January 2005 and September 2015. RESULTS Sixty-four articles were included. They generally had a low level of evidence; indeed, the majority of them were retrospective observational studies. They involved biotherapy (44%), dynamic phototherapy (16%), antibiotics (11%), Laser (8%), retinoids (6%) and immunosuppressive therapies, anti-inflammatory drugs, zinc, metformin, gammaglobulins and fumarates. CONCLUSIONS None of the non-surgical treatments can treat all stages of the disease and offer long-term remission. Antibiotics and biotherapy seem to have real effectiveness but their effect remains suspensive and the disease is almost certain to reappear once they are stopped. As regards antibiotics, no association has shown their superiority in a study with a high level of evidence. And while some biotherapies seem quite effective, due to their side effects they should be reserved for moderate-to-severe, resistant or inoperable forms of the disease. Randomized controlled studies are needed before valid conclusions can be drawn. In the resistant or disabling forms, it is consequently advisable to orientate to the greatest possible extent towards radical surgery, which is the only treatment allowing hope for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Robert
- Department of plastic surgery, Strasbourg university hospitals, university of Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France
| | - F Bodin
- Department of plastic surgery, Strasbourg university hospitals, university of Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Paul
- Department of dermatology, Rangueil-Larrey hospital, Paul-Sabatier university, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - M-P Konstantinou
- Department of dermatology, Rangueil-Larrey hospital, Paul-Sabatier university, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Y Gall
- Department of dermatology, Rangueil-Larrey hospital, Paul-Sabatier university, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - J-L Grolleau
- Department of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, Rangueil hospital, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - J Laloze
- Department of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, Rangueil hospital, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - B Chaput
- Department of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, Rangueil hospital, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|