Low-dose oral fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide as first-line treatment in elderly patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Chemoimmunotherapy with oral low-dose fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (old-FCR) as treatment for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Median age at diagnosis for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients is now 72 years, thus a consistent number of patients may not tolerate standard doses i.v. of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR), the best available therapy, due to unacceptable myelotoxicity and risk of severe infections. We studied safety and efficacy of the addition of rituximab to the oral low-dose FC regimen (old-FCR) in a selected population of 30 elderly (median age 75, 15 untreated, 15 treated with 1 prior therapy) CLL patients. Complete remission (CR) rate was 80% in the untreated patients (overall response rate, ORR 93%), and 30% in pretreated patients (ORR 74%). Progression free survivals (PFS) were 45 months and 30 months in the untreated and treated patients, respectively. In patients achieving CR, old-FCR led to PFS of 67 months. Moreover, haematological toxicity was mild (grade 3-4: 15%) and patients were treated mostly in outpatient clinic. Old-FCR could be a good therapy option for elderly CLL patients outside clinical trials, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab plus low-dose oral fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as first-line treatment of elderly patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs) are B-cell neoplasms for which no consensus is available about optimal first-line therapy. Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophospamide and rituximab is very effective, but may give severe hematological and non-hematological toxicity at standard doses, especially in elderly patients. In this phase II study, 25 untreated elderly patients with iNHL received rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) plus low-dose oral fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive days) and cyclophosphamide (150 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive days) for four monthly cycles. Twenty-three patients were responsive (92%) and 12 patients achieved a complete remission (48%). Twenty-one patients (84%) were alive, median follow-up was 30 months and median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached. Patients who we previously treated with chemotherapy alone had a shorter EFS (median 20 months). Compliance was good, with mild toxicity. This regimen is effective for elderly patients with iNHL. The addition of rituximab results in long EFS without affecting toxicity.

Fludarabine-containing chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical efficacy and safety of fludarabine combination chemotherapy was investigated for the treatment of previously untreated patients with low-grade (NHL).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who were newly diagnosed as low-grade NHL were treated with fludarabine combination chemotherapy. Fludarabine combination regimens consisted of fludarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone with or without rituximab and repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years (range, 35-77 years), with 13 of 25 patients (52%) ≥60 years of age. Seven of 25 patients (28%) with an intermediate risk follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) and 9 of 25 patients (36%) with a high risk FLIPI were enrolled in this study. The delivered median number of chemotherapy was six (range, 2-9 cycles). The overall response rate with fludarabine-based treatment was 88%, including 52% complete remission and 36% partial remission. During the median follow-up of 19 months, the estimated 2-year event-free survival was 63±10% (95% CI, 43-83) and the 2-year overall survival was 78±9% (95% CI, 60-96). Fludarabine combination chemotherapy was frequently associated with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 84% patients. However, neutropenic infection was observed in only one (4%) patient. Four patients (16%) showed grade 3 or more non-hematologic toxicities, such as acute coronary syndrome, intracranial hemorrhage, anaphylaxis and gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

Fludarabine-combination treatment was a highly active regimen with well toleration in untreated low-grade NHL.

Treatment of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue with fludarabine: effect on tumor microenvironment

Gastric Helicobacter pylori (HP) positive extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) develops during chronic antigenic stimulation with specific T-cell help. Chemotherapy that acts both on the malignant B-cells and on T-cells in the microenvironment, i.e. nucleoside analogs, might therefore be an attractive treatment. In 14 patients with gastric MALT lymphoma treated with fludarabine, alterations in T-cell subsets were studied in subsequent peripheral blood samples and in gastric biopsies. Treatment with fludarabine resulted in a steep decrease in T-cell subsets in peripheral blood samples. By contrast no decrease in T-cell populations was observed in subsequent gastric biopsy samples and a moderate increase was observed in relative infiltration with CD3 +, CD4 + and CD8 + cells. In addition an increase in density of FOXP3 + cells (i.e. Tregs) was seen (p = 0.047). These alterations in different T-cell subsets were not observed in gastric biopsy samples of patients treated with HP-eradication only.

How I treat elderly or comorbid patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has recently undergone several major changes. Most importantly, large randomized trials (CLL-8 in first line and REACH in relapse) clearly demonstrated superiority of chemoimmunotherapy consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) over fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) alone, thus establishing FCR regimen as the new gold standard in younger and physically fit patients. However, management of elderly and/or comorbid patients is still a challenging task because they cannot be treated with agressive approaches due to high risk of unacceptable toxicity. To date, no randomized trials in this patient population have improved therapeutic results over chlorambucil; therefore, this agent remains the backbone of treatment against which the new protocols should be tested. When deciding about the intensity of treatment, performance status, biological age and number as well as severity of comorbidities should be taken into account. Emerging treatment concepts for elderly/comorbid patients include combination of chlorambucil with monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, ofatumumab, GA-101), fludarabine-based regimens in reduced doses or protocols based on bendamustine and lenalidomide. Combination of high-dose steroids with rituximab represent a promising option in relapsed/refractory CLL; however, infectious toxicity remains a serious issue. Finally, ofatumumab monotherapy appears to be a safe and effective therapy for heavily pretreated patients with CLL. This article reviews the current and future possibilities in the treatment of elderly and comorbid patients with CLL.