IgE and IgG antibody response to purified bee-venom antigens and peptides in four patients who had adverse reactions to immunotherapy

Development of macrophage-associated genes prognostic signature predicts clinical outcome and immune infiltration for sepsis

Sepsis is a major global health problem, causing a significant burden of disease and death worldwide. Risk stratification of sepsis patients, identification of severe patients and timely initiation of treatment can effectively improve the prognosis of sepsis patients. We procured gene expression datasets for sepsis (GSE54514, GSE65682, GSE95233) from the Gene Expression Omnibus and performed normalization to mitigate batch effects. Subsequently, we applied weighted gene co-expression network analysis to categorize genes into modules that exhibit correlation with macrophage activity. To pinpoint macrophage-associated genes (MAAGs), we executed differential expression analysis and single sample gene set enrichment analysis. We then established a prognostic model derived from four MAAGs that were significantly differentially expressed. Functional enrichment analysis and immune infiltration assessments were instrumental in deciphering the biological mechanisms involved. Furthermore, we employed principal component analysis and conducted survival outcome analyses to delineate molecular subgroups within sepsis. Four novel MAAGs-CD160, CX3CR1, DENND2D, and FAM43A-were validated and used to create a prognostic model. Subgroup classification revealed distinct molecular profiles and a correlation with 28-day survival outcomes. The MAAGs risk score was developed through univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox analyses to predict patient prognosis. Validation of the risk score upheld its prognostic significance. Functional enrichment implicated ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, mitochondrial matrix, and transcription coregulator activity in sepsis, with an immune infiltration analysis indicating an association between MAAGs risk score and immune cell populations. The four MAAGs exhibited strong diagnostic capabilities for sepsis. The research successfully developed a MAAG-based prognostic model for sepsis, demonstrating that such genes can significantly stratify risk and reflect immune status. Although in-depth mechanistic studies are needed, these findings propose novel targets for therapy and provide a foundation for future precise clinical sepsis management.

Modified antigenic reactivity of anti-phospholipase A2 IgG antibodies in patients allergic to bee venom: conversion with immunotherapy and relation to subclass expression

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported that, in addition to modifying IgG levels and subclass distributions, wasp venom immunotherapy (VIT) rapidly changes IgG antibody specificity.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether such a change can be documented in the IgG response to the major bee venom allergen, phospholipase A2 (PLA2), from patients allergic to bees treated with VIT; whether it is coupled to the shift in IgG subclass distribution (IgG4 predominance) usually observed during VIT; and whether it restores the specificity displayed by IgG antibodies from nonallergic individuals.

METHODS

Antibody specificity was evaluated in 17 patients allergic to bee venom in competitive ELISAs by using streptavidin biotin technology. Patients were tested before and during specific immunotherapy (at 15 days and 6 months) and compared with another group of 17 patients treated with venom injections for at least 2 years (VIT patients) and 30 healthy individuals.

RESULTS

The capacity of individual sera to prevent PLA2 binding of pooled IgG from allergic patients changed rapidly with mean percentage inhibitions falling from 84% +/- 14% before starting VIT to 27% +/- 13% and 28% +/- 7% after 15 days and 6 months of treatment, respectively (p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]). IgG titers were only slightly increased. The capacity of individual sera to prevent the binding of pooled IgG from patients receiving VIT changed rapidly with mean percentage inhibition increasing from 60% +/- 12% before starting VIT to 85% +/- 6% and 82% +/- 6% after 15 days and 6 months of treatment, respectively (p < 0.001 by one-way ANOVA). Similar results were found regardless of whether pooled IgG1 or pooled IgG4 were used.

CONCLUSION

VIT results in a rapid change in the antigenic reactivity of anti-PLA2 IgG antibody of human allergic sera, restoring, although not completely, the specificity peculiar to lgG from healthy individuals. This suggests that allergic status and immunoprotection correlate with the preferential expression of distinct IgG specificities, which appear equally distributed over the IgG1 and IgG4 antibody subclasses. It is, however, not known whether the shift in IgG specificity is one of the operative mechanisms of VIT.

A comparative study of IgG subclass antibodies in patients allergic to wasp or bee venom

IgG1 and IgG4 antivenom antibody responses were compared in groups of patients who had experienced systemic reactions to wasp (Vespula spp.) or bee stings. Pretreatment serum IgG4 antibody levels were low in both groups, but IgG1 antibodies were significantly raised in bee-allergic patients (P < 0.002), probably reflecting their greater exposure to stings than wasp-reactive patients. No direct or indirect relationships were found, in untreated bee or wasp patients, between IgG1, IgG4, or IgE antibody levels and the severity of a patient's last systemic reaction to a sting. After a 12-week course of venom immunotherapy (VIT), IgG1 antibodies increased significantly only in wasp-sensitive patients (P < 0.001), although both groups responded with marked increases in venom-specific IgG4 (P < 0.01). Wasp-allergic subjects who responded to VIT with high production of specific IgG4 showed the greatest increases (pre- to post-VIT) in IgE antibodies (P < 0.05). This group also demonstrated a direct correlation (P < 0.05) between post-VIT levels of IgE and IgG1 antibodies, a finding contrary to an IgE-immunoregulatory role for IgG1. High levels of venom-specific IgG1 alone, or in combination with IgG4, were not protective in three patients who suffered repeated adverse reactions to bee VIT, showing that absolute levels of IgG subclass antivenom antibodies are not reliably indicative of clinical responsiveness in individual patients.

Specific IgE antibodies to vespids in the course of immunotherapy with Vespula germanica administered to patients sensitized to Polistes dominulus

Sera from a group of 12 patients with anaphylactic reactions to vespids were studied. Field observations and RAST values suggested that the offending insect was Polistes dominulus (PD). Specific IgE antibodies to PD appeared in all cases and to Vespula germanica (VG) in nine. Absorption studies in these basal sera showed that IgE antibodies to VG were due to cross-reactivity with PD. The RAST value to both venoms was higher after immunotherapy (IT) in six cases. IgE antibodies increased to determinants common to both vespids, and in 41% of the cases to specific epitopes of VG venom allergens not initially detected in the basal sera. In one case antibodies increased only to VG without a corresponding rise to PD. These results indicate that if the correct venom to which the individuals are sensitized is not administered IgE antibodies may appear which were not initially detected in the patients' sera. The levels of these antibodies declined during the course of IT.