Psoriasiform eruption associated with alopecia areata during infliximab therapy

Paradoxical Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) Inhibitor-Induced Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have been shown to be well tolerated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis. Meanwhile, more recently, clinical practice and research efforts have uncovered increasing cases of psoriatic lesion development tied to initiating treatment with a TNF-α inhibitor. The underlying mechanisms associated with this occurrence have yet to be fully elucidated. A review and analysis of cases of paradoxical psoriasis currently published in the literature is warranted. In addition, exploring possible mechanisms of action and potential treatment options associated with favorable outcomes is much needed. A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar databases (1992-present), in which 106 cases of paradoxical psoriasis were reviewed. The most common morphology developed was plaque psoriasis vulgaris. There was a female predominance (61.3%), and the most common underlying autoimmune disease was rheumatoid arthritis (45.3%). In addition, the most commonly associated drug with the onset of psoriatic lesions was infliximab (62.3%). Furthermore, the findings suggest that the most well-supported mechanism of action involves the uncontrolled release of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) after TNF-α inhibition. While TNF-α inhibitors have been shown to have great benefits to patients with rheumatologic diseases, cases of paradoxical psoriasis demonstrate the importance of close monitoring of patients on TNF-α inhibitors to allow for early recognition, treatment, and potentially change to a different mechanism of action of the medication used to prevent further progression of the inflammatory lesions.

IFN-α and TNF-α serum levels and their association with disease severity in Egyptian children and adults with alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune skin disease characterized by abnormal levels of several cytokines, such as interferon alpha (IFN-α) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which are T-helper type 1 cytokines that have important roles in the pathogenesis of AA. The aim of our study was to correlate circulating IFN-α and TNF-α levels with disease severity, activity, and clinical type in patients with AA and to evaluate the relationship between the two cytokines.

METHODS

We investigated serum IFN-α and TNF-α levels in 72 patients with AA (35 children and 35 adults) and 75 healthy control individuals (34 children and 41 adults) using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. We evaluated AA severity using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) and determined the activity based on dermoscopic criteria of disease activity.

RESULTS

Serum IFN-α and TNF-α concentrations were significantly higher in the patients than in the controls. There was a significant positive correlation between serum IFN-α and TNF-α levels in all patients with alopecia areata, as well as between serum TNF-α levels and disease severity in all patients and in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the association between IFN-α and TNF-α levels and AA and suggest that TNF-α might be related to disease severity.

Detection of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in Nonlesional Tissues of Alopecia Areata Patients: A Prove for a Systemic Disease

Introduction

The pathogenesis of alopecia areata (AA) remains incompletely understood. Different cytokines may play a role in AA. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) has been shown to be inhibitory to hair follicle growth in in vitro studies suggesting that it may play an important role in AA. This study was conducted to assess the presence of TNF-α in lesional and nonlesional skin of AA, to review its possible role in AA, and to show whether AA is a systemic or localized disease by comparing the level of TNF-α between lesional and nonlesional skin biopsies of the patients.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients with AA and thirty age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included in the study. A 4 mm punch skin biopsy was taken from lesional and nonlesional skin of every patient, as well as from the normal skin of each individual in the control group for immunohistochemical analysis of TNF-α.

Results

The level of TNF-α in lesional skin biopsies was significantly higher than in nonlesional skin biopsies of patients as well as controls' biopsies. Furthermore, TNF-α level in nonlesional biopsies of patients was significantly higher than the level in controls' biopsies.

Conclusions

We concluded that skin of AA has a high level of TNF-α (a normal inhibitor of hair follicle growth in vitro). This high level may point to the important role of TNF-α in AA. Further studies should be conducted to detect the level of TNF-α in long-standing AA and the more severe cases of AA.

Alopecia induced by tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists: description of 52 cases and disproportionality analysis in a nationwide pharmacovigilance database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to describe the cases of TNF-α antagonist-related alopecia reported in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD) and to investigate the association between exposure to TNF-α antagonists and occurrence of alopecia.

METHODS

All spontaneous reports of TNF-α antagonist-related alopecia recorded in the FPVD between January 2000 and April 2012 were colligated and described. We conducted disproportionality analyses (case/non-case method) to assess the link between the occurrence of alopecia and exposure to TNF-α antagonists. Cases were all reports of alopecia and non-cases were all other reports recorded during the study period. Exposure to TNF-α antagonists was sought in cases and in non-cases. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated to assess the association. Docetaxel was used as positive control and acetaminophen as negative control. We performed sensitivity analyses excluding cases of androgenic alopecia and those occurring in psoriatic patients.

RESULTS

Among 282 590 spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) collated in the FPVD, 1068 cases (alopecia reports) were identified. Of these cases, 52 (4.9%) occurred during exposure to TNF-α antagonists (18 involved infliximab, 17 adalimumab, 15 etanercept and 2 certolizumab). Exposure to TNF-α antagonists was more frequent among alopecia reports than among other ADR reports for all TNF-α antagonists pooled (ROR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3, 4.0) as well as for each antagonist separately, with similar values. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. The RORs were 29.9 (95% CI 25.3, 35.5) with docetaxel and 0.3 (95% CI 0.2, 0.4) with acetaminophen.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms a strong link between TNF-α antagonist exposure (class effect) and the occurrence of alopecia.

Safety and efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of severe alopecia areata: case series of three patients

BACKGROUND

Current therapeutic options for extensive alopecia areata (AA) often lead to disappointing results.

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with severe AA.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, single-center, pilot study. Three subjects of the planned 10 were enrolled and received two weekly subcutaneous (SC) loading doses of adalimumab 80 mg followed by 40 mg SC every week for 6 months. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and safety on a monthly basis.

RESULTS

Enrolment in this trial was stopped following publication of studies showing no improvement in patients with AA treated with tumor necrosis factor α antagonists. One patient had a favorable response to adalimumab, whereas the two other patients had no benefit from the therapy. Adalimumab was well tolerated by patients with AA.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab was well tolerated in patients with AA but did not induce clinically significant hair regrowth.

Psoriatic alopecia/alopecia areata-like reactions secondary to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy: a novel cause of noncicatricial alopecia

With the increasing use of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) biologic drugs to treat autoimmune diseases, an expanding array of adverse reactions is emerging. Anti-TNF drug-induced alopecia is a less well-known side effect of this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to define the clinical and histopathological features of alopecia arising in the setting of anti-TNF therapy. Clinical and histopathological features of 3 patients who developed scalp alopecia during anti-TNF treatment were examined. Two of the 3 patients also developed psoriasiform lesions outside the scalp, and biopsies from both scalp and nonscalp sites were reviewed. Clinically, each patient had large scaly patches associated with the scalp alopecia. All scalp biopsies revealed psoriasiform epidermal features and alopecia areata-like dermal changes. Epidermal changes included acanthosis and confluent parakeratosis with neutrophils and frank pustules. Dermal changes included markedly increased catagen/telogen and miniaturized hairs and peribulbar lymphocytic inflammation. Numerous plasma cells and eosinophils were present in all cases. Biopsies from the nonscalp lesions showed psoriasiform changes and prominent eosinophils and plasma cells. Two patients showed significant improvement of the alopecia with topical treatment only. In conclusion, anti-TNF therapy-related alopecia may closely mimic psoriatic alopecia and alopecia areata but can be histologically distinguished from alopecia areata by epidermal psoriasiform changes and dermal plasma cells and from primary psoriasis by the presence of plasma cells and eosinophils. A correct diagnosis can enable effective treatment and, in some cases, allow anti-TNF therapy to continue.

Alopecia areata as another immune-mediated disease developed in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor-α blocker agents: Report of five cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF-α) have demonstrated the efficacy in different chronic immune inflammatory disorders. Within the spectrum of adverse events, autoimmune diseases have been observed, including cases of alopecia areata (AA).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study is to characterize AA developed during anti-TNF-α therapy.

METHODS

We present five new cases and review all the cases reported in the literature (eleven).

RESULTS

One third of the cases had a positive (personal or family) history of AA. Most of them presented with rapid extensive AA, usually involving the ophiasis area. Prognosis was usually poor, with slight response to treatments. In the cases where anti-TNF-α therapy was maintained, the course did not seem to change.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, AA developed during anti-TNF-α therapy might be more frequent than suggested by reports of isolated cases. Personal and family history of autoimmune disease might alert clinicians to their possible development or relapse once the anti-TNF-α therapy is started.

[Alopecia areata during anti-TNF alpha therapy: Nine cases]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, a growing number of biological agents have been introduced for the treatment of various diseases, and their principal adverse events are known. We present nine cases of alopecia areata (AA) developed in patients treated with TNF-α blocking agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine cases are described: five men and four women of mean age 39.2 years (range: 29-54 years). Two patients had a past history of alopecia areata. The anti-TNF given was adalimumab (Humira(®)) in eight cases and etanercept (Enbrel(®)) in one case. The time lapse to development of AA following introduction of the anti-TNF alpha agent was between six weeks and eight months (mean: 4.2 months). There were five cases of patchy AA and four of AA universalis. Anti-TNF alpha treatment was stopped in all patients. Complete regrowth was seen in five patients. Two patients showed no improvement. In two patients, partial hair regrowth (<50%) was seen after systemic corticosteroid therapy and methotrexate.

DISCUSSION

Our nine cases of alopecia areata developed in patients treated with TNF-α blockers constitute the largest series reported to our knowledge. 17 cases of AA during anti-TNF-alpha therapy have previously been described in the literature. AA may be a side effect of anti-TNF-alpha drugs. In our patients, no conclusive triggers could be associated with the development of AA, except a context of stress in four patients. Complete regrowth in three patients after discontinuation of the anti-TNF-alpha (without other therapy) is an additional argument in favour of the implication of biotherapies. However, a random coincidence of AA with anti-TNF-alpha cannot be completely ruled out. The role of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in the pathogenesis of AA is poorly understood. Activation of self-reactive T cells by anti-TNF-alpha could lead to the development of AA.