Infiltrating cellular pattern in kidney graft biopsies translates into forkhead box protein 3 up-regulation and p16INK4α senescence protein down-regulation in patients treated with belatacept compared to cyclosporin A

Tissue talks: immunophenotype of cells infiltrating the graft explains histological findings and the benefits of belatacept at 10 years

Previously, we found a substantial number of regulatory T cells (Tregs ) and fewer senescent and T helper type 17 (Th17) and a decrease in interstitial fibrosis (IF) in 12-month graft biopsies in belatacept versus cyclosporin (CNI)-treated patients [Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial (BENEFIT) study]. Seven years after kidney transplantation (KT), mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patient and graft survival were significantly higher with belatacept versus CNI treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether the immunophenotypes of inflammatory and regulatory cell subsets infiltrating the grafts contribute to the BENEFIT's clinical findings a decade after KT. Twenty-three adult patients with functionally stable KT treated with belatacept and 10 treated with CNI were enrolled. Biopsies were analyzed by histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry for proliferation, senescence, apoptosis, inflammatory and regulatory cell markers in a blinded manner. Significantly lower percentages of inflammatory/fibrogenic cells [interleukin (IL)-22+ /Th17/Th2/M1 macrophages] were observed in patients treated with belatacept than in patients treated with CNI. By contrast, remarkably higher percentages of regulatory cells [Tregs /Bregs / plasmacytoid dendritic regulatory cells (pDCregs )/M2] were found in belatacept-treated patients than in CNI-treated patients. Conspicuously lower percentages of apoptosis and senescence and higher proliferation markers were found in belatacept-treated patients than in CNI-treated patients. Consequently, there was significantly more inflammation in the microvascular compartments as well as increased tubular atrophy and IF in CNI-treated patients. These findings strongly suggest that regulatory mechanisms, along with the absence of deleterious effects of CNI, contribute to the long-term graft histology and function stability in patients treated with belatacept.

Immunomics of Renal Allograft Acute T Cell-Mediated Rejection Biopsies of Tacrolimus- and Belatacept-Treated Patients

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Belatacept-based therapy in kidney transplant recipient has been shown to increase long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based therapy, however, with an increased risk of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR). An improved understanding of costimulation blockade-resistant rejections could lead to a more personalized approach to belatacept therapy. Here, immunomic profiles of aTCMR biopsies of patients treated with either tacrolimus or belatacept were compared.

Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal transplant biopsies were used for immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis using the innovative NanoString technique. To validate NanoString, transcriptomic profiles of patients with and without biopsy-proven aTCMR were compared. Biopsies from 31 patients were studied: 14 tacrolimus-treated patients with aTCMR, 11 belatacept-treated patients with aTCMR, and 6 controls without rejection.

Results

A distinct pattern was seen in biopsies with aTCMR compared to negative controls: 78 genes had a higher expression in the aTCMR group (false discovery rate P value <.05 to 1.42e–05). The most significant were T cell-associated genes (CD3, CD8, and CD4; P < 1.98e-04), γ-interferon-inducible genes (CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL11, CXCL10, TBX21; P < 1.33e-04) plus effector genes (GNLY, GZMB, ITGAX; P < 2.82e-03). Immunophenotypical analysis of the classic immune markers of the innate and adaptive immune system was comparable between patients treated with either tacrolimus or belatacept. In addition, the transcriptome of both groups was not significantly different.

Conclusions

In this small pilot study, no difference was found in immunomics of aTCMR biopsies of tacrolimus- and belatacept-treated patients. This suggests that clinically diagnosed aTCMR reflects a final common pathway of allorecognition which is unaffected by the type of immunosuppressive therapy.

Effect of cyclosporine, tacrolimus and sirolimus on cellular senescence in renal epithelial cells

INTRODUCTION

In transplantation medicine calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) still represent the backbone of immunosuppressive therapy. The nephrotoxic potential of the CNI Cyclosporine A (CsA) and Tacrolimus (FK506) is well recognized and CNI not only have been linked with toxicity, but also with cellular senescence which hinders parenchymal tissue regeneration and thus may prime kidneys for subsequent insults. To minimize pathological effects on kidney grafts, alternative immunosuppressive agents like mTOR inhibitors or the T-cell co-stimulation blocker Belatacept have been introduced.

METHODS

We compared the effects of CsA, FK506 and Sirolimus on the process of cellular senescence in different human renal tubule cell types (HK2, RPTEC). Telomere length (by real time PCR), DNA synthesis (by BrdU incorporation), cell viability (by Resazurin conversion), gene expression (by RT-PCR), protein (by western blotting), Immuncytochemistry and H₂O₂ production (by Amplex Red® conversion) were evaluated.

RESULTS

DNA synthesis was significantly reduced when cells were treated with cyclosporine but not with tacrolimus and sirolimus. Resazurin conversion was not altered by all three immunosuppressive agents. The gene expression as well as protein production of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 (CDKN1A) but not p16 (CDKN2A) was significantly induced by cyclosporine compared to the other two immunosuppressive agents when determined by western blotting an immuncytochemistry. Relative telomere length was reduced and hydrogen peroxide production increased after treatment with CsA but not with FK506 or sirolimus.

CONCLUSION

In summary, renal tubule cells exposed to CsA show clear signs of cellular senescence where on the contrary the second calcineurin inhibitor FK506 and the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus are not involved in such mechanisms. Chronic renal allograft dysfunction could be in part triggered by cellular senescence induced by immunosuppressive medication and the choice of drug could therefore influence long term outcome. Tacrolimus and Sirolimus are equally effective in avoiding cellular senescence compared to cyclosporine at least in parts due to a lack of induction of reactive oxygen species.

Tubular Cell Senescence in the Donated Kidney Predicts Allograft Function, but Not Donor Remnant Kidney Function, in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether kidneys from marginal donors are suitable for live kidney transplantation. In deceased donor kidneys, tubular cell senescence affects allograft function. However, the degree of cell senescence in a living donor kidney with marginal factors has not been reported. In this study, we assessed the association of tubular cell senescence with allograft and remnant kidney function by a prospective observational clinical study.

METHODS

Thirty-eight living donor kidney transplantations were analyzed prospectively. Tissue sections obtained from preimplantation kidney biopsies were immunostained for p16INK4a to indicate cell senescence. Various kidney biomarkers were analyzed in urine and blood samples.

RESULTS

Of the 38 donors, 21 had marginal factors. Severe tubular senescence was found in living donors with overlapping marginal criteria. Tubular senescence in living donor kidneys was significantly related to donor age and lower recipient kidney function at 1 year after transplantation independently of donor age (β = -0.281; p = 0.050) but did not affect remnant kidney function after donation. Pretransplantation donor pre-estimated glomerular filtration rate and hypertension did not show a significant area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of high tubular senescence. High plasma levels of soluble αKlotho were associated with a higher predictive value for low tubular cell senescence with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.93; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The nuclear p16-staining rate in donated kidney tubules is a predictor for allograft kidney function but not donor remnant kidney function. Detection of tubular cell senescence may facilitate selection of appropriate living donor candidates.

Belatacept conversion in African American kidney transplant recipients with severe renal dysfunction

Objectives:

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor–based maintenance immunosuppression to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients has been demonstrated to improve renal function while maintaining efficacy against rejection. However, conversion studies to date have excluded patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 35 mL/min/1.73 m².

Methods:

We describe two patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² who underwent conversion from maintenance calcineurin inhibitor to belatacept.

Results:

Both patients experienced improvement in renal function following conversion.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that patients with more severe degrees of allograft impairment may benefit from conversion of maintenance calcineurin inhibitor to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Larger, randomized studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of such an approach.

Rapamycin safeguards lymphocytes from DNA damage accumulation in vivo

Several studies reported the benefits of switching from anticalcineurins to mTOR inhibitors to avoid cancer occurrence after organ transplantation. The purpose of our study was to determine in vivo biological markers to explain these benefits. Cellular changes related to cellular senescence and DNA damage were analyzed in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Thirty-five kidney transplanted patients receiving anticalcineurins were investigated: 17 patients were proposed to switch to rapamycin and 18 patients with similar age and transplantation duration, continued anticalcineurins. Rapamycin effects were studied one year after the switch. Thirteen healthy volunteers and 18 hemodialyzed patients were evaluated as control. Compared with the healthy group, hemodialyzed and transplanted patients exhibited a significant decrease in telomere length, an increase in p16(INK4A) mRNA expression and in lymphocytes with 53BP1 foci. A destabilization of the shelterin complexes was suggested by a significant TIN2 mRNA decrease in transplanted patients compared with controls and a significant increase in TRF1, TRF2 and POT1 expression in switch-proposed patients compared with the non-switched subgroup. Rapamycin treatment resulted in a significant decrease in DNA damage and a slight TIN2 increase. In vitro experiments strengthened in vivo results showing that rapamycin but not FK506 induced a significant DNA damage decrease and TIN2 expression increase compared with controls. The roles of rapamycin in the decrease in DNA damage in vivo and the rescue of shelterin gene expression are demonstrated for the first time. These data provide new insights into understanding of how rapamycin may overcome genomic injuries.

Differential cytokine expression and regulatory cells in patients with primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome

Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the salivary and lacrimal glands. The aim of the study was to characterize and compare the presence of diverse cytokines and regulatory T and B cells in lip minor salivary gland (MSG) biopsies from patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), secondary SS (sSS), and patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) without (w/o) SS. We included samples of MSG from 15 pSS, 24 sSS (six scleroderma, nine rheumatoid arthritis and nine lupus patients) and 15 patients with CTD w/o SS. Tissues were examined by an indirect immunoperoxidase technique (goat polyclonal anti-human IL-19, goat polyclonal anti-human IL-22 or mouse monoclonal anti-human IL-24). To determine the subpopulation of CD4(+)/IL-17A(+)-, CD4(+)/IL-4(+)-, CD4(+)/IFN-ɣ(+)-expressing T cells, CD25(+)/Foxp3(+) Treg cells and CD20(+)/IL-10(+)-producing B cell subset, a double-staining procedure was performed. We estimated the mean percentage of positively staining cells in two fields per sample. CD4(+)/IFN-ɣ(+), CD4(+)/IL-4(+) and IL-22(+) cell percentages were elevated in both SS varieties; however, the cells were more prevalent in pSS. Patients with pSS had a high number of CD4(+)/IL-17A(+) and IL-19(+) T cells and a lower percentage of IL-24(+) cells (P < 0.05). The Treg and IL-10-producing B cells were increased in pSS (P < 0.05). Concluding, in our patients, a pro-inflammatory and regulatory balance coexists in SS, being both responses more intense in pSS. The explanation of these differences may be related to disease activity, disease duration and treatment.

Belatacept for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Most people who receive a kidney transplant die from either cardiovascular disease or cancer before their transplant fails. The most common reason for someone with a kidney transplant to lose the function of their transplanted kidney necessitating return to dialysis is chronic kidney transplant scarring. Immunosuppressant drugs have side effects that increase risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer and chronic kidney transplant scarring. Belatacept may provide sufficient immunosuppression while avoiding unwanted side effects of other immunosuppressant drugs. However, high rates of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) have been reported when belatacept is used in particular kidney transplant recipients at high dosage.

OBJECTIVES

1) Compare the relative efficacy of belatacept versus any other primary immunosuppression regimen for preventing acute rejection, maintaining kidney transplant function, and preventing death. 2) Compare the incidence of several adverse events: PTLD; other malignancies; chronic transplant kidney scarring (IF/TA); infections; change in blood pressure, lipid and blood sugar control. 3) Assess any variation in effects by study, intervention and recipient characteristics, including: differences in pre-transplant Epstein Barr virus serostatus; belatacept dosage; and donor-category (living, standard criteria deceased, or extended criteria deceased).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 1 September 2014 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared belatacept versus any other immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant recipients were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data for study quality and transplant outcomes and synthesized results using random effects meta-analysis, expressed as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).  Subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression were used to investigate potential heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies that compared belatacept and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) that reported data from a total of 1535 kidney transplant recipients. Of the five studies, three (478 participants) compared belatacept and cyclosporin and two (43 recipients) compared belatacept and tacrolimus. Co-interventions included basiliximab (4 studies, 1434 recipients); anti-thymocyte globulin (1 study, 89 recipients); alemtuzumab (1 study, 12 recipients); mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 5 studies, 1509 recipients); sirolimus (1 study, 26 recipients) and prednisone (5 studies, 1535 recipients).Up to three years following transplant, belatacept and CNI-treated recipients were at similar risk of dying (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.44), losing their kidney transplant and returning to dialysis (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.38), and having an episode of acute rejection (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.86). Belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients were 28% less likely to have chronic kidney scarring (3 studies, 1360 recipients: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94) and also had better graft function (measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (3 studies 1083 recipients): 10.89 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 4.01 to 17.77; estimated GFR (4 studies, 1083 recipients): MD 9.96 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 3.28 to 16.64) than CNI-treated recipients. Blood pressure was lower (systolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -7.51 mm Hg, 95% CI -10.57 to -4.46; diastolic (2 studies, 658 recipients): MD -3.07 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.83 to -1.31, lipid profile was better (non-HDL (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -12.25 mg/dL, 95% CI -17.93 to -6.57; triglycerides (3 studies 1101 recipients): MD -24.09 mg/dL, 95% CI -44.55 to -3.64), and incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant was reduced by 39% (4 studies (1049 recipients): RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.93) among belatacept-treated versus CNI-treated recipients.Risk of PTLD was similar in belatacept and CNI-treated recipients (4 studies, 1516 recipients: RR 2.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 12.66) and was no different among recipients who received different belatacept dosages (high versus low dosage: ratio of risk ratios (RRR) 1.06, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.80, test of difference = 0.96) or among those who were Epstein Barr virus seronegative compared with those who were seropositive before their kidney transplant (seronegative versus seropositive; RRR 1.49, 95% CI 0.15 to 14.76, test for difference = 0.73).The belatacept dose used (high versus low), type of donor kidney the recipient received (extended versus standard criteria) and whether the kidney transplant recipient received tacrolimus or cyclosporin made no difference to kidney transplant survival, incidence of acute rejection or estimated GFR. Selective outcome reporting meant that data for some key subgroup comparisons were sparse and that estimates of the effect of treatment in these groups of recipients remain imprecise.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of any difference in the effectiveness of belatacept and CNI in preventing acute rejection, graft loss and death, but treatment with belatacept is associated with less chronic kidney scarring and better kidney transplant function. Treatment with belatacept is also associated with better blood pressure and lipid profile and a lower incidence of diabetes versus treatment with a CNI. Important side effects (particularly PTLD) remain poorly reported and so the relative benefits and harms of using belatacept remain unclear. Whether short-term advantages of treatment with belatacept are maintained over the medium- to long-term or translate into better cardiovascular outcomes or longer kidney transplant survival with function remains unclear. Longer-term, fully reported and published studies comparing belatacept versus tacrolimus are needed to help clinicians decide which patients might benefit most from using belatacept.

Renal transplant recipient with advanced HIV infection: graft and peripheral cell population analysis

The scenario of a renal transplant recipient who is diagnosed with HIV infection in the late post transplant period is very uncommon. The viral infection effect on immunologic stability, regulatory cells, and allogeneic response during immune quiescence and graft acceptance provides a fertile ground in organ transplantation research and translational immunology.

Belatacept: a novel immunosuppressive agent for kidney transplant recipients

Long-term graft and patient survival remain the most significant challenges in kidney transplantation, and new therapies are needed to improve long-term outcomes. Belatacept, a first-in-class selective costimulation blocker, has been approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection in kidney transplant recipients who are positive for EBV. In Phase III trials, belatacept demonstrated superior preservation of renal function and comparable patient/graft survival compared with cyclosporine, while avoiding the renal toxicities and other adverse events associated with the use of a calcineurin inhibitor. Patients treated with belatacept had higher rates of acute rejection than cyclosporine-treated patients. However, acute rejection episodes that occurred early and did not recur were generally not associated with donor-specific antibodies, and few belatacept patients had graft loss due to rejection. The improved renal benefit with belatacept may translate into improvements in long-term graft and patient outcomes. Targeting T-cell costimulation is an important new option for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Influence of pharmacological immunomodulatory agents on CD4(+)CD25(high)FoxP3(+) T regulatory cells in humans

T regulatory cells (Tregs) play a critical role in the immunologic tolerance to the graft in transplantation. Thus, due to their immunosuppressive capability, ex vivo expanded Tregs may be used as a cellular therapy and an attractive novel strategy to control chronic rejection and eliminate need for lifelong pharmacological immunosuppression. Since Treg therapy is still in its infancy, initially Tregs still need to be applied in combination with pharmacological agents to prevent rejection. Fortunately, some of the medications have been shown to enhance the function and number of Tregs. In the clinic, different immunosuppressive regimens are used for individual patients for different types of organ transplantation. In this review, we present the most commonly used pharmacological agents for immunosuppression and discuss how they affect the Treg population. It is extremely difficult to dissect the effect of single agent on Tregs population in clinical settings since usually the combination of several medications is applied at the same time for graft protection. Nevertheless, experimental and clinical data indicate that thymoglobulin as immunosuppressive induction and mTOR inhibitors as immunosuppressive maintenance agents have the most beneficial effect on Treg population in the blood. Among supplemental agents promoting Tregs, anti-TNFα preparations have been in clinical use (in autoimmune diseases) for many years, so they are optimal candidates for testing in transplant settings in combination with Treg based cellular therapy.

Chronic renal allograft damage after transplantation: what are the reasons, what can we do?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic renal allograft damage is one of the main problems after kidney transplantation. This review enumerates causes, describes available therapeutic options, and discusses options of the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alloantigen-dependent and alloantigen-independent factors are responsible for allograft damage. Prevention of renal allograft damage starts with interventions that occur surrounding the explantation in cadaveric organs. These include the use of dopamine or machine perfusion systems.Followed by the critical phase of ischemia/reperfusion injury, the LCN2/lipocalin-2, HAVCR1, and p38 MAPK pathway are new players involved in that process. Innate immunity plays a part, too. Cold ischemia time is associated with genes of apoptosis. Nondonor-specific antibodies like antihuman leukocyte antibodies-Ia or angiotensin type 1 receptor may also play a role. Recent research indicates that genetic polymorphism like the Ficolin-2 Ala258Ser polymorphism and the mannose-binding lectin-2 polymorphism are involved in that process. New therapeutic options are rare and in the future. However, there is some evidence that drugs interfering with metalloproteinases, sexual hormones like dihydroandrosterone, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy may be of importance.

SUMMARY

Taken together, although the understanding of chronic rejection has improved, the available therapeutic options remain scarce.

New insights on molecular mechanisms of renal aging

Long-term transplant outcome is importantly influenced by the age of the organ donor. The mechanisms how age carries out its pathophysiological impact on graft survival are still not understood. One major contributing factor for the observed poor performance of old donor kidneys seems in particular the age-related loss in renal regenerative capacity. In this review, we will summarize recent findings about the molecular basis of renal aging with specific focus on the potential role of somatic cellular senescence and mitochondrial aging in renal transplant outcome.