Ovarian electrocautery or hormone therapy in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome

Is laparoscopy necessary before assisted reproductive technology?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laparoscopy is widely used during infertility work-up, although it is sometimes unnecessary. This review highlights when laparoscopic intervention should be used in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no evidence for an increase in pregnancy rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles following surgical treatment of pelvic adhesions or endometriosis with laparoscopy. If the patient has bilateral visible hydrosalpinges, laparoscopy may be an option for evaluation of the tubes and treatment with salpingectomy in order to enhance the chance of pregnancy before commencing an assisted reproductive technology cycle. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling before assisted reproductive technology may be considered a therapeutic option in polycystic ovary disease patients who previously had severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Finally, laparoscopy may be useful in replacing the transposed ovaries to their original sites in the pelvic cavity in previously treated cancer patients so that monitoring of the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the oocyte aspiration would be much easier during the assisted reproductive technology cycles.

SUMMARY

Laparoscopy should be considered before assisted reproductive technology cycles if the procedure diagnoses and treats a pelvic pathology at the same time and if laparoscopic intervention increases the chance of pregnancy following these cycles.

Surgically induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome: wedge resection revisited in the age of laparoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To provide an up-to-date comprehensive review of published data on laparoscopic methods of ovulation induction in the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Areas to be considered include the historical background of these procedures, their outcomes as reported in the literature, and their potential adverse effects. Through the careful review of these issues, some recommendations for clinical use and further study are offered.

DESIGN

Relevant studies were identified through a the search of a computerized bibliographic database of holdings in the National Library of Medicine as well as the manual scanning and cross-referencing of relevant medical journals.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine relevant studies were identified in the English language literature. These studies consist almost exclusively of uncontrolled case series. Pregnancies after laparoscopic ovulation induction procedures have been reported in an average of 55% of treated subjects (range 20% to 65%). Potential advantages of laparoscopic ovulation induction over gonadotropin therapy may include possible cost savings, serial repetitive ovulatory events resulting from a single treatment, no increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation or multiple gestation, and the prospect for a higher live birth rate owing to a seemingly lower incidence of miscarriage. Reported adverse effects include a high rate of intra-abdominal adhesion formation and a single case of iatrogenic premature menopause due to postoperative ovarian atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

The available circumstantial evidence suggests that laparoscopic procedures designed to induce ovulation may be of value in the PCOS subject who, despite an exhaustive trial of clomiphene citrate therapy, remains anovulatory and is unable or unwilling to undergo gonadotropin therapy. However, because of the risks of postoperative ovarian adhesions, carefully constructed controlled trials must be performed before these procedures can be viewed as efficacious and safe.

Ovarian electrocauterization causes LH-regulated but not insulin-regulated endocrine changes

OBJECTIVE

We studied the effects of ovarian electrocauterization on the serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, insulin, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor binding globulin-1 (IGFBP-1) in women with polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD).

DESIGN

Prospective.

PATIENTS

Ten women with PCOD admitted to a University Infertility Clinic.

MEASUREMENTS

Fasting blood samples for determination of hormone levels were taken during the follicular phase before and one month after laparoscopic ovarian electrocauterization.

RESULTS

One month after electrocauterization the serum mean +/- SE LH levels had decreased from 14.4 +/- 1.9 to 10.9 +/- 1.1 U/l (P < 0.05), while the serum insulin levels showed no significant change (10.3 +/- 2.0 and 8.1 +/- 1.3 mU/l). The levels of IGFBP-1 (33.9 +/- 8.2 and 38.4 +/- 13.7 micrograms/l) and SHBG (48 +/- 10.4 and 43 +/- 5.7 nmol/l) showed no significant changes. Testosterone decreased from 3.9 +/- 2.6 to 2.9 +/- 0.3 nmol/l (P < 0.001) and androstenedione from 15.0 +/- 1.2 to 12.0 +/- 1.5 nmol/l (P = 0.05). After electrocautery seven out of ten PCOD patients ovulated either spontaneously (n = 3) or with clomiphene citrate (n = 4), and two of them conceived.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian electrocautery leads to resumption of ovulatory cycles in some but not all PCOD patients. This effect seems to be mediated by reduction of serum LH and androgen levels, while the insulin-driven pathway via SHBG and IGFBP-1 remains unaffected.