How many cisplatin administration protocols does your department use?

Impact of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury on long-term renal function in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The reality of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (CIA) and its effects on long-term renal function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors for CIA development, and if CIA is a useful predictor of long-term renal dysfunction after cisplatin treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational, longitudinal follow-up, large cohort study in adult patients with solid tumors treated with cisplatin-based systematic chemotherapy. Electronic medical records were used for all demographic and medical data. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. We assessed long-term renal dysfunction using %ΔeGFR/Y; (the last eGFR value during follow-up)-(the baseline eGFR)/(the baseline eGFR)/year of follow-up × 100.

RESULTS

A total of 2191 patients received 8,482 cycles of cisplatin. CIA was observed 359 times (4.2%). Significant risk factors for developing CIA, using multiple linear regression analysis, included: cisplatin administration immediately before the onset of CIA (p < 0.01), liver cancer (p = 0.02), colon cancer (p = 0.04), hypertension (p = 0.03), high estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p < 0.01), and high C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.04). Significant risk factors for %ΔeGFR/Y, using multivariate linear regression analysis, included: esophageal cancer (p < 0.01), lung cancer (p < 0.01), pharyngeal cancer (p = 0.02), Head and neck cancer (p < 0.01), liver cancer (p = 0.02), potassium (p < 0.01), and CIA (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that CIA is a significant predictive risk factor for long-term renal dysfunction after cisplatin administration. Effective strategies are needed to prevent CIA in cancer patients.

Renal function impairment in cervical cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiation: A review of medical records in a Zimbabwean outpatient department

Background

There is a potential increase in risk of renal function impairment among patients with invasive cervical cancer (ICC) who are HIV-positive and treated with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). This concern is due to overlapping nephrotoxicity of the drugs, and nephropathy from the diseases themselves. There is limited literature available for the short-term renal outcomes for HIV-positive patients with ICC during routine clinical management. This study aimed to assess if HIV-infection increased the risk of renal impairment in ICC patients treated with CCRT, and explore the respective risk factors.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective review of records of ICC patients treated with at least one cycle of weekly cisplatin during CCRT at the Parirenyatwa Radiotherapy Center from January 2017-December 2018. The RIFLE criteria were used to classify renal impairment. Analyses were performed with Fisher’s Exact tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Odds ratios (OR) were generated using logistic regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided at a 5% level of significance.

Results

Seventy-two eligible patients were identified, 32 (44.44%) were HIV-positive. HIV-positive patients were younger (p = 0.002), had lower albumin levels (p = 0.014) and received lower cisplatin doses (p = 0.044). The mean percent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline was -19% (95% CI: -25.9% to -13.2%) for all patients. Thirty-one (43.1%) patients experienced renal impairment, 50% and 37.5% of HIV-positive and -negative patients respectively (p = 0.287). HIV-infection was associated with an adjusted OR of 1.16 (95% CI 0.35–3.43, p = 0.769). Baseline eGFR< 60ml/min was the only independent predictor of renal impairment, OR 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07–0.85). Baseline eGFR<60ml/min was also associated with receipt of lower cisplatin doses (p = 0.044).

Conclusion

HIV-infection was not associated with elevated risk of renal impairment. Patients with an eGFR<60ml/min appear to be managed more cautiously reducing their risk for renal impairment during cisplatin therapy. The high prevalence of renal impairment in this population suggests the need for optimization of pre-treatment protocols.

Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin (CDDP)-induced nephrotoxicity is a concern in CDDP-based chemotherapy. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to identify potential risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

Clinical data were reviewed for 762 patients who underwent chemotherapy including CDDP ≥60 mg/m2 per day from Spring 2014 to September 2016. CDDP nephrotoxicity was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for acute kidney injury. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

CDDP nephrotoxicity was observed in 165 patients (21.7%). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher rate of CDDP nephrotoxicity in patients with cardiac disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-3.93, p = 0.03), hypertension (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.06-2.32, p = 0.02), and high-dose CDDP therapy (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.50-3.07, p < 0.01). Magnesium (Mg) supplementation (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.93, p = 0.02) and diuretic use (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.63, p < 0.01) were also independent risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that high-dose CDDP and comorbidities of cardiac disease and hypertension are independent risk factors for CDDP nephrotoxicity. Therefore, close monitoring of serum creatinine values during CDDP treatment is recommended for patients with these risk factors. In addition, Mg supplementation and administration of diuretics might be effective for prevention of CDDP nephrotoxicity.

A Systematic Review of Strategies to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin, a platinum-based antineoplastic agent, is the cornerstone for the treatment of many malignancies. Nephrotoxicity is the primary dose-limiting toxicity, and various hydration regimens and supplementation strategies are used to prevent cisplatin-induced kidney injury. However, evidence-based recommendations on specific hydration regimens are limited. A systematic review was performed to evaluate clinical studies that have examined hydration and supplementation strategies to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Excerpta Medica databases were searched from 1966 through October 2015 for clinical trials and other studies focused on hydration regimens to prevent nephrotoxicity in cancer patients treated with cisplatin. The University of Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria were used to grade level of evidence.

RESULTS

Among the 1,407 identified studies, 24 were included in this systematic review. All studies differed on type, volume, and duration of hydration. Among the 24 studies, 5 evaluated short-duration hydration, 4 evaluated low-volume hydration, 4 investigated magnesium supplementation, and 7 reviewed forced diuresis with hydration. Short-duration and lower-volume hydration regimens are effective in preventing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Magnesium supplementation may have a role as a nephroprotectant, and forced diuresis may be appropriate in some patients receiving cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

Hydration is essential for all patients to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Specifically, short-duration, low-volume, outpatient hydration with magnesium supplementation and mannitol forced diuresis (in select patients) represent best practice principles for the safe use of cisplatin. The Oncologist 2017;22:609-619 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings contained within this systematic review show that (a) hydration is essential for all patients to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, (b) short-duration, low-volume, outpatient hydration regimens appear to be safe and feasible, even in patients receiving intermediate- to high-dose cisplatin, (c) magnesium supplementation (8-16 milliequivalents) may limit cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, and (d) mannitol may be considered for high-dose cisplatin and/or patients with preexisting hypertension. These findings have broad implications for clinical practice and represent best practice principles for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Safety of a short hydration method for cisplatin administration in comparison with a conventional method-a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin is administered in combination with massive hydration to avoid renal toxicity, making its administration difficult in an outpatient setting. Although a short hydration protocol for cisplatin has been recently developed, its safety is not fully understood.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with lung or other cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 who were receiving chemotherapy containing cisplatin at a dose of ≥60 mg/m(2) in a single administration were evaluated. Seventy-four patients were treated with a short hydration protocol consisting of 1750-2250 ml of hydration with mannitol and magnesium supplementation over a period of 3.75-4.75 h on Day 1. Sixty-nine patients were treated with a conventional hydration protocol consisting of 2100-2600 ml of hydration over 6.5-7.5 h on Day 1 with pre- and post-hydration on Days 0, 2 and 3. Toxicity was then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

An elevated serum creatinine level ≥grade 1 was significantly less frequent in the group receiving the short hydration protocol than in the group receiving conventional hydration. Other toxicities were similar between the two groups. Consequently, the completion rate for the planned treatment in the short hydration group (73.0%, 54/74) was significantly higher than that in the conventional hydration group (53.6%, 37/69).

CONCLUSIONS

Short hydration is safe, making cisplatin-containing chemotherapy easier to perform.

Cisplatin : an old drug with a newfound efficacy -- from mechanisms of action to cytotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin is a highly effective antineoplastic drug with an extremely current mechanism of action. Cisplatin-induced side effects are dose-dependent and limit the administration of increased dosages, thus compromising its therapeutic efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to describe the emerging knowledge about the biochemical mechanisms that mediate cisplatin cytotoxicity and side effects. A specific section is devoted to discuss the pathogenesis of cisplatin-related toxicities and the potential measures to counteract them.

EXPERT OPINION

Although cisplatin has been used for a long time, only recently its exact mechanism of action has been better defined. The cytotoxic activity of cisplatin is largely dependent on the glycolytic metabolism of tumor cells: cisplatin redirects cancer cells to oxidative phosphorylation from the 'Warburg effect', which is considered one of the most important mechanisms of tumor cell survival. The interference of cisplatin with glucose metabolism is also a cause of its relevant toxicities. The emerging knowledge on the complex mechanisms, which mediate cisplatin cytotoxicity and side effect, may lead to a more appropriate and safe use of this drug. Further studies are warranted to define and implement its effectiveness in combination with targeted drugs able to interfere with cellular energy metabolism, such as mTOR inhibitors.

Use of high-dose cisplatin with aprepitant in an outpatient setting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and nephrotoxicity are adverse events induced by cisplatin administration. These effects can be reduced by treatment regimens with low-dose cisplatin, but high-dose cisplatin is still used. In Japan, high-dose cisplatin is usually administered in an inpatient setting to permit management of CINV. However, with use of new-generation antiemetic agents such as aprepitant, CINV and nephrotoxicity are controllable in an outpatient setting. Here, we discuss issues related to the management of high-dose cisplatin administration in outpatients. Grade 2 or worse CINV induced by high-dose cisplatin occurs in more than 40% of patients without treatment with aprepitant, but is controllable by administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, steroids and aprepitant. Moreover, prevention of CINV using these drugs is cost-effective, since outpatient settings have advantages with regard to health economics and patient quality of life. These findings suggest that shifting high-dose cisplatin administration to the outpatient setting may be achieved with co-administration of aprepitant. Available facilities and the status of the patient should be considered when selecting whether an outpatient setting is suitable for administration of cisplatin, but the use of aprepitant and adequate oral hydration should allow use of cisplatin in this setting.