Ethical issues in haemophilia

The ethics of gene therapy for hemophilia: a narrative review

Gene therapy is expected to become a promising treatment, and potentially even a cure, for hemophilia. After several years of research, the first gene therapy product has been granted conditional market authorization by the European Union in August 2022. The recent progress in the field also has implications on the ethical aspects of hemophilia gene therapy. Reviews conducted in the 2000s mainly identified questions on the ethics of conducting early-phase clinical trials. However, since then, the knowledge on safety and efficacy has improved, and the field has moved toward clinical application, a phase that has its own ethical aspects. Therefore, we conducted a narrative review to take stock of the ethical aspects of hemophilia gene therapy. Based on our analysis of the literature, we identified 3 ethical themes. The theme Living up to expectations describes the existing hopes for gene therapy and the unlikelihood of the currently approved product becoming a permanent cure. In the theme Psychosocial impacts, we discuss the fear that gene therapy will impact the identity of people with hemophilia and their need for psychosocial support. The theme Costs and access discusses the expected cost-effectiveness of gene therapy and its implications on accessibility worldwide. We conclude that it may be necessary to change the narratives surrounding gene therapy, from describing it as a cure to describing it as one of the many treatments that temporarily relieve symptoms and that there is a need to reevaluate the desirability of gene therapy for hemophilia, given the availability of other treatments.

Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review of Ethical Aspects

Genetic testing is associated with many ethical challenges on the individual, organizational and macro level of health care systems. The provision of genetic testing for rare diseases in particular requires a full understanding of the complexity and multiplicity of related ethical aspects. This systematic review presents a detailed overview of ethical aspects relevant to genetic testing for rare diseases as discussed in the literature. The electronic databases Pubmed, Science Direct and Web of Science were searched, resulting in 55 relevant publications. From the latter, a total of 93 different ethical aspects were identified. These ethical aspects were structured into three main categories (process of testing, consequences of the test outcome and contextual challenges) and 20 subcategories highlighting the diversity and complexity of ethical aspects relevant to genetic testing for rare diseases. This review can serve as a starting point for the further in-depth investigation of particular ethical issues, the education of healthcare professionals regarding this matter and for informing international policy development on genetic testing for rare diseases.

Hemophilia Gene Therapy: Approaching the First Licensed Product

The clinical potential of hemophilia gene therapy has now been pursued for the past 30 years, and there is a realistic expectation that this goal will be achieved within the next couple of years with the licensing of a gene therapy product. While recent late phase clinical trials of hemophilia gene therapy have shown promising results, there remain a number of issues that require further attention with regard to both efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach. In this review, we present information relating to the current status of the field and focus attention on the unanswered questions for hemophilia gene therapy and the future challenges that need to be overcome to enable the widespread application of this treatment paradigm.

Biological therapies for inherited diseases: social and bioethical considerations. Hemophilia as an example

INTRODUCTION

In hemophilia, advanced therapies are warranted from a conceptual and methodological standpoint. Current advanced therapy strategies are centered on the use of adeno-associated viral vectors, although problems related to immunogenicity and hepatotoxicity still remain.

AREAS COVERED

Future clinical trials will have to scrupulously observe international bioethical standards in terms of patient selection, particularly children. Patient recruitment rates are likely to remain low due to the stringent exclusion criteria usually imposed on the trial population regarding their hepatic and immunological markers and the presence of viral coinfection; and to the existence of an optimal palliative treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Accordingly, the results obtained are likely to be of low statistical significance, which could hinder their application to clinical practice. Another important issue is the degree to which society embraces these new emerging therapies. The unfamiliarity of society with these new methods, together with the many unresolved questions about them that remain, may threaten their acceptance not only by society at large but also by health-care professionals, which would limit their translational application to clinical practice.

MASAC Consensus Conference: impediments to conducting clinical research in persons with haemophilia, von Willebrand's disease and rare bleeding disorders

A consensus conference conducted by the Medical and Scientific Advisory Council of the National Hemophilia Foundation was held in New Orleans, LA, on November 11, 2010, to discuss the impediments to conducting clinical research in persons with haemophilia, von Willebrand's disease and rare bleeding disorders. The conference combined presentations providing academic, non-profit and industry perspectives with periods of open discussion. The objective of this conference was to identify the many challenges involved in facilitating U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of innovative products for these patient populations.

Clinical advances in hemophilia management

Hemophilia is an excellent example in medicine where clinical translation of basic science discoveries has transformed the gloomy outlook of the disease. This review provides an overview of clinical advances in hemophilia management with a specific focus on the molecular heterogeneity of the disease and progress in management of patients with inhibitors. Novel therapeutics and the emerging ethical issues in the field of hemophilia are also discussed.

Ethical considerations in clinical investigation: exploring relevance in haemophilia research

Painful controversy has so far been largely absent from the history of haemophilia-related clinical research. However, the investigative methods now needed to realize evidence-based clinical practice, therapeutic advance, and a progressive standard of care for patients worldwide will be accompanied by the potential for ethical dilemma and transgression. From the current vantage point, three primary ethical issues merit special consideration: (i) the therapeutic misconception inherent to all clinical research and the randomized trial in particular; (ii) high risk and potentially non-beneficial novel technology research in children; and (iii) a collaborative partnership approach to research in the developing world. This study will focus on a discussion of each of these, drawing from the research ethics literature to offer a potential template for future deliberations in clinical trial design.

Staunch protections: the ethics of haemophilia gene transfer research

Haemophilia has long been considered an ideal system for validating human gene transfer (GT). However, haemophilia GT trials present a particular ethical challenge because they involve subjects whose medical condition is stabilized by standard therapies. Below, I review the ethics and risks of haemophilia GT clinical research. I propose several conditions and practices that strengthen the ethical basis for such trials. These include consultation with haemophilia advocacy organizations as trials are designed and executed, high standards of supporting evidence before trials are initiated, pretrial publication of this evidence, and the offer of indemnification for participants. I further argue against the conduct of paediatric haemophilia GT studies at this time, and raise questions about the fairness of recruiting economically disadvantaged subjects into studies that are primarily directed towards the health needs of persons in the developed world.