One-stage and chromogenic FVIII:C assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A and the relationship with the mutation and bleeding phenotype

Treatment changes in hemophilia A with chromogenic factor VIII assay implementation

Background

The one-stage assay (OSA) and the chromogenic assay (CSA) are 2 factor VIII (FVIII) assays used for the diagnosis and classification of hemophilia A. Discrepancies between the 2 assays exist in approximately one-third of patients with mild hemophilia A.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to report the proportion of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A and OSA-CSA discrepancies and to report the observed changes in treatment approach prompted by the presence of assay discrepancy. The study aimed to identify OSA:CSA ratio associated with the highest sensitivity for identification of patients in whom modification of treatment approach may be recommended.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study including adult (>18-year-old) patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A who were followed up at the Adult British Columbia Hemophilia Program between January 2013 and March 2019.

Results

A total of 75 patients with mild and 23 with moderate hemophilia A based on baseline OSA were included. Overall, 52% of study patients had OSA-CSA discrepancies, and change in treatment approach was observed in 27% of patients with OSA-CSA discrepancy. The OSA:CSA ratio of 1.8 to 3.5 demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and sensitivity for identification of patients in which modification of treatment approach may be recommended (AUC 0.75; sensitivity 71%).

Conclusion

In our population, OSA-CSA discrepancy was observed in 52% of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, and the treatment approach in 27% of these patients had to be modified.

Bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool, bleeding frequency, and the joint status

Background

Although the phenotype of severe hemophilia has been well studied, there are still knowledge gaps in nonsevere hemophilia.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia and its association with different factor VIII/IX assessments.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study to investigate the bleeding phenotype in adults with nonsevere hemophilia by the number of bleeding and joint bleeding in the past 5 years, a joint score, and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool (ISTH-BAT). Factor levels were analyzed by 1-stage (lowest in history and at study inclusion) and chromogenic assay (at study inclusion). Patients were enrolled between March 2015 and May 2019.

Results

Of the 111 patients (86 with mild and 25 with moderate hemophilia), 57 patients (54.8%) reported any bleeding and 24 (23.1%) any joint bleeding in the past 5 years. A joint score ≥1 was found in 44 patients (41.9%), an ISTH-BAT ≥4 in 100 patients (90.1%), and an ISTH-BAT joint item ≥1 in 50 patients (45.0%). Within the ISTH-BAT, muscle and joint bleeds showed the largest difference between mild and moderate hemophilia. The lowest factor VIII/IX level in patients' history was best associated with bleeding outcomes. Factor was inversely associated with joint bleeds (incidence rate ratio 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98), joint score, and ISTH-BAT (odds ratios from proportional odds ordinal logistic regression 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97; and 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93, respectively).

Conclusion

The occurrence of joint bleeding differentiated persons with mild and moderate hemophilia. The ISTH-BAT and lowest factor in patients' history provided valuable information of the bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia.

Guidance for establishing a factor VIII testing protocol for the myriad of factor VIII products

INTRODUCTION

Management of hemophilia A has changed significantly in the past few years with the expansion of new and/or modified products as treatment options. Unfortunately, many of the standard factor VIII assays do not always accurately measure all available treatment products; therefore, the laboratory must investigate various assay algorithms to ensure the reporting of the correct results.

METHODS

Requirements for factor testing, diagnosis and severity levels, product testing, factor VIII inhibitor detection and titers, are evaluated, and potential algorithms are created for optimal assessment of patients with hemophilia A.

RESULTS

The potential for inaccurate result reporting for patients with hemophilia A or those being treated with the myriad of products has left many laboratories uncertain as to which assay algorithm to implement to ensure reporting the correct results for all products used in their hemophilia program. Algorithms for using either One-stage Clotting assays or Chromogenic assays or a combination of both types of assays are presented for each laboratory to implement based on their clinical situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Several algorithms are considered based on the needs of the clinical providers and their patients. Each laboratory must select a testing algorithm that is cost-effective and within available resources, yet that encompasses the needs of their providers and patients. Laboratory personnel must consider all assay uses (factor VIII levels, different products, interfering products, and inhibitor titers) in determining the best algorithm for their laboratory. This paper is a starting guide for developing the best factor VIII testing assays and protocols for your laboratory.

Coagulation assay discrepancies in Japanese patients with non-severe hemophilia A

Patients with non-severe hemophilia A often show discrepancies in factor VIII (FVIII) activity. However, information on variant-specific coagulation assay characteristics in Japanese patients is limited. Pathogenic variants were classified into three groups, thrombin-cleavage site (TC), A1-A2-A3 interface (IF), and non-discrepant, with reference to previous studies. Cutoff values for the one-stage assay (OSA)/chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) ratio, which is suitable for distinguishing discrepancies, were determined for all five aPTT reagents. TGA and CWA parameters and bleeding scores were compared between groups. Two of the 39 patients with non-severe hemophilia A (5%) were classified as TC, 10 (26%) as IF, and 27 (69%) as non-discrepant. The OSA/CSA cutoff values between the groups varied widely by aPTT reagent and tended to be relatively low compared to previous studies. As an indicator of bleeding tendency, TGA had a low correlation coefficient for the IF variant, but this was not significant and was comparable to FVIII activity and CWA. Moreover, various parameters and bleeding tendency differed among patients with the same variants. Thus, our findings suggest that it is difficult to adequately assess the bleeding tendency of individual patients, even with the various assessments currently available.

Genetic analysis of non-severe hemophilia A phenotype with A discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity assays

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of hemophilia A (HA) is based on the measurement of factor VIII activity (VIII:C). About one-third of non-severe HA patients show a discrepancy of VIII:C measured by one-stage (VIII:C 1st) and chromogenic (VIII:C chr) assays. Different mutations in the F8 gene may cause the discrepancy in results of the FVIII activity assay. The aim of this study was to investigate F8 gene mutations in patients with assay discrepancies and to evaluate their impact on the results of VIII:C assays.

METHODS

Mutation analysis was performed on 41 individuals with a discrepancy in VIII:C 1st and FVIII: C chr assays by direct sequencing. In addition, the effect of the variants on FVIII macromolecule structure was investigated by in silico and bioinformatics tools.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis disclosed 22 different variants, of which 19 were identified for the first time to be involved in the phenotype of VIII:C discrepancy. Most of the variants related to the higher VIII:C 1st were found in A1, A2, A3 domains. The variant related to VIII:C chr > VIII:C 1st was located in the thrombin cleavage site. In silico analysis showed the effect of variants on FVIII macromolecule stability, which may be the possible mechanism causing the discrepancy.

CONCLUSION

Our data shed light on the impact of genetic defects on VIII:C assay and provided evidence that the consideration of these mutations may open a new window to the proper diagnosis and treatment monitoring of non-severe HA patients.

Haemophilia

Haemophilia A and B are rare congenital, recessive X-linked disorders caused by lack or deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The severity of the disease depends on the reduction of levels of FVIII or FIX, which are determined by the type of the causative mutation in the genes encoding the factors (F8 and F9, respectively). The hallmark clinical characteristic, especially in untreated severe forms, is bleeding (spontaneous or after trauma) into major joints such as ankles, knees and elbows, which can result in the development of arthropathy. Intracranial bleeds and bleeds into internal organs may be life-threatening. The median life expectancy was ~30 years until the 1960s, but improved understanding of the disorder and development of efficacious therapy based on prophylactic replacement of the missing factor has caused a paradigm shift, and today individuals with haemophilia can look forward to a virtually normal life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, the potential development of inhibitory antibodies to infused factor is still a major hurdle to overcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Finally, gene therapy for both types of haemophilia has progressed remarkably and could soon become a reality.

Impact of variation in reagent combinations for one-stage clotting assay on assay discrepancy in nonsevere haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) is measured by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Significant differences in FVIII:C between OSA (FVIII:C_1st ) and CSA (FVIII:C_Chr ) are described as assay discrepancy in nonsevere haemophilia A (HA). A large number of reagent combinations (APTT reagent and FVIII-deficient plasma) are used for OSA, but the impact of variations in reagent combinations on assay discrepancy has not been fully characterized.

AIM

To clarify the variations in FVIII:C_1st /FVIII:C_Chr ratios according to OSA reagent combination in HA subjects with/without assay discrepancy.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients previously diagnosed with nonsevere HA were enrolled, and their FVIII genes were investigated and FVIII:C levels were assessed by a single CSA reagent and 11 OSA reagent combinations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to predict possible cut-off values of the FVIII:C_1st /FVIII:C_Chr ratio to define FVIII assay discrepancy for each reagent combination.

RESULTS

Patients were categorized into nondiscrepant (n = 25), discrepant (n = 5) and unclassified (n = 9) groups according to their genotypes and information in the database. The FVIII:C_1st /FVIII:C_Chr ratio in nondiscrepant HA varied widely, depending on the APTT reagents and FVIII-deficient plasma used. The ratio in discrepant HA patients differed with respect to their genotype and the reagent combination used. ROC curve analyses revealed that cut-off values to distinguish the assay discrepancy differed depending on the reagents used, but revealed two novel genotype variants, p.Cys573Gly and p.Gly582Arg, associated with FVIII assay discrepancy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the FVIII:C_1st /FVIII:C_Chr ratio is dependent on the reagent combination used for OSA.

Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients

Background

The one-stage assay is the most common method to measure factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) in hemophilia A patients. The chromogenic assay is another two-stage test involving purified coagulation factors followed by factor Xa-specific chromogenic substrate.

Aim

This study aimed to assess the discrepancy and correlation between the chromogenic and one-stage assays in measuring FVIII : C levels in hemophilia patients receiving Extended Half-Life Elocta® as a recombinant extended half-life coagulation factor.

Methods

We performed a study comparing the measurements of FVIII : C levels by the chromogenic versus the one-stage assays at different drug levels. Data of FVIII : C levels, dosage, and the time interval from administration to measurement were retrieved from the hospital records. The correlation, mean differences, and discrepancy between the two assays were calculated. The linear regression analysis was used to predict the time interval till reaching 1% FVIII : C.

Results

Fourteen patients with 56 samples were included in the study. Of them, 13 patients were receiving Elocta® as a prophylactic, while one was receiving Elocta® on demand. One-third of these samples showed a discrepancy between the chromogenic and one-stage assays. The two assays were well correlated. Mean differences were significant at the individual and the time interval level. The time since the last Elocta® injection could significantly predict FVIII : C levels (β = 0.366, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings suggested a significant difference between both methods; the FVIII : C levels measured by the one-stage assay were less than those estimated by the chromogenic assay. However, the measurements of FVIII levels by the two assays were well correlated but discrepant in one-third of the samples. The levels of FVIII : C reach 1% after 5.4 days since the last Elocta® administration.

Genetics and Hemostatic Potential in Persons with Mild to Moderate Hemophilia A with a Discrepancy between One-Stage and Chromogenic FVIII Assays

BACKGROUND

 Factor VIII (FVIII) activity (FVIII:C) can be measured by different methods including one-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and chromogenic assays (CSAs). Discrepancy between FVIII:C assays is known and associated with genetic variations causing mild and moderate hemophilia A (HA). We aimed to study the discrepancy phenomenon and to identify associated genetic alterations. Further, we investigated if hemostatic global assays could discriminate the group with discrepant FVIII:C from them.

METHODS

 The study contained plasma samples from 45 patients with HA (PwHA) from Hemophilia Centers in Stockholm, Sweden, and Belgrade, Serbia. We measured FVIII:C with OSA and CSA, sequenced the F8 gene, and performed two global hemostatic assays; endogenous thrombin potential and overall hemostatic potential.

RESULTS

 Nineteen of 45 PwHA had a more than twofold higher FVIII:C using OSA compared to CSA and were considered discrepant. Thirty-four causal mutations were detected, where of five had not previously been associated with assay discrepancy. These novel mutations were p.Tyr25Cys, p.Phe698Leu, p.Met699Leu, p.Ile1698Thr, and Ala2070Val. We found no difference between discrepant and nondiscrepant cases with either of the global assays.

CONCLUSION

 There was a discrepancy between FVIII:C assays in almost half of the PwHA, which for some could lead to missed HA diagnoses or misclassification of severity. Genotyping confirmed that mutations associated with FVIII:C discrepancy cluster in the A domains of F8, and five mutations not previously associated with FVIII:C discrepancy was identified. Global hemostatic assays did not contribute to distinguish assay discrepancy in PwHA.

The one-stage assay or chromogenic assay to monitor baseline factor VIII levels and desmopressin effect in non-severe haemophilia A: Superiority or non-inferiority?

Introduction

Diagnosis, treatment monitoring and assessment of desmopressin effect in haemophilia A patients are performed by measurement of factor VIII activity (FVIII). The two assays commonly applied are the one‐stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Especially in non‐severe haemophilia A, discrepancies between these assays are common. It is still unestablished which assay corresponds best with bleeding phenotype and desmopressin effect.

Aim

To correlate FVIII levels measured by the one‐stage assay and by the chromogenic assay with bleeding phenotype and, additionally, to compare FVIII assay discrepancies before and after desmopressin administration.

Method

Factor VIII was measured in 130 non‐severe haemophilia A patients during routine visits to the outpatient clinic and/or during desmopressin testing. FVIII was measured by both the one‐stage assay and the chromogenic assay. Discrepancies between assays were defined as at least a twofold difference of FVIII or an absolute FVIII difference between measurements of ≥0.10 IU/mL. Bleeding phenotype was defined as annual number of treated bleedings (adjusted ABR).

Results

Hundred and thirty non‐severe haemophilia A patients were included. In 31/130 patients, assay results were discrepant. However, FVIII measurements with both assays correlated adequately with adjusted ABR. In addition, in 27/130 patients FVIII measurements at baseline and after desmopressin administration were analysed. In 13/27 patients, all measurements were either equivalent or discrepant when results were compared. In 14/27 patients, this was not the case as both equivalent measurements and discrepant measurements at different time points within one patient were observed.

Conclusion

Neither the one‐stage assay nor the chromogenic assay is superior in predicting bleeding phenotype. In addition, equivalent or discrepant FVIII results measured before desmopressin do not always predict FVIII assay results after desmopressin administration.

Discrepant Hemophilia A: An Underdiagnosed Disease Entity

OBJECTIVES

The term discrepant hemophilia A (DHA) denotes the discrepancy between factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) measured by different assay methodologies in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (HA). The objective was to review the characteristics and the current understanding of mechanisms contributing to assay discrepancy in DHA.

METHODS

Characteristics of the DHA patients treated were examined by retrospective chart review. In addition, a literature review was performed to determine the current understanding of DHA.

RESULTS

Three cases of DHA were diagnosed based on bleeding phenotype: 2 cases represented missed diagnoses of HA, and 1 represented misclassification of hemophilia severity. The revised diagnosis and classification of hemophilia directly affected clinical management. Review of the literature identified 18 articles with an estimated pooled prevalence of 36% (95% CI, 23%-56%; I2 = 85%; P < .01) among nonsevere HA. Furthermore, literature indicated that DHA is a feature of how different FVIII gene mutations affect FVIII:C activity within different assay methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience and literature review suggested that DHA is not only a laboratory phenomenon-it can affect clinical management in a subset of patients. A high index of suspicion for DHA is necessary while evaluating bleeding patients and/or classifying nonsevere HA.

Laboratory testing in hemophilia: Impact of factor and non-factor replacement therapy on coagulation assays

The advent of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant clotting factors and innovative non-factor replacement therapeutics, such as emicizumab, offers several advantages over existing products for the prophylactic treatment of people living with hemophilia (PwH). These include low annual bleeding rates with less frequent dosing, higher trough plasma concentrations, and a more convenient route of administration. However, increasing use of these therapies poses challenges to clinicians and coagulation laboratories due to the lack of standardized assays for monitoring of hemostatic parameters, and the potential for misinterpretation of test results, which may jeopardize patient safety. Definitive diagnosis of hemophilia and treatment monitoring is reliant on demonstrating factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; hemophilia B) deficiency using a functional coagulation assay. The most frequently used assays are based on activated partial thromboplastin time, using a one-stage or two-stage process. While one-stage and chromogenic assays have performed well with human-derived FVIII and FIX and full-length recombinant products, EHL recombinant factors are heterogeneous in structure and mode of action and therefore show wide variation in activity levels between different one-stage assays, and between one-stage and chromogenic assays. In the context of the recommended stepwise approach for laboratory diagnosis of hemophilia, we examine the diagnostic challenges associated with the use of EHL factors and novel non-factor therapeutics and consider the optimal diagnostic approach in PwH who are receiving these treatments. Ultimately, accurate diagnostic solutions are a prerequisite for personalized therapy to minimize treatment burden and improve quality of life in PwH.

Hemophilia management: Huge impact of a tiny difference

Hemophilia A and B are inherited X-linked disorders of hemostasis, associated with an increased bleeding tendency. Patients with severe hemophilia have undetectable clotting factor levels and experience spontaneous bleeds. In patients with nonsevere hemophilia, the clotting factor levels are 2% to 40% of normal and bleeds predominantly occur after provocative events such as trauma and surgery. Despite this milder phenotype, patients with nonsevere hemophilia may suffer from considerable morbidity and have an increased mortality risk. However, many aspects of the course of disease and treatment remain unclear. Information on the factors influencing interindividual differences in bleeding phenotype is lacking, and misdiagnosis may occur due to assay discrepancies in the diagnostic workup. Desmopressin is the preferred treatment modality, but some patients and indications require treatment with clotting factor concentrates. This may elicit inhibitor formation, which is associated with an increased burden of disease and a higher mortality rate. It has been found that patients with nonsevere hemophilia A carry a lifelong risk for this serious complication. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge of the diagnosis and management of nonsevere hemophilia. A report of science presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2019 Annual Congress is also provided.

Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B

Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients.

Evaluation of an automated chromogenic assay for Factor VIII clotting activity measurement in patients affected by haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The original one-stage clotting assay is still the most widely used method to measure Factor VIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) in patients with haemophilia A (HA), although the use of chromogenic assays is increasing significantly.

AIM

Evaluation of the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of BIOPHEN™ FVIII:C (HYPHEN BioMed, Neuville-sur-Oise, France) assay on Sysmex CS-2400 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) analyser.

METHODS

Sixty patients with haemophilia A (HA; any severity) and 120 healthy Italian subjects were included. All the assays were performed on citrate platelet-poor plasmas stored at -80°C. Chromogenic BIOPHEN™ FVIII:C was compared with the one-stage assay using Actin FS and Factor VIII deficient plasma (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) on Sysmex CS-2400 and with another chromogenic automated assay (COAMATIC™ Factor VIII, CHROMOGENIX on ACL TOP analyzer; Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy).

RESULTS

Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variation were <6%. Linearity was good up to 1/128 dilution (r = 0.99); mean recovery was 91.7% and limit of detection was 0.2%. BIOPHEN™ FVIII:C assay showed a good correlation and diagnostic agreement with the chromogenic COAMATIC™ assay: the Spearmen's Rank correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the inter-rate agreement K Cohen coefficient was 0.61. The K coefficient was 0.91 when BIOPHEN™ FVIII:C was compared with the historical classification of the patients, demonstrating an optimal diagnostic accuracy in HA.

CONCLUSIONS

BIOPHEN™ FVIII:C showed good analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy and could be considered suitable for the introduction in routine analytical panel of coagulation for the diagnosis of HA patients.

Haemophilia A mutations in patients with non-severe phenotype associated with a discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity assays

About one-third of patients with non-severe haemophilia A (HA) show a discrepancy of factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) measured by one-stage (FVIII:C1st), two-stage assays or the chromogenic method (FVIII:Cchr). The aim of the study was to characterise the mutation profile in patients with FVIII:C assay discrepancies. FVIII:C discrepancy was considered significant if the calculated ratio between FVIII:C1st and FVIII:Cchr was ≤ 0.6. In 16 patients FVIII:C1st was higher than FVIII:Cchr. The reverse phenomenon was observed in 83 patients. Genetic analysis revealed 23 different missense mutations of which 17 were novel. Most mutations, exhibiting a higher FVIII:C1st were localised in the A1-A2-A3 interface. The majority of mutations associated with FVIII:Cchr>FVIII:C1st discrepancy were located close to or within the thrombin cleavage sites, FIX or vWF binding sites. Our data show a correlation between FVIII:C and thrombin generation testing with a clear differentiation between patients with haemophilia and normal controls. However, in the subgroup of FVIII:C1st>FVIII:Cchr discrepancy, the endogenous thrombin potential and peak thrombin parameters were similar to non-discrepant haemophilia patients, while in the inverse discrepancy FVIII:Cchr>FVIII:C1st, these variables showed values close to that of the normal control group. Certain hereditary F8 mis-sense mutations cause discrepancy in FVIII:C as measured with different assays. This can lead to failure in diagnosing HA or incorrectly classifying the severity of the disease. Therefore, we recommend that initial diagnosis of non-severe HA phenotypes should be based on results of both FVIII:C1st and FVIII:Cchr assays.

Cross-reacting Material-positive Hemophilia A Diagnosed in a Patient with a Spontaneous Thigh Hemorrhage

A 53-year-old man, who had been diagnosed with mild hemophilia A (HA) at 35 years of age, was hospitalized with a thigh hematoma. His bleeding continued despite the administration of recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). The results of an FVIII/von Willebrand factor binding assay were normal. The patient's FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) was low, but his FVIII antigen levels were within the normal limits, suggesting FVIII protein dysfunction. The FVIII:C measurements obtained by one-stage clotting and chromogenic assays were different. An FVIII gene analysis revealed a missense mutation p.Ser308Leu, which is rare in Japan. This case highlights that gene analyses and chromogenic assays are necessary to interpret the discrepancies between FVIII:C and the bleeding phenotype of patients with mild HA.

Chromogenic Factor VIII Assays for Improved Diagnosis of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by a reduced level of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) in blood. Bleeding episodes may occur spontaneously in the severe form of hemophilia or after trauma in the milder forms. It is important that patients are diagnosed correctly, which includes placing them into the correct severity category of the disorder so that appropriate treatment can be given. Diagnosis is made by determination of the amount of FVIII:C in the blood, usually using a one-stage factor VIII:C assay. However, approximately one third of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia will have much lower results by the chromogenic assay, with some of them having normal results by the one-stage assay. The chromogenic factor VIII assay is used in some specialized hemophilia reference centers and is recommended for the diagnosis of mild hemophilia A, as this assay is considered to better reflect the severity status of hemophilia patients than the one-stage assay.

A critical appraisal of one-stage and chromogenic assays of factor VIII activity

Accurate and precise potency determination by manufacturers of different types of factor VIII product (plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII [rFVIII]) is vital to clinicians and patients using FVIII concentrates. A separate, but related, requirement is ascertaining the FVIII activity levels in clinical samples for diagnosing and treating hemophilia A. The one-stage clotting assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) are the main assays used for these measurements, with both assays being used for potency assignments, and the OSA also being widely used for clinical monitoring. Although the assays can produce concordant results, discrepancies often occur, e.g. when measuring FVIII levels in patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, or when assaying high-purity FVIII products. Modifications to rFVIII proteins, such as B-domain deletion (BDD), and technologies for improving the pharmacokinetic profile of rFVIII may exacerbate assay discrepancies. The CSA appears to be essentially unaffected by these modifications. However, the OSA underestimates the FVIII activity levels and therapeutic potential of some further modified BDD rFVIII products, especially those conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol); the extent of the effects is dependent on the specific OSA reagents used. Although the OSA remains the preferred choice for clinical monitoring in Europe and the USA, an awareness of the limitations of that assay has prompted more laboratories to adopt the CSA.

A subset of high-titer anti-factor VIII A2 domain antibodies is responsive to treatment with factor VIII

The primary B-cell epitopes of factor VIII (fVIII) are in the A2 and C2 domains. Within the C2 domain, antibody epitope and kinetics are more important than inhibitor titer in predicting pathogenicity in a murine bleeding model. To investigate this within the A2 domain, the pathogenicity of a diverse panel of antihuman fVIII A2 domain monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was tested in the murine model. MAbs were injected into hemophilia A mice, followed by injection of human B domain-deleted fVIII. Blood loss after a 4-mm tail snip was measured. The following anti-A2 MAbs were tested: high-titer type 1 inhibitors 4A4, 2-76, and 1D4; 2-54, a high-titer type 2 inhibitor; B94, a type 2 inhibitor; and noninhibitory MAbs GMA-012, 4C7, and B25. All high-titer type 1 MAbs produced blood loss that was significantly greater than control mice, whereas all non-inhibitory MAbs produced blood loss that was similar to control. The type 2 MAbs were not pathogenic despite 2-54 having an inhibitor titer of 34 000 BU/mg immunoglobulin G. In addition, a patient with a high-titer type 2 anti-A2 inhibitor who is responsive to fVIII is reported. The discrepancy between inhibitor titer and bleeding phenotype combined with similar findings in the C2 domain stress the importance of inhibitor properties not detected in the standard Bethesda assay in predicting response to fVIII therapy.

Specific and global coagulation tests in patients with mild haemophilia A with a double mutation (Glu113Asp, Arg593Cys)

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous bleeding phenotypes are observed in haemophilia A patients with the same mutation in the F8 gene. Specific mutations in the A2 domain of factor VIII are associated with mild haemophilia and a higher risk of inhibitor development. Double mutations in mild haemophilia A are rarely reported. In this study, we investigated the in vitro function of factor VIII, performing different specific and global coagulation assays, observed clinical characteristics and assessed the possible predictive diagnostic value of the differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical features of haemophiliacs with a mild phenotype were reviewed. Blood samples were obtained and analysed for mutations and coagulation assays: activated partial thromboplastin time, one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity, factor VIII antigen and rotational thromboelastometry.

RESULTS

We report on a cohort of 22 patients with double Glu113Asp, Arg593Cys mutations. All our patients have a quantitative defect of factor VIII and preserved similar functional activity. Factor VIII activities measured by the one-stage or chromogenic method were not discrepant, although the chromogenic assay resulted in 20% lower factor VIII activities. Waveform analysis showed a lower maximum value of the second derivative curve (Max2) of APTT with curve shape alternation, while thromboelastometry (INTEM) showed low sensitivity in comparison to results in a normal population.

DISCUSSION

In genotyping, the coexistence of a second mutation should never be excluded, especially in cases of discordant clinical presentation. Waveform analysis correlates better with factor VIII activity than thromboelastometry and the Max2 parameter could provide additional information in managing haemophilia patients. The utility of specific factor activity and global haemostatic assays in general practice still needs to be investigated.

Life-threatening bleeding in a patient with mild hemophilia A and heterozygosity for von Willebrand disease Type 2N

Hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD) are distinct bleeding disorders with a spectrum of clinical phenotypes. They are characterized by mutations in either factor VIII (F8) or von Willebrand factor (VWF) genes, respectively. The pattern of inheritance and appropriate laboratory evaluation differentiates these diseases, and treatment strategies for both are different. Here, we report a male patient with hemophilia A and VWD Type 2 Normandy (N) mutations who presented with life-threatening bleeding. We document his medical history, clinical course, management, and diagnostic work up.

Chromogenic factor VIII activity assay

Factor VIII (FVIII) may be measured by three different methodologies in the clinical laboratory: one-stage clotting assay, two-stage clotting assay, and chromogenic assay. These assays differ in ease of use, variety of reagents available, sensitivity to mild hemophilia A, and interference from lupus anticoagulants. This review will outline the methodology for each of the FVIII activity assays, with a discussion of assay interferences and variability. In some cases, chromogenic FVIII activity assays may be preferable to clot-based assays, and these clinical situations will be reviewed as well.

Factor VIII assay mimicking in vivo coagulation conditions

Under certain circumstances, the determination of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is hampered by assay discrepancies between clotting and chromogenic approaches. These are observed in certain patients' plasma as well as in certain concentrates. We intended to develop a novel assay for the quantification of coagulation FVIII which reflects the physiological situation better than the established assays. It is based on plasma without chelation of divalent cations and simultaneously minimizes the generation of activated factors which could function as uncontrolled triggers of coagulation. FVIII deficient plasma is prepared with the aid of biotinylated antibodies against FVIII from normal plasma in presence of inhibitors of contact activation. To start the assay only tiny amounts of activated FIX serve as trigger. The FVIII determination is performed in a kinetic experiment and is based on the cleavage of a fluorogenic substrate for activated FX. FVIII concentrations between 0.01 and 1 IU mL(-1) are easily determined. Plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII concentrates were compared. All plasma-derived concentrates were found to contain FVIII activities within the specification of the manufacturer. Recombinant concentrates yielded only 35-50% of the claimed potency. The novel in vivo-like assay avoids the undue advantage or disadvantage of certain product characteristics by eliminating unphysiological assay conditions. Its usefulness could turn out in future experiments with plasma from haemophilia A patients.

Genetic sequence analysis of inherited bleeding diseases

The genes encoding the coagulation factor proteins were among the first human genes to be characterized over 25 years ago. Since then, significant progress has been made in the translational application of this information for the 2 commonest severe inherited bleeding disorders, hemophilia A and B. For these X-linked disorders, genetic characterization of the disease-causing mutations is now incorporated into the standard of care and genetic information is used for risk stratification of treatment complications. With electronic databases detailing >2100 unique mutations for hemophilia A and >1100 mutations for hemophilia B, these diseases are among the most extensively characterized inherited diseases in humans. Experience with the genetics of the rare bleeding disorders is, as expected, less well advanced. However, here again, electronic mutation databases have been developed and provide excellent guidance for the application of genetic analysis as a confirmatory approach to diagnosis. Most recently, progress has also been made in identifying the mutant loci in a variety of inherited platelet disorders, and these findings are beginning to be applied to the genetic diagnosis of these conditions. Investigation of patients with bleeding phenotypes without a diagnosis, using genome-wide strategies, may identify novel genes not previously recognized as playing a role in hemostasis.

Specific and global coagulation assays in the diagnosis of discrepant mild hemophilia A

The activity of the factor VIII coagulation protein can be measured by three methods: a one or two-stage clotting assay and a chromogenic assay. The factor VIII activity of most individuals with mild hemophilia A is the same regardless of which method is employed. However, approximately 30% of patients show marked discrepancies in factor VIII activity measured with the different methods. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of assay discrepancy in our center, assess the impact of alternative reagents on factor VIII activity assays and determine the usefulness of global assays of hemostasis in mild hemophilia A. Factor VIII activity was measured in 84 individuals with mild hemophilia A using different reagents. Assay discrepancy was defined as a two-fold or greater difference between the results of the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays. Rotational thromboelastometry and calibrated automated thrombography were performed. Assay discrepancy was observed in 31% of individuals; 12% with lower activity in the two-stage assay and 19% with lower activity in the one-stage assay. The phenotype could not always be predicted from the individual's genotype. Chromogenic assays were shown to be a suitable alternative to the two-stage clotting assay. Thromboelastometry was found to have poor sensitivity in hemophilia. Calibrated automated thrombography supported the results obtained by the two-stage and chromogenic assays. The current international guidelines do not define the type of assay to be used in the diagnosis of mild hemophilia A and some patients could be misclassified as normal. In our study, 4% of patients would not have been diagnosed on the basis of the one-stage factor VIII assay. Laboratories should use both one stage and chromogenic (or two-stage) assays in the diagnosis of patients with possible hemophilia A.

Prevalence, biological phenotype and genotype in moderate/mild hemophilia A with discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic factor VIII activity

BACKGROUND

In most laboratories, the severity of hemophilia A is assessed by the factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) one-stage assay. However, comparisons of these results with those of two-stage assays can reveal discrepancies and suggest misdiagnosis.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this monocentric study, we measured FVIII:C with two methods (one-stage chronometric and chromogenic assays) in 307 (173 families) patients with moderate/mild hemophilia A. To compare results, we used a chronometric/chromogenic ratio. Discrepancy was defined as a ratio < 0.5 or > 1.5. We studied their putative involvement at known FVIII functional sites, their interspecies conservation status, and their spatial position within the FVIII structure.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients from 17 families exhibited a discrepancy between the two assays: 12 (6.9%) families had a low ratio (< 0.5), and five (2.9%) families had a high ratio (> 1.5). Qualitative deficiency was diagnosed in about 16% of the families. Molecular studies were performed in 15 of these 17 families, resulting in each case in the identification of missense mutations, including three novel mutations. We were further able to propose a pathophysiologic explanation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this monocentric study, we have demonstrated a discrepancy between FVIII:C assay results in 10% of families with moderate/mild hemophilia A. The prevalence of 'inverse' discrepancy (i.e. low chronometric/chromogenic ratio) is high as compared with previous reports. We suggest that both FVIII:C assays are recommended in patients with moderate/mild hemophilia A for a complete biological phenotype. This could also improve our knowledge of the FVIII structure-function relationships.

Mild hemophilia A

Mild hemophilia A (HA), defined by clinical features and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) between 0.05 and 0.40 IU mL(-1), is characteristically distinct from severe HA. Indeed, although the molecular characterization of mild HA has permitted the identification of specific underlying mutations, its clinical phenotype is strikingly different from that of patients with a severe FVIII defect, where spontaneous hemorrhages or recurrent joint bleeding are usual manifestations. With aging, mild HA patients may develop complications (i.e. cancers and cardiovascular disorders), the management of which may prove challenging due to the concomitant bleeding tendency. Furthermore, the development of inhibitors provides an additional major complication in these patients, because it increases the severity of the bleeding phenotype and complicates their management. Standard management of mild HA includes the use of desmopressin and antifibrinolytic agents for minor bleeding episodes or surgical procedures, whilst major bleeding or surgery requires replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates. As regards treatment of patients with inhibitors, bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated FVII) have proven effective in the treatment of bleeding episodes, but as there are insufficient data to determine the optimal approach to immune tolerance induction in this group of patients, their optimal management remains controversial. Rituximab is a newer, promising therapeutic option for inhibitor eradication in such patients. Many aspects concerning mild HA remain to be clarified, including the molecular basis, the natural history and the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Only large prospective studies will shed light on this condition.