Temporal changes in the serum levels of gonadotrophins and testosterone in male rats bearing subcutaneous implants of 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone

Sexual responses of the male rat medial preoptic area and medial amygdala to estrogen II: site specific effects of selective estrogenic drugs

In the medial preoptic area (MPO) and medial amygdala (MEA), estradiol (E(2)) aromatized from testosterone (T) may act via either estrogen receptor (ER) α or ERβ to mediate mating in male rats. We tested the hypothesis that, in the MPO, ERα exclusively mediates sexual responses to E(2) by monitoring mating in four groups of castrated male rats administered dihydrotestosterone (DHT) subcutaneously and MPO implants delivering either: cholesterol, E(2), propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, ERα-agonist) or diarylpropionitrile (DPN, ER β-agonist); a fifth group of intact males served as DPN toxicity control, receiving DPN MPO implants. In a follow-up study, either 1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridinium (MPP, ERα-antagonist) or blank MPO cannulae were implanted in castrated male rats receiving T subcutaneously, whereas intact MPP toxicity controls received MPP MEA implants. PPT or E(2) MPO implants maintained mating, but cholesterol or DPN MPO implants did not. Moreover, MPP MPO implants interfered with T reinstatement of mating suggesting that, in the MPO, ERα is necessary and sufficient for mating in androgen-maintained male rats and ERβ is not sufficient. Because it is unknown which ER subtype(s) mediate sexual responses of the MEA to E(2), we examined mating following MEA implants of cholesterol, E(2), PPT or DPN in four groups of castrated male rats administered DHT subcutaneously. E(2) MEA implants maintained mounting but mating was significantly decreased in groups receiving PPT, DPN or cholesterol MEA implants suggesting that, unlike the MPO where ERα alone is essential, sexual responses of the MEA to E(2) require simultaneous interactions among multiple ER subtypes.

Implants of estradiol conjugated to bovine serum albumin in the male rat medial preoptic area promote copulatory behavior

The expression of mating behavior in male rats is dependent on estrogen-responsive neurons in the medial preoptic area (MPO). Previous reports showed that mating is attenuated if the aromatization of testosterone to estradiol (E2) is blocked in the MPO and that mating is maintained by MPO E2 implants. However, the mechanisms by which E2 exerts its action are not fully understood. It had been thought that E2 acted exclusively by binding to nuclear estrogen receptors to exert it effects; however, recent reports suggest that E2 also binds to membrane-associated receptors activating downstream intracellular cascade responses. In this study, we aimed to determine if an action of E2 at the cell surface is sufficient to support mating behavior. Therefore, either vehicle, E2, or E2 conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA-E2: a complex of E2 and a large protein that will not cross the plasma membrane, thereby restricting the action of E2 to cell surface signaling) was chronically administered bilaterally to the MPO of castrated, dihydrotestosterone-treated male rats. Mating behavior was supported by MPO BSA-E2 implants, suggesting that E2 operates in the MPO via a cell surface mechanism to facilitate male rat mating behavior.

Effects of estrogen in the male rat medial amygdala: infusion of an aromatase inhibitor lowers mating and bovine serum albumin-conjugated estradiol implants do not promote mating

In male rats, copulatory behavior depends on estrogen-responsive neurons located in brain areas known to be crucial for mating. Blocking the aromatization of testosterone (T) to estradiol (E(2)) either throughout the brain or within the medial preoptic area (MPO) reduces mating, whereas E(2) treatment of either the MPO or the medial amygdala (MEA) maintains sexual behavior. The effects of T aromatization in the MEA have received less attention; therefore, 2 studies were done to further elucidate the effects of E(2) in the MEA. In experiment 1, gonadally intact male rats that showed robust mating behavior were administered chronic fadrozole, a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, to the MEA to stop the conversion of T to E(2) and then paired with receptive females. Infusion of fadrozole to the MEA significantly lowered mating behavior in experimental males compared to vehicle-infused control males. To further investigate the mechanism by which E(2) acts in the MEA, in experiment 2, E(2) conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA-E(2): a complex of E(2 )and a large protein that does not cross the plasma membrane, thereby restricting the action of E(2) to cell-surface signaling) was chronically administered bilaterally to the MEA of castrated, dihydrotestosterone-treated males. This treatment did not maintain mating behavior. These studies show that E(2) acts in the MEA to promote male sexual behavior and suggest an intercellular mechanism of E(2) action.