1
|
Jones O, Li Z, Magyar CTJ, Goldaracena N, Sayed BA, Ghanekar A, Cattral M, Selzner N, Sapisochin G. A scoping review of nonmedical barriers to living donor liver transplant. Liver Transpl 2025; 31:287-297. [PMID: 39190370 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to identify and categorize nonmedical barriers encountered by recipients, donors, and health care providers in the context of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Liver transplantation is vital for individuals with liver failure, yet high mortality rates on the transplant waitlist persist. LDLT was introduced to address deceased donor organ shortages; however, its adoption varies widely across regions, prompting the need to explore barriers hindering its implementation. The scoping review employed inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify studies focusing on nonmedical barriers to LDLT in both adult and pediatric populations. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies were considered, covering the period from January 2005 to February 2023. The review's search strategy was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE databases. Studies meeting the criteria were assessed for their characteristics and findings, which were synthesized into recipient, donor, and provider-level barriers. Among 2394 initially screened articles, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion. Recipient-level barriers encompassed systemic disparities in access, limited social support, immigration status, and inadequate awareness of LDLT. Donor-level barriers involved surgery-related risks, recovery time concerns, financial burdens, and religious beliefs. Provider-level barriers highlighted institutional support inadequacies and specialized surgeon shortages. The scoping review underscores nonmedical barriers to LDLT across recipient, donor, and provider levels. These barriers include socioeconomic disparities, information gaps, and inadequate institutional support. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive national efforts to raise awareness about LDLT and provide essential financial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Jones
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhihao Li
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian Tibor Josef Magyar
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Blayne A Sayed
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Cattral
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, HBP & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiratsuka K, Nakamura N, Sato N, Saito T. How Parents of Adolescents and Young Adults with Biliary Atresia Surviving with Native Livers Transfer the Responsibility of Medical Treatment to Their Children in Japan. J Pediatr Nurs 2021; 61:115-121. [PMID: 34023555 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examines how the parents of adolescents and young adults with biliary atresia, surviving with their native livers, transfer medical treatment responsibility to their children, and how becoming a living liver transplant donor affects this process. The basis for the study was that becoming a living liver transplant donor may influence the transfer of responsibility. METHODS A qualitative, descriptive design was employed using a modified grounded theory approach. Data were collected from eight parents from November 2016 to August 2017 through semi-structured interviews conducted in two Japanese hospitals. Interpretive analysis from the viewpoint of the analytical theme and analytical focus person was conducted, resulting in a diagram and storyline explaining the process. FINDINGS Five categories were generated from one father and seven mothers (aged 40-60 years) of outpatients (aged 17-25 years): parental ability to cherish the child's "now" (live in the moment); put the brakes on their child's life; learn as they go; leave the child's life to the child; and openly express reservations about becoming a living liver transplant donor for their child. DISCUSSION Parental transfer of responsibility for treatment may be influenced by close-knit parent-child relationships, perception of the child's growth, and parental concern about becoming a living donor. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE Care providers should understand parent-child relationships and the parents' concerns about becoming living donors, thereby enabling them to recognize that medical treatment control must be relinquished to foster children's autonomy as adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Naho Sato
- Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Japan
| | - Takeshi Saito
- Division of pediatric surgery, Chiba Children's Hospital, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cousino MK, Rea KE, Schumacher KR, Magee JC, Fredericks EM. A systematic review of parent and family functioning in pediatric solid organ transplant populations. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21. [PMID: 28181361 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The process of pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) places new and increased stressors on patients and family members. Measures of family functioning may predict psychological and health outcomes for pediatric patients and their families, and provide opportunity for targeted intervention. This systematic review investigated parent and family functioning and factors associated with poorer functioning in the pediatric SOT population. Thirty-seven studies were identified and reviewed. Studies featured a range of organ populations (eg, heart, liver, kidney, lung, intestine) at various stages in the transplant process. Findings highlighted that parents of pediatric SOT populations commonly report increased stress and mental health symptoms, including posttraumatic stress disorder. Pediatric SOT is also associated with increased family stress and burden throughout the transplant process. Measures of parent and family functioning were associated with several important health-related factors, such as medication adherence, readiness for discharge, and number of hospitalizations. Overall, findings suggest that family stress and burden persists post-transplant, and parent and family functioning is associated with health-related factors in SOT, highlighting family-level functioning as an important target for future intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Cousino
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,University of Michigan Transplant Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kelly E Rea
- University of Michigan Transplant Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kurt R Schumacher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,University of Michigan Transplant Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John C Magee
- University of Michigan Transplant Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Emily M Fredericks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,University of Michigan Transplant Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mendes-Castillo AMC, Bousso RS, Sloand E. The Family Management Styles Framework as A Tool for Tailoring Interventions for Pediatric Transplant Recipients and Their Families: A Case Study. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/24694193.2016.1245364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elizabeth Sloand
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tankurt A, Krespi Boothby MR, Acarlı K, Kalayoğlu M, Kanmaz T, Yankol Y. Liver Transplantation: Recipients' Evaluation of Life From the Perspective of Living Donors. Transplant Proc 2016; 48:107-110. [PMID: 26915852 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Revised: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM Liver transplantation affects not only recipients and living donors' lives, but also the nature and quality of their relationship. Moreover, the ways in which recipients of liver transplant experience life and views of living donors on how recipients experience life may differ. These differences may account for relational changes. It is also important to understand how recipients and their living donors' views differ if the aim is to devise psychoeducational programs for recipients and living donors. Therefore, the present study examined the recipients' experience of life after a diagnosis of end-stage liver failure (ESLF) and transplantation surgery from donors' perspective. METHODS The sample consisted of 16 living donors who donated a part of their liver to a patient with ESLF. Thematic analysis was undertaken in parallel with interviews during which an interview guide was followed. FINDINGS Donors felt that recipients evaluated life after the diagnosis of ESLF and transplantation surgery in terms of limitations, mixed relationships, emotional changes, and improvement in life. CONCLUSION Experience of social limitations, negative emotions, and the feeling that one is supported by others could be interpreted in terms of existing psychological theory. Some ways of adjusting that have not been reported before within the context of ESLF extended the literature. These included others being frightened of being infected by ESLF and being insensitive, experience of positive emotions, and ways of improving. Overall, compared with findings of previous qualitative work among recipients, our findings suggest that donors' evaluation of recipients' lives converge with that of recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tankurt
- Counselling Service, Doga College, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - K Acarlı
- Centre of Organ Transplantation, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Kalayoğlu
- Centre of Organ Transplantation, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Kanmaz
- Centre of Organ Transplantation, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Y Yankol
- Centre of Organ Transplantation, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation is an option for effective treatment for patients with liver disease or a liver tumor. One disadvantage, however, is the risk of complications or death in a healthy donor. Thus, promoting the donor's safety and well-being is a major goal of transplantation care. In this regard, more research on physical and psychological complications and adjustment among donors is needed. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe the experiences of living liver donors, focusing on their perceptions of living liver transplantation and corresponding coping strategies. METHODS The data were analyzed using content analysis in this qualitative design. RESULTS Seven of 12 donors, all men, agreed to participate in the study. The core theme that emerged in regard to adjustment was "maintaining peace of mind." In addition, there were 4 subthemes: (a) removing themselves from information, (b) viewing the surgery as common, (c) having overall confidence, and (d) assigning value to their decision. DISCUSSION Living donor liver transplantation is a treatment option that requires acceptance by both the donor and his or her family. The process is enormously stressful, and the living liver donor needs adjustment strategies to maintain his or her peace of mind throughout the process.
Collapse
|