Improving drug use in rheumatic disorders

Academic Detailing to Reduce Sedative-Hypnotic Prescribing in Older Veterans

BACKGROUND

Sedative-hypnotics, including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZD-RA), are considered potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults. Academic detailing, an educational outreach delivered by trained clinicians to other clinicians to encourage evidence-based care, can promote deprescribing of PIMs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of academic detailing on sedative-hypnotic prescribing to older veterans.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of academic detailing on BZD and BZD-RA prescribing to veterans aged 75 years and older. Prescribing trends for primary care and mental health prescribers in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) Southeast Network were calculated for the 18 months before and after an initial academic detailing session for each prescriber. Pre-post interrupted time series analyses (ITSAs) were conducted, and period prevalence was calculated as the number of prescriptions per 1000 older veterans.

RESULTS

A total of 155 prescribers were followed for 36 months. BZD prevalence declined by 23% (69.08-53.33 per 1000 population; P < .001) and by 15% for BZD-RA (18.07-15.38 per 1000 population; P < .001). New starts on BZD declined by 54% (2.36-1.09 per 1000 population; P < .001) and new starts on BZD-RA declined by 53% (1.02-0.48 per 1000 population; P < .001). Alternative medications for insomnia increased by 23% (39.98-49.27 per 1000 population; P < .001). Findings from the ITSA confirmed those of the pre-post analysis with sustained effects in the postintervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

Academic detailing was associated with reduced sedative-hypnotic prescribing in the primary care and mental health setting.

Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns

BACKGROUND

The roles of pharmacists in patient care have expanded from the traditional tasks of dispensing medications and providing basic medication counseling to working with other health professionals and the public. Multiple reviews have evaluated the impact of pharmacist-provided patient care on health-related outcomes. Prior reviews have primarily focused on in-patient settings. This systematic review focuses on services provided by outpatient pharmacists in community or ambulatory care settings. This is an update of the Cochrane review published in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient and health professional outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

This review has been split into two phases. For Phase I, we searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register (January 1966 through March 2007). For Phase II, we searched MEDLINE/EMBASE (January 1966 through March 2008). The Phase I results are reported in this review; Phase II will be summarized in the next update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing 1. Pharmacist services targeted at patients versus services delivered by other health professionals; 2. Pharmacist services targeted at patients versus the delivery of no comparable service; 3. Pharmacist services targeted at health professionals versus services delivered by other health professionals; 4. Pharmacist services targeted at health professionals versus the delivery of no comparable service.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included; 36 studies were pharmacist interventions targeting patients and seven studies were pharmacist interventions targeting health professionals. For comparison 1, the only included study showed a significant improvement in systolic blood pressure for patients receiving medication management from a pharmacist compared to usual care from a physician. For comparison 2, in the five studies evaluating process of care outcomes, pharmacist services reduced the incidence of therapeutic duplication and decreased the total number of medications prescribed. Twenty-nine of 36 studies reported clinical and humanistic outcomes. Pharmacist interventions resulted in improvement in most clinical outcomes, although these improvements were not always statistically significant. Eight studies reported patient quality of life outcomes; three studies showed improvement in at least three subdomains. For comparison 3, no studies were identified meeting the inclusion criteria. For comparison 4, two of seven studies demonstrated a clear statistically significant improvement in prescribing patterns.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Only one included study compared pharmacist services with other health professional services, hence we are unable to draw conclusions regarding comparisons 1 and 3. Most included studies supported the role of pharmacists in medication/therapeutic management, patient counseling, and providing health professional education with the goal of improving patient process of care and clinical outcomes, and of educational outreach visits on physician prescribing patterns. There was great heterogeneity in the types of outcomes measured across all studies. Therefore a standardized approach to measure and report clinical, humanistic, and process outcomes for future randomized controlled studies evaluating the impact of outpatient pharmacists is needed. Heterogeneity in study comparison groups, outcomes, and measures makes it challenging to make generalised statements regarding the impact of pharmacists in specific settings, disease states, and patient populations.

Pharmacist Interventions in Geriatric Nursing Facility NSAID Therapy: A One-Year Follow-up Study of Costs and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To document costs and outcomes occurring with acceptance or rejection of ongoing pharmacists' interventions regarding therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) versus acetaminophen (APAP) therapy in treating osteoarthritis in a long-term care facility in the sixth year of observation.

DESIGN

A nonrandomized observational prospective cohort study with all patients resident for 30 or more days over the 12-month study period receiving NSAID or APAP therapy for osteoarthritis.

SETTING

A skilled nursing facility with more than 100 beds.

PATIENTS

All patients had a monthly drug regimen review, receiving full-dose NSAIDs (not low-dose aspirin alone) on a continuous basis, and were selected for intervention. A control group of patients receiving APAP on a continuous basis also was selected for comparison of outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients receiving NSAIDs had (1) periodic hemoglobin and hematocrit determinations; (2) physical assessment of lower eyelid, nailbed, and stool color; (3) and a recommendation to replace NSAID with APAP or to add gastroprotective pharmacotherapy if the NSAID was continued. Patients not receiving an NSAID for osteoarthritis and continuously taking APAP served as a control group.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Cost-analysis calculations were performed for existing regimens versus cost savings that would be experienced with recommended pharmacotherapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

Fourteen intervention subjects and sixteen control patients were identified. In the three patients for whom the pharmacist's recommendations were accepted within three months (11 NSAID-use months), there were three substitutions of APAP therapy observed over an additional 26 patient-months. Five of 11 patients in the NSAID group for whom pharmacists' recommendations were rejected developed gastrointestional (GI) bleeding, necessitating six hospitalizations. Two of these patients died over the study period. No group for whom APAP was accepted nor control-group patients experienced suspected GI bleeding. Total costs of the control group analgesic therapy was $756.74, or $47.30 per patient. Cost savings for APAP substitution in the intervention rejection group would exceed $91,000, while cost savings with the addition of hemoglobin and hematocrit determinations would exceed $84,200. Cost savings from addition of gastroprotectives to the NSAID would have been misoprostol, $73,000; omeprazole, $71,400.

CONCLUSIONS

Refusal to accept pharmacists' intervention recommendations regarding alternatives to NSAID pharmacotherapy in this nursing facility population is associated with sustained and considerable costs, morbidity, and mortality.

A Community-Based Educational Intervention to Improve Antithrombotic Drug Use in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that antithrombotics are effective in reducing the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF), they remain underused.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a controlled trial of a comprehensive educational program promoting the rational prescribing of antithrombotics for stroke prevention in AF.

METHODS

The intervention was conducted in Southern Tasmania, Australia, using Northern Tasmania as a control area. General practitioners were sent locally produced guidelines on stroke risk stratification and antithrombotic drug use in AF, which were followed by academic detailing visits. Outcomes were measured using evaluation feedback from the general practitioners, and drug utilization data were provided by a series of patients presenting to the hospital with an admission diagnosis of AF and dispensing of antithrombotic therapy under the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

RESULTS

During the educational intervention, 272 guidelines were mailed and, subsequently, 162 general practitioners were visited and the guidelines discussed. Hospital admission data before and after the intervention revealed a significant increase in the use of warfarin in patients at high risk of stroke (33% vs 46% of eligible patients; p < 0.05). Analysis of prescription data for warfarin also indicated that the increase in use of warfarin within the intervention region was significantly greater than for the control region (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The educational program described here led to a significant increase in the prescribing of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Effectiveness of educational interventions on the improvement of drug prescription in primary care: a critical literature review

This paper is a critical review of studies of educational programmes designed to improve prescription practices in ambulatory care. Scientific articles were selected from the following bibliographical indices: MEDLINE, IME, ICYT and ERIC. The searches covered the time period between 1988 and 1997. The search criteria included: primary-care, educat*, prescription* and other related keywords. The inclusion criteria were studies describing educational strategies aimed at general practitioners working in ambulatory settings. The study outcome was change in prescribing behaviour of physicians through prescribing indicators. The following data were extracted: study design, target drugs, type of intervention, follow-up period of the prescription trends, type of data analysis, type of statistical analysis and reported results. We found 3233 articles that met the search criteria. Of these, 51 met the inclusion criteria and 43 studied the efficacy/effectiveness of one or various interventions as compared to no intervention. Among seven studies evaluating active strategies, four reported positive results (57%), as opposed to three of the eight studies assessing passive strategies (38%). Among the 28 studies that tested reinforced active strategies, 16 reported positive results for all variables (57%). Eight studies were classified as a high degree of evidence (16%). We concluded that the results of our review suggest that the more personalized, the more effective the strategies are. We observe that combining active and passive strategies results in a decrease of the failure rate. Finally, better studies are still needed to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of prescribing practices.

One-to-one versus group sessions to improve prescription in primary care: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 educational strategies aimed at improving prescribing standards in primary care.

METHODS

A pragmatic controlled trial was designed; the study population included general and family practitioners in Galicia (northwestern Spain) divided into 3 study groups: a one-to-one education group (n = 98), a by-group education group (n = 92), and a control group (n = 405). The educational intervention included explicit recommendations for selecting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for inflammation signs. Some of the subjects were given reminders. Mixed-effect linear models were applied to data analysis. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. The dependent variable is a rate with a numerator that is the number of prescribed units of the NSAIDs recommended during intervention; the denominator is the total number of prescribed units of the NSAID total.

RESULTS

One-to-one education obtained an average prescribing behavior improvement of 6.5% (P < 0.001) in the 9 months after intervention. In the education group, the average improvement was 2.4% (P < 0.05) for the same period. Statistically significant differences were observed between the group intervention and one-to-one groups. The reminder increased significantly the effectiveness of the one-to-one intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A single, short educational session to primary care doctors can improve their prescribing standards during long periods of > or = 9 months. Of the 2 strategies followed in the trial, one-to-one education has shown to be the most effective. Results also show that the effectiveness of these interventions increases when presented together with written material.

Modification of general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics by use of a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer)

AIMS

This was a pilot study of the use of a clinical pharmacist as a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer) to modify antibiotic prescribing by general practitioners.

METHODS

Following a visit by the adviser (March-May), 112 general practitioners were recruited and randomised to control or active groups. A panel of experts prepared a best practice chart of recommended drugs for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, otitis media and urinary tract infections. The adviser made a 10-15 min visit to each prescriber in the active group (June-July), gave them the chart and discussed its recommendations briefly. Doctors in the control group were not visited nor given the chart. Prescription numbers for all prescribers were obtained from the Commonwealth Health Insurance Commission for the pre(March-May) and postdetailing (August-September) periods using a three month lag time for data collection. Data for total numbers of prescriptions and for selected individual antibiotics used in these two periods were analysed using nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Prescribing patterns were similar for the control and active groups in the predetailing period. For both groups, there were significant (P<0.03) increases (45% for control and 40% for active) in total number of antibiotic prescriptions in the post compared with the predetailing period. This trend was anticipated on the basis of the winter seasonal increase in respiratory infections. In line with the chart recommendations for first-line treatment, doctors in the active group prescribed significantly more amoxycillin (P<0.02) and doxycycline (P<0.001) in the post vs predetailing periods. By contrast, doctors in the control group prescribed significantly more cefaclor (P<0.03) and roxithromycin (P<0.03), drugs that were not recommended. The total cost of antibiotics prescribed by doctors in the control group increased by 48% ($37 150) from the preto postdetailing periods. In the same time period, the costs for the active group increased by only 35% ($21 020).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the academic detailing process was successful in modifying prescribing patterns and that it also decreased prescription numbers and costs. Application of the scheme on a nationwide basis could not only improve prescriber choice of the most appropriate antibiotic but also result in a significant saving of health care dollars.

Programme to improve the use of drugs in older people and involve general practitioners in community education

As part of a multi-pronged approach to improving the quality of drug use in the elderly, a pharmacist was contracted by the Division of General Practice (Northern Tasmania) to develop educational material and implement two academic detailing sessions for general practitioners on the issues of adverse drug reactions and drug interactions in older people. The project aimed to involve general practitioners in community education after optimizing relevant therapeutic knowledge and standardizing prescribing practices. Sixteen general practitioners were involved in the project and 13 of these agreed to participate in academic detailing. The pharmacist developed prescribing guidelines for general practitioners and discussed these and illustrative case studies at the academic detailing sessions. General practitioner-conducted education sessions were completed by nine general practitioners to groups of carers, general practitioners, nurses and older people. Despite the relatively low numbers of general practitioners involved, the results of the project were encouraging. Academic detailing by the pharmacist was well received by the general practitioners, who indicated they would be willing to participate in further sessions. Pre- and post-project multiple-choice tests on therapeutic issues in the elderly indicated a strong trend for an increase in knowledge. Analysis of general practitioners' patient records found a statistically significant decline in the median number of medications prescribed per patient during the project. There was also a statistically significant decline in prescribing of 'indicator' medications, particularly psychoactive drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients resident in nursing homes. The project demonstrated that academic detailing by a pharmacist can be effective as part of a combined approach to improve the quality of drug use in older people.

Improving the prescribing of antibiotics for urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND

In recent years there have been changes in the recommended antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infections (UTIs). In particular, the use of amoxycillin or co-trimoxazole is now discouraged, with amoxycillin-potassium clavulanate, cephalexin and trimethoprim becoming first-line agents for uncomplicated lower UTIs.

AIM

To examine whether academic detailing, performed by a pharmacist, could modify prescribing practices for antibiotics used in the treatment of UTI in the community setting.

METHODS

The intervention was conducted in Southern Tasmania, using the remainder of the State as a control area. The target group of general practitioners was sent educational material designed to assist in the appropriate prescribing of antibiotics in the treatment of UTI. A pharmacist then visited each general practitioner and discussed the rational use of antibiotics for UTIs directly with him/her. Outcomes were measured using evaluation feedback from the general practitioners and pharmacoepidemiological data, which were not linked to diagnosis. The key variable examined was the total defined daily doses (DDDs) dispensed for the recommended first-line agents (amoxycillin-potassium clavulanate, cephalexin and trimethoprim) compared with amoxycillin (3 g single-dose form) and co-trimoxazole.

RESULTS

The educational programme was very well received by the general practitioners. Changes in the prescribing of antibiotics commonly used for UTIs were evident in both study regions over the course of the study, but the improvements were significantly greater in the intervention area.

CONCLUSION

Educational programmes utilizing academic detailing by pharmacists can modify prescribing practices within the community setting.