1
|
Halmetoja A. Challenges and responsibilities in the medication management process in 24/7 group housing services for adults with intellectual disability: Interviews with nurses. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2024; 28:372-392. [PMID: 36932940 PMCID: PMC11059829 DOI: 10.1177/17446295231163979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Staff in 24/7 group housing services for adults with intellectual disability are responsible for ensuring safe medication management processes and supporting the residents in their health-related issues. Ten interviewed nurses reported several challenges in the medication management process emerging at the staff level, the level of the group home, and the level of the social and healthcare system, and were often related to issues in communication and responsibility. They reported a variety of complex tasks in the medication management process, for which they need a multiple skill set. They also act as healthcare advocates for residents, but healthcare services do not always match residents' needs. Training for social and healthcare professionals, access to healthcare services and the collaboration of social and healthcare services should be improved to provide the people with intellectual disability the best possible pharmacotherapy and healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Halmetoja
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, F University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watson E, Raghavendra P, Lawn S, Watson J. Improving communication access in psychoeducational interventions for people with complex communication needs: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:3388-3406. [PMID: 36172972 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2127932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Psychoeducational interventions are commonly used to improve mental health among the general population; however, their application among people with complex communication needs is under explored. This scoping review aims to identify the psychoeducational interventions utilised with people with complex communication needs, any adaptations to improve communication access, and outcomes for this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS The scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley guidelines and included stakeholder consultations. A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Stakeholder consultations were conducted via semi-structured interviews with informants from three populations: people with complex communication needs, everyday communication partners and mental health workers. RESULTS The search yielded 2112 articles. Twenty-four articles were retained for data extraction. Numerical analysis provided an overview of the existing literature. Thematic analysis highlighted the range of communication access strategies applied within psychoeducational interventions. Common aims and outcomes of interventions occurred across three interrelated themes: education, symptom reduction, and improved coping and wellbeing. Stakeholder consultations enabled contextualisation of literature. CONCLUSIONS People with complex communication needs may benefit from psychoeducational interventions when effective, personalised communication access strategies are employed. Future research should include lived-experience perspectives to ensure the relevance of communication access strategies in mental health support.Implications for rehabilitationThis scoping review adds to the evidence base supporting equitable access to mental health support for people with complex communication needs.A range of specific strategies are presented for mental health workers to consider when working with people with complex communication needs.Positive behaviour support (PBS) practitioners must be equipped to address the psychoeducational and mental health support requirements of people with complex communication needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Watson
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Parimala Raghavendra
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sharon Lawn
- College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joanne Watson
- School of Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sevcik RA, Barton-Hulsey A, Bruce S, Goldman A, Ogletree BT, Paul D, Romski M. It's Never Too Late: Debunking Myths About Communication and Adults With Severe Disabilities. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2022; 60:416-425. [PMID: 36162046 DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-60.5.416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Communication infuses all dimensions and stages of life, influencing one's self-determination and quality of life. A number of empirical studies have demonstrated that people with severe disabilities continue to develop communication and language skills well into their adult years and make measurable gains when provided with appropriate communication services and supports. Several myths about age, ability, and experiences limit opportunities for persons with severe disabilities. In this paper, we confront and address these myths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amy Goldman
- Amy Goldman, United States Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication
| | | | - Diane Paul
- Diane Paul, American Speech Language Hearing Association
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Charles ML. Communication experiences of family caregivers of hospitalized adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities-A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2020; 7:1725-1734. [PMID: 33072356 PMCID: PMC7544848 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To explore communication experiences between family caregivers of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) and healthcare personnel during hospitalization. Design A qualitative descriptive study approach with interviews of family caregivers was used. Method Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted from June-September 2015 with ten family caregivers of adults with I/DD. Participants were recruited through an advocacy organization in the north-eastern United States. Data were analysed by content analysis. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research was the chosen checklist. Results The four overarching themes: "Need for Advocacy"; "Need for Better Communication"; "Sense of Abandonment"; and "Lack of Confidence" along with 12 subthemes were identified. Overall, participants reported miscommunications leading to instances of mistrust in hospital staff's competence to deliver quality patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lourdes Charles
- College of Health ProfessionsLienhard School of NursingPace UniversityNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barriers and facilitators to primary health care for people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: an integrative review. BJGP Open 2020; 4:bjgpopen20X101030. [PMID: 32605913 PMCID: PMC7465578 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism experience health inequalities. Death occurs at a younger age and the prevalence of long-term morbidities is higher than in the general population. Despite this, their primary healthcare access rates are lower than the general population, their health needs are often unmet, and their views and experiences are frequently overlooked in research, policy, and practice. Aim To investigate the barriers and facilitators reported by individuals with intellectual disabilities, autism, or both, and/or their carers, to accessing and utilising primary health care for their physical and mental health needs. Design & setting An integrative review was undertaken, which used systematic review methodology. Method Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane were searched for relevant studies (all languages) using a search strategy. Two researchers independently screened the results and assessed the quality of the studies. Results Sixty-three international studies were identified. Six main themes relating to barriers and facilitators emerged from an analysis of these studies. The main themes were: training; knowledge and awareness; communication; fear and embarrassment; involvement in healthcare decision-making; and time. All the themes were underpinned by the need for greater care, dignity, respect, collaborative relationships, and reasonable adjustments. Opposing barriers and facilitators were identified within each of the main themes. Conclusion Adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities and/or autism experience several barriers to accessing and utilising primary health care. The findings highlight the reasonable adjustments and facilitators that can be implemented to ensure that these individuals are not excluded from primary health care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gómez LE, Monsalve A, Morán ML, Alcedo MÁ, Lombardi M, Schalock RL. Measurable Indicators of CRPD for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities within the Quality of Life Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E5123. [PMID: 32679924 PMCID: PMC7400318 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This article proposes the quality of life (QOL) construct as a framework from which to develop useful indicators to operationalize, measure, and implement the Articles of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). A systematic review of the scientific literature on people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) was carried out, with the aim of identifying personal outcomes that can be translated into specific and measurable items for each of the CRPD Articles aligned to the eight QOL domains. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the systematic review was conducted across the Web of Science Core Collection, Current Contents Connect (CCC), MEDLINE, KCI-Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index and SciELO Citation Index, for articles published between 2008 and 2020. A total of 65 articles focusing on people with IDD were selected. The results were grouped into four broad categories: conceptual frameworks used to monitor the CRPD; instruments used to assess the rights set out in the CRPD; recommendations on the use of inclusive research; and indicators or personal outcomes associated with specific rights contained in the CRPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E. Gómez
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; (A.M.); (M.L.M.); (M.Á.A.)
| | - Asunción Monsalve
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; (A.M.); (M.L.M.); (M.Á.A.)
| | - Mª Lucía Morán
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; (A.M.); (M.L.M.); (M.Á.A.)
| | - Mª Ángeles Alcedo
- Department of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain; (A.M.); (M.L.M.); (M.Á.A.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Johnson KR, Bagatell N. "No! You can't have it": Problematizing choice in institutionalized adults with intellectual disabilities. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2020; 24:69-84. [PMID: 29621910 DOI: 10.1177/1744629518766121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Institutionalized adults with profound intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant challenges to having their choice-making cultivated and supported. Based on observational and interview data from an institutional ethnographic study, this article explores how choice-making during mealtimes is acknowledged and problematized by staff. First, we suggest that Foucauldian problematization offers a lens through which to better understand how mealtime intervention plans passed down over time become embodied restrictive practices. Second, we provide examples and analyses of mealtime negotiations between staff and residents. Analyses revealed staff infantilize and misrepresent residents' choice-making during meals as manipulation; additionally, analyses suggest that past experiences of staff with residents and historical meal plans color how they acknowledge and interpret residents' choices. Our argument is an attempt to move forward discussions concerning the implementation of quality habilitation services by highlighting the ways contemporary institutional systems perpetuate misrepresentations of nonverbal behaviors in adults with profound ID.
Collapse
|
8
|
Whittle EL, Fisher KR, Reppermund S, Trollor J. Access to mental health services: The experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2018; 32:368-379. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Louise Whittle
- 3DN; The Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry; UNSW; Sydney Australia
- Social Policy Research Centre; UNSW; Sydney Australia
| | | | - Simone Reppermund
- 3DN; The Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry; UNSW; Sydney Australia
| | - Julian Trollor
- 3DN; The Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry; UNSW; Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alexander N, Taylor Gomez M. Pleasure, sex, prohibition, intellectual disability, and dangerous ideas. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS 2017; 25:114-120. [PMID: 28784071 DOI: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1331690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The sexual lives of people with intellectual disability continue to be the subject of prohibition and restriction by disability sectors. Without access to sex education and the concomitant sex literacy, people with intellectual disability are denied the essential conversation about sex, sexual expression, and pleasure. The authors explore the history of sexual repression of people with intellectual disability, and the culture of sexual disempowerment. This propositional paper offers a sense of hope about sex facilitation and sex education for people with intellectual disability which can afford them a full life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miriam Taylor Gomez
- b Coordinator, Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability (QCIDD) , Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland , South Brisbane , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berghs M, Atkin K, Graham H, Hatton C, Thomas C. Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: a scoping study and evidence synthesis. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/phr04080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPublic health interventions that are effective in the general population are often assumed to apply to people with impairments. However, the evidence to support this is limited and hence there is a need for public health research to take a more explicit account of disability and the perspectives of people with impairments.Objectives(1) To examine the literature on theories and models of disability; (2) to assess whether or not, and how, intervention studies of effectiveness could incorporate more inclusive approaches that are consistent with these theories and models; and (3) to use the findings to draw out implications for improving evaluative study designs and evidence-based practice.Review methodsThe project is a scoping review of the literature. The first stage examines theories and models of disability and reflects on possible connections between theories of disability and public health paradigms. This discussion is used to develop an ethical–empirical decision aid/checklist, informed by a human rights approach to disability and ecological approaches to public health. We apply this decision aid in the second stage of the review to evaluate the extent to which the 30 generic public health reviews of interventions and the 30 disability-specific public health interventions include the diverse experiences of disability. Five deliberation panels were also organised to further refine the decision aid: one with health-care professionals and four with politically and socially active disabled people.ResultsThe evidence from the review indicated that there has been limited public health engagement with theories and models of disability. Outcome measures were often insensitive to the experiences of disability. Even when disabled people were included, studies rarely engaged with their experiences in any meaningful way. More inclusive research should reflect how people live and ‘flourish’ with disability.LimitationsThe scoping review provides a broad appraisal of a particular field. It generates ideas for future practice rather than a definite framework for action.ConclusionsOur ethical–empirical decision aid offers a critical framework with which to evaluate current research practice. It also offers a resource for promoting more ethical and evidence-based public health research that is methodologically robust while being sensitive to the experiences of disability.Future workDeveloping more inclusive research and interventions that avoid conceptualising disability as either a ‘burden’ or ‘problem’ is an important starting point. This includes exploring ways of refining and validating current common outcome measures to ensure that they capture a diverse range of disabling experiences, as well as generating evidence on meaningful ways of engaging a broad range of disabled children and adults in the research process.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Berghs
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karl Atkin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Hilary Graham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Chris Hatton
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Carol Thomas
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chinn D, Abraham E. Using 'candidacy' as a framework for understanding access to mainstream psychological treatment for people with intellectual disabilities and common mental health problems within the English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2016; 60:571-582. [PMID: 27097932 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service was established to address common mental health problems among the English population in a timely manner in order to counter the social and economic disadvantage accompanying such difficulties. Using the concept of candidacy, we examined how the legitimacy of claims by people with intellectual disabilities to use this service is facilitated or impeded. METHOD We used a sequential mixed methods design. We completed 21 interviews with a range of stakeholders, including people with intellectual disabilities and their carers. Themes from the interviews were used to design an online survey questionnaire that was returned by 452 staff from IAPT and specialist intellectual disability services. RESULTS Using the candidacy framework, we noted that eligibility and access to IAPT were achieved through dynamic and iterative processes of negotiation involving people with intellectual disabilities and their supporters on one side and IAPT staff and service structures on the other. Barriers and facilitators were apparent throughout the seven dimensions of candidacy (identification, navigation, permeability of services, appearances, adjudications, offers and resistance and operating conditions) and were linked to discourses relating to the character and purpose of IAPT and specialist intellectual disability services. CONCLUSIONS Opportunities exist for some people with intellectual disabilities to assert their candidacy for IAPT input, although there are barriers at individual, professional, organisational and structural levels. More attention needs to be paid to how principles of inclusiveness are operationalised within IAPT teams and to the mental health facilitation role of specialist intellectual disability staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Chinn
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - E Abraham
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steinert C, Steinert T, Flammer E, Jaeger S. Impact of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UN-CRPD) on mental health care research - a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:166. [PMID: 27387916 PMCID: PMC4937523 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0862-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN-CRPD) aims at stimulating profound changes and social development in many areas of the society. We wanted to examine the impact of the convention on mental health care research up to now by a systematic review. METHODS We searched relevant electronic databases for empirical studies from the area of mental health which focused directly on the content of the UN-CRPD. RESULTS One thousand six hundred ten articles were screened, 36 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria and came from 22 different countries. 25 studies (69 %) are related to persons with intellectual disabilities, only 11 to other mental disorders. Study designs were quantitative and qualitative as well. Issues were realisation of the UN-CRPD, implementation and financing, development of instruments, and attitudes towards the UN-CRPD. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to possible wide-reaching consequences for the organisation of mental health care, theoretical debates prevail as of yet and empirical research is still scarce. Research on the UN-CRPD is more advanced for intellectual disabilities and provides good suggestions for relevant research aspects in major mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Steinert
- University of Mannheim, Chair for Political Science IV, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tilman Steinert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Centres for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Ulm University, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Erich Flammer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Centres for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Ulm University, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Ravensburg, Germany.
| | - Susanne Jaeger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Centres for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Ulm University, Versorgungsforschung Weissenau, Ravensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Dooren K, Dean J, Boyle FM, Taylor-Gomez M, Lennox NG. Consider the Support Worker in the Role of Health Assessments. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2015; 29:585-586. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kate van Dooren
- Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Julie Dean
- School of Public Health; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Frances M. Boyle
- School of Public Health; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Miram Taylor-Gomez
- Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Nicholas G. Lennox
- Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Feldman MA, Owen F, Andrews AE, Tahir M, Barber R, Griffiths D. Randomized Control Trial of the 3Rs Health Knowledge Training Program for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2015; 29:278-88. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice A. Feldman
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Frances Owen
- Department of Child and Youth Studies; Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Amy E. Andrews
- 3Rs Community-University Research Alliance; Community LivingWelland-Pelham; Welland ON Canada
| | - Munazza Tahir
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Rachel Barber
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Dorothy Griffiths
- Department of Child and Youth Studies; Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|