Calcium antagonism in essential hypertension: effect on renal haemodynamics and microalbuminuria

Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension

Microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion equal to 30-300 mg/24 h) is a reliable indicator of premature cardiovascular mortality in diabetic patients and in the general population. In insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus microalbuminuria is a marker of initial diabetic nephropathy and predicts the evolution toward renal insufficiency. In essential hypertension the clinical and prognostic role of microalbuminuria is more controversial. While it is a recognised marker of cardiovascular complications and a reliable predictor of ischaemic heart disease, its prognostic value on the risk of progressive renal alterations is still uncertain because no prospective studies, taking microalbuminuria as a selection criterion and renal insufficiency as an end point, are available. Blood pressure control with antihypertensive drugs is accompanied by a reduction in urinary albumin excretion. The favourable effects of antihypertensive agents on microalbuminuria appear to be proportional to blood pressure reduction, but angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists show an additional beneficial effect on urinary albumin excretion. Whether the reduction of microalbuminuria obtained through pharmacological intervention has favourable prognostic implications remain to be demonstrated. However, screening for microalbuminuria is a relatively easy and inexpensive procedure and reveals a potentially treatable abnormality. Thus, considering that microalbuminuria identifies hypertensive subjects at higher risk than standard, urinary albumin excretion should be routinely measured in hypertensive patients and, in the presence of microalbuminuria, antihypertensive treatment should be intensified in order to obtain an optimal blood pressure control.

[Factors associated with changes in microalbuminuria during antihypertensive treatment]

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to analyze the factors related with changes of microalbuminuria during antihypertensive treatment in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

One hundred and six patients (57 men, mean age 40.8 [SD 6.6] years) never treated with antihypertensive treatment were included. At the beginning and after one year, blood pressure biochemical profile and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) were measured. After the initial evaluation, 53 patients received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and 53 beta-blockers (BB). Hydrochlorothiazide was added to achieve the blood pressure target < 140/90 mmHg.

RESULTS

The average of UAE was 32.1 (43.1) mg/24 h, and 41 (39%) patients had microalbuminuretics. After 12 months of treatment, a significative fall of systolic BP (-20.6 [8.03] mmHg, p < 0.001), and diastolic BP (-14.18 [10.34] mmHg, p < 0.001) were observed, whereas baseline glucose increases (3.08 [11.07] mg/dl, p = 0.006). The changes of UAE were only related with the baseline UAE values. Neither, age, sex, baseline diastolic BP and changes in diastolic BP were significantly related with the changes in UAE. In spite of similar mean BP reduction (medial BP 17.4 [10.9] vs 14.8 [10.4] mmHg), UAE only was reduced in patients treated with ACEi (LogUAE: 0.203 [0.872] mg/24 h; p < 0.04). In addition, in patients treated with BB a significative increase in baseline glucose (4.4 [12.3] mg/dl; p = 0.013) and uric acid (1.18 [4.18]; p = 0.031) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with essential hypertension, changes in microalbuminuria depends of the initial UAE values and the kind of antihypertensive treatment. ACEi produced higher UAE reduction and lower derangement of the glucose metabolism than BB.

Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension: significance, pathophysiology, and therapeutic implications

Some patients with essential hypertension manifest greater than normal urinary albumin excretion (UAE). The significance of this association, which is the object of this review, is not well established. Hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria manifest greater levels of blood pressure, particularly at night, and higher serum levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, and uric acid than patients with normal UAE. Levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, on the other hand, were lower in patients with microalbuminuria than in those with normal UAE. Patients with microalbuminuria manifested greater incidence of insulin resistance and thicker carotid arteries than patients with normal UAE. After a follow-up of 7 years, we observed that 12 cardiovascular events occurred among 54 (21.3%) patients with microalbuminuria and only two such events among 87 patients with normal UAE (P < 0.0002). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that UAE, cholesterol level, and diastolic blood pressure were independent predictors of the cardiovascular outcome. Rate of creatinine clearance from patients with microalbuminuria decreased more than that from those with normal UAE. In conclusion, these studies suggest that hypertensive individuals with microalbuminuria manifest a variety of biochemical and hormonal derangements with pathogenic potential, which results in hypertensive patients having a greater incidence of cardiovascular events and a greater decline in renal function than patients with normal UAE.

Renal protection by antihypertensive drugs: insights from microalbuminuria studies

During the last few years there has been a renewed interest in blood-pressure (BP)-induced kidney damage, owing to a progressive increase in the incidence and prevalence of hypertension and vascular diseases as a cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The need to prevent ESRD demands continued efforts so as to identify early those people with hypertension who are at risk and to provide them with effective antihypertensive therapy. This review analyses what is needed in terms of surrogate endpoints for monitoring kidney damage and what is known about the impact of antihypertensive treatments in reducing the BP burden on the kidney in non-diabetic subjects. Although glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and proteinuria are useful surrogate endpoints for patients with nephropathy and GFR below or close to the threshold value for renal insufficiency, it is clear that monitoring changes in either GFR or proteinuria does not provide a sensitive endpoint for subjects with the mildest forms of renal disease, e.g. essential hypertensive patients who are at risk of developing kidney damage. In this case microalbuminuria may be useful, although unequivocal evidence demonstrating that microalbuminuria is a risk marker for developing renal insufficiency in non-diabetic renal diseases has not existed until now, and whether a decrease in microalbuminuria is of prognostic significance in patients with essential hypertension remains to be demonstrated. The beneficial effects of the antihypertensive agents on microalbuminuria are also proportional to BP reduction. If a large enough BP reduction is achieved there seem to be, at most, only minimal differences among the antihypertensive drug classes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers have additional beneficial effects on microalbuminuria independent of the BP reduction, owing to their direct role in glomerular haemodynamics. The heterogeneity in the changes in urinary albumin excretion during antihypertensive treatment may be related to the different factors involved in the presence of microalbuminuria or structural end-organ damage, or both.

Antihypertensive treatment of patients with proteinuric renal diseases: risks or benefits of calcium channel blockers?

In patients with proteinuric renal diseases the rate of progression of renal insufficiency is determined by the level of blood pressure and proteinuria. It has been demonstrated that strict blood pressure control with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors or beta-blockers, aimed at reaching values below 130/80 mm Hg, attenuates the deterioration of renal function. In general, the beneficial effects of these drugs are reflected in a parallel lowering of proteinuria. Calcium channel blockers are effective antihypertensive drugs, however, their safety in patients with proteinuric renal diseases and renal insufficiency may be questioned because of reported untoward effects on urinary protein excretion. The present review discusses the potential benefits and risks of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of patients with renal diseases. To this end we have evaluated the effects of these drugs in animal models of progressive renal injury. In these animal models adverse effects of CCBs have been reported which are attributed to an impairment of autoregulation. In patients with proteinuria, the dihydropyridine CCBs do not lower proteinuria despite a reduction of blood pressure. Studies on the effects on the course of renal function are limited, however, the available data do suggest that this class of CCBs may be less advantageous than other antihypertensive drugs, thus arguing against the use of these agents as first-line drugs in patients with proteinuric renal diseases. Information on the effects of the non-dihydropyridine CCBs is limited to a small number of studies in patients with diabetic renal disease. Although the data suggest that these classes of CCBs might be more beneficial, more studies are needed, particularly in patients with non-diabetic renal diseases, before founded conclusions can be reached.

Renal effects of nifedipine and captopril in patients with essential hypertension and reduced renal reserve

In this study we investigated the short-term effects of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on renal hemodynamics and the urinary excretion of proteins with different relative mass in subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension and apparently normal glomerular filtration rate but reduced renal functional reserve. Sixteen subjects underwent the following four treatments: (1) low-protein meal (0.2 g protein/kg body wt), (2) high-protein meal (1.3 g protein/kg body wt), (3) high-protein meal plus oral nifedipine (20 mg), and (4) high-protein meal plus oral captopril (50 mg). Two urine samples were obtained after meals. Blood samples were drawn at the midpoint of each 120-minute urine collection period. Urine and serum were tested for total protein, immunoglobulin G, albumin, alpha 1-microglobulin, retinol binding protein, and beta 2-microglobulin. Glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were assessed by iothalamate and p-aminohippuric clearance, respectively. Compared with the high-protein meal alone, nifedipine elicited a clear-cut increase in the urinary excretion of total protein (+60%, P < .01), immunoglobulin G (+58%, P < .01), albumin (+25%, P < .05), retinol binding protein (+47%, P < .05), and beta 2-microglobulin (+52%, P < .05); captopril decreased the urinary excretion rate of immunoglobulin G (-26%, P < .05), albumin (-22%, P < .05), and beta 2-microglobulin (-34%, P < .05). The ratio between the clearances of immunoglobulin G and albumin was higher after nifedipine (+21%, P < .01) and unchanged after captopril (-9%, P = NS) compared with the high-protein meal alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension. Reduction by different antihypertensive drugs

The effects of four different antihypertensive drugs (the Ca(2+)-channel blocker felodipine, the beta-blocker metoprolol, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril, and the alpha-blocking agent doxazosin) on microalbuminuria and renal hemodynamics were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover study in 17 patients (10 women, seven men, aged 39 +/- 14 years) with mild-to-moderate essential arterial hypertension and microalbuminuria. Patients were studied after a 2-week placebo phase preceded by 2 weeks off all medication and after 12 weeks of treatment with each drug. Between each drug treatment, there was another 14-day placebo washout period. At the end of the study, we performed two additional 2-week placebo periods. After each placebo and treatment period, we measured albumin excretion during a 3-day collecting period. Renal hemodynamics were assessed by clearance techniques (inulin and p-aminohippurate clearance) at the end of the first and last placebo periods and after each treatment period. All drugs reduced mean arterial pressure and microalbuminuria to a similar and statistically significant (p < 0.05) extent (mean arterial pressure: placebo phase, 116 +/- 5 mm Hg; felodipine, 101 +/- 4 mm Hg; metoprolol, 101 +/- 5 mm Hg; ramipril, 101 +/- 4 mm Hg; doxazosin, 102 +/- 5 mm Hg; urinary albumin excretion: placebo phase, 46 +/- 50 mg/day; felodipine, 18 +/- 23 mg/day; metoprolol, 14 +/- 12 mg/day; ramipril, 16 +/- 16 mg/day; doxazosin, 14 +/- 14 mg/day). Mean arterial pressure levels and urinary albumin excretion returned to baseline after the last placebo period (110 +/- 6 mm Hg and 40 +/- 46 mg/day, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic alterations and urinary albumin excretion in patients with essential hypertension

Salt-sensitive animals as well as patients with essential hypertension appear to have a greater propensity to develop renal disease as a consequence of hypertension. They also manifest an abnormal renal hemodynamic adaptation to changes in dietary sodium intake and blood pressure. This suggests that the two may be related. Some patients with essential hypertension manifest an increase in urinary albumin excretion (UAE). It is uncertain whether this is more common in salt-sensitive patients and whether it represents a marker for progressive renal disease. The effect of antihypertensive agents on UAE varies substantially depending on the agent used, and it is not necessarily related to the antihypertensive action. Whether antihypertensive agents that more effectively reduce UAE may also result in greater renal protective effects remains to be established.