An open-label study of darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly for the maintenance of haemoglobin concentrations in patients with chronic kidney disease not receiving dialysis

Efficacy and safety of CKD-11101 (darbepoetin-alfa proposed biosimilar) compared with NESP in anaemic chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKD-11101 (biosimilar darbepoetin-alfa, Chong Kun Dang Pharm.) compared with NESP® in treatment of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03431623.

METHOD

In this multi-centre, randomized, double-blind study, patients were treated with CKD-11101 and NESP. The efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was 24 weeks, during which patients were treated every 2 weeks. All patients who completed the EEP were treated with CKD-11101 every 2 weeks for the first 4 weeks and every 4 weeks for the safety evaluation period (SEP), which was from 24 weeks to 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean haemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to end of EEP and mean dose needed to achieve the target Hb.

RESULTS

The mean Hb level was increased in both groups during the EEP (both p < 0.001). The difference in mean Hb level change between the two groups was 0.01 g/dL (95% CI = -0.213-0.242), indicating that CKD-11101 was equivalent to NESP. The difference in mean administration dose between groups was -1.40 mcg (95% CI = -6.859-4.059) included in the equivalent range. The incidence of AEs and ADRs was not different between the two groups, and the frequency of ADRs was favourable in both groups (1.2% in CKD-11101 vs 7.7% in the NESP to CKD-11101 conversion group).

CONCLUSION

CKD-11101 has an equivalent therapeutic effect as NESP in chronic kidney disease patients with renal anaemia. CKD-11101 can be safely used for long-term treatment and in patients converted from NESP.

Hepcidin in chronic kidney disease anemia

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with several complications that worsen with progression of disease; anemia, disturbances in iron metabolism and inflammation are common features. Inflammatory response starts early, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute phase reactants and hepcidin. Hepcidin production is modulated by several factors, as hypoxia/anemia, erythropoietin and erythropoiesis products, transferrin saturation (TSAT) and liver iron levels, which are altered in CKD. Treatment of CKD anemia is based on pharmaceutical intervention, with erythropoietic stimulating agents and/or iron supplementation; however, in spite of the erythropoietic benefits, this therapy, on a regular basis, involves risks, namely iron overload. To overcome these risks, some therapeutic approaches are under study to target CKD anemia. Considering the actual alerts about risk of iron overload in dialysis patients, inhibition of hepcidin, the central key player in iron homeostasis, could be a pivotal strategy in the management of CKD anemia.

Biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies-a systematic review

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed published observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) reports of clinical trials on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA's). Only studies evaluating the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies (ADA) of both original and biosimilar drugs were chosen.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to 17 March 2015. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevant studies for risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-one publications were included. The overall prevalence of ADA in the studies was about 0.2 to 0.5 %. Most studies were not designed to monitor the development of ADA and often the study duration was too short (less than 6 months) and the patient population too small. Moreover, in many studies, the assays used only determined the presence of ADA and did not measure therapy failure due to ADA. In one RCT, as many as 13 cases (4 %) of ADA were identified.

CONCLUSION

ADA development seems to be low in short-term studies with ESA. None of the efficacy and safety issues for ESA biosimilars were judged to be adequately addressed in the evaluated literature, with respect to ADA formation, due to the study design and the assay method used.

Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis receiving extended dosing regimens of darbepoetin alfa: long-term results of the EXTEND observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Extended dosing of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) darbepoetin alfa (DA) once biweekly or monthly reduces anaemia treatment burden. This observational study assessed outcomes and dosing patterns in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-NoD) commencing extended dosing of DA.

METHODS

Adult CKD-NoD patients starting extended dosing of DA in Europe or Australia in June 2006 or later were followed up until December 2012. Outcomes included haemoglobin (Hb) concentration, ESA dosing, mortality rates and receipt of dialysis and renal transplantation. Subgroup analyses were conducted for selected outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 6035 enrolled subjects, 5723 (94.8%) met analysis criteria; 1795 (29.7%) received dialysis and 238 (3.9%) underwent renal transplantation. Mean (standard deviation) Hb concentration at commencement of extended dosing was 11.0 (1.5) g/dL. Mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] Hb 12 months after commencement of extended dosing (primary outcome) was 11.6 g/dL (11.5, 11.6) overall and was similar across countries, with no differences between subjects previously treated with an ESA versus ESA-naïve subjects, subjects with versus without prior renal transplant or diabetics versus non-diabetics. Weekly ESA dose gradually decreased following commencement of extended DA dosing and was similar across subgroups. The decrease in weekly DA dose was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of patients receiving iron therapy. Hb concentrations declined following changes in ESA labels and treatment guidelines. The mortality rate (95% CI) was 7.06 (6.68, 7.46) deaths per 100 years of follow-up. Subjects alive at study end had stable Hb concentrations in the preceding year, while those who died had lower and declining Hb concentrations in their last year.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term, extended dosing of DA maintained Hb concentrations in patients already treated with an ESA and corrected and maintained Hb in ESA-naïve patients.

Iron therapy in chronic kidney disease: Recent changes, benefits and risks

Anemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), mainly due to inadequate renal production of erythropoietin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients this condition may be aggravated by iron deficiency (absolute or functional). The correction of this anemia is usually achieved by treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron (oral or intravenous). Studies questioning the safety of ESAs (especially at higher doses) changed the pattern of anemia treatment in CKD patients. According to the new guidelines, when transferrin saturation is lower than 30% and ferritin lower than 500 ng/mL, a trial with iron should be started, to avoid therapy with ESAs or at least to reduce the doses needed to treat the anemia. Recent reports showed increasing ferritin levels, towards values above 800 ng/mL, in CKD patients treated according to the guidelines. In this review we focus on the risks of the increased iron use to treat CKD anemia, namely, iron overload and toxicity, increased risk of infections, as well as mortality.

Conversion from epoetin and darbepoetin to C.E.R.A. in non-dialysis CKD patients: a multicenter Italian prospective study in nephrology practice

BACKGROUND

In non-dialysis patients (ND-CKD), C.E.R.A. has been extensively investigated in ESA-naïve subjects but no data are available on its efficacy after switch from other ESA.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study lasting 24 weeks, ND-CKD patients (n = 157) receiving ESA were converted to C.E.R.A. at doses lower than recommended. Primary outcome was the prevalence of Hb target (11-12.5 g/dl).

RESULTS

Age was 73 ± 13 years and GFR was 26.2 ± 9.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2); male gender, diabetes and prior cardiovascular disease were 49, 33 and 19%, respectively. Doses of darbepoetin (25 ± 16 µg/week, n = 124) and epoetin (5,702 ± 3,190 IU/week, n = 33) were switched to low dose C.E.R.A. (87 ± 17 µg/month). During the study, prevalence of Hb target increased from 60% to 68% at week-24, while that of Hb < 11 g/dl declined from 32% to 16% (p < 0.001). Hb increased from 11.3 ± 0.8 at baseline to 11.7 ± 0.9 g/dl at week-24 (p = 0.01) without changes in C.E.R.A. dose. Significant predictors of Hb increase were low BMI, low Hb and longer dosing intervals before switch. These factors also predicted the risk of Hb overshooting (Hb > 12.5 g/dl) occurring in 57 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In ND-CKD, conversion from other ESAs to C.E.R.A. is associated with a better anemia control induced by a greater Hb increase in patients previously treated with ESAs at extended dosing interval. This parameter should be considered when switching to long-acting ESA for its potential impact on the risk of overshooting.

Patients' perceptions of subcutaneous delivery of darbepoetin alfa by autoinjector prefilled pen versus prefilled syringe: a randomized, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous injection of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the correction of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease is well recognized. Different delivery devices are available, although their impact on patient-reported outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVES

Subcutaneous delivery of darbepoetin alfa via an autoinjector prefilled pen (PFP) and prefilled syringe (PFS) were compared and assessed according to patient-rated preferences and perceptions.

METHODS

In this single-center, randomized, open-label, double-crossover study, patients continued using the PFS for 4 injections or were switched to the PFP for the same number of injections, after which they were switched to the alternative device. Following further 4 injections using the new device, patients were switched back to the initial device. Questionnaires were administered at the end of each series of injections for each device and at the start and end of the study.

RESULTS

For overall device preference, the majority (62%) of patients responded with PFP, whereas 32% preferred the PFS mode of delivery. This preference for PFP was driven by a perception of increased convenience and ease of use compared with PFS. No significant differences in pain scores were noted between the 2 devices. Most patients rated both devices as being "easy" or "extremely easy" to use and were either "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied."

CONCLUSION

When given the choice, most patients preferred the PFP mode of administration compared with PFS due to convenience and ease of use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ACTRN12611000839909.

An observational cohort study of extended dosing (once every 2 weeks or once monthly) regimens with darbepoetin alfa in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: the EXTEND study

Background.

Darbepoetin alfa (DA) has been shown to be an effective treatment of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis (NoD). EXTEND is an observational study assessing the effectiveness of DA administered once biweekly (Q2W) or monthly (QM) in a general CKD-NoD population.

Methods.

Adult CKD-NoD patients starting DA Q2W/QM treatment in June 2006 or later were eligible. Retrospective and/or prospective data including haemoglobin levels and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dosing were collected for 6 months before and 12 months after DA initiation. Mean Hb levels were calculated every 3 months, and ESA dose was converted to a geometric mean weekly DA equivalent dose and summarized monthly.

Results.

Data from 4278 patients showed that patients receiving ESA treatment before DA Q2W/QM initiation had a mean (95% confidence interval) Hb level of 11.9 g/dL (11.8–12.0 g/dL) at initiation and 11.6 g/dL (11.6–11.7 g/dL) at Months 10–12, with mean ESA dose of 22 μg/week (21–23 μg/week) prior to initiation, 16 μg/week (15–16 μg/week) at initiation and 16 μg/week (15–16 μg/week) at Month 12. In ESA-naive patients, Hb levels increased from 10.3 g/dL (10.2–10.3 g/dL) at initiation to 11.7 g/dL at Months 4–6 and were maintained at a mean level of 11.7 g/dL (11.7–11.8 g/dL) at Months 10–12, with mean ESA dose of 16 μg/week (16–17 μg/week) at initiation and 16 μg/week (16–17 μg/week) at Month 12. In the 85% of patients receiving DA at extended intervals (Q2W or less frequently) at Month 12, 12 patients (0.3%) experienced DA-related adverse reactions.

Conclusion.

DA Q2W/QM was an effective treatment of anaemia in the general CKD-NoD patient population and a dose increase was not required in patients switching from a previous ESA regimen.

Exposure-response modeling of darbepoetin alfa in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease not receiving dialysis

A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model (PK/PD) of darbepoetin alfa following intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) administration in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) was developed. Darbepoetin alfa concentrations from 96 CKD participants, who received IV or SC darbepoetin alfa, and Hgb concentration from 332 CKD participants not on dialysis, who received SC doses of darbepoetin alfa, were used to develop the PK/PD model. An open 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption was used to characterize darbepoetin alfa pharmacokinetics. Darbepoetin alfa was assumed to trigger concentration-dependent stimulation of production of progenitor cells of red blood cells (RBCs) in bone marrow, which become red blood cells and died after life span expiration. Model evaluation was performed through nonparametric bootstrap and posterior predictive checks. Absolute bioavailability, total mean absorption time, clearance, and volume of distribution were estimated to be 44%, 52 h, 3.4 L/d/70 kg, and 5.9 L/70 kg, respectively. The estimates of drug potency, efficacy, and RBC life span were 0.41 ng/mL, 64%, and 77 days, respectively. Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of darbepoetin alfa were not affected by age and sex. The qualified model supports the use of darbepoetin alfa administered biweekly (SC) in CKD patients for anemia correction and monthly (SC) for hemoglobin maintenance. In addition, the model is deemed appropriate to conduct simulations to support dose selection for additional clinical studies.

Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial

BACKGROUND

Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly.

METHODS

Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable once-weekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11-13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50-53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P < 0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa.

[Direct medical cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in anaemia treatment of chronic renal failure patient: a literature review]

INTRODUCTION

Management of anaemia in chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) represents an important medico-economic challenge because of the great number of patients and the cost of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). The aim of this study was to identify determinants of the costs associated with these treatments in order to choose, with equal efficacy, the most efficient ASE.

METHOD

A bibliographic research was realised by Medline database interrogation.

RESULTS

Among the direct medical costs, five studies showed that acquisition of epoetine alfa (EA) compared to darbepoetin alfa (DA) was less expensive. Concerning the costs associated with the route of administration, the subcutaneous injection (SC) of epoetine allowed a gain in costs because of the decrease of doses compared to the intravenous (IV) route. The switch from EA in SC to DA in IV, for hemodialysis patients, was associated with a reduction of the number of injections and with a treatment's cost lower by DA than by EA. Costs related to the regimen of administration, notably those related to nursing, medical and pharmaceutical time, were negligible towards those associated to the acquisition of the ASE. Finally, the costs of the therapeutic follow-up and treatment of the adverse effects of the ASE were similar between the EA and the DA.

CONCLUSION

The costs associated with the prices of acquisition of the ASE, negotiated by the structure of care, represent the most important part of the direct medical costs.

C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: The ARCTOS extension study

C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator is approved for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The ARCTOS (administration of C.E.R.A. in CKD patients to treat anemia with a twice-monthly schedule) phase 3 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of C.E.R.A. in correcting anemia when administered once every 2 weeks (Q2W) subcutaneously in patients with CKD not on dialysis. We assessed the feasibility and long-term safety of converting patients who responded to treatment with C.E.R.A. Q2W to C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks (Q4W) during a 24-week extension period. After the core ARCTOS study period (28 weeks), 296 patients entered the 24-week extension period. At week 29, patients who responded to C.E.R.A. Q2W during the core period were rerandomized to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W or Q4W. Patients in the comparator arm could receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly or Q2W. Dosage was adjusted to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) between 11 and 13 g/dL. Mean Hb levels remained stable in all groups, and were comparable at the end of the extension period (mean [standard deviation], C.E.R.A. Q2W, 11.92 [0.90] g/dL; C.E.R.A. Q4W, 11.70 [0.86] g/dL; darbepoetin alfa, 11.89 [0.98] g/dL). Mean within-patient standard deviation values for Hb were also comparable in all groups (0.66, 0.62, and 0.65 g/dL for C.E.R.A. Q2W, C.E.R.A. Q4W and darbepoetin alfa, respectively). All treatments were well tolerated. Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q4W is safe and effective in maintaining stable Hb levels in patients with CKD not on dialysis following correction with subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Q2W.

Meeting New Challenges in the Management of Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease Through Collaborative Care with Pharmacists

Objective:

To evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD)–associated anemia management challenges and limitations and discuss strategies to improve treatment rates and patient response to therapy, monitoring of patient response to therapy, and education of prescribing providers and patients.

Data Sources:

Multiple MEDLINE searches were performed using a comprehensive search term list to identify studies for inclusion, including, but not limited to, anemia, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), epoetin, darbepoetin, CERA, hemoglobin, CKD, dialysis, end-stage renal disease, quality of life, and pharmacist. Annual data reports and clinical practice guidelines published by the National Kidney Foundation and US Renal Data System were included. Information provided within product package inserts for recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa; Epogen, Procrit) and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) were also included.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Only articles that were published in English and were relevant for this review were included.

Data Synthesis:

Anemia is a common complication of CKD, with significant impact on patients' quality of life. Anemia of CKD represents a significant burden on the healthcare system, with ESA use resulting in substantial financial costs. As new therapies, formularies, and dosing regimens evolve, the collaborative role of the clinical pharmacist is integral to a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings, such as hospitals or dialysis centers, respectively. This review focuses on initial and target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, as well as patient characteristics, treatment preferences, and dosing schedules, which are important considerations in managing CKD-associated anemia. To ensure effective therapeutic strategies, a patient-centered approach is required. Pharmacists are ideally positioned to help select ESA therapy, influence formulary use, educate healthcare professionals and patients, develop and implement dosing and monitoring protocols, and possibly promote quality improvement.

Conclusions:

An approach to CKD-associated anemia management that involves collaboration with pharmacists is essential to achieve patient-specific, cost-effective ESA therapy.

Drug safety profile of darbepoetin alfa for anemia of chronic kidney disease

Anemia of chronic kidney disease due to deficiency of erythropoietin is common and has clinical consequences. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents including darbepoetin alfa (DA) are effective in correcting anemia. DA is generally well tolerated and has side effect profile similar to recombinant human erythropoietin. It has a long half-life permitting infrequent dosing. DA has been tested extensively in preclinical and clinical studies and significant experience has accumulated in clinical practice. Global safety profile of DA must consider recent data indicating worse survival, poor cardiovascular outcomes and thrombotic risks of targeting near normal hemoglobin levels and administering high doses of erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Strategies to achieve and maintain a reasonable, individualized target hemoglobin level with minimal variations in hemoglobin level are needed.

Hemoglobin variability in anemia of chronic kidney disease

Hemoglobin levels in individuals with chronic kidney disease fluctuate frequently above or below the recommended target levels within short periods of time even though the calculated mean hemoglobin remains within the target range of 11 to 12 g/dl. Both pharmacologic features and dosing of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents may lead to cyclic pattern of hemoglobin levels within the recommended range. Several longitudinal studies highlight the complexity of maintaining stable hemoglobin levels over time. As a consequence, patients may risk increased hospitalization and mortality, because both low and high hemoglobin levels are associated with increased cardiovascular events and death. The duration of time that hemoglobin remains higher or lower than the target thresholds may be important to adverse outcomes. It is not clear whether adverse effects of hemoglobin variability are because of the therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and/or iron or despite such a therapy. Several factors affect hemoglobin variability, including those that are drug related, such as pharmacokinetic parameters, patient-related differences in demographic characteristics, and factors affecting clinical status, as well as clinical practice guidelines, treatment protocols, and reimbursement policies. Strategies that consider each of these factors and reduce hemoglobin variability may be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Use of darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia of chronic kidney disease: clinical and pharmacoeconomic considerations

The introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) into everyday clinical practice has greatly improved the care of patients with chronic kidney disease. ESAs have reduced the need for blood transfusions, improved survival, decreased cardiovascular complications and enhanced patient quality of life. The longer acting ESA, darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®), which can be administered less frequently than traditional ESAs, provides further benefits to both patients and healthcare professionals relative to the epoetins. Clinical studies have shown that darbepoetin alfa administered once every 2 weeks or once every month allows enhanced convenience and cost savings with no compromise in efficacy, while maintaining patients within target haemoglobin ranges.

Extended administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for optimising the management of renal anaemia: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have transformed the management of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reducing transfusion requirements and leading to improved quality of life. However, effective anaemia management with current ESAs is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Approaches are required to simplify anaemia management and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. There is increasing interest in extending the administration interval of ESAs. This would result in considerable time-savings, reducing the workload of healthcare providers and potentially reducing healthcare system costs. Time saved could be utilised in improving other aspects of patient care, such as implementation of guidelines, or treating more patients. Potential benefits of extended administration intervals for patients include a less demanding regimen and fewer injections, which could lead to improved adherence to treatment.

AIM

This article reviews studies of the efficacy of current ESAs in maintaining stable haemoglobin (Hb) levels when used at extended administration intervals of up to once monthly.

SUMMARY OF FINDING

Patients who are already stable on more frequent ESA therapy and who respond well to treatment may be able to maintain stable Hb with extended dosing regimens with established ESAs. However, few patients with CKD currently receive ESAs once-monthly in clinical practice. New agents with long half-lives offer the potential for extended dosing regimens in all patients with CKD.

Effect of darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly on maintaining hemoglobin levels in older patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased hospitalizations, increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and diminished quality of life in the elderly. Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that has been shown to be effective in treating anemia in patients with CKD (but not on dialysis) when administered using extended-dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety profile of once-monthly (QM) darbepoetin alfa in study patients stratified according to age (ie, <65, 65-74, and > or =75 years).

METHODS

Patients with CKD but not on dialysis, receiving darbepoetin alfa every other week (Q2W), and with stable hemoglobin (Hb) levels between 11 and 13 g/dL, inclusive, were enrolled in this 33-week, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. The study was carried out at 36 US centers and consisted of a 24-week QM darbepoetin alfa dose-titration period followed by an 8-week evaluation period. Hb levels were measured Q2W. Study results were stratified according to patient age (<65, 65-74, and > or =75 years).

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients (79 women, 73 men) were enrolled; 55 patients (36%) were <65 years of age, 46 (30%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 51 (34%) were > or =75 years of age. In patients who received > or =1 dose of darbepoetin alfa, Hb levels > or =11 g/dL were maintained in 76%, 80%, and 71% of patients aged <65, 65 to 74, and > or =75 years, respectively. For patients who completed the study, the proportions who maintained Hb levels > or =11 g/dL were 83%, 88%, and 85%, respectively, for the 3 age groups. The safety profile of QM darbepoetin alfa in this study was consistent with that expected in patients with CKD not receiving dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alfa administered QM maintained Hb levels > or =11 g/dL in patients with CKD (not on dialysis) aged <65, 65 to 74, and > or =75 years. This treatment regimen may help optimize anemia management for older community-dwelling and long-term care patients.

Darbepoetin alfa for anemia in chronic kidney disease

Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, yet it is often under-recognized and undertreated, with serious adverse consequences. It is highly responsive to treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Darbepoetin alfa is a hyperglycosylated ESA that has a lower affinity to the erythropoietin receptor but a longer half-life than recombinant human erythropoietin, irrespective of administration by a subcutaneous or intravenous route. Owing to its pharmacokinetic characteristics, darbepoetin alfa has been used in extended dosing intervals ranging from once every week to once every 4 weeks in CKD patients on dialysis, as well as in CKD patients not on dialysis. Darbepoetin alfa has been shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials. The safety profile of darbepoetin alfa is similar to that of recombinant human erythropoietin. While target hemoglobin levels in CKD anemia remain debatable, treatment of anemia with ESAs has the proven benefits of reducing transfusions and improving quality of life. Darbepoetin alfa has the potential to simplify the treatment of CKD anemia with many advantages, including infrequent dosing, improved patient convenience and compliance, and decreased healthcare resource utilization.

The association of darbepoetin alfa with hemoglobin and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease not receiving dialysis

OBJECTIVE

Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) decreases patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The objective of this subanalysis was to determine the effect of every-other-week (Q2W) darbepoetin alfa on hemoglobin (Hb) levels and HRQoL measures in subjects with CKD who are naïve to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

METHODS

STAAR was a 52-week, multicenter, single-arm study. Subject inclusion criteria included: > or = 18 years of age and creatinine clearance < or = 70 mL/min or estimated glomerular filtration rate < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) but not receiving dialysis. Subjects included in this subanalysis were previously naïve to ESAs, had Hb < 11 g/dL, were initiated on subcutaneous Q2W darbepoetin alfa to achieve a Hb level not to exceed 12 g/dL, and had responses to at least one question on the KDQOL-CRI forms administered at baseline, week 12, and week 52.

RESULTS

Of 911 ESA-naïve subjects enrolled in the study, 277 (30.4%) were included in this subanalysis. The majority of subanalysis subjects were Caucasian (63.2%) and/or women (54.5%). Mean Hb concentrations and all KDQOL-CRI scores improved significantly between baseline and week 12 (p < 0.0001), and were maintained until week 52. Darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alfa initiated Q2W achieved and maintained Hb targets, and significantly improved and maintained HRQoL in study subjects with CKD. Limitations of the study must be considered when extrapolating these results to assess the benefits of treatment on HRQoL in the general CKD population.

Treatment and costs associated with anemic chronic kidney disease patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current therapeutic options afforded to anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and the costs of these interventions.

METHODOLOGY

Literature search of articles within Ovid MEDLINE between 1996 and 2007 that pertained to the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients.

RESULTS

Early detection and treatment of anemia associated with CKD has proven to provide positive cognitive and physical effects. Treatment options that increase iron storage and availability within the body and production of erythropoietin can assist in anemic CKD patients in achieving recommended levels of hemoglobin. Acknowledgement of the potential side effects associated with the medications selected to treat anemia can help in avoiding additional injury to the patient and thus reduce healthcare expenditure. A limitation of this review is that the search was performed within a single database.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care providers can play an active role in detecting anemia early and optimizing available treatment options. Future research on the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) on patients before they need dialysis, and a cost analysis between epoetin and darbepoetin alpha, would be beneficial.

Implications of Neocytolysis for Optimal Management of Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Erythropoietin is the major hormone regulator of erythrocyte production promoting the survival, as well as the differentiation and maturation, of erythroid progenitor cells. In addition to these well-characterized effects, it appears that an erythropoietin-responsive non-erythroid mechanism also mediates the selective destruction of young circulating erythrocytes (neocytes) when red cell mass becomes excessive - a process termed 'neocytolysis'. Endothelial cells appear to respond to a rapid decrease in circulating levels of erythropoietin by secreting cytokines (including TGF-alpha), which signal reticuloendothelial phagocytes to destroy neocytes. The result is a more rapid decrease in red cell mass than can be explained by natural erythrocyte senescence alone. The current pharmacologic approach to treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease may cause neocytolysis and could keep therapy from reaching its full potential. Understanding neocytolysis and its relationship to fluctuating serum erythropoietin levels might help to better understand optimal treatment with erythropoietic agents.

Once-Monthly Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. Maintains Stable Hemoglobin Control in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis and Converted Directly from Epoetin One to Three Times Weekly

BACKGROUND

C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, is in development to provide anemia correction and stable maintenance of hemoglobin (Hb) levels at extended administration intervals in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined its efficacy and safety when administered up to once monthly in patients who have CKD and are on dialysis and randomly convert directly from epoetin alpha or beta one to three times weekly.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

In this three-arm, comparator-controlled, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III study, 572 dialysis patients (> or =18 yr) who were receiving stable subcutaneous epoetin one to three times weekly were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to continue epoetin or to receive subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once monthly or twice monthly for 52 wk. Dosage was adjusted to maintain Hb +/-1.0 g/dl of baseline level. Primary end point was mean change in Hb level between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 29 to 36).

RESULTS

Mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were similar between groups (once-monthly C.E.R.A. 11.5 g/dl; twice-monthly C.E.R.A. 11.7 g/dl; epoetin 11.5 g/dl). The difference between C.E.R.A. and epoetin in mean change (97.5% confidence interval) in Hb concentration between baseline and evaluation was -0.022 g/dl (-0.262 to 0.217) for once monthly and 0.141 g/dl (-0.098 to 0.380) for twice monthly. Analysis demonstrated that C.E.R.A. was as effective as epoetin in maintaining Hb and was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. once or twice monthly successfully maintained tight and stable Hb levels in patients who were on dialysis and randomly converted directly from epoetin one to three times weekly.