Theophylline and its metabolites produce a stimulating cholinergic effect on the small intestine and a nonadrenergic noncholinergic relaxing effect on the colon: a comparative study in the rabbit intestine

Assessment of the Airway Smooth Muscle Relaxant Effect of Drotaverine

BACKGROUND

Drotaverine, a type 4 cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE4) inhibitor, blocks the degradation of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate. However, published receptor binding data showed that drotaverin also binds to the L-type voltage-operated calcium channel (L-VOCC). Based on these molecular mechanisms of action, a direct and indirect (by blocking the constrictor response) relaxant effect on airway smooth muscle can be predicted, which has not yet been assessed.

SUMMARY

Accordingly, drotaverine and reference agents were tested both on the histamine-, methacholine-, or KCl-induced contraction response and on precontracted guinea pig tracheal preparations. It was found that drotaverine not only relaxed the precontracted tracheal preparations but also decreased mediator-induced contraction. These effects of drotaverine were concentration dependent, with a significantly higher potency on the KCl-induced response, than on either the histamine or methacholine induced one. A similar result was noted for nifedipine. The PDE inhibitor, theophylline, also relaxed the precontracted preparations but was ineffective on the mediator-induced contraction in a physiologically relevant concentration range. Moreover, theophylline did not show selectivity and was the least potent relaxant among the 3 tested molecules. Key Message: These results show that drotaverine is a more potent airway smooth muscle relaxant molecule than theophylline. This enhanced potency on relaxation and inhibition of the constrictor response, at least partly, may be explained by the combined L-VOCC blocking and PDE inhibitory potential of drotaverine.

Characterization of the mechanism of drug-drug interactions from PubMed using MeSH terms

Identifying drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for the development of safe pharmaceutical drugs and for the optimization of multidrug regimens for complex diseases such as cancer and HIV. There have been about 150,000 publications on DDIs in PubMed, which is a great resource for DDI studies. In this paper, we introduced an automatic computational method for the systematic analysis of the mechanism of DDIs using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms from PubMed literature. MeSH term is a controlled vocabulary thesaurus developed by the National Library of Medicine for indexing and annotating articles. Our method can effectively identify DDI-relevant MeSH terms such as drugs, proteins and phenomena with high accuracy. The connections among these MeSH terms were investigated by using co-occurrence heatmaps and social network analysis. Our approach can be used to visualize relationships of DDI terms, which has the potential to help users better understand DDIs. As the volume of PubMed records increases, our method for automatic analysis of DDIs from the PubMed database will become more accurate.

The gastrointestinal effects that may follow the administration of theophylline reflect the pharmacodynamic profiles of both the parent drug and its metabolites

This study investigates the effect of theophylline along the rabbit gastrointestinal tract in comparison with the pharmacodynamic effect produced by the combined application of its three major metabolites. At concentrations up to 10(-3) m, theophylline relaxed, in a declining order from the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) to pylorus, all regions of the upper gastrointestinal tract, but only the ascending colon from the intestinal regions studied. At concentrations higher than 10(-3) m, instead of relaxing, theophylline strongly contracted the antrum and pylorus. In all three small intestinal regions, at concentrations up to 10(-3) m, theophylline produced a weak contraction, which at higher concentrations became very strong, and at 10(-2) m was comparable to that produced by a supramaximal dose of acetylcholine. The additive relaxing effect resulting from the combined application of the theophylline's metabolites was, from oesophagus to pylorus, weaker than that produced by theophylline, while on the ascending colon it was comparable to that of the parent drug. In contrast, the additive contractile effect of the metabolites on the three small intestinal regions was four to five times higher the one produced by theophylline. In conclusion, this study shows that the additive effect of the combined application of theophylline's major metabolites on the rabbit gastrointestinal tract plays a major role in the final response of the intestine, and a minor one in the final responses of the gastric regions, while both the parent drug and the metabolites contribute to the final responses of the oesophagus and LOS.

Relaxing and contracting effects of theophylline's metabolites on the rabbit upper gastrointestinal tract

The present study, aimed to clarify whether the gastrointestinal adverse effects following administration of the bronchodilator theophylline are owing to the action of the drug itself or its metabolites, investigates the pharmacodymanic effects of theophylline's metabolites on the spontaneous contractility in the rabbit upper gastrointestinal tract. Comparative examination reveals that while two of the metabolites, namely 1-methylxanthine (1-MX) and 3-methylxanthine (3-MX), cause a similar, but less pronounced than the parent drug, concentration-dependent relaxation on the isolated oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), fundus, antrum and pylorus, the remaining two metabolites, 1,3-dimethyluric acid (1,3-DMU) and 1-methyluric acid (1-MU), produce either a weak stimulating effect, or an even weaker relaxation. The relaxation which is muscle-mediated, non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) and nitric oxide (NO)-independent is probably mediated via inhibition of the metabolites on phosphodiesterases (PDEs), while a presynaptic cholinergic pathway is involved in the weak stimulating effect. The effects of all substances are additive. As a consequence, the net result of the cumulative action of all metabolites in the oesophagus, LOS, antrum and pylorus is, at 10(-3) m, comparable with that of theophylline, but in the fundus it is lower than that of the parent drug, because in the latter tissue the stimulating effect of 1,3-DMU and 1-MU counteracts the relaxing effect of the other two metabolites. However, combination of the parent drug with its metabolites leads to a considerable relaxation in all the gastrointestinal regions extending from the oesophagus to pylorus. Conclusively, upper gastrointestinal adverse effects following theophylline's administration are also because of theophylline's metabolites.