Rapid virological response as a predictor of sustained response in HCV-infected patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels: A multicenter study

Rapid virologic response in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1: Evaluation of pretreatment factors in patients

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Rapid virologic response (RVR) is defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in serum after 4 weeks of treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir (PRO) and/or dasabuvir (D), with or without ribavirin [PRO (D) ± ribavirin], which are direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), is the currently approved treatment regimen for CHC genotype 1; this regimen can also be used in patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of pretreatment factors on RVR in patients treated with PRO (D) ± ribavirin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 60 patients with CHC genotype 1 who were treated with PRO (D) ± ribavirin and achieved RVR. Patients' demographic data; baseline HCV RNA levels; HCV genotype information; biochemical, histologic, and radiologic results; and previous treatment history were recorded. Patients were categorized into two groups: virologic responses achieved in the first week (group 1) and in the first to the fourth week (group 2). Pretreatment factors were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 who achieved ultraRVR (undetectable HCV RNA after 1 week of treatment) had significantly lower mean pretreatment HCV RNA levels and lower prevalence of ESRF than patients in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

RVR has been indicated to be a robust positive predictor of sustained virologic response. We concluded that some pretreatment factors such as low HCV RNA level and absence of ESRF might lead to faster RVR and shorter treatment duration with DAAs for CHC.

[Efficacy of peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a pooled analysis]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A combination of peginterferon and ribavirin is the standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). However, the respective study has not been carried out in a large scale in Korea. The purpose of this study was to collect the studies that have been reported in Korea in order to analyze the therapeutic effect of combination therapy and compare to find racial difference.

METHODS

Twenty-eight papers related to the therapeutic effect of combination therapy in CHC patients were analyzed based on pooled analysis.

RESULTS

Based on the analysis for genotype 1 in Korea, early virologic response (EVR), end of treatment response (ETR), and sustained virologic response (SVR) were 79.6% (125/157), 80.1% (166/207), and 62.7% (341/543). The EVR, ETR, and SVR for genotype 2 and 3 were 89.4% (119/133), 92.2% (203/220), and 84.1% (434/516). Data from other Asians showed that EVR and SVR for genotype 1 were 88.9% (290/326) and 64.4% (491/762) respectively and 88.8% (135/152), and 79.4% (151/190) for genotype 2 and 3 respectively. In Western, EVR and SVR for genotype 1 were 51.3% (1,981/3,860) and 42.4% (1,798/4,231) respectively, and for genotype 2 and 3 were 87.7% (350/399) and 77.8% (533/685) respectively. Based on the comparative analysis, no statistical difference in SVR between Koreans and other Asians (p=0.955) was observed; However, the SVR of Koreans was higher with significance than that of Westerns (p<0.001) On the other hand, there was no difference what so ever, in SVR for genotype 2 amongst the different races.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVR of combination therapy for the Korean chronic hepatitis C patients was similar to other Asians but higher than Westerns.

Rapid virological response tailors the duration of treatment in hepatitis C virus genotype 3 patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Rapid virological response (RVR) is now thought to be the strongest predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients undergoing antiviral therapy. It can be used as a guide to individualize treatment duration. The aim of this study was to assess the role of RVR in tailoring the duration of treatment.

METHODS

Patients with HCV genotype 3 infections were enrolled and treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG IFN alfa-2a) 180 μg/week and ribavirin. HCV RNA was analyzed at weeks 4, 12, 16, and 24. Treatment duration was individualized on the basis of RVR. Patients who achieved RVR and who were aged ≤ 40 years with a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 27 kg/m(2) received 16 weeks of treatment (group A). Patients who achieved RVR and were aged >40 years with a BMI >27 kg/m(2), aged >40 years with a BMI ≤ 27 kg/m(2), and aged ≤ 40 years with a BMI >27 kg/m(2) received 24 weeks of treatment (group B). Patients who did not achieve RVR but who achieved an early virological response (EVR; HCV PCR-negative or ≥ 2 log drop in HCV RNA at week 12) were treated with 24 weeks of therapy (group C).

RESULTS

SVR was observed in 86% in group A, 82.2% in group B, and 46.8% in group C. A difference was observed in SVR for patients with and without RVR and receiving the standard duration of treatment (82.2% vs. 46.8%, p<0 .001). The results show that the rate of SVR is not inferior in those with RVR treated with 16 weeks of therapy compared to 24 weeks (86% vs. 82.2%, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

RVR is useful to individualize the duration of treatment and to predict the treatment outcome. A short treatment of 16 weeks is as effective as 24 weeks in HCV genotype 3 patients who achieve RVR, who have a low BMI, and are younger in age.

Peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of peginterferon α-2a plus ribavirin at standard doses in patients with hepatitis C virus (HVC) genotype 1 infection with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 to 65 years were included in this observational, prospective study if they had evidence of a HCV genotype 1 infection. The serum HCV RNA concentration was determined at baseline and week 12. A qualitative HCV RNA test was performed at baseline and at weeks 48 and 72. Liver function tests were performed at each study visit. The primary efficacy measure was the sustained virological response in the intention-to-treat population. Logistic regression analyses were also performed to explore predictors of virological response.

RESULTS

A sustained virological response was observed in 100 of the 175 patients (57%). An early virological response and end-of-treatment response were seen in 159 patients (91%) and 133 patients (76%), respectively. Thirty-seven of the 122 evaluable patients for this outcome (30%) showed a rapid virological response. A higher viral load was a significant predictor for a lack of rapid virological response and lack of sustained virological response. There were not any unexpected safety or tolerability findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the efficacy of the combination of peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and normal ALT levels is at least similar to that reported in patients with elevated ALT levels.

Analysis of variables and interactions among variables associated with a sustained virological response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus genotype 3-infected patients

BACKGROUND

The recommended standard therapeutic regimen for chronic hepatitis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 is pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. The aim of the present study was to evaluate treatment efficacy and variables predictive of treatment success, interactions among variables contributing to a response to therapy, and the utility of the rapid virological response (RVR; week 4 virological response) to predict treatment outcomes in HCV genotype 3-infected patients in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We prospectively studied baseline and during-treatment factors associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in HCV genotype 3-infected patients who received pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN α2a) 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 800 mg daily for 24 weeks and who were followed for 24 weeks after the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-six treated patients were included in the analysis; 320 (75.1%) showed an SVR. The following factors were assessed for their ability to predict SVR by means of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis: patient age, sex, pre-treatment viral load, pre-treatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT), body mass index (BMI), and RVR. Four factors - age, pre-treatment viral load, pre-treatment ALT, and RVR - were statistically significant predictors of SVR (p<0.05) in the univariable analysis. Factors showing a significant association with SVR were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with SVR were the attainment of RVR (odds ratio (OR) 11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.15-20.69; p<0.0001), patient age ≤40 years (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.30-7.96, p<0.0001), and a low pre-treatment viral load (≤8 × 10(5) IU/ml; OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.87-6.25; p<0.0001). The effect of RVR in patients aged >40 years was more pronounced than in those aged ≤40 years: 81.1% of patients aged >40 years who achieved an RVR had an SVR, whereas only 7.5% of patients aged >40 years who did not achieve an RVR had an SVR (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RVR is an independent variable that is predictive of SVR. Moreover older patients (>40 years) who achieve an RVR are likely to have an SVR, while patients who do not achieve an RVR and who have a high pre-treatment viral load (>8 × 10(5) IU/ml) are unlikely to have an SVR.

Should we treat HCV carriers with normal ALT levels? The '5Ws' dilemma

Approximately 30% of patients with chronic HCV infection have persistently normal ALT levels. Although formerly referred to as 'healthy' or 'asymptomatic' HCV carriers, and thus historically excluded from antiviral treatment, it has now become clear that the majority of these patients have some degree of histological liver damage that may be significant in up to 20% of cases and might progress towards a more severe degree of liver fibrosis. A significant proportion of patients experience periods of increased serum ALT associated with enhanced disease progression. However, controversies still exist in clinical practice regarding the definition of 'persistent' ALT normality, the virological and histological features of these subjects, the need for liver biopsy, the role of noninvasive tools for the assessment of liver fibrosis, the natural history and the usefulness of antiviral treatment. The advent of new therapeutic options (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) has shifted treatment targets towards the eradication of underlying infection, with therapy decision based on age, severity of disease and likelihood of response rather than on aminotransferase levels. This review is aimed at approaching the main unresolved issues on this topic, trying to give evidence-based answers to the more frequently asked questions from patients and their physicians.