Increased serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and left ventricle diastolic dysfunction in patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Impact of DAA Treatment on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Chronic HCV Infection: An Update

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a systemic disease associated with multiple significant extrahepatic manifestations. Emerging studies indicate association between the HCV infection and a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events such as: coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and peripheral artery disease, when compared to general population. Atherosclerosis is a common pathophysiologic mechanism of cardiovascular disease (CVD) development which is the leading cause of mortality in the Western world. Proposed mechanisms of HCV-induced atherosclerosis includes systemic inflammation due to the chronic infection with increased levels of pro-atherogenic cytokines and chemokines. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that HCV exists and replicates within atheroschlerotic plaques, supporting the theory of direct pro-atherogenic effect of the virus. Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) represent a safe and highly effective treatment of HCV infection. Beside the improvement in liver-related outcomes, DAAs exhibit a beneficial effect on extra-hepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection. Recently, it has been shown that patients with chronic HCV infection treated with DAA-based therapeutic regimes had a 43% reduction of CVD events incidence risk. Moreover, eradication of HCV with DAAs results in a significant positive effect on risk factors for cardiovascular disease, despite a general worsening of the lipid profile. This positive effects is mainly due to an improvement of endothelial function and glucose metabolism. Although DAA treatment is associated with a beneficial impact on cardiovascular events, further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms responsible.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), LV filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F₁ : Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F₂ : Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases biomarkers in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: A review

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects 180 million people worldwide and over 4 million people in the United States. HCV infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease and is recognized as a risk factor for clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). Many studies have shown increased prevalence of cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chronic HCV infection (CHC), and though these markers may be used to risk stratify people for cardiac disease in the general population their role in the HCV population is unknown. Patients with CHC have elevated cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers compared to noninfected controls which may play a role in CVD risk stratification. We undertook a systematic review of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers in people with HCV infection with a focus on the effect of CHC on serum levels of these markers and their utility as predictors of CVD in this population. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles until June 2019. A total of 2430 results were reviewed with 115 studies included. Our review revealed that HCV infection significantly alters serum levels of markers of inflammation, endothelial function, and cardiac dysfunction prior to HCV treatment, and some of which may change in response to HCV therapy. Current risk stratification tools for development of CVD in the general population may not account for the increased inflammatory markers that appear to be elevated among HCV‐infected patients contributing to increased CVD risk.

Expert opinion on managing chronic HCV in patients with cardiovascular disease

Extrahepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection include cardiovascular diseases and an increase in cardiovascular mortality. The pathogenic mechanisms by which HCV contributes to cardiovascular disease are not well defined, however, it is likely that systemic inflammation, and the promotion of other metabolic diseases are involved. In this Review, the evidence for HCV infection as a non-traditional risk factor for cardiovascular disease is evaluated. Furthermore, practical advice to evaluate cardiovascular disease risk and disease in chronic hepatitis C patients are included for help in daily clinical practice. Despite the advances in therapies for the treatment of HCV, there remains a need for increased awareness among specialists so that patients are more likely to obtain the treatment required to mitigate disease progression.

Effects of Hepatitis C Virus Antibody-Positivity on Cardiac Function and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Adult Congenital Heart Disease

It was reported that hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody-positivity adversely affects cardiac function. As the screening for HCV began in 1992, we hypothesized that HCV antibody-positive rate would be high in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients who underwent heart surgery before 1992 and adversely affected cardiac function and long-term prognosis. We retrospectively enrolled 243 ACHD patients (mean age 25.9 years) who underwent cardiac surgery before 1992 and visited our hospital from 1995 to 2015. We compared clinical characteristics including cardiac function and long-term prognosis between HCV antibody-positive (n = 48) and antibody-negative (n = 195) patients. The composite end point (CEP) included cardiac death, heart failure hospitalization, lethal ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac reoperation. The prevalence of reduced systemic ventricular ejection fraction <50% was significantly higher in the HCV antibody-positive group compared with the HCV antibody-negative group (17 vs 5.4%, p = 0.014). During a mean follow-up period of 10.1 years (interquartile range 6 to 14 years), the CEP was noted in 51 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed the HCV antibody-positive group had significantly poor event-free survival than the HCV antibody-negative group (log-rank, p = 0.002). In contrast, HCV ribonucleic acid-positivity was not a significant predictor of the CEP in the HCV antibody-positive group (log-rank, p = 0.442). Furthermore, the HCV antibody-positivity was significantly associated with the CEP in both univariable and multivariable Cox regression models (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confident interval 1.32 to 4.15, p = 0.005 and 1.96, 1.06 to 3.63, p = 0.032, respectively). In conclusion, these results suggest that more attention should be paid to HCV antibody-positivity in the management of ACHD patients.

The Unraveled Link Between Antiviral Therapy and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection - A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, whether antiviral therapy (AVT) can reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations is unknown.Methods and Results:In this population-based cohort study, we used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to evaluate the effect of interferon-based therapy (IBT) on cardiovascular events in patients with chronic HCV infection. Clinical outcomes evaluated included HF hospitalizations; a composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease; all-cause death; and cardiovascular death. Of 83,229 eligible patients with chronic HCV infection, we compared 16,284 patients who received IBT with untreated subjects after propensity score matching. Patients who received IBT were less likely to be hospitalized for HF compared with untreated subjects (incidence density.ID, 0.9 vs. 1.5 events per 10³person-years; hazard ratio.HR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval.CI, 0.42-0.79; P=0.001). Compared with untreated subjects, the treated group had significantly lower risk of composite vascular events (ID, 3.7 vs. 5.0 events per 10³person-years; P<0.001), all-cause death (ID, 5.6 vs. 17.2 events per 10³person-years; P<0.001), and cardiovascular death (ID, 0.2 vs. 0.6 events per 10³person-years; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AVT for chronic HCV infection might offer protection against HF hospitalizations, critical vascular events, and cardiovascular death beyond known beneficial effects.

Pegylated Interferon-α Plus Ribavirin Therapy Improves Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Attaining Sustained Virological Response

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon (pegIFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) has successfully improved the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected individuals, which reduces the progression of the chronic liver disease. However, the influence of combination therapy (pegIFN/RBV) on cardiac function has yielded ambiguous results. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of combination therapy with pegIFN/RBV on cardiac function of HCV-infected individuals with SVR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cardiac function was assessed and correlated in 142 treatment-naïve patients with HCV infections by determining cardiac biomarkers and echocardiography before treatment and for 24 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

An SVR was achieved by 50.7% of all patients. Serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were significantly higher in all patients before treatment and decreased significantly 24 weeks post-treatment in the SVR group (62.84 [36.98-102.73] versus 22.87 [15.64-56.92] pg/mL, P < 0.01). Peak early diastolic annular velocity (E') was significantly lower (7.69 ± 2.48 versus 9.74 ± 2.68cm/s, P < 0.001) and E/E' was higher (10.04 ± 2.51 versus 8.18 ± 2.31, P < 0.001) in all patients with SVR. However, there were no statistically significant differences in biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters for patients without SVR. In addition, multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.076; 95% CI: 1.031-1.125; P < 0.001), NT-proBNP (OR = 1.122; 95% CI: 1.002-1.248; P = 0.015), and SVR (OR = 0.532; 95% CI: 0.214-0.895; P = 0.023) as statistically significant independent variables associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed no adverse effects of combination therapy on cardiac function of HCV-infected individuals with SVR. Subsequent viral eradication resulted in improvement of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Pre-transplant left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is associated with post transplant acute graft rejection and graft failure

INTRODUCTION

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a significant cause of morbidity and graft failure in liver transplant recipients (LTR). Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequently present in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation. However, it is unclear if DD leads to ACR.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively for consecutive LTR between January 2000 and December 2010. Demographic data and mortality related data was obtained from social security index. Primary outcome was biopsy proven ACR. Graft failure and all-cause mortality were also evaluated. DD was evaluated as a predictor of these outcomes. Other echocardiographic indices were also assessed as predictors of ACR by using Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 970 LTR (mean age 53.2 ± 10 years, women 34.6 % and white 64.5 %) were followed for 5.3 ± 3.4 years. Patients with DD (n = 145, 14.9 %) were significantly more likely to develop ACRs (HR 10.56; 95 % CI 6.78-16.45, p value = 0.0001) as well as graft failure (HR 2.09; 95 % CI 1.22-3.59, p value = 0.007) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.52; 95 % CI 1.08-2.13, p = 0.01). There was an increase in the risk of these outcomes with worsening of DD, when adjusted for various risk factors such as donor and recipient age, gender, race, Framingham risk score, pre-transplant MELD, transplant etiology and cold ischemia time.

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplant DD is significantly associated with increased risk of allograft rejection, graft failure and mortality. This signifies the importance of cardiac evaluation during the pre-transplant period.

Association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Prior study showed HCV-infected patients have increased serum N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and a possible left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. The objectives of the present paper were to investigate the characteristics of hs-CRP and its correlation with clinical profiles including NT-proBNP and echocardiographic variables in HCV-infected patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 106 HCV-infected patients and 106 control healthy individuals were enrolled. The level of serum hs-CRP (median 1.023 mg/L, range 0.03∼5.379 mg/L) was significantly lower in all 106 patients than that in controls (median 3.147 mg/L, range 0.08~7.36 mg/L, P = 0.012). Although hs-CRP did not correlate significantly with NT-proBNP when all patients and controls were included (r = 0.169, P = 0.121), simple regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between hs-CRP and NT-proBNP in HCV-infected patients group (r = 0.392, P = 0.017). Independent correlates of hs-CRP levels (R(2) = 0.13) were older age (β' = 0.031, P = 0.025) and NT proBNP (β' = 0.024, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the level of serum hs-CRP decreased significantly, there was a significant association between hs-CRP and NT-proBNP in HCV-infected patients.