Complex transcription of an operon encoding the SalI restriction-modification system of Streptomyces albus G

Antisense RNA associated with biological regulation of a restriction-modification system

Restriction–modification systems consist of a modification enzyme that methylates a specific DNA sequence and a restriction endonuclease that cleaves DNA lacking this epigenetic signature. Their gene expression should be finely regulated because their potential to attack the host bacterial genome needs to be controlled. In the EcoRI system, where the restriction gene is located upstream of the modification gene in the same orientation, we previously identified intragenic reverse promoters affecting gene expression. In the present work, we identified a small (88 nt) antisense RNA (Rna0) transcribed from a reverse promoter (P_REV0) at the 3′ end of the restriction gene. Its antisense transcription, as measured by transcriptional gene fusion, appeared to be terminated by the P_M1,M2 promoter. P_M1,M2 promoter-initiated transcription, in turn, appeared to be inhibited by P_REV0. Mutational inactivation of P_REV0 increased expression of the restriction gene. The biological significance of this antisense transcription is 2-fold. First, a mutation in P_REV0 increased restriction of incoming DNA. Second, the presence of the antisense RNA gene (ecoRIA) in trans alleviated cell killing after loss of the EcoRI plasmid (post-segregational killing). Taken together, these results strongly suggested the involvement of an antisense RNA in the biological regulation of this restriction–modification system.

Regulation of gene expression in restriction-modification system Eco29kI

The Eco29kI restriction-modification (R-M) system consists of two partially overlapping genes, eco29kIR, encoding a restriction endonuclease and eco29kIM, encoding methyltransferase. The two genes are thought to form an operon with the eco29kIR gene preceding the eco29kIM gene. Such an organization is expected to complicate establishment of plasmids containing this R-M system in naive hosts, since common logic dictates that methyltransferase should be synthesized first to protect the DNA from cleavage by the endonuclease. Here, we characterize the Eco29kI gene transcription. We show that a separate promoter located within the eco29kIR gene is sufficient to synthesize enough methyltransferase to completely modify host DNA. We further show that transcription from two intragenic antisense promoters strongly decreases the levels of eco29kIR gene transcripts. The antisense transcripts act by preventing translation initiation from the bicistronic eco29kIR–eco29kIM mRNA and causing its degradation. Both eco29kIM and antisense promoters are necessary for Eco29kI genes establishment and/or stable maintenance, indicating that they jointly contribute to coordinated expression of Eco29kI genes.

[Regulation of gene expression in type II restriction-modification system]

Type II restriction-modification systems are comprised of a restriction endonuclease and methyltransferase. The enzymes are coded by individual genes and recognize the same DNA sequence. Endonuclease makes a double-stranded break in the recognition site, and methyltransferase covalently modifies the DNA bases within the recognition site, thereby down-regulating endonuclease activity. Coordinated action of these enzymes plays a role of primitive immune system and protects bacterial host cell from the invasion of foreign (for example, viral) DNA. However, uncontrolled expression of the restriction-modification system genes can result in the death of bacterial host cell because of the endonuclease cleavage of host DNA. In the present review, the data on the expression regulation of the type II restriction-modification enzymes are discussed.

Real-time kinetics of restriction-modification gene expression after entry into a new host cell

Most type II restriction-modification (R-M) systems produce separate restriction endonuclease (REase) and methyltransferase (MTase) proteins. After R-M system genes enter a new cell, protective MTase must appear before REase to avoid host chromosome cleavage. The basis for this apparent temporal regulation is not well understood. PvuII and some other R-M systems appear to achieve this delay by cotranscribing the REase gene with the gene for an autogenous transcription activator/repressor (the 'C' protein C.PvuII). To test this model, bacteriophage M13 was used to introduce the PvuII genes into a bacterial population in a relatively synchronous manner. REase mRNA and activity appeared approximately 10 min after those of the MTase, but never rose if there was an inactivating pvuIIC mutation. Infection with recombinant M13pvuII phage had little effect on cell growth, relative to infection with parental M13. However, infection of cells pre-expressing C.PvuII led to cessation of growth. This study presents the first direct demonstration of delayed REase expression, relative to MTase, when type II R-M genes enter a new host cell. Surprisingly, though the C and REase genes are cotranscribed, the pvuIIC portion of the mRNA was more abundant than the pvuIIR portion after stable establishment of the R-M system.

Negative regulation of the EcoRI restriction enzyme gene is associated with intragenic reverse promoters

Type II restriction-modification systems are expected to possess mechanisms for tight regulation of their expression to suppress the potential of lethal attack on their host bacteria when they establish and maintain themselves within them. Although the EcoRI restriction enzyme has been well characterized, regulation of its expression is still poorly understood. In this study, mutational analysis with lacZ gene fusion and primer extension assay identified a promoter for the transcription of the ecoRIR gene. Further analyses revealed that an intragenic region containing two overlapping reverse promoter-like elements acted as a negative regulator for ecoRIR gene expression. The activity of these putative reverse promoters was verified by transcriptional gene fusion, primer extension and in vitro transcription. Mutations in these reverse promoters resulted in increased gene expression in both translational and transcriptional gene fusions. An RNase protection assay revealed that the transcript level of the wild type relative to that of the reverse promoter mutant at the downstream regions was much lower than the level at the upstream regions. This suggests that these reverse promoter-like elements affect their downstream transcript level. The possible mechanisms of this kind of negative regulation, in addition to their possible biological roles, are discussed.

Regulation of the EcoRI restriction-modification system: Identification of ecoRIM gene promoters and their upstream negative regulators in the ecoRIR gene

Type II restriction-modification (R-M) systems are composed of linked restriction endonuclease and modification methyltransferase genes and serve as barriers to horizontal gene transfer even though they are mobile in themselves. Their products kill host bacterial cells that have lost the R-M genes, a process that helps to maintain the frequency of the R-M systems in the viable cell population. Their establishment and maintenance in a bacterial host are expected to involve fine regulation of their gene expression. In the present study, we analyzed transcription of the modification gene and its regulation within the EcoRI R-M system. Northern blotting revealed that the downstream ecoRIM gene is transcribed as a monocistronic mRNA and as part of a larger bicistronic mRNA together with the upstream ecoRIR gene. Primer extension, RNase protection, and mutational analysis using lacZ gene fusions identified two overlapping promoters for ecoRIM gene transcription within the ecoRIR gene. Further mutational analysis revealed that two upstream AT-rich elements within the ecoRIR gene, "AATAAA" and "ATTATAAATATA," function as negative regulators of these promoters. Simultaneous substitution of these two elements resulted in a four-fold increase in beta-galactosidase activity and a five-fold increase in transcript levels as measured by RNase protection assay. RNA measurements of the ecoRIM transcript suggested that these elements decreased ecoRIM expression by interfering with transcription initiation of the ecoRIM promoters. Possible roles for these ecoRIM promoters and their negative regulators in the EcoRI R-M system are discussed.

The methyltransferase from the LlaDII restriction-modification system influences the level of expression of its own gene

The type II restriction-modification (R-M) system LlaDII isolated from Lactococcus lactis contains two tandemly arranged genes, llaDIIR and llaDIIM, encoding a restriction endonuclease (REase) and a methyltransferase (MTase), respectively. Interestingly, two LlaDII recognition sites are present in the llaDIIM promoter region, suggesting that they may influence the activity of the promoter through methylation status. In this study, separate promoters for llaDIIR and llaDIIM were identified, and the regulation of the two genes at the transcriptional level was investigated. DNA fragments containing the putative promoters were cloned in a promoter probe vector and tested for activity in the presence and absence of the active MTase. The level of expression of the MTase was 5- to 10-fold higher than the level of expression of the REase. The results also showed that the presence of M.LlaDII reduced the in vivo expression of the llaDIIM promoter (P(llaDIIM)) up to 1,000-fold, whereas the activity of the llaDIIR promoter (P(llaDIIR)) was not affected. Based on site-specific mutations it was shown that both of the LlaDII recognition sites within P(llaDIIM) are required to obtain complete repression of transcriptional activity. No regulation was found for llaDIIR, which appears to be constitutively expressed.

Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution

Restriction-modification (RM) systems are composed of genes that encode a restriction enzyme and a modification methylase. RM systems sometimes behave as discrete units of life, like viruses and transposons. RM complexes attack invading DNA that has not been properly modified and thus may serve as a tool of defense for bacterial cells. However, any threat to their maintenance, such as a challenge by a competing genetic element (an incompatible plasmid or an allelic homologous stretch of DNA, for example) can lead to cell death through restriction breakage in the genome. This post-segregational or post-disturbance cell killing may provide the RM complexes (and any DNA linked with them) with a competitive advantage. There is evidence that they have undergone extensive horizontal transfer between genomes, as inferred from their sequence homology, codon usage bias and GC content difference. They are often linked with mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, viruses, transposons and integrons. The comparison of closely related bacterial genomes also suggests that, at times, RM genes themselves behave as mobile elements and cause genome rearrangements. Indeed some bacterial genomes that survived post-disturbance attack by an RM gene complex in the laboratory have experienced genome rearrangements. The avoidance of some restriction sites by bacterial genomes may result from selection by past restriction attacks. Both bacteriophages and bacteria also appear to use homologous recombination to cope with the selfish behavior of RM systems. RM systems compete with each other in several ways. One is competition for recognition sequences in post-segregational killing. Another is super-infection exclusion, that is, the killing of the cell carrying an RM system when it is infected with another RM system of the same regulatory specificity but of a different sequence specificity. The capacity of RM systems to act as selfish, mobile genetic elements may underlie the structure and function of RM enzymes.

Restriction-modification gene complexes as selfish gene entities: roles of a regulatory system in their establishment, maintenance, and apoptotic mutual exclusion

We have reported some type II restriction-modification (RM) gene complexes on plasmids resist displacement by an incompatible plasmid through postsegregational host killing. Such selfish behavior may have contributed to the spread and maintenance of RM systems. Here we analyze the role of regulatory genes (C), often found linked to RM gene complexes, in their interaction with the host and the other RM gene complexes. We identified the C gene of EcoRV as a positive regulator of restriction. A C mutation eliminated postsegregational killing by EcoRV. The C system has been proposed to allow establishment of RM systems in new hosts by delaying the appearance of restriction activity. Consistent with this proposal, bacteria preexpressing ecoRVC were transformed at a reduced efficiency by plasmids carrying the EcoRV RM gene complex. Cells carrying the BamHI RM gene complex were transformed at a reduced efficiency by a plasmid carrying a PvuII RM gene complex, which shares the same C specificity. The reduction most likely was caused by chromosome cleavage at unmodified PvuII sites by prematurely expressed PvuII restriction enzyme. Therefore, association of the C genes of the same specificity with RM gene complexes of different sequence specificities can confer on a resident RM gene complex the capacity to abort establishment of a second, incoming RM gene complex. This phenomenon, termed "apoptotic mutual exclusion," is reminiscent of suicidal defense against virus infection programmed by other selfish elements. pvuIIC and bamHIC genes define one incompatibility group of exclusion whereas ecoRVC gene defines another.

Control of expression of LlaI restriction in Lactococcus lactis

The plasmid encoded LlaI R/M system from Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis consists of a bidomain methylase, with close evolutionary ties to type IIS methylases, and a trisubunit restriction complex. Both the methylase and restriction subunits are encoded on a polycistronic 6.9 kb operon. In this study, the 5' end of the llal 6.9 kb transcript was determined by primer extension analysis to be 254 bp upstream from the first R/M gene on the operon, llalM. Deletion of this promoter region abolished LlaI restriction in L. lactis. Analysis of the intervening sequence revealed a 72-amino-acid open reading frame, designated llalC, with a conserved ribosome binding site and helix-turn-helix domain. Overexpression of llalC in Escherichia coli with a T7 expression vector produced the predicted protein of 8.2 kDa. Mutation and in trans complementation analyses indicated that C-LlaI positively enhanced LlaI restriction activity in vivo. Northern analysis and transcriptional fusions of the llal promoter to a lacZ reporter gene indicated that C x LlaI did not enhance transcription of the llal operon. Databank searches with the deduced protein sequence for llalC revealed significant homologies to the E. coli Rop regulatory and mRNA stabilizer protein. Investigation of the effect of C x LlaI on enhancement of LlaI restriction in L. lactis revealed that growth at elevated temperatures (40 degrees C) completely abolished any enhancement of restriction activity. These data provide molecular evidence for a mechanism on how the expression of a restriction system in a prokaryote can be drastically reduced during elevated growth temperatures, by a small regulatory protein.

Isolation and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the XamI DNA methyltransferase of Xanthomonas campestris pv. amaranthicola

The gene (xamIM) encoding the DNA methyltransferase of the XamI restriction-modification system from Xanthomonas campestris pv. amaranithicola (M.XamI) has been cloned in Escherichia coli and its nucleotide sequence determined. The sequence predicts a protein of 527 amino acids that contains nine conserved motifs characteristic of DNA amino methyltransferases. In fact, M.XamI shows significant similarity with N6-adenine methyltransferases of the gamma group of amino methyltransferases, including M.SalI (from the isoschizomeric SalI restriction-modification system) and M.TaqI (the only N6-adenine methyltransferase for which a three-dimensional structure is available). M.XamI and M.SalI share two highly conserved regions within the C-terminal domain, one of which aligns with one of the DNA recognition loops proposed for M.TaqI. Analysis of the chromosomal DNA adjacent to xamIM led to the identification of an additional ORF (275 codons), downstream, in the same transcriptional orientation. Although some limited similarities between the SalI restriction enzyme and the product deduced from this ORF were found, the clone carrying xamIM did not express the expected endonuclease function.

Expression of the SalI restriction-modification system of Streptomyces albus G in Escherichia coli

The salIR and salIM genes of Streptomyces albus G encode the restriction endonuclease (ENase) and DNA methyltransferase (MTase) of the SalI restriction-modification (R-M) system. In S. albus G, the genes constitute an operon that is mainly transcribed from a promoter located upstream from salIR, the first gene of the operon. In addition, a second promoter, at the 3' end of salIR, allows independent transcription of the MTase gene. Expression of salIR and salIM in Escherichia coli was investigated. The ENase gene was not expressed in the heterologous host, probably due to inactivity of the main promoter of the salI operon. In contrast to salIR, salIM was functional in E. coli. Preliminary S1 nuclease mapping experiments suggest that the alternative promoter of the MTase gene can initiate transcription in the heterologous, as well as in the homologous host.

Cloning and expression of the NaeI restriction endonuclease-encoding gene and sequence analysis of the NaeI restriction-modification system

NaeI, a type-II restriction-modification (R-M) system from the bacterium Nocardia aerocolonigenes, recognizes the sequence 5'-GCCGGC. The NaeI DNA methyltransferase (MTase)-encoding gene, naeIM, had been cloned previously in Escherichia coli [Van Cott and Wilson, Gene 74 (1988) 55-59]. However, none of these clones expressed detectable levels of the restriction endonuclease (ENase). The absence of the intact ENase-encoding gene (naeIR) within the isolated MTase clones was confirmed by recloning the MTase clones into Streptomyces lividans. The complete NaeI system was finally cloned using E. coli AP1-200 [Piekarowicz et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 19 (1991) 1831-1835] and less stringent MTase-selection conditions. The naeIR gene was expressed first by cloning into S. lividans, and later by cloning under control of a regulated promoter in an E. coli strain preprotected by the heterologous MspI MTase (M.MspI). The DNA sequence of the NaeI R-M system has been determined, analyzed and compared to previously sequenced R-M systems.

In vivo restriction by LlaI is encoded by three genes, arranged in an operon with llaIM, on the conjugative Lactococcus plasmid pTR2030

The LlaI restriction and modification (R/M) system is encoded on pTR2030, a 46.2-kb conjugative plasmid from Lactococcus lactis. The llaI methylase gene, sequenced previously, encodes a functional type IIS methylase and is located approximately 5 kb upstream from the abiA gene, encoding abortive phage resistance. In this study, the sequence of the region between llaIM and abiA was determined and revealed four consecutive open reading frames (ORFs). Northern (RNA) analysis showed that the four ORFs were part of a 7-kb operon with llaIM and the downstream abiA gene on a separate transcriptional unit. The deduced protein sequence of ORF2 revealed a P-loop consensus motif for ATP/GTP-binding sites and a three-part consensus motif for GTP-binding proteins. Data bank searches with the deduced protein sequences for all four ORFs revealed no homology except for ORF2 with MerB, in three regions that coincided with the GTP-binding motifs in both proteins. To phenotypically analyze the llaI operon, a 9.0-kb fragment was cloned into a high-copy-number lactococcal shuttle vector, pTRKH2. The resulting construct, pTRK370, exhibited a significantly higher level of in vivo restriction and modification in L. lactis NCK203 than the low-copy-number parental plasmid, pTR2030. A combination of deletion constructions and frameshift mutations indicated that the first three ORFs were involved in LlaI restriction, and they were therefore designated llaI.1, llaI.2, and llaI.3. Mutating llaI.1 completely abolished restriction, while disrupting llaI.2 or llaI.3 allowed an inefficient restriction of phage DNA to occur, manifested primarily by a variable plaque phenotype. ORF4 had no discernible effect on in vivo restriction. A frameshift mutation in llaIM proved lethal to L. lactis NCK203, implying that the restriction component was active without the modification subunit. These results suggested that the LlaI R/M system is unlike any other R/M system studied to date and has diverged from the type IIS class of restriction enzymes by acquiring some characteristics reminiscent of type I enzymes.

Organization and sequence of the SalI restriction-modification system

The organization and nucleotide (nt) sequences were determined for the genes encoding the SalI restriction and modification (R-M) system (recognition sequence 5'-GTCGAC-3') from Streptomyces albus G. The system comprises two genes, salIR, coding for the restriction endonuclease (ENase, R.SalI; probably 315 amino acids (aa), a predicted M(r) of 35,305; product, G'TCGAC) and salIM, coding for the methyltransferase (MTase, M.SalI; probably 587 aa, a predicted M(r) of 64,943; product, GTCGm6AC). The genes are adjacent, they have the same orientation, and they occur in the order salIR then salIM. R.SalI contains a putative magnesium-binding motif similar to those at the active sites of R.EcoRI and R.EcoRV, but otherwise it bears little aa sequence similarity to other ENases. M.SalI is a member of the m6A gamma class of MTases. In aa sequence it resembles M.AccI, another m6A gamma-MTase whose recognition sequence includes the SalI recognition sequence as a subset.