Nociceptin/orphanin FQ-induced delay in gastric emptying: role of central corticotropin-releasing factor and glucocorticoid receptors

Activation of NOP receptor increases vulnerability to stress: role of glucocorticoids and CRF signaling

RATIONALE

Recently, we demonstrated that the activation of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptor (NOP) signaling facilitates depressive-like behaviors. Additionally, literature findings support the ability of the N/OFQ-NOP system to modulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

OBJECTIVES

Considering that dysfunctional HPA axis is strictly related to stress-induced psychopathologies, we aimed to study the role of the HPA axis in the pro-depressant effects of NOP agonists.

METHODS

Mice were treated prior to stress with the NOP agonist Ro 65-6570, and immobility time in the forced swimming task and corticosterone levels were measured. Additionally, the role of endogenous glucocorticoids and CRF was investigated using the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone and the CRF1 antagonist antalarmin in the mediation of the effects of Ro 65-6570.

RESULTS

The NOP agonist in a dose-dependent manner further increased the immobility of mice in the second swimming session compared to vehicle. By contrast, under the same conditions, the administration of the NOP antagonist SB-612111 before stress reduced immobility, while the antidepressant nortriptyline was inactive. Concerning in-serum corticosterone in mice treated with vehicle, nortriptyline, or SB-612111, a significant decrease was observed after re-exposition to stress, but no differences were detected in Ro 65-6570-treated mice. Administration of mifepristone or antalarmin blocked the Ro 65-6570-induced increase in the immobility time in the second swimming session.

CONCLUSIONS

Present findings suggest that NOP agonists increase vulnerability to depression by hyperactivating the HPA axis and then increasing stress circulating hormones and CRF1 receptor signaling.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor system blockade as an innovative strategy for increasing resilience to stress

The ability to successfully cope with stress is known as 'resilience', and resilient individuals are less prone to develop psychopathologies. Understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of resilience may be instrumental to improve current therapies and benefit high-risk subjects. This review summarizes the complex interplay that exists between physiological and pathological responses to stressful events and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) - N/OFQ receptor (NOP) system, including: the effects of stress in regulating N/OFQ release and NOP expression; the ability of the N/OFQ-NOP system to modulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; behavioral studies; and evidence in humans correlating this peptidergic system with psychopathologies. Available findings support the view that N/OFQ signaling stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, thus increasing stress circulating hormones and corticotropin-releasing factor signaling. Additionally, activation of the NOP receptor inhibits monoamine transmission, including 5-HT, and this may contribute to maladaptive outcomes of stress. Ultimately, the N/OFQ system seems to have an important role in stress vulnerability, and blockade of NOP signaling may provide an innovative strategy for the treatment of stress related psychopathologies.

Blockade of nociceptin/orphanin FQ signaling facilitates an active copying strategy due to acute and repeated stressful stimuli in mice

The role of stress in the etiology of depression has been largely reported. In this line, exogenous glucocorticoids are employed to mimic the influence of stress on the development of depression. The N/OFQ-NOP receptor system has been implicated in the modulation of stress and emotional behaviors. In fact, the blockade of NOP receptors induces antidepressant effects and increases resilience to acute stress. This study investigated the effects of the NOP receptor blockade on dexamethasone-treated mice exposed to acute and prolonged swimming stress. Swiss and NOP(+/+) and NOP(−/−) mice were treated with dexamethasone, and the protective effects of the NOP antagonist SB-612111 (10 mg/kg, ip) or imipramine (20 mg/kg, ip) were investigated in three swimming sessions. The re-exposure to swim stress increased immobility time in Swiss and NOP(+/+), but not in NOP(−/−) mice. Acute and repeated dexamethasone administration induced a further increase in the immobility time, and facilitated body weight loss in Swiss mice. Single administration of SB-612111, but not imipramine, prevented swimming stress- and dexamethasone-induced increase in the immobility time. Repeated administrations of SB-612111 prevented the deleterious effects of 5 days of dexamethasone treatment. Imipramine also partially prevented the effects of repeated glucocorticoid administration on the immobility time, but did not affect the body weight loss. NOP(−/−) mice were more resistant than NOP(+/+) mice to inescapable swimming stress, but not dexamethasone-induced increase in the immobility time and body weight loss. In conclusion, the blockade of the NOP receptor facilitates an active stress copying response and attenuates body weight loss due to repeated stress.

Brain and Gut CRF Signaling: Biological Actions and Role in the Gastrointestinal Tract

BACKGROUND

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) pathways coordinate behavioral, endocrine, autonomic and visceral responses to stress. Convergent anatomical, molecular, pharmacological and functional experimental evidence supports a key role of brain CRF receptor (CRF-R) signaling in stress-related alterations of gastrointestinal functions. These include the inhibition of gastric acid secretion and gastric-small intestinal transit, stimulation of colonic enteric nervous system and secretorymotor function, increase intestinal permeability, and visceral hypersensitivity. Brain sites of CRF actions to alter gut motility encompass the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, locus coeruleus complex and the dorsal motor nucleus while those modulating visceral pain are localized in the hippocampus and central amygdala. Brain CRF actions are mediated through the autonomic nervous system (decreased gastric vagal and increased sacral parasympathetic and sympathetic activities). The activation of brain CRF-R2 subtype inhibits gastric motor function while CRF-R1 stimulates colonic secretomotor function and induces visceral hypersensitivity. CRF signaling is also located within the gut where CRF-R1 activates colonic myenteric neurons, mucosal cells secreting serotonin, mucus, prostaglandin E2, induces mast cell degranulation, enhances mucosal permeability and propulsive motor functions and induces visceral hyperalgesia in animals and humans. CRF-R1 antagonists prevent CRF- and stressrelated gut alterations in rodents while not influencing basal state.

DISCUSSION

These preclinical studies contrast with the limited clinical positive outcome of CRF-R1 antagonists to alleviate stress-sensitive functional bowel diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The translational potential of CRF-R1 antagonists in gut diseases will require additional studies directed to novel anti-CRF therapies and the neurobiology of brain-gut interactions under chronic stress.

Protective and worsening peripheral nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor-mediated effect in a rat model of experimental colitis

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and nociceptin orphanin peptide (NOP) receptors represent an endogenous system modulating gastrointestinal functions and inflammation. We investigated the peripheral effect of N/OFQ and of UFP-101, the NOP antagonist, in a model of colitis induced by TNBS (2,4,6 trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid; 60mg/kg). Male rats received two intraperitoneal injections per day of N/OFQ, UFP-101 or saline for 3 days after colitis induction. Four days after TNBS, animals were sacrificed and colonic histological damage, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and cytokine (IL-1β and IL-10) levels were evaluated. N/OFQ plasmatic levels were assessed by radioimmunoassay. TNBS increased all the inflammatory variables considered. In colitic rats, N/OFQ (0.02 and 0.2nmol/kg) improved microscopic damage, MPO activity and decreased IL-1β levels in comparison with TNBS group, whereas at the highest dose (20nmol/kg) the peptide worsened colitis. UFP-101 at the dose of 1nmol/kg, without pharmacological activity, antagonised the protective effect of N/OFQ (0.2nmol/kg) on colitis, but at a dose level of 3 and 10nmol/kg worsened inflammation, revealing the endogenous N/OFQergic system protective role. N/OFQ plasmatic levels were not modified in TNBS-treated rats compared with controls, whereas they were reduced in rats treated with the doses of UFP-101 aggravating colitis. In conclusion, peripheral low doses of N/OFQ have a beneficial effect on colonic inflammation in rats. In contrast, N/OFQ at a dose 100-1000-fold higher than those that protect worsens colitis, probably through different mechanisms. The peripheral N/OFQergic system can represent a new field of investigation in some intestinal inflammatory conditions.

Effect of mosapride citrate on gastric emptying in interferon-induced gastroparesis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastroparesis, a gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy, is a common adverse reaction in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients receiving interferon therapy. Current therapeutic options are limited. We evaluated the efficacy of mosapride for IFN-induced gastroparesis.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive CHC patients were randomly assigned to either the control group, which received pegylated interferon α-2b at 1.5 μg/kg/week and ribavirin at 600-1,000 mg/day, depending on body weight (PegIFN/RBV), or the mosapride group, which received PegIFN/RBV plus mosapride at 15 mg/person/day. The solid-phase gastric emptying half-times (T1/2) of the total, proximal, and distal stomach (scintigraphy) and digestive symptoms (questionnaire) were measured within one week before and four weeks after initiation of the assigned therapy. The test meal comprised a 200-g pancake containing Tc-99m diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid.

RESULTS

In the control group, after PegIFN/RBV initiation, a significant increase was observed in the total T1/2 (before: 84.0 ± 22.1 min versus after: 100.8 ± 28.9 min, P = 0.03), the distal T1/2 (before: 95.3 ± 32.2 min versus after: 115.3 ± 41.4 min, P = 0.03), and digestive symptom score (before: 3.2 ± 1.4 versus after: 8.1 ± 4.8, P = 0.02); proximal T1/2 change was not significant. In the mosapride group, no significant delays were observed in the total, proximal, and distal T1/2 values; the change in symptom scores was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Mosapride improved total and distal gastric motility in IFN-induced gastroparesis, and consequently relieved symptoms.

Inhibition of serotonin outflow by nociceptin/orphaninFQ in dorsal raphe nucleus slices from normal and stressed rats: Role of corticotropin releasing factor

In the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) many inputs converge and interact to modulate serotonergic neuronal activity and the behavioral responses to stress. The effects exerted by two stress-related neuropeptides, corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and nociceptin/orphaninFQ (N/OFQ), on the outflow of [(3)H]5- hydroxytryptamine were investigated in superfused rat dorsal raphe nucleus slices. Electrical stimulation (100 mA, 1 ms for 2 min) evoked a frequency-dependent peak of [(3)H]5- hydroxytryptamine outflow, which was sodium and calcium-dependent. Corticotropin releasing factor (1-100 nM), concentration-dependently inhibited the stimulation (3 Hz)-evoked [(3)H]5-hydroxytryptamine outflow; the inhibition by 30 nM corticotropin releasing factor (to 68 +/- 5.7%) was prevented both by the non selective CRF receptor antagonist alpha-helicalCRF(9-41) (alpha-HEL) (300 nM) and by the CRF(1) receptor antagonist antalarmin (ANT) (100 nM). The CRF(2) agonist urocortin II (10 nM) did not modify [(3)H]5- hydroxytryptamine outflow, ruling out the involvement of CRF(2) receptors. Bicuculline (BIC), a GABAA antagonist (10 microM), prevented the inhibitory effect of corticotropin releasing factor (30 nM), supporting the hypothesis that the inhibition was mediated by increased gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release. Nociceptin/ orphaninFQ (1 nM-1 microM) exerted an antalarmin- and bicuculline-insensitive inhibition on [(3)H]5- hydroxytryptamine outflow, with the maximum at 100 nM (to 63+/- 4.2%), antagonized by the NOP receptor antagonist UFP-101 (1 microM). Dorsal raphe nucleus slices prepared from rats exposed to 15 min of forced swim stress displayed a reduced [(3)H]5-hydroxytryptamine outflow, in part reversed by antalarmin and further inhibited by nociceptin/orphaninFQ. These findings indicate that (i) both corticotropin releasing factor and nociceptin/orphaninFQ exert an inhibitory control on dorsal raphe nucleus serotonergic neurons; (ii) the inhibition by corticotropin releasing factor involves gamma-aminobutyric acid neurons; (iii) nociceptin/ orphaninFQ inhibits dorsal raphe nucleus serotonin system in a corticotropin releasing factor- and gamma-aminobutyric acid-independent manner; (iv) nociceptin/orphaninFQ modulation is still operant in slices prepared from stressed rats. The nociceptin/orphaninFQ-NOP receptor system could represent a new target for drugs effective in stress-related disorders.

The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis does not influence the protective effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ on the rat gastric mucosa

The participation of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in the gastroprotective effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) has been investigated. Gastric mucosal lesions were induced by intragastric administration of 50% ethanol, 1 ml/rat. Rats received N/OFQ either by the intracerebroventricular (icv) route, at 3 microg/rat, or by the intraperitoneal (ip) route, at 10 microg/kg, 30 min before ethanol administration. The protective effect of icv and ip administered N/OFQ was assessed in adrenalectomized rats and in rats pretreated with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, mifepristone, or with the CRF receptor antagonist, alpha-helical CRF(9-41). The damaging effect of ethanol was apparently not influenced by adrenalectomy. N/OFQ markedly reduced macroscopically and histologically assessed gastric mucosal damage. The extent of reduction by N/OFQ was comparable in adrenalectomized and in sham-operated rats, with either icv or ip route of administration. Pretreatment with mifepristone, both icv (80 microg/rat) and ip (10 mg/kg) injected, did not modify the response to icv and ip N/OFQ. Pretreatment with alpha-helical CRF(9-41) (25 microg/rat icv or 250 microg/kg ip), had no effect on the reduction of gastric damage produced by icv or ip N/OFQ. Present findings suggest that the gastroprotective effects of N/OFQ on ethanol-induced damage do not involve the endocrine pathway through the HPA axis.

Synergistic interaction between dexamethasone and tramadol in a murine model of acute visceral pain

Tramadol is effective in the management of mild to moderate postoperative pain, but its administration is associated with nausea and vomiting. Patients treated with tramadol, often receive dexamethasone as antiemetic. The aim of our investigation was to assess if the two drugs interact in a murine model of acute visceral pain. Using the acetic acid writhing test in mice, we assessed the antinociceptive effects of tramadol and dexamethasone (a glucocorticoid with antiemetic effect) administrated individually and in a 1 : 1 fixed ratio combination. Tramadol and dexamethasone induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the writhing response when administered individually, with ED(50) values of 2.9 [2.09-4.31, 95% confidence limit (CL)] mg/kg, and 0.13 (0.05-0.29, 95% CL) mg/kg, respectively. The ED(50) of the combination was 0.13 (0.01-0.29, 95% CL) mg/kg; the isobolographic and interaction index analysis revealed a synergistic interaction. The results suggest that the combination of tramadol and dexamethasone could be beneficial in the management of postoperative pain in humans.

The gastric effects of UFP-112, a new nociceptin/orphanin receptor agonist, in physiological and pathological conditions

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), the endogenous NOP receptor ligand, centrally modulates gastric motor and secretory functions and prevents ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats. A recently synthesized N/OFQ analog, [(pF)Phe(4)Aib(7)Arg(14)Lys(15)]N/OFQ-NH(2) (UFP-112), acts as a highly potent and selective peptide agonist for NOP receptors and produces longer-lasting in vitro and in vivo effects in mice than the natural ligand N/OFQ. In this study, we evaluated the effects of centrally (intracerebroventricularly/icv) and peripherally (intraperitoneally/ip) injected UFP-112 on gastric emptying and gastric acid secretion, and on the development of gastric mucosal lesions induced by 50% ethanol in the rat. When injected icv, it dose-dependently delayed gastric emptying of a phenol red meal (by up to 70%), decreased gastric secretion in water-loaded rats after 90 pylorus ligature, and reduced ethanol-induced gastric lesions (by up to 87%). In all three assays, UFP-112 was more effective than N/OFQ. The highly selective NOP receptor antagonist, UFP-101, decreased the efficacy of UFP-112, thus confirming that central NOP receptors mediate inhibitory control on these functional and pathological conditions in rats. Ip injected N/OFQ and UFP-112 induced non-dose-related gastric hypersecretory and antiulcer effects, which UFP-101 partially abolished. Ip N/OFQ appeared equiactive but about 30-100 times less potent than ip UFP-112 in stimulating gastric acid secretion and preventing lesion formation. When ip injected, both UFP-112 and N/OFQ left gastric emptying in rats unchanged, suggesting that peripheral NOP receptors have a role in mediating gastric hypersecretory and antiulcer effects but are not involved in regulating gastric motility. In addition, the inhibitory effects induced by this novel NOP receptor agonist lasted longer than those induced by N/OFQ. In conclusion, UFP-112 is a promising new pharmacological tool for studying the functional roles of the central and peripheral N/OFQ receptor system.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ prevents gastric damage induced by cold-restraint stress in the rat by acting in the periphery

The influence of peripheral nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) on cold restraint-induced gastric mucosal damage in the rat was investigated. Exposure to cold-restraint for 3 and 4h caused the formation of hemorrhagic lesions in the glandular portion of the stomach. N/OFQ dose-dependently decreased lesion formation, in the range 0.03-1 microg/kg/h i.p. Its effect was reversed by the selective NOP receptor antagonist [Nphe(1)Arg(14)Lys(15)]N/OFQ-NH(2) (UFP-101), 30 microg/kg/h ip. The selective NOP receptor agonist [(pF)Phe(4)Aib(7)Arg(14)Lys(15)]N/OFQ-NH(2) (UFP-112), 0.01-0.3 microg/kg/h i.p., similarly reduced lesion formation. Light and scanning electron microscopy confirmed the protective activity of N/OFQ. Cold-restraint stress causes a reduction in mucus content and in adhering mucus layer, partly counteracted by N/OFQ. These results suggest that N/OFQ counteracts acute stress-induced gastric mucosal damage by interacting with NOP receptor and by influencing mucous cell activity.

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ antagonist UFP-101 differentially modulates the glucocorticoid response to restraint stress in rats during the peak and nadir phases of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis circadian rhythm

The involvement of nociceptin (N/OFQ) and the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor in behavior associated with stress and anxiety has been established but their role in the regulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis under conditions of stress has not been fully investigated. We used the selective NOP receptor antagonist UFP-101 to examine the contribution of endogenous N/OFQ to HPA axis control under conditions of restraint stress in the morning and the evening. We found that in the morning during the HPA axis circadian nadir rats exposed to restraint stress in both the presence and absence of UFP-101 exhibited significantly elevated plasma corticosterone at 30 min post-i.c.v. injection compared to the home cage control group. Additionally, rats treated with UFP-101 and exposed to restraint had significantly elevated corticosterone levels at 60 min post-i.c.v. injection compared to all other treatment groups. Interestingly, while there was a significant increase in the expression of CRF mRNA in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of rats exposed to restraint stress only, there was no comparable increase in those co-treated with UFP-101. There was no change in the expression of AVP or POMC mRNA in any of the treatment groups. In contrast, when carried out in the evening we observed significantly elevated plasma corticosterone in the vehicle-treated restraint group only at 30 min post-i.c.v. injection. There was no significant difference between the UFP-101-treated restraint group and either of the home cage control groups or the vehicle-treated restraint group. Additionally, in contrast to the morning study, UFP-101 did not prolong glucocorticoid release at the 60 min time-point. These results demonstrate for the first time a differential effect of UFP-101 on restraint stress-induced HPA axis activity characterized by significant prolongation of stress-induced activity in the morning but no significant effect on the response to restraint in the evening.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2005

This paper is the 28th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2005 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity, neurophysiology and transmitter release (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); immunological responses (Section 17).