Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

Treatment options for postoperative faecal incontinence after colorectal surgery

Postoperative faecal incontinence is a common and challenging complication following colorectal surgery, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. This article provides an overview of the types of colorectal surgical interventions that may contribute to faecal incontinence and explores various treatment options, ranging from conservative management to surgery. Conservative approaches include dietary modifications, bowel training and pharmacological treatments such as bulking agents, antidiarrhoeal medications and biofeedback therapy. For patients with persistent symptoms, advanced therapies such as sacral and tibial nerve stimulation are considered. Surgical options including sphincter repair, pouch formation, artificial anal sphincter implant or colostomy may be required for severe cases. The article reviews the most common treatment modalities, emphasising the importance of an individualised approach. Multidisciplinary care involving colorectal surgeons, physiotherapists and gastroenterologists is essential for optimising outcomes. Ultimately, the management of postoperative faecal incontinence requires careful assessment of the underlying cause, severity of symptoms and patient preferences to guide treatment selection.

The efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become one of the main treatment options in patients with fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted using the Pubmed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases, restricted to the English language and to articles published from 2000 to November 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 434 articles on the efficacy of SNM in the treatment of LARS were retrieved, and 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 114 patients treated with SNM for LARS The overall success rate excluding study heterogeneity was 83.30% [95% CI (71.33-95.25%)]. Improvement in anal continence was seen in several clinical and functional parameters, including the Wexner Score [10.78 points, 95% CI (8.55-13.02), p < 0.0001], manometric maximum resting pressure [mean improvement of 6.37 mm/Hg, 95% CI (2.67-10.07), p = 0.0007], maximum squeeze pressure [mean improvement of 17.99 mm/Hg, 95% CI (17.42-18.56), p < 0.0001] and maximum tolerated volume [mean improvement of 22.74 ml, 95% CI (10.65-34.83), p = 0.0002]. Quality of life questionnaires also demonstrated significant improvement in patients' quality of life, but were reported only in a small group of included patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SNM significantly improves symptoms and quality of life in patients suffering from fecal incontinence following low anterior resection.

Etiology and management of low anterior resection syndrome based on the normal defecation mechanism

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) commonly develops after an anal sphincter-preserving operation (SPO). The etiology of LARS is not well understood, as the anatomical components and physiological function of normal defecation, which may be damaged during the SPO, are not well established. SPOs may damage components of the anal canal (such as the internal anal sphincter, longitudinal conjoint muscle, or hiatal ligament), either mechanically or via injury to the nerves that supply these organs. The function of the rectum is substantially impaired by resection of the rectum, division of the rectococcygeus muscle, and/or injury of the nervous supply. When the remnant rectum is small and does not function properly, an important functional role may be played by the neorectum, which is usually constructed from the left side of the colon. Hypermotility of the remnant colon may affect the manifestation of urge fecal incontinence. To develop an SPO that minimizes the risk of LARS, the anatomy and physiology of the structures involved in normal defecation need to be understood better. LARS is managed similarly to fecal incontinence. In particular, management should focus on reducing colonic motility when urge fecal incontinence is the dominant symptom.

Systematic review of the impact of sacral neuromodulation on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology

Background

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has emerged as a treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). However, its objective effect on symptoms and anorectal function is inconsistently described. This study aimed to systematically review the impact of SNM on clinical symptoms and gastrointestinal physiology in patients with FI, including factors that may predict treatment outcome.

Methods

An electronic search of MEDLINE (1946–2014)/EMBASE database was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles that reported the relevant outcome measures following SNM were included. Clinical outcomes evaluated included: frequency of FI episodes, FI severity score and success rates. Its impact on anorectal and gastrointestinal physiology was also evaluated.

Results

Of 554 citations identified, data were extracted from 81 eligible studies. Meta‐analysis of the data was precluded due to lack of a comparison group in most studies. After permanent SNM, ‘perfect’ continence was noted in 13–88% of patients. Most studies reported a reduction in weekly FI episodes (median difference of the mean −7.0 (range: −24.8 to −2.7)) and Wexner scores (median difference of the mean −9 (−14.9 to −6)). A trend towards improved resting and squeeze anal pressures and a reduction in rectal sensory volumes were noted. Studies failed to identify any consistent impact on other physiological parameters or clinicophysiological factors associated with success.

Conclusion

SNM improves clinical symptoms and reduces number of incontinence episodes and severity scores in patients with FI, in part by improving anorectal physiological function. However, intervention studies with standardized outcome measures and physiological techniques are required to robustly assess the physiological impact of SNM.

Is sacral neuromodulation here to stay? Clinical outcomes of a new treatment for fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) was approved by the FDA for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) in 2011, and previous industry-sponsored trials have shown excellent clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine clinical outcomes of patients treated during our initial experience with SNM.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients treated with SNM for FI by one of three colorectal surgeons at two separate institutions was maintained starting in 2011. Patients showing ≥50% improvement of weekly incontinent episodes during test stimulation were offered permanent implantation of the SNM device. Disease severity was tracked using the Wexner score.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients received a full system implantation (of 152 who received test stimulation). The median preoperative Wexner score of 14 decreased to 3, 3 months after implantation and persisted to 12 months. At 12 months, 95.2% of patients achieved >50% improvement in Wexner Score and 67.6% achieved >75% improvement. The most common adverse event was infection (3.4%). Three patients (2.1%) required lead revision.

CONCLUSIONS

SNM is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of FI. Postoperative patient surveillance is important, as many patients require programming changes, and some will require a lead revision over time.

Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). A recent study from our group found that the relationship between patient satisfaction and clinical outcome is complex and does not match the traditional used success criteria. Therefore, the ability to predict patient satisfaction must be given priority. The aim of the present study is to identify baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction, with SNM, for idiopathic FI.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients treated with SNM for idiopathic FI in Aarhus, Denmark, and Maastricht, The Netherlands. A questionnaire considering self-reported satisfaction was mailed to these patients and compared to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive value of baseline demographic and diagnostic variables.

RESULTS

In total, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Patient satisfaction with the current treatment result was reported in 75 patients. Fifty-six patients were dissatisfied with SNM treatment, after median 46 months (range 11-122) with permanent implantation. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was the solely identified predictor for long-term patient satisfaction. A subgroup univariate-logistic regression analysis showed that PNTML ≤ 2.3 ms at the side of lead implantation was a statistically significant predictor for patient satisfaction (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-5.24, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Baseline PNTML measurement may be predictive of long-term satisfaction with SNM therapy for idiopathic FI. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.