1
|
Factors impacting adolescent and young adult cancer patients' decision to pursue genetic counseling and testing. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:5481-5489. [PMID: 35306607 PMCID: PMC9703615 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06974-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients face challenges when navigating cancer treatment and survivorship. Many are at risk for cancer predisposition syndromes; however, factors influencing pursuit of genetic counseling and testing have not been reported. We describe AYA cancer patients' decision-making process, including motivational factors and barriers, as it relates to utilization of genetic services. METHODS Thirty AYAs diagnosed with cancer previously referred for cancer predisposition genetic counseling completed semi-structured interviews via audio-only Zoom calls. Thematic analysis was used to perform qualitative analysis and identify major themes. RESULTS The sample comprised 21 AYAs who had genetic counseling and nine who did not. Motivational factors identified included learning genetic counseling is an available service, concern about the impact of a hereditary syndrome on family members and family planning, learning about the need for cancer screening or prevention, affordability of genetic testing, and easing worry about additional cancer risks. For those who did not pursue genetic counseling, barriers included scheduling or other priorities, worry, and cost. However, the majority expressed they would reconsider genetic counseling in the future. CONCLUSION AYA cancer patients have similar motivational factors to pursue genetic counseling compared to other patients; however, their younger age of diagnosis may alter how these factors affect decision-making. While there are barriers limiting access to genetic services, they did not decrease interest in future genetic counseling for most patients. Genetic counseling and testing should be discussed with patients who previously declined genetic services.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dusic EJ, Bowen DJ, Bennett R, Cain KC, Theoryn T, Velasquez M, Swisher E, Brant JM, Shirts B, Wang C. Socioeconomic Status and Interest in Genetic Testing in a US-Based Sample. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:880. [PMID: 35628017 PMCID: PMC9141316 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a significant burden, particularly to individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES). Genetic testing can provide information about an individual's risk of developing cancer and guide future screening and preventative services. However, there are significant financial barriers, particularly for individuals of low SES. This study used the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) Study's patient baseline survey (n = 2329) to evaluate the relationship between socioeconomic status and interest in pursuing hereditary cancer genetic testing. Analysis was completed for two interest outcomes-overall interest in genetic testing and interest in genetic testing if the test were free or low cost. Many demographic and SES variables were predictors for interest in genetic testing, including education, income, and MacArthur Subjective Social Scale (SSS). After controlling for the healthcare system, age, and gender, having a higher education level and a higher household income were associated with greater general interest. Lower SSS was associated with greater interest in genetic testing if the test was free or low cost. If genetic testing is the future of preventative medicine, more work needs to be performed to make this option accessible to low-SES groups and to ensure that those services are used by the most underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EJ Dusic
- Institute of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - Deborah J. Bowen
- Department of Bioethics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - Robin Bennett
- Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - Kevin C. Cain
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - Tesla Theoryn
- Institute of Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA;
| | - Mariebeth Velasquez
- University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.V.); (E.S.); (B.S.)
| | - Elizabeth Swisher
- University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.V.); (E.S.); (B.S.)
| | - Jeannine M. Brant
- Clinical Science & Innovation, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT 59105, USA;
| | - Brian Shirts
- University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.V.); (E.S.); (B.S.)
| | - Catharine Wang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Szakály Z, Kovács B, Szakály M, T. Nagy-Pető D, Popovics P, Kiss M. Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary. GENES & NUTRITION 2021; 16:3. [PMID: 33648454 PMCID: PMC7923598 DOI: 10.1186/s12263-021-00683-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the increasing number of personalized nutrition services available on the market, nutrigenomics-based level of personalization is still the exception rather than a mainstream activity. This can be partly explained by various factors of consumer acceptance of the new technology. While consumer attitudes toward genetic tests aiming to reveal the risks of a predisposition to various illnesses have already been examined by several research studies worldwide; consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalized nutrition has only been examined by a significantly lower number of papers, especially in the Central and Eastern European region. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to examine consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary. Therefore a national representative survey was conducted involving 1000 individuals. The starting point of the model used is the assumption that the consumer acceptance of personalized nutrition is influenced by its consumer perceptions, which are affected by psychological processes that, in a more general sense, determine acceptance of food innovations. RESULTS The results show that 23.5% of respondents accept genetic test-based personalized nutrition. Women were found to reject the new technology in a significantly smaller proportion than men. The relationship between other demographic variables (i.e. age groups, education and subjective income level) and the perception of genetic-based personalized nutrition is also significant. Our results indicate that it is perceived cost/benefit that is most strongly related to genetically based personalized dietary preferences, followed by perceived risk and subjective norms. Perceived uncertainty and perceived behavioural control, however, have only a weak relationship with genetic-based personalized dietary preferences. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the magnitude of the effect of socio-demographic criteria, it can be concluded that, on the whole, psychological processes in the individual have a greater influence on the development of preferences for genetic-based personalized nutrition than any socio-demographic factor. This also confirms the trend that there are more and more value-added products or value propositions (where a significant part of the value added is to be found in product innovation), for which psychological characteristics are/should be given more emphasis among the segmentation criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Szakály
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Bence Kovács
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Márk Szakály
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Dorka T. Nagy-Pető
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Péter Popovics
- Institute of Applied Economics Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Marietta Kiss
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Omark J, Vilar E, You YN, Dunnington L, Noblin S, Stevens B, Mork M. Patients with unexplained mismatch repair deficiency are interested in updated genetic testing. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2020; 18:19. [PMID: 32973963 PMCID: PMC7507605 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-00150-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals who have colorectal or endometrial cancers displaying loss of immunohistochemical staining of one or more mismatch repair proteins without an identifiable causative germline pathogenic variant have unexplained mismatch repair deficiency (UMMRD). Comprehensive germline genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) includes sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, deletion analysis of EPCAM, and MSH2 inversion analysis. Updated genetic testing to include elements of comprehensive LS testing not previously completed could further clarify LS status in individuals with UMMRD, allowing for tailored screening guidelines for affected individuals and their family members. However, patient understanding of the potential impact of updated genetic testing for LS is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the interest in and perceived impact of updated genetic testing among individuals with UMMRD at a tertiary academic center. Methods A survey evaluating interest in and perceived impact of updated genetic testing was mailed to 98 potential participants. Electronic health record review was completed for all individuals meeting eligibility criteria. Thirty-one individuals responded to the survey. Results Results indicate this population is highly interested in updated genetic testing with the perceived impact being primarily for family members to have appropriate genetic testing and screening. Electronic health record review indicates that clinicians have an evolving understanding of causes of UMMRD, representing a potential change in assessment of cancer risk. Conclusions Updated risk assessment and genetic counseling with a discussion of the benefits and limitations of germline and somatic genetic testing, is essential as the understanding of UMMRD and genetic testing recommendations for this population evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Omark
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Leslie Dunnington
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX USA
| | - Sarah Noblin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX USA.,Natera, San Carlos, CA USA
| | - Blair Stevens
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX USA
| | - Maureen Mork
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA.,Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bartley N, Best M, Jacobs C, Juraskova I, Newson AJ, Savard J, Meiser B, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Biesecker B, Butow P. Cancer patients' views and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative study. J Med Genet 2020; 57:671-676. [PMID: 31980566 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about knowledge of, and attitudes towards, genome sequencing (GS) among individuals with a personal history of cancer who decide to undergo GS. This qualitative study aimed to investigate baseline knowledge and attitudes among individuals previously diagnosed with a cancer of likely genetic origin who have consented to GS. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants (n=20) from the longitudinal Psychosocial Issues in Genomic Oncology study, within a month of consenting to GS and prior to receiving any results. Participants were adults with a cancer of likely genetic aetiology who are undertaking GS as part of a larger genetic study. RESULTS Analysis identified three main themes: limited understanding of genomics; multifactorial motivation; and complex decision making. While motivations such as obtaining health information about self and family appear to be the main drivers for undertaking GS, these motivations are sometimes based on limited knowledge of the accuracy and utility of GS, creating unrealistic expectations. This in turn can prolong the deliberation process and lead to ongoing decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Understanding the degree and nature of patient understanding of GS, as well as their attitudes and decision-making processes, will enable healthcare professionals to better manage patient expectations and appropriately engage and support patients to make an informed decision when pursuing GS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicci Bartley
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Best
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- The Kinghorn Cancer Center and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Center and Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Barbara Biesecker
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van de Beek I, Smets EMA, Legdeur MA, de Hullu JA, Lok CAR, Buist MR, Mourits MJE, Kets CM, van der Kolk LE, Oosterwijk JC, Aalfs CM. Genetic counseling of patients with ovarian carcinoma: acceptance, timing, and psychological wellbeing. J Community Genet 2019; 11:183-191. [PMID: 31168696 PMCID: PMC7062983 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00427-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The new Dutch guidelines on hereditary and familial ovarian carcinoma recommend genetic testing of all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). With this study, we aimed to obtain insight into (1) the acceptance and timing of the offer of genetic counseling in women with EOC, (2) reasons for accepting or declining genetic counseling, and (3) psychological differences between women who did and did not have genetic counseling. A multicenter questionnaire survey was performed in patients with EOC in four Dutch oncology centers. The questionnaire addressed whether, how, and when genetic counseling was offered, women’s arguments to accept or decline genetic counseling, and included the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A total of 67 women completed the questionnaire, of which 43 had genetic counseling. Despite a wide variability in the timing of the offer of genetic counseling, 89% of the women were satisfied with the timing. No significant differences were found between the CWS and HADS scores for the timing of the offer of genetic counseling and whether or not women had genetic counseling. Taking the small sample size into account, the results tentatively suggest that genetic counseling may have limited impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of women with EOC. Therefore, we assume that implementation of the new guidelines offering genetic counseling to all patients with EOC will not cause considerable additional burden to these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Van de Beek
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E M A Smets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Legdeur
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M R Buist
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J E Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C M Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L E van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wessel J, Marrero D. Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes in High-Risk Children: the Case for Primordial Prevention. RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e20695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
8
|
Keogh LA, Niven H, Rutstein A, Flander L, Gaff C, Jenkins M. Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining. J Behav Med 2017; 40:583-594. [PMID: 28197815 PMCID: PMC6057776 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
While medical research continues to investigate the genetic basis of cancer, and personalised prevention gains momentum, little research has been conducted with the individuals who decline predictive genetic testing for cancer. We recruited individuals who had been offered genetic testing for Lynch syndrome or bi-allelic MUTYH mutations due to their participation in a large, population-based, Australia-wide colorectal cancer study. Thirty-three individuals in mutation-carrying families, unaffected by cancer, who had actively or passively declined testing at one of four decision-making points, took part in a qualitative interview about their decision. Data analysis revealed a typology of 'decliners': (1) uninformed about genetic testing; (2) a weak intention to undergo genetic testing; (3) conditionally declining; and (4) unconditionally declining testing. In this population we found substantial barriers to achieving the benefits promised by predictive genetic testing; a lack of knowledge of the availability of genetic testing; a lack of trust in genetic test information; a desire to see a stronger benefit from genetic testing before proceeding; and a sense that there may be more negative than positive outcomes from genetic testing. These discourses must be addressed if medical research on the genetic basis of cancer continues to be funded, and personalised prevention of cancer continues to be recommended by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise A Keogh
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Heather Niven
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alison Rutstein
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louisa Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Drury A, Payne S, Brady AM. Cancer survivorship: Advancing the concept in the context of colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2017; 29:135-147. [PMID: 28720260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous conceptualizations of cancer survivorship have focused on heterogeneous cancer survivors, with little consideration of the validity of conclusions for homogeneous tumour groups. This paper aims to examine the concept of cancer survivorship in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD Rodgers' (1989) Evolutionary Method of Concept Analysis guided this study. A systematic search of PUBMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2016 to identify studies of CRC survivorship. The Braun and Clarke (2006) framework guided the analysis and interpretation of data extracted from eighty-five publications. RESULTS Similar to general populations of cancer survivors, CRC survivors experience survivorship as an individual, life-changing process, punctuated by uncertainty and a duality of positive and negative outcomes affecting quality of life. However, CRC survivors experience specific concerns arising from the management of their disease. The concept of cancer survivorship has evolved over the past decade as the importance of navigating the healthcare system and its resources, and the constellation of met and unmet needs of cancer survivors are realised. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight core similarities between survivorship in the context of CRC and other tumour groups, but underlines issues specific to CRC survivorship. Communication and support are key issues in survivorship care which may detrimentally affect CRC survivors' well-being if they are inadequately addressed. Healthcare professionals (HCP's) therefore have a duty to ensure cancer survivors' health, information and supportive care needs are met in the aftermath of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Drury
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Brady
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leenen CHM, Heijer MD, van der Meer C, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME, Wagner A. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation. Fam Cancer 2016; 15:63-73. [PMID: 26446592 PMCID: PMC4698279 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Current genetic counselling practice for Lynch syndrome (LS) relies on diagnosed index patients to inform their biological family about LS, referred to as the family-mediated approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate this approach and to identify factors influencing the uptake of genetic testing for LS. In 59 mutation carriers, 70 non carriers and 16 non-tested relatives socio-demographic characteristics, family communication regarding LS, experiences and attitudes towards the family-mediated approach and motivations for genetic testing, were assessed. The majority of all respondents (73 %) were satisfied with the family-mediated approach. Nevertheless, 59 % of the respondents experienced informing a family member and 57 % being informed by a family member as burdensome. Non-tested differed from tested respondents, in that they were younger, less closely related to the index patient and a lower proportion had children. The most important reasons for declining genetic testing were (1) anticipating problems with life insurance and mortgage, (2) being content with life as it is, and (3) not experiencing any physical complaints. In conclusion, the majority of respondents consider the current family-mediated information procedure acceptable, although the provision of information on LS by relatives may be burdensome. Special attention should be paid to communication of LS to more distant relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine H M Leenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mariska den Heijer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Conny van der Meer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section. J Behav Med 2015; 38:701-5. [PMID: 26350552 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9674-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this special section is to showcase research contributing to our understanding of factors influencing decisions to undergo genetic testing and the impact of the genetic testing process on health-related behaviors of tested individuals. The first two articles report studies investigating factors associated with interest in genetic testing and acceptance of test results (Sherman et al. in J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9630-9 , 2015; Taber et al. in J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9642-5 , 2015b). The next two papers address the unique contribution of genetic risk information to understanding risk beyond genetic counseling alone (Heiniger et al. in J Behav Med doi 10.1007/s10865-015-9632-7 , 2015; Taber et al. in J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9648-z , 2015a). The final three articles investigate the effects of genetic risk information on beliefs about disease control and prevention (Aspinwall et al. in J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9631-8 , 2015; Kelly et al. in J Behav Med doi 10.1007/s10865-014-9613-2 , 2014; Myers et al. in J Behav Med doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5 , 2015). Collectively, the special section of papers highlights the diverse ways in which behavioural medicine contributes to our understanding of genetic testing for disease risk, and points to the value of further research to better understand ways in which individuals perceive, interpret and respond to genetic risk information.
Collapse
|
12
|
Galiatsatos P, Rothenmund H, Aubin S, Foulkes WD. Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:2246-50. [PMID: 25786861 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3626-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, conferring a heightened risk not only of colon cancer but also of various extracolonic tumors. Studies in hereditary breast cancer have shown a negative psychological impact for patients testing positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, but there is a paucity of literature looking at psychosocial impact of LS testing for probands and families. METHODS A literature search of PubMed English-language articles was performed using the keywords "Lynch syndrome" combined with "psychological impact," "depression," and "anxiety." RESULTS Lynch syndrome mutation carriers, whether or not they have had cancer, suffer a transient increase in depression and anxiety scores post-disclosure, which seem to normalize by 6-12 months. Younger patients with higher colorectal cancer risk perception, higher education level, married, and employed are more likely to accept genetic testing. Major motivators for testing are predicting one's own risk of cancer and risk to offspring. Carrier status influences family planning, and there is growing interest for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial ramifications of LS mutation positivity need to be explored further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polymnia Galiatsatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Room E-110, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hunter JE, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Davis JV, Esterberg EJ, Muessig KR, Peterson SK, Syngal S, Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Reiss JA, Goddard KAB. Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: Assessment of the perspectives of patients with colorectal cancer regarding benefits and barriers. Cancer 2015; 121:3281-9. [PMID: 26036338 PMCID: PMC4560979 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2015] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), has been recommended among all patients newly diagnosed with CRC. However, there is limited literature regarding patient perspectives of tumor screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with CRC who are not selected for screening based on family history criteria. METHODS A total of 145 patients aged 39 to 87 years were administered surveys assessing perceived risk, patient perspectives, and potential benefits of and barriers to tumor screening for Lynch syndrome. Associations between patient‐specific and cancer‐specific factors and survey responses were analyzed. RESULTS The majority of participants perceived their risk of developing Lynch syndrome as being low, with 9 participants (6.2%) anticipating an abnormal screening result. However, most participants endorsed the potential benefits of screening for themselves and their families, with 84.8% endorsing ≥6 benefits and 50.3% endorsing all 8 benefits. Participants also endorsed few potential barriers to screening, with 89.4% endorsing ≤4 of 9 potential barriers. A common barrier was worry about the cost of additional testing and surveillance, which was endorsed by 54.5% of participants. The level of distress associated with tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, which was very low, was not associated with age or CRC stage. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study indicate that patients with CRC overall have a positive attitude toward tumor screening for Lynch syndrome, endorse the benefits of screening, and experience low levels of distress. These findings provide insight into patient attitudes toward tumor screening for Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with CRC to inform educational approaches that assist in patient decision‐making and guide the successful implementation of screening programs. Cancer 2015;121:3281–3289. © 2015 American Cancer Society. In the current study, perspectives among patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer are assessed regarding universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome. The majority of patients appear to have a positive attitude toward screening and endorse the benefits for themselves and their families, whereas potential barriers include concerns over the cost of additional genetic counseling and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Mari J Gilmore
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - James V Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Kristin R Muessig
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise S Acheson
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Reproductive Biology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Program, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Esplen MJ, Wong J, Aronson M, Butler K, Rothenmund H, Semotiuk K, Madlensky L, Way C, Dicks E, Green J, Gallinger S. Long-term psychosocial and behavioral adjustment in individuals receiving genetic test results in Lynch syndrome. Clin Genet 2015; 87:525-32. [PMID: 25297893 PMCID: PMC4391982 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A cross-sectional study of 155 participants who underwent genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) examined long-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes. Participants completed standardized measures of perceived risk, psychosocial functioning, knowledge, and a questionnaire of screening activities. Participants were on average 47.3 years and had undergone testing a mean of 5.5 years prior. Eighty four (54%) tested positive for a LS mutation and 71 (46%) negative. For unaffected carriers, perceived lifetime risk of colorectal cancer was 68%, and surprisingly, 40% among those testing negative. Most individuals demonstrated normative levels of psychosocial functioning. However, 25% of those testing negative had moderate depressive symptoms, as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies for Depression Scale, and 31% elevated state anxiety on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Being female and a stronger escape - avoidant coping style were predictive of depressive symptoms. For state anxiety, similar patterns were observed. Quality of life and social support were significantly associated with lower anxiety. Carriers maintained higher knowledge compared to those testing negative, and were more engaged in screening. In summary, most individuals adapt to genetic test results over the long term and continue to engage in screening. A subgroup, including some non-carriers, may require added psychosocial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Esplen
- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; de Souza Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Underhill M, Berry D, Dalton E, Schienda J, Syngal S. Patient experiences living with pancreatic cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015. [PMID: 26029287 DOI: 10.1186/s13053 -015-0034-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer (PancCa) is recognized as a component of many well-described hereditary cancer syndromes. Minimal research has focused on patient needs and experiences living with this risk. PURPOSE To understand the meaning and experience of living with familial PancCa risk and to explore experiences related to screening and prevention of PancCa. METHODS Participants underwent semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Adults without PancCa and who met familial or hereditary risk criteria were eligible. Thematic analysis was completed on the transcripts in order to identify patterns, consistencies, and differences. Narrative review of existing literature related to women living with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk was completed to explore similarities and differences between published findings and our current findings. RESULTS Nineteen individuals (9 male, 10 female) participated. Major themes addressed participants' family experiences with PancCa and PancCa death and the associated grief from the experiences. Family experiences impacted how participants interpreted and approached their own cancer risk and participated in the cancer screening program. Participants wanted to control their cancer risk and sought information and resources to prevent PancCa or PancCa related death. Distress related to risk was not described as constant but occurred around salient time points. CONCLUSION & FUTURE IMPLICATIONS Study results begin to describe the lived experience of individuals with PancCa risk. Through this research we have uncovered important variables to further understand, measure, and intervene upon in future research. Distress related to risk was not described as ongoing, but occurred around specific and salient time points that brought risk to the forefront. Individuals with familial PancCa risk may have a unique experience compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes due to the high mortality of the disease and uncertainty related to prevention and early detection outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Emily Dalton
- Ambry Genetics, (previously Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Boston, MA USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Underhill M, Berry D, Dalton E, Schienda J, Syngal S. Patient experiences living with pancreatic cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015; 13:13. [PMID: 26029287 PMCID: PMC4449523 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-015-0034-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer (PancCa) is recognized as a component of many well-described hereditary cancer syndromes. Minimal research has focused on patient needs and experiences living with this risk. Purpose To understand the meaning and experience of living with familial PancCa risk and to explore experiences related to screening and prevention of PancCa. Methods Participants underwent semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Adults without PancCa and who met familial or hereditary risk criteria were eligible. Thematic analysis was completed on the transcripts in order to identify patterns, consistencies, and differences. Narrative review of existing literature related to women living with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk was completed to explore similarities and differences between published findings and our current findings. Results Nineteen individuals (9 male, 10 female) participated. Major themes addressed participants’ family experiences with PancCa and PancCa death and the associated grief from the experiences. Family experiences impacted how participants interpreted and approached their own cancer risk and participated in the cancer screening program. Participants wanted to control their cancer risk and sought information and resources to prevent PancCa or PancCa related death. Distress related to risk was not described as constant but occurred around salient time points. Conclusion & future implications Study results begin to describe the lived experience of individuals with PancCa risk. Through this research we have uncovered important variables to further understand, measure, and intervene upon in future research. Distress related to risk was not described as ongoing, but occurred around specific and salient time points that brought risk to the forefront. Individuals with familial PancCa risk may have a unique experience compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes due to the high mortality of the disease and uncertainty related to prevention and early detection outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Emily Dalton
- Ambry Genetics, (previously Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Boston, MA USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reflex testing for Lynch syndrome: if we build it, will they come? Lessons learned from the uptake of clinical genetics services by individuals with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). Fam Cancer 2015; 13:75-82. [PMID: 24002367 PMCID: PMC3927060 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this qualitative study was to examine the experience of individuals facing a choice about genetic counselling/testing in the context of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). Nineteen individuals with newly diagnosed CRC, including 12 individuals who accepted genetic counselling (“acceptors”) and 7 individuals who declined genetic counselling (“refusers”), were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire guide which focused on motivations and barriers experienced in the decision process. Data were analyzed using Karlsson’s Empirical Phenomenological method of data analysis (Karlsson in Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Almgvist and Wiksell International, Stockholm, 1993). Three major themes were identified: facing challenges in health literacy; mapping an unknown territory; and adjusting to cancer. The study participants’ testimonies provided novel insights into potential reasons for patient non-engagement in pilot studies of reflex testing for Lynch syndrome, and allowed us to formulate several recommendations for enhancing patient engagement. Our study findings suggest that patient engagement in clinical cancer genetics services, including reflex testing for Lynch syndrome, can only be achieved by addressing current health literacy issues, by deconstructing current misconceptions related to potential abuses of genetic information, by emphasizing the clinical utility of genetic assessment, and by adapting genetics practices to the specific context of cancer care.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hong J, Wei Z, Wang W. Preoperative psychological distress, coping and quality of life in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer. J Clin Nurs 2015; 24:2439-47. [PMID: 25930090 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of preoperative psychological distress and its relationship with coping style and quality of life in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer. BACKGROUND Being newly diagnosed with cancer can be a source of psychological distress. Understanding the preoperative psychological distress may contribute to the development of appropriate interventions. DESIGN This is a descriptive correlational survey study. METHODS The study was conducted in two teaching hospitals in Anhui province, China. A total of 165 patients with gastric cancer completed a battery of self-report questionnaires including the Distress Thermometer, the revised Chinese version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach 22 and the Cancer Coping Modes Questionnaire. RESULTS The prevalence of clinically significant preoperative psychological distress was 76·97% in this group. Statistically significant correlations were identified between the distress score and stomach pain, eating restrictions and anxiety subscale. Positive associations were found between the distress scores and four subdimensions of coping (avoidance and suppression, resignation, fantasy and catharsis), whereas a negative association was found between the distress scores and one subdimension of coping (Confrontation). There were also significant differences in the quality of life and coping style of patients who had different psychological distress statuses. CONCLUSION These findings indicate a relatively high prevalence of preoperative psychological distress among Chinese patients with gastric cancer. Patients with clinically psychological distress were more likely to have poor quality of life and to demonstrate negative coping styles. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Nursing professionals need to carefully assess the psychological status of patients with gastric cancer. Tailored interventions can be administered to help these patients appropriately cope with the disease and to enhance their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingfang Hong
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Zengzeng Wei
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Weili Wang
- School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.,Anhui Provincial Nursing International Research Center, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wolf SM, Branum R, Koenig BA, Petersen GM, Berry SA, Beskow LM, Daly MB, Fernandez CV, Green RC, LeRoy BS, Lindor NM, O'Rourke PP, Breitkopf CR, Rothstein MA, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS. Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:440-63. [PMID: 26479555 PMCID: PMC4617203 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Genomic research results and incidental findings with health implications for a research participant are of potential interest not only to the participant, but also to the participant's family. Yet investigators lack guidance on return of results to relatives, including after the participant's death. In this paper, a national working group offers consensus analysis and recommendations, including an ethical framework to guide investigators in managing this challenging issue, before and after the participant's death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; Professor of Medicine; Faculty member, Center for Bioethics; and Chair, Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She is one of three Principal Investigators on NIH/NCI/NHGRI grant 1-R01-CA154517 on return of genomic results to family members, including after the death of the proband
| | - Rebecca Branum
- Policy director at the Minnesota State College Student Association and previously served as a Research Associate at the University of Minnesota's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Currently, she co-directs a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research focused on translational genomics, co-leads an NCI/NHGRI R01 on return of results in genomic biobanks, and directs the ELSI component of a U19 award focused on newborn screening in an era of whole genome analysis
| | - Gloria M Petersen
- Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Health Sciences Research at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. She earned her Master's degree in Anthropology from University of Oregon, and Ph.D. in Anthropology from UCLA. She is a Founding Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
| | - Susan A Berry
- Professor of Pediatrics & Genetics and Division Director for Genetics and Metabolism in the Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota. She is a member of the Minnesota Department of Health Newborn Screening Advisory Committee, the Society for Inherited Metabolic Disease, and the American Society of Human Genetics, and is a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Medical Genetics
| | - Laura M Beskow
- Associate Professor at the Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, where her work focuses on ethics and policy issues in biomedical research - particularly human subjects issues in large-scale genomic and translational research. She holds a B.S. in nutrition from Iowa State University, an M.P.H. with a concentration in health law from Boston University, and a Ph.D. in health policy and administration from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Mary B Daly
- Medical oncologist and epidemiologist who chairs the Department of Clinical Genetics at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Her research focuses on defining the best methods of communicating hereditary cancer risk information and on providing risk management strategies and coping skills to family members dealing with an increased risk for cancer
| | - Conrad V Fernandez
- Professor and Head of the Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology in the Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University and is cross-appointed in Bioethics, Medicine, and Postgraduate Studies. He obtained his Hon. B.Sc. at the University of Western Ontario, his medical degree at McMaster University, specialist certification in Pediatrics as a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada at Dalhousie University, and completed specialty training in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology at the University of British Columbia
| | - Robert C Green
- Medical geneticist and physician-scientist who directs the G2P Research Program in translational genomics and health outcomes in the Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. He is also Associate Director for Research at Partners Personalized Medicine. Dr. Green leads and co-leads the MedSeq Project and the BabySeq Project respectively, two NIH-funded randomized trials designed to explore the medical, behavioral, and economic implications of integrating genome sequencing into the medical care of adults and newborns
| | - Bonnie S LeRoy
- Professor and Director of the Graduate Program in Genetic Counseling, University of Minnesota. The primary focus of her work is on preparing graduate students to enter the profession of genetic counseling. Her research examines the ethical and social challenges associated with the genetic counseling profession. Prof. LeRoy served as the President of the American Board of Genetic Counseling from 2001-03
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Professor of Medical Genetics in the Department of Health Sciences Research at Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona. She received her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota, her doctorate of medicine from Mayo Medical School in Rochester, Minnesota, and did her residencies at Bowman Gray School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and at Mayo Clinic in Rochester
| | - P Pearl O'Rourke
- Director of Human Research Affairs at Partners HealthCare in Boston, and Associate Professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. She received her B.A. from Yale University, and completed medical school at Dartmouth Medical School and the University of Minnesota Medical School
| | - Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
- Associate Professor of Health Services Research in the Department of Health Sciences Research at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. She earned her Master's and Doctoral degrees in Psychology from the State University of New York at Albany
| | - Mark A Rothstein
- Herbert F. Boehl Chair of Law & Medicine and Director of the Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy & Law, University of Louisville School of Medicine. From 1999-2008, he served as Chair of the Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality of the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, the statutory advisory committee to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on health information policy. He is past-President of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics and serves as Public Health Ethics editor for the American Journal of Public Health
| | - Brian Van Ness
- Professor of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development at the University of Minnesota. He earned his doctorate in Biochemistry from the University of Minnesota, completed a postdoctoral fellowship at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, and has served as the Department Head and Director of the Institute of Human Genetics at the University of Minnesota
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Director of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital; Professor and Chief of the Division of Bioethics; Professor, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics; and Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine. He is President of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors, Chair for the Clinical Research Ethics Consultation Working Group for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards program, and a member of the Bioethics and Legal Working Group of the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull? Proc Nutr Soc 2014; 74:171-6. [PMID: 25342299 DOI: 10.1017/s0029665114001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The notion of educating the public through generic healthy eating messages has pervaded dietary health promotion efforts over the years and continues to do so through various media, despite little evidence for any enduring impact upon eating behaviour. There is growing evidence, however, that tailored interventions such as those that could be delivered online can be effective in bringing about healthy dietary behaviour change. The present paper brings together evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies that have considered the public perspective of genomics, nutrigenomics and personalised nutrition, including those conducted as part of the EU-funded Food4Me project. Such studies have consistently indicated that although the public hold positive views about nutrigenomics and personalised nutrition, they have reservations about the service providers' ability to ensure the secure handling of health data. Technological innovation has driven the concept of personalised nutrition forward and now a further technological leap is required to ensure the privacy of online service delivery systems and to protect data gathered in the process of designing personalised nutrition therapies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Averyt JC, Nishimoto PW. Psychosocial issues in colorectal cancer survivorship: the top ten questions patients may not be asking. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5:395-400. [PMID: 25276412 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in colorectal cancer screening and treatment have increased survivorship significantly in recent years. This has led to an increased emphasis on the need for continuing patient care long after cancer treatment is completed. Colorectal cancer survivors may face a number of psychosocial issues following treatment, including cancer-related distress, adjustment to physical changes following treatment, and challenges related to returning to work. Although there are many resources available to assist with these challenges, many patients may not seek this information from their providers during follow-up care visits. This article highlights some of the most common patient concerns related to survivorship in colorectal cancer and serves as a reminder to ask about these concerns throughout the course of treatment and follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Averyt
- 1 Department of Behavioral Health, 2 Department of Oncology/Hematology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Patricia W Nishimoto
- 1 Department of Behavioral Health, 2 Department of Oncology/Hematology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Skinner S, Guimond C, Butler R, Dwosh E, Traboulsee AL, Sadovnick AD. An Assessment of Genetic Counseling Services for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:46-57. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9735-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 06/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
23
|
Batte BAL, Bruegl AS, Daniels MS, Ring KL, Dempsey KM, Djordjevic B, Luthra R, Fellman BM, Lu KH, Broaddus RR. Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134:319-25. [PMID: 24933100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Revised: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 06/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine factors impacting the uptake of genetic counseling and results of genetic testing following universal tumor testing for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS The study population consisted of two unselected cohorts of endometrial cancer patients, 408 identified retrospectively and 206 identified prospectively. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair protein expression and/or microsatellite instability analysis was performed on these tumors. MLH1 methylation analysis was performed on tumors with loss of MLH1 protein. Tumor studies were considered suggestive of Lynch Syndrome if they showed immunohistochemical loss of MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2, loss of MLH1 without MLH1 promoter methylation, and/or microsatellite instability. Participants with suggestive tumor studies were contacted and offered genetic counseling and testing. RESULTS In the retrospective cohort, 11% had tumor studies suggestive of Lynch syndrome, and 42% was seen for genetic counseling. A germline mutation was detected in 40%, and one had a variant of uncertain significance. In the prospective cohort, 8.7% of patients had tumor testing suggestive of Lynch syndrome; 72% were seen for genetic counseling. Germline mutations were found in 40%, and one had a variant of uncertain significance. Common challenges included timing of re-contact, age, perceived lack of relevance, inability to travel and limited insurance coverage. CONCLUSIONS There are several barriers to genetic counseling and testing follow-up after universal tumor testing, and uninformative genetic test results present a management challenge. It is important to consider these limitations when implementing an approach to screening endometrial cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany A L Batte
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda S Bruegl
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Molly S Daniels
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kari L Ring
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katherine M Dempsey
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bojana Djordjevic
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rajyalakshmi Luthra
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Influence of family history on psychosocial distress and perceived need for treatment in prostate cancer survivors. Fam Cancer 2014; 13:481-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9715-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
25
|
Motivation to pursue genetic testing in individuals with a personal or family history of cardiac events or sudden cardiac death. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:849-59. [PMID: 24664857 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9707-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing is becoming increasingly available for cardiac channelopathies, such as long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome, which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Test results can be used to shape an individual's medical management and to identify at-risk family members. In our qualitative study, all participants had a personal or family history of a diagnosed cardiac arrhythmia syndrome or sudden cardiac death. Open-ended interviews were conducted individually and in focus groups. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a qualitative grounded-theory approach. Of 50 participants, 37 described their motivations for pursuing genetic testing for long QT syndrome or another cardiac channelopathy. Participants' motivations included: to find an explanation for a family member's sudden death, to relieve uncertainty regarding a diagnosis, to guide future medical management, to allay concern about children or other family members, and to comply with recommendations of physicians or family members. Perceived reasons not to pursue genetic testing included denial, fear, and lack of information. The genetic counseling and informed consent process can be enhanced by understanding and addressing an individual's internal and external motivations either for or against pursuing genetic testing.
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
In the care of patients with Lynch Syndrome (LS), a range of psychosocial issues are encountered, which significantly affect patient outcomes. A brief historical background of 'psycho-onco-genetics' (the domain where psychology, oncology and genetics meet) in relation to LS is presented, followed by an overview of important psychosocial issues identified in the past 20 years. The identification of mismatch repair genes in 1993-1994 made possible genetic counseling and testing for patients who had cancer and for potentially high-risk relatives without cancer. At that time, concerns were raised about the potentially negative psychosocial impact of predictive genetic testing. Since 1993, a large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the possible psychosocial benefits and limitations of such testing. This article presents an overview of: the uptake of and motivations for genetic testing, its psychosocial impact (e.g. psychological adaptation, impact on risk perception and self-concept, and concerns about, and experiences of, genetic discrimination), psychological screening instruments, adherence to and decision-making about preventive strategies, family communication, lifestyle changes, reproductive technology utilization, and professional psychosocial support needs of members of families with LS. Finally, challenges for the future are discussed, including population screening and genomic testing.
Collapse
|
27
|
Quinlivan JA, Battikhi Z, Petersen RW. What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing? Front Oncol 2014; 3:325. [PMID: 24432248 PMCID: PMC3880931 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2013] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of human genome project has lead to genetic tests that identify high-risk states for certain cancers. Many are privately marketed on the Internet. Despite the availability of tests, limited data has evaluated factors that lead to test uptake. The aim of the present study was to explore the attitudes of a cohort of new mothers toward uptake of a genetic cancer test with a 50% predictive value of cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was undertaken. The project targeted women who had recently given birth at an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Women were asked about a theoretical blood test that detected an increased risk for the development of cancer. Attitudes and knowledge questionnaires were completed. RESULTS Of 232 consecutive women approached, 32 declined, giving a response rate of 86.2%. Only 63 (31.5%) women stated they would have the test. Absence of religious belief, higher level of education, better knowledge of terms used in genetics, an absence of concern over emotional, employment, and insurance discrimination, and previous acceptance of Down syndrome screening in pregnancy were each associated with significantly higher rate of test uptake in univariate analysis (all p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, a lack of concern over discrimination and a history of having accepted Down syndrome screening in the previous pregnancy remained significantly associated with test uptake (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Concern over discrimination and having made a prior decision to have genetic testing were the principal factors associated with decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A. Quinlivan
- North Metropolitan Health Service, Western Australian Department of Health, Perth, WA, Australia
- Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Zain Battikhi
- Institute of Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Rodney W. Petersen
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lautenbach DM, Christensen KD, Sparks JA, Green RC. Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013; 14:491-513. [PMID: 24003856 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Communicating genetic risk information in ways that maximize understanding and promote health is increasingly important given the rapidly expanding availability and capabilities of genomic technologies. A well-developed literature on risk communication in general provides guidance for best practices, including presentation of information in multiple formats, attention to framing effects, use of graphics, sensitivity to the way numbers are presented, parsimony of information, attentiveness to emotions, and interactivity as part of the communication process. Challenges to communicating genetic risk information include deciding how best to tailor it, streamlining the process, deciding what information to disclose, accepting that communications may have limited influence, and understanding the impact of context. Meeting these challenges has great potential for empowering individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles and improve public health, but will require multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration.
Collapse
|
29
|
Okayama M, Takeshima T, Ae R, Harada M, Kajii E. Primary care patient willingness for genetic testing for salt-sensitive hypertension: a cross sectional study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2013; 14:149. [PMID: 24103405 PMCID: PMC3851547 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The current research into single nucleotide polymorphisms has extended the role of genetic testing to the identification of increased risk for common medical conditions. Advances in genetic research may soon necessitate preparation for the role of genetic testing in primary care medicine. This study attempts to determine what proportion of patients would be willing to undergo genetic testing for salt-sensitive hypertension in a primary care setting, and what factors are related to this willingness. Methods A cross-sectional study using a self-report questionnaire was conducted among outpatients in primary care clinics and hospitals in Japan. The main characteristics measured were education level, family medical history, personal medical history, concern about hypertension, salt preference, reducing salt intake, and willingness to undergo genetic testing for salt-sensitive hypertension. Results Of 1,932 potential participants, 1,457 (75%) responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 726 (50%) indicated a willingness to undergo genetic testing. Factors related to this willingness were being over 50 years old (adjusted odds ratio [ad-OR] = 1.42, 95% Confidence interval = 1.09 – 1.85), having a high level of education (ad-OR: 1.83, 1.38 – 2.42), having a family history of hypertension (ad-OR: 1.36, 1.09 – 1.71), and worrying about hypertension (ad-OR: 2.06, 1.59 – 2.68). Conclusions Half of the primary care outpatients surveyed in this study wanted to know their genetic risk for salt-sensitive hypertension. Those who were worried about hypertension or had a family history of hypertension were more likely to be interested in getting tested. These findings suggest that primary care physicians should provide patients with advice on genetic testing, as well as address their anxieties and concerns related to developing hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanobu Okayama
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Yakushiji 3311-1, Shimotsuke-city, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eijzenga W, Hahn DEE, Aaronson NK, Kluijt I, Bleiker EMA. Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review. J Genet Couns 2013; 23:133-46. [PMID: 23996531 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9649-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 25% of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer experiences clinically relevant levels of distress, anxiety and/or depression. However, these general psychological outcomes that are used in many studies do not provide detailed information on the specific psychosocial problems experienced by counselees. The aim of this review was to investigate the specific psychosocial issues encountered by individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer, and to identify overarching themes across these issues. A literature search was performed, using four electronic databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL and Embase). Papers published between January 2000 and January 2013 were selected using combinations, and related indexing terms of the keywords: 'genetic counseling', 'psychology' and 'cancer'. In total, 25 articles met our inclusion criteria. We identified the specific issues addressed by these papers, and used meta-ethnography to identify the following six overarching themes: coping with cancer risk, practical issues, family issues, children-related issues, living with cancer, and emotions. A large overlap in the specific issues and themes was found between these studies, suggesting that research on specific psychosocial problems within genetic counseling has reached a point of saturation. As a next step, efforts should be made to detect and monitor these problems of counselees at an early stage within the genetic counseling process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Eijzenga
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bruwer Z, Futter M, Ramesar R. Communicating cancer risk within an African context: experiences, disclosure patterns and uptake rates following genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2013; 92:53-60. [PMID: 23453851 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2012] [Revised: 01/16/2013] [Accepted: 02/03/2013] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data pertaining to Lynch syndrome within a developing country are sparse. This study explored the emotional reaction to a mutation-positive test result among a group of individuals from South Africa. As genetic information is not only limited to the individual but extends to the biological family, communication patterns and uptake of testing among at-risk family members was also investigated. METHODS Eighty individuals participated in this qualitative interview study. RESULTS Eight emotional reactions were observed, of which two were of particular concern: (1) secrecy due to disbelief and (2) interpretation of a mutation-positive result as a cancer diagnosis. Disclosure rates of personal genetic test results were high to family members, but low to general healthcare providers. Disclosing the test result was not always followed by a discussion of implications of the genetic information or availability of predictive testing for at-risk family members. The uptake rate of predictive testing among the participants' siblings and children was 97% and 73.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION Awareness of concerning emotional reactions following the delivery of a genetic test result and insight into disclosure patterns, especially the information that is not communicated, will prove beneficial in improving the effectiveness of counselling and management in Lynch syndrome families. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Implementation of these findings into the PT programme will have a positive effect on the genetic counseling process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zandrè Bruwer
- MRC/UCT Human Genetics Research Unit, IIDMM Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lolkema MP, Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk CG, Bredenoord AL, Kapitein P, Roach N, Cuppen E, Knoers NV, Voest EE. Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:1842-8. [PMID: 23589552 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.2789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, an overwhelming number of genetic aberrations have been discovered and linked to the development of treatment for cancer. With the rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, it is expected that large-scale DNA analyses will increasingly be used to select patients for treatment with specific anticancer agents. Personalizing cancer treatment has many advantages, but sequencing germline DNA as reference material for interpreting cancer genetics may have consequences that extend beyond providing cancer care for an individual patient. In sequencing germline DNA, mutations may be encountered that are associated with increased susceptibility not only to hereditary cancer syndromes but also to other diseases; in those cases, disclosing germline data could be clinically relevant and even lifesaving. In the context of personal autonomy, it is necessary to develop an ethical and legal framework for how to deal with identified hereditary disease susceptibilities and how to return the data to patients and their families. Because clear legislation is lacking, we need to establish guidelines on disclosure of genetic information and, in the process, we need to balance privacy issues with the potential advantages and drawbacks of sharing genetic data with patients and their relatives. Importantly, a strong partnership with patients is critical for understanding how to maximize the translation of genetic information for the benefit of patients with cancer. This review discusses the ethical, legal, and counseling issues surrounding disclosure of genetic information generated by NGS to patients with cancer and their relatives. We also provide a framework for returning these genetic results by proposing a design for a qualified disclosure policy.
Collapse
|
33
|
Palmer CGS, Boudreault P, Baldwin EE, Fox M, Deignan JL, Kobayashi Y, Sininger Y, Grody W, Sinsheimer JS. Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults. J Genet Couns 2013; 22:492-507. [PMID: 23430402 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9573-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Limited data suggest that enhanced self-knowledge from genetic information related to non-medical traits can have a positive impact on psychological well-being. Deaf individuals undertake genetic testing for deaf genes to increase self-knowledge. Because deafness is considered a non-medical trait by many individuals, we hypothesized that deaf individuals receiving a genetic explanation for why they are deaf will experience increased psychological well-being. We report results from a prospective, longitudinal study to determine the impact of genetic testing (GJB2, Cx26; GJB6, Cx30) on perceived personal control (PPC), anxiety, and depression in deaf adults (N = 209) assessed following pre-test genetic counseling as well as 1-month and 6-months following test result disclosure. Participants were classified as Cx positive (n = 82) or Cx negative/inconclusive (n = 127). There was significant evidence for Cx group differences in PPC and anxiety over time (PPC: Cx group*time interaction p = 0.0007; anxiety: Cx group*time interaction p = 0.002), where PPC scores were significantly higher, and anxiety scores were significantly lower for the Cx positive group relative to the negative/inconclusive group following test result disclosure. Compared to pre-test, PPC scores increased at 1-month (p = 0.07) and anxiety scores decreased at 6-months (p = 0.03) for the Cx positive group. In contrast, PPC scores decreased (p = 0.009, p < 0.0001) and anxiety scores increased (p = 0.09, p = 0.02) for the Cx negative/inconclusive group at 1- and 6-months post test result disclosure. Genetic testing for deaf genes affects the psychological well-being of deaf individuals. Increasing deaf adults' access to genetic testing may potentially enhance self-knowledge and increase psychological well-being for those who receive a genetic explanation, which could offer downstream health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina G S Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California-Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Watkins KE, Way CY, Gregory DM, LeDrew HM, Ludlow VC, Esplen MJ, Dowden JJ, Cox JE, Fitzgerald GWN, Parfrey PS. Development and preliminary testing of the psychosocial adjustment to hereditary diseases scale. BMC Psychol 2013; 1:7. [PMID: 25566359 PMCID: PMC4270033 DOI: 10.1186/2050-7283-1-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of Lynch syndrome (LS) can bring a lifetime of uncertainty to an entire family as members adjust to living with a high lifetime cancer risk. The research base on how individuals and families adjust to genetic-linked diseases following predictive genetic testing has increased our understanding of short-term impacts but gaps continue to exist in knowledge of important factors that facilitate or impede long-term adjustment. The failure of existing scales to detect psychosocial adjustment challenges in this population has led researchers to question the adequate sensitivity of these instruments. Furthermore, we have limited insight into the role of the family in promoting adjustment. Methods The purpose of this study was to develop and initially validate the Psychosocial Adjustment to Hereditary Diseases (PAHD) scale. This scale consists of two subscales, the Burden of Knowing (BK) and Family Connectedness (FC). Items for the two subscales were generated from a qualitative data base and tested in a sample of 243 participants from families with LS. Results The Multitrait/Multi-Item Analysis Program-Revised (MAP-R) was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PAHD. The findings support the convergent and discriminant validity of the subscales. Construct validity was confirmed by factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha supported a strong internal consistency for BK (0.83) and FC (0.84). Conclusion Preliminary testing suggests that the PAHD is a psychometrically sound scale capable of assessing psychosocial adjustment. We conclude that the PAHD may be a valuable monitoring tool to identify individuals and families who may require therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy E Watkins
- Centre for Nursing Studies, Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority, St. John's, NL Canada ; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL Canada
| | - Christine Y Way
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL Canada ; School of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
| | - Deborah M Gregory
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL Canada ; Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority, St. John's, NL Canada
| | - Holly M LeDrew
- Western Regional School of Nursing, Western Regional Integrated Health Authority, Corner Brook, NL Canada
| | - Valerie C Ludlow
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL Canada
| | - Mary Jane Esplen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Jeffrey J Dowden
- Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information, St. John's, NL Canada
| | - Janet E Cox
- Division of Surgery, Charles S. Curtis Memorial Hospital, St. Anthony, NL Canada
| | | | - Patrick S Parfrey
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cragun D, Malo TL, Pal T, Shibata D, Vadaparampil ST. Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012; 16:493-9. [PMID: 22224634 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Benefits of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), will be realized only if patients are interested in genetic counseling and testing. This study explores interest in genetic testing for hereditary CRC among CRC patients who have never received genetic counseling or testing. METHODS Using results from a cross-sectional survey of CRC patients (n=91) at varying categories of risk for hereditary CRC, bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to compare positive and negative attitudinal beliefs regarding genetic testing, risk perceptions, demographics, and tumor stage of those who were interested in genetic testing (n=61) and those who were not interested or were not sure (n=30). RESULTS Although significant at the bivariate level, gender, perceived relative risk of hereditary cancer, employment status, and belief that genetic testing would help in preparing for the future were not significantly related to interest in genetic testing when controlling for all other variables in a logistic regression model. The two factors that remained significant include a single-item question measuring the belief that genetic testing is warranted based on personal/family history and a positive attitudinal scale regarding the utility of genetic testing in medical decision making and cancer prevention. CONCLUSION Results have potential implications for policies regarding universal tumor screening for LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Roberts JS, Christensen KD, Green RC. Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics. Clin Genet 2011; 80:407-14. [PMID: 21696382 PMCID: PMC3191239 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01739.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Susceptibility testing for common, complex adult-onset diseases is projected to become more commonplace as the rapid pace of genomic discoveries continues, and evidence regarding the potential benefits and harms of such testing is needed to inform medical practice and health policy. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) testing for risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) provides a paradigm in which to examine the process and impact of disclosing genetic susceptibility for a prevalent, severe and incurable neurological condition. This review summarizes findings from a series of multi-site randomized clinical trials examining psychological and behavioral responses to various methods of genetic risk assessment for AD using APOE disclosure. We discuss challenges involved in disease risk estimation and communication and the extent to which participants comprehend and perceive utility in their genetic risk information. Findings on the psychological impact of test results are presented (e.g. distress), along with data on participants' health behavior and insurance purchasing responses (e.g. long-term care). Finally, we report comparisons of the safety and efficacy of intensive genetic counseling approaches to briefer models that emphasize streamlined processes and educational materials. The implications of these findings for the emerging field of personal genomics are discussed, with directions identified for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Roberts
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic testing of minors is controversial, as ethical considerations depend on multiple aspects of the particular disease and familial context. For melanoma, there is a well-established and avoidable environmental influence and a documented benefit of early detection. METHODS We surveyed 61 CDKN2A/p16 mutation-tested adults from two kindreds about their attitudes toward genetic testing of minors immediately posttesting and 2 years later. RESULTS Overall, 86.9% expressed support of melanoma genetic testing of minors, with the importance of risk awareness (77.4%) and the likelihood of improved prevention and screening behaviors (69.8%) as the most frequently cited potential benefits. Among mutation carriers, 82.6% wanted genetic testing for their own children. These preferences remained stable over a 2-year period. Most respondents (62.3%) favored complete involvement of their children in genetic counseling and test reporting; 19.7% suggested that children be tested but not informed of the results. Concerns about inducing psychological distress or compromising children's decision autonomy were infrequently cited. Testing preferences did not vary by respondent age, gender, or melanoma history. CONCLUSION Respondents strongly supported melanoma genetic testing of minors, with most citing improved health behavior as a likely outcome. We discuss options for melanoma genetic counseling and testing of minors.
Collapse
|
38
|
Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:1213-7. [PMID: 21731059 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The promise of personalized medicine depends on the ability to integrate genetic sequencing information into disease risk assessment for individuals. As genomic sequencing technology enters the realm of clinical care, its scale necessitates answers to key social and behavioral research questions about the complexities of understanding, communicating, and ultimately using sequence information to improve health. Our study captured the motivations and expectations of research participants who consented to participate in a research protocol, ClinSeq, which offers to return a subset of the data generated through high-throughput sequencing. We present findings from an exploratory study of 322 participants, most of whom identified themselves as white, non-Hispanic, and coming from higher socio-economic groups. Participants aged 45-65 years answered open-ended questions about the reasons they consented to ClinSeq and about what they anticipated would come of genomic sequencing. Two main reasons for participating were as follows: a conviction to altruism in promoting research, and a desire to learn more about genetic factors that contribute to one's own health risk. Overall, participants expected genomic research to help improve understanding of disease causes and treatments. Our findings offer a first glimpse into the motivations and expectations of individuals seeking their own genomic information, and provide initial insights into the value these early adopters of technology place on information generated by high-throughput sequencing studies.
Collapse
|
39
|
Landsbergen KM, Prins JB, Brunner HG, Hoogerbrugge N. Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress. Fam Cancer 2011; 10:51-7. [PMID: 20853153 PMCID: PMC3036824 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9387-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Current diagnostic practices have shortened the interval between colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and genetic analysis for Lynch syndrome by MSI-testing. We studied the relation of time between MSI-testing since CRC diagnosis (MSI-CRC interval) and psychological distress. We performed a cross-sectional study in 89 patients who had previously been treated for CRC. Data were collected during MSI-testing after genetic counseling. Psychological distress was measured with the IES, the SCL-90 and the POMS; social issues with the ISS, ISB and the ODHCF. The median time of MSI-CRC interval was 24 months (range 0-332), with 23% of the patients diagnosed less than 12 months and 42% more than 36 months prior to MSI-testing. In 34% of the patients cancer specific distress was high (IES scores >26). Mean psychopathology (SCL-90) scores were low, mean mood states (POMS) scores were moderate. Interval MSI-CRC was not related to psychological distress. High cancer specific distress was reported by 24% of patients diagnosed with CRC less than 12 months ago versus 39 and 35% by those diagnosed between 12 and 36 months and more than 36 months ago respectively. Distress was positively related to female gender (P = 0.04), religiousness (P = 0.01), low social support (P = 0.02) and difficulties with family communication (P < 0.001). Shortened time interval between CRC diagnosis and MSI-testing is not associated with higher psychological distress. Females, religious persons, those having low social support and those reporting difficulties communicating hereditary colorectal cancer with relatives are at higher risk for psychological distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Landsbergen
- Department of Human Genetics, Raboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Distress and psychosocial needs of a heterogeneous high risk familial cancer population. J Genet Couns 2011; 20:249-69. [PMID: 21509653 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9344-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2009] [Accepted: 12/20/2010] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In order to assess the levels of distress and psychosocial support needs of a high risk population, we undertook a study to look at both the objective and subjective levels of distress and the wants and needs of individuals from a high familial cancer risk population. Three hundred and eighteen individuals (160 affected, 158 unaffected) completed several distress and psychosocial needs questionnaires (including the Brief Symptom Inventory-18). Sixty key informants were also surveyed about their perspective on the support needs of this population. In the largely female (90%), largely HBOC syndrome group (approximately 90%), 20% had significant levels of generalized distress, with no significant differences between affected and unaffected individuals. Generalized distress was also not significantly different as a function of mutation status. Individuals who received inconclusive test results, however, were more likely to indicate somatic symptoms of distress. Those individuals who did not have social support were more likely to be those who had never had cancer and who either had a mutation, received inconclusive test results, or were not tested. Key informants were most likely to indicate that patients need more support. These results provide evidence for the importance of establishing regular psychosocial distress screening, including a focus on somatic symptoms, in such high risk populations.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hilgart J, Phelps C, Bennett P, Hood K, Brain K, Murray A. "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. Fam Cancer 2010; 9:469-77. [PMID: 20119651 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9324-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
It is well-recognised that receipt of cancer genetic risk information can evoke a mix of both positive and negative emotional responses. Objective risk itself is not necessarily predictive of emotional response to receipt of risk information and the Cue Adaptive Reasoning Account (CARA; Renner, 2004) suggests that that the degree to which level of risk is consistent with expectations may influence emotional responses. This paper reports a thematic analysis of the free-text data structured around responses to the three risk labels: average, moderate or high. Data is reported from both 123 women and 15 men, including those with a past or current cancer diagnosis. Reactions to risk information appear to be dependent upon participants' pre-conceived expectations about their level of cancer risk. Many average risk respondents questioned the accuracy of their result, whereas high risk information was often expected. Findings are discussed in relation to the CARA model and clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hilgart
- Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, Wales, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Theory, measurement, and controversy in positive psychology, health psychology, and cancer: basics and next steps. Ann Behav Med 2010; 39:43-7. [PMID: 20393819 DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9171-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of this commentary are two-fold: First, to amplify some of the points that Aspinwall, Tedeschi, Coyne, Tennen, and Ranchor have raised, noting the importance of a return to basics. Second, to posit next steps in theory development and methods at the intersection of health psychology, positive psychology, and cancer. Additional theory development, more applications of large prospective studies, and instrument refinements are warranted to understand the effects of positive constructs on health outcomes and adaptation to cancer. This area of research would be strengthened by studies that incorporate survival, health-related quality of life, and well-being outcome measures, using cancer registries and/or multiple raters. More observational studies are necessary. Attention to social justice questions is suggested in future studies at the intersection of these fields.
Collapse
|
43
|
Aronson M. Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Issues. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2009; 18:669-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2009.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
44
|
Landsbergen KM, Prins JB, Brunner HG, Kraaimaat FW, Hoogerbrugge N. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact. Fam Cancer 2009; 8:325-37. [PMID: 19330464 PMCID: PMC2771129 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9239-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2008] [Accepted: 03/14/2009] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
An increasing number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receive genetic counselling within 1 year after diagnosis. Little is known whether specific subgroups are more vulnerable for genetic testing related distress. A literature review was conducted to identify the psychological impact of CRC in the first year, and the additional impact of genetic testing. The electronic databases of PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify all reports published between January 1997 and October 2007 on the psychological impact of (1) CRC-diagnosis up to 1 year after treatment and of (2) genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in patients with CRC. Studies on the psychological impact of genetic testing in newly diagnosed patient with CRC were not available. Either CRC patients diagnosed several years ago were studied and the focus was also often on the psychological impact of genetic testing prior to DNA-test disclosure. They show that limitations in emotional and social functioning can persist up to 1 year after CRC treatment, especially in those with a stoma or diagnosed before age 60. Female patients and male patients diagnosed before age 50 appear to be more vulnerable to genetic test-related distress. It is well known that being treated for CRC has great impact on psychological functioning. Little is known about the psychological impact during the first year after diagnosis and very little is known about the additional psychological effect of genetic testing for hereditary cancer in this period. We found presumptive evidence that specific subgroups of patients with CRC are more vulnerable for genetic-testing-related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin M Landsbergen
- Department of Human Genetics, Raboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ramsey S, Blough D, McDermott C, Clarke L, Bennett R, Burke W, Newcomb P. Will knowledge of gene-based colorectal cancer disease risk influence quality of life and screening behavior? Findings from a population-based study. Public Health Genomics 2009; 13:1-12. [PMID: 20160979 DOI: 10.1159/000206346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2008] [Accepted: 12/17/2008] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several gene variants conveying a modestly increased risk for disease have been described for colorectal cancer. Patient acceptance of gene variant testing in clinical practice is not known. We evaluated the potential impact of hypothetical colorectal-cancer-associated gene variant testing on quality of life, health habits and cancer screening behavior. METHODS First-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients and controls from the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Familial Registry were invited to participate in a web-based survey regarding testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk. RESULTS 310 relatives and 170 controls completed the questionnaire. Quality of life for the hypothetical carrier state was modestly and nonsignificantly lower than current health after adjustment for sociodemographic and health factors. In the positive test scenario, 30% of respondents expressed willingness to change their diet, 25% to increase exercise, and 43% to start colorectal cancer screening. The proportions willing to modify these habits did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Testing for gene variants associated with colorectal cancer risk may not influence quality of life, but may impact health habits and screening adherence. Changing behaviors as a result of testing may help to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, particularly among those at higher risk for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Ramsey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 98109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With rapid advances in genetic testing for disease susceptibility, behavioral medicine faces significant challenges in identifying likely patterns of use, how individuals interpret test results, and psychosocial and health impacts of testing. We review recent research on these psychosocial aspects of genetic testing for disease risk. RECENT FINDINGS Individuals exhibit limited sensitivity in their perceptions of genetic risk information, and mental representations of disease risk appear to guide testing perceptions and behavioral responses. Motivations to undergo testing are complex, and efforts to develop decision aids are underway. Findings on psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing vary markedly, with some evidence of minimal or positive effects and other evidence indicating negative consequences that may be undetectable using common measures of general well being. Recent evidence suggests that genetic risk information can motivate health behavior change. Research demonstrates wide-ranging influences of testing on family dynamics, and use of genetic testing with children is of increasing concern. SUMMARY More research is needed to determine how to structure health communications and counseling to motivate informed use, promote positive responses, and optimize behavior change. Given the ramifications of genetic information for families, personalized genomics will demand a shift toward a family-based healthcare model.
Collapse
|
47
|
Bjorvatn C, Eide GE, Hanestad BR, Hamang A, Havik OE. Intrusion and avoidance in subjects undergoing genetic investigation and counseling for hereditary cancer. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17:1371-81. [PMID: 19224252 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0594-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2008] [Accepted: 01/27/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
GOALS OF WORK Genetic counseling for hereditary cancer is expected to involve a growing number of individuals in the near future since an increasing number of genetic tests are offered. This study was designed to identify psychosocial variables predicting distress after genetic investigation and genetic counseling (GC) in order to develop new counseling strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective multi-site study was undertaken on 214 patients undergoing GC for hereditary cancer to explore the relationships between socio-demographic variables, medical variables, social support, self-efficacy, physical functioning, satisfaction with GC, the level of worry after GC, results of genetic testing, and the course and outcomes of distress. Distress was measured with the Impact of Event Scale, which includes subscales of intrusion and avoidance. Patients completed questionnaires mailed to them before and after GC. MAIN RESULTS The mean level of intrusion and avoidance was moderate, even though one quarter of participants reported a severe level of intrusion at baseline. Subjects with a low level of self-efficacy at baseline and high level of worry immediately after GC seemed to be vulnerable to both intrusion and avoidance. Lower level of intrusion was also associated with having a first-degree relative with cancer, while a lower avoidance level was associated with a higher level of education, having cancer, more social support, and higher satisfaction with GC. CONCLUSIONS In this study, subjects who had lower level of self-efficacy at baseline and a high level of worry immediately after GC seemed to be vulnerable to both intrusion and avoidance in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Bjorvatn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, 5018 Bergen, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Keller M, Jost R, Haunstetter CM, Sattel H, Schroeter C, Bertsch U, Cremer F, Kienle P, Tariverdian M, Kloor M, Gebert J, Brechtel A. Psychosocial outcome following genetic risk counselling for familial colorectal cancer. A comparison of affected patients and family members. Clin Genet 2008; 74:414-24. [PMID: 18954412 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01089.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have reported prospective data on psychosocial outcomes after genetic counselling in families with suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). This prospective study examines the impact of multidisciplinary risk counselling on the psychosocial outcome of 139 affected cancer patients and 233 family members without cancer at risk for HNPCC. Participants completed questionnaires specific to HNPCC before and 8 weeks after attending the familial cancer clinic. Affected patients' levels of distress were closely related to their health status and exceeded that of unaffected individuals, as did worry regarding their relatives' risk. A significant reduction in general anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), distress specific to familial CRC (Impact of Events Scale) and general cancer worry (Distress Hereditary Disorder) was demonstrated after counselling in both affected patients and unaffected individuals. Reduction in distress was more pronounced in affected patients given a high risk of HNPCC compared with those at intermediate risk. Among unaffected individuals, distress declined regardless of what clinical risk they were assigned. Their perceptions of risk and cancer-related threat declined, while confidence in effective surveillance increased. These results suggest the beneficial effects of multidisciplinary counselling even when high-risk information is conveyed. A patient's previous cancer experience is likely to contribute to clinically relevant distress (15% of those patients), indicating the need for appropriate counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Keller
- Division of Psychooncology, Department for Psychosomatic and General Clinical Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ceballos RM, Newcomb PA, Beasley JM, Peterson S, Templeton A, Hunt JR. Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 12:415-20. [PMID: 18752450 DOI: 10.1089/gte.2008.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent developments in genetic testing allow us to detect individuals with inherited susceptibility to some cancers. Genetic testing to identify carriers of cancer-related mutations may help lower risk by encouraging preventive behaviors and surveillance. This study assessed willingness of colon cancer cases and relatives to receive genetic information that may indicate an increased risk for cancer, to whom they would disclose genetic information, and whether receiving genetic test results may influence future prevention behaviors among individuals enrolled in the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry. METHODS Incident invasive colorectal cancer cases were identified from the Puget Sound Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. In 2007, a sequential sample of cases and relatives (n = 147) were asked to respond to a questionnaire addressing study aims. The questionnaire was administered during a baseline or 5-year follow-up interview. RESULTS Patterns of response to each statement were similar between colorectal cancer cases and relatives. Both colorectal cases (95%) and relatives (95%) reported willingness to receive genetic information. Nearly all participants would tell their doctor the results of a genetic test (99% of cases; 98% of relatives), and all married participants would tell their spouses. Cases (96%) anticipated being slightly more likely than relatives (90%) to change their cancer screening behavior, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS A high percentage of both colorectal cancer cases and relatives sampled from the Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry are interested in identifying their genetic status, discussing their genetic status with their family and doctor, and adopting behavioral changes that may reduce cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Ceballos
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|