Heart transplant recipient clinical profile improvement following mycophenolate mofetil late incorporation into the treatment schedule

Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options

Renal dysfunction after heart transplantation is a frequently observed complication, in some cases resulting in significant limitation of quality of life and reduced survival. Since the pathophysiology of renal failure (RF) is multifactorial, the current etiologic paradigm for chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation relies on the concept of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity acting on a predisposed recipient. Until recently, the management of RF has been restricted to the minimization of CNI dosage and general avoidance of classic nephrotoxic risk factors, with somewhat limited success. The recent introduction of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) (sirolimus and everolimus), a new class of immunosuppressive drugs lacking intrinsic nephrotoxicity, has provided a completely new alternative in this clinical setting. As clinical experience with these new drugs increases, new renal-sparing strategies are becoming available. PSIs can be used in combination with reduced doses of CNIs and even in complete CNI-free protocols. Different strategies have been devised, including de novo use to avoid acute renal toxicity in high-risk patients immediately after transplantation, or more delayed introduction in those patients developing chronic RF after prolonged CNI exposure. In this review, the main information on the clinical relevance and pathophysiology of RF after heart transplantation, as well as the currently available experience with renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens, particularly focused on the use of PSIs, is reviewed and summarized, including the key practical points for their appropriate clinical usage.

Impact of different long-term maintenance immunosuppressive therapy strategies on patients' outcome after heart transplantation

The introduction of cyclosporine in the early 1980s meant a decisive improvement in post-transplant outcomes for all solid-organ transplants and, in particular, it allowed heart transplantation to emerge as a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage cardiac failure. Many factors, including recipient and donor selection, organ preservation and the technical aspects of the transplant itself, influence post-operative outcomes following heart transplantation but the continued need to treat the recipient's immune response plays a key role in determining long-term outcomes. Thereby interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in different combinations play an important role in patients' outcome. After more than two decades, significant controversy still exists as to the best immunosuppressive regimen for long-term maintenance. During the 1990s and 2000s, newer immunosuppressive medications, specifically, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, everolimus and the IL-2 receptor blockers (daclizumab and basiliximab), were introduced that allow the clinician several options to try to minimize side effects and maximize the desired therapeutic effects. The side effects involve direct organ toxicity (e.g. renal and hepatic dysfunction), metabolic disturbances, (e.g. diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension), neurotoxicity, and several other significant adverse events, such as cholestasis and myelosuppression. Newer immunosuppressive drugs can impair wound healing, induce lung toxicity and produce various cytopenic states. Steroids continue to plague patients with their well-known side effects. This article reviews the current data on the benefits and risks of the various therapeutic regimens available, which are analyzed under three main themes: calcineurin inhibitor based therapies, calcineurin minimization protocols and calcineurin free regimens.