Indications of immunological tolerance in kidney transplantation

B Cell-mediated Immune Regulation and the Quest for Transplantation Tolerance

Pathophysiologic function of B cells in graft rejection has been well recognized in transplantation. B cells promote alloantigen-specific T-cell response and secrete antibodies that can cause antibody-mediated graft failures and rejections. Therefore, strategies targeting B cells, for example, B-cell depletion, have been used for the prevention of both acute and chronic rejections. Interestingly, however, recent mounting evidence indicates that subsets of B cells yet to be further identified can display potent immune regulatory functions, and they contribute to transplantation tolerance and operational tolerance in both experimental and clinical settings, respectively. In this review, we integrate currently available information on B-cell subsets, including T-cell Ig domain and mucin domain 1-positive transitional and T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain-positive memory B cells, displaying immune regulatory functions, with a focus on transplantation tolerance, by analyzing their mechanisms of action. In addition, we will discuss potential T-cell Ig domain and mucin domain 1-positive and T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain-positive B cell-based strategies for the enhancement of operational tolerance in transplantation patients.

Clinical Operational Tolerance and Immunosuppression Minimization in Kidney Transplantation: Where Do We Stand?

BACKGROUND

The 20th century represents a breakthrough in the transplantation era, since the first kidney transplantation between identical twins was performed. This was the first case of tolerance, since the recipient did not need immunosuppression. However, as transplantation became possible, an immunosuppression-free status became the ultimate goal, since the first tolerance case was a clear exception from the hard reality nowadays represented by rejection.

METHODS

A plethora of studies was described over the past decades to understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for rejection. This review focuses on the most relevant studies found in the literature where renal tolerance cases are claimed. Contrasting, and at the same time, encouraging outcomes are herein discussed and a glimpse on the main renal biomarkers analyzed in this field is provided.

RESULTS

The activation of the immune system has been shown to play a central role in organ failure, but also it seems to induce a tolerance status when an allograft is performed, despite tolerance is still rare to register. Although there are still overwhelming challenges to overcome and various immune pathways remain arcane; the immunosuppression minimization might be more attainable than previously believed.

CONCLUSION

. Multiple biomarkers and tolerance mechanisms suspected to be involved in renal transplantation have been investigated to understand their real role, with still no clear answers on the topic. Thus, the actual knowledge provided necessarily leads to more in-depth investigations, although many questions in the past have been answered, there are still many issues on renal tolerance that need to be addressed.

Operational tolerance in kidney transplantation and associated biomarkers

In the 1960s, our predecessors won a historical battle against acute rejection and ensured that transplantation became a common life-saving treatment. In parallel with this success, or perhaps because of it, we lost the battle for long-lived transplants, being overwhelmed with chronic immune insults and the toxicities of immunosuppression. It is likely that current powerful treatments block acute rejection, but at the same time condemn the few circulating donor cells that would have been able to elicit immunoregulatory host responses towards the allograft. Under these conditions, spontaneously tolerant kidney recipients - i.e. patients who maintain allograft function in the absence of immunosuppression - are merely accidents; they are scarce, mysterious and precious. Several teams pursue the goal of finding a biomarker that would guide us towards the 'just right' level of immunosuppression that avoids rejection while leaving some space for donor immune cells. Some cellular assays are attractive because they are antigen-specific, and provide a comprehensive view of immune responses toward the graft. These seem to closely follow patient regulatory capacities. However, these tests are cumbersome, and require abundant cellular material from both donor and recipient. The latest newcomers, non-antigen-specific recipient blood transcriptomic biomarkers, offer the promise that a practicable and simple signature may be found that overcomes the complexity of a system in which an infinite number of individual cell combinations can lead possibly to graft acceptance. Biomarker studies are as much an objective - identifying tolerant patients, enabling tolerance trials - as a means to deciphering the underlying mechanisms of one of the most important current issues in transplantation.

Obtaining regulatory T cells from uraemic patients awaiting kidney transplantation for use in clinical trials

Adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (T(regs)) has been proposed for use as a cellular therapy to induce transplantation tolerance. Preclinical data are encouraging, and clinical trials with T(reg) therapy are anticipated. In this study, we investigate different strategies for the isolation and expansion of CD4(+) CD25(high) CD127(low) T(regs) from uraemic patients. We use allogeneic dendritic cells (DCs) as feeder cells for the expansion and compare T(reg) preparations isolated by either fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) or magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) that have been expanded subsequently with either mature or tolerogenic DCs. Expanded T(reg) preparations have been characterized by their purity, cytokine production and in-vitro suppressive ability. The results show that T(reg) preparations can be isolated from uraemic patients by both FACS and MACS. Also, the type of feeder cells used in the expansion affects both the purity and the functional properties of the T(reg) preparations. In particular, FACS-sorted T(reg) preparations expanded with mature DCs secrete more interleukin (IL)-10 and granzyme B than FACS-sorted T(reg) preparations expanded with tolerogenic DCs. This is a direct comparison between different isolation techniques and expansion protocols with T(regs) from uraemic patients that may guide future efforts to produce clinical-grade T(regs) for use in kidney transplantation.

Finding the right time for weaning off immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) requires lifelong immunosuppression (IS) to prevent rejection and graft loss. The currently adopted immunosuppressive protocols are numerous and are based on the administration of at least two molecules with diverse mechanisms of action. Owing to the fact that the majority of immunosuppressants act non-selectively, the immune system is normally oversuppressed, and as a result is less able to both defend the host against infection and to control the spread of malignant cells. Consequently, long-term IS is burdened by chronic toxicity, which may be highly invalidating and may significantly influence patient's quality of life, compliance to treatment, overall success rate, and patient and graft survival. In an ideal scenario, SOT recipients should initially receive just enough IS to favor the onset of clinical operational tolerance (COT), a condition where the immune system of the host does not attack the graft in the absence of any immunosuppressant. COT has been documented after liver transplantation (LT) and renal transplantation (RT). First, COT was accidentally detected in patients who were nonadherent to treatment and who spontaneously decided to stop all IS without any medical guidance or surveillance. Later, it was described in recipients who required IS withdrawal following the occurrence of malignant diseases. Based on strikingly convincing experimental data, several tolerogenic protocols have recently been applied in patients but overall the results have been disappointing. The current literature demonstrates that COT can be safely achieved in stable LT recipients, with completely different strategies. Importantly, the onset of an episode of acute rejection during the attempt of IS withdrawal would not worsen the clinical outcome. On the contrary, COT remains a major challenge after RT because the onset of acute rejection will substantiate in graft loss. Currently, a major field of investigation aims to define markers of COT, which will allow the selection of individuals who are more prone to develop COT. Preliminary results in both RT and LT have just been announced; however, these markers will require validation in prospective studies.

Clinical operational tolerance after renal transplantation: current status and future challenges

In solid organ transplantation, the achievement of an immunosuppression (IS)-free state [also referred to as clinical operational tolerance (COT)] represents the ultimate goal. Although COT is feasible and safe in selected cases after liver transplantation, it is an exceptional finding after other types of solid organ transplantation. In the field of renal transplantation (RT), approximately 100 cases of COT have been reported to date, mainly in patients who were not compliant with their immunosuppressive regimens or in individuals who had previously received a bone marrow transplant for hematological disorders. On the basis of promising results obtained in animal models, several tolerogenic protocols have been attempted in humans, but most have failed to achieve robust and stable COT after RT. Molecule-based regimens have been largely ineffective, whereas cell-based regimens have provided some encouraging results. In these latter regimens, apart from standard IS, patients usually receive perioperative infusion of donor bone marrow-derived stem cells, which are able to interact with the immune cells of the host and mitigate their response to engraftment. Unfortunately, most renal transplant patients who developed acute rejection-occurring either during the weaning protocol or after complete withdrawal of IS-eventually lost their grafts. Currently, the immune monitoring necessary for predicting the presence and persistence of donor-specific unresponsiveness is not available. Overall, the present review will provide a conceptual framework for COT and conclude that stable and robust COT after RT remains an elusive goal and that the different strategies attempted to date are not yet reproducibly safe or effective.

Development of a cross-platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans

Identifying transplant recipients in whom immunological tolerance is established or is developing would allow an individually tailored approach to their posttransplantation management. In this study, we aimed to develop reliable and reproducible in vitro assays capable of detecting tolerance in renal transplant recipients. Several biomarkers and bioassays were screened on a training set that included 11 operationally tolerant renal transplant recipients, recipient groups following different immunosuppressive regimes, recipients undergoing chronic rejection, and healthy controls. Highly predictive assays were repeated on an independent test set that included 24 tolerant renal transplant recipients. Tolerant patients displayed an expansion of peripheral blood B and NK lymphocytes, fewer activated CD4+ T cells, a lack of donor-specific antibodies, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness of CD4+ T cells, and a high ratio of forkhead box P3 to alpha-1,2-mannosidase gene expression. Microarray analysis further revealed in tolerant recipients a bias toward differential expression of B cell-related genes and their associated molecular pathways. By combining these indices of tolerance as a cross-platform biomarker signature, we were able to identify tolerant recipients in both the training set and the test set. This study provides an immunological profile of the tolerant state that, with further validation, should inform and shape drug-weaning protocols in renal transplant recipients.

Monitoring of human liver and kidney allograft tolerance: a tissue/histopathology perspective

Several factors acting together have recently enabled clinicians to seriously consider whether chronic immunosuppression is needed in all solid organ allograft recipients. This has prompted a dozen or so centers throughout the world to prospectively wean immunosuppression from conventionally treated liver allograft recipients. The goal is to lessen the impact of chronic immunosuppression and empirically identify occasional recipients who show operational tolerance, defined as gross phenotype of tolerance in the presence of an immune response and/or immune deficit that has little or no significant clinical impact. Rare operationally tolerant kidney allograft recipients have also been identified, usually by single case reports, but only a couple of prospective weaning trials in conventionally treated kidney allograft recipients have been attempted and reported. Pre- and postweaning allograft biopsy monitoring of recipients adds a critical dimension to these trials, not only for patient safety but also for determining whether events in the allografts can contribute to a mechanistic understanding of allograft acceptance. The following is based on a literature review and personal experience regarding the practical and scientific aspects of biopsy monitoring of potential or actual operationally tolerant human liver and kidney allograft recipients where the goal, intended or attained, was complete withdrawal of immunosuppression.

Spontaneous operational tolerance after immunosuppressive drug withdrawal in clinical renal allotransplantation

Tolerance is the so-called "Holy Grail" of transplantation, but achieving this state is proving a major challenge, particularly in the clinical setting. Even in rodents, the definition of true transplant tolerance is not applicable to many models, with late graft damage often occurring despite long-term graft survival. Hence the term "operational tolerance," based more on graft function and absence of exogenous immunosuppression, is being adopted. Although the most sought-after goal in this field is to intentionally induce this state in a controlled manner, translating protocols across species from rodents to the clinic, the current literature demonstrates that this is proving a formidable task. A complementary approach is to address transplant tolerance from a different angle, by studying tolerance-like phenomena that occur "unintentionally" in transplant patients after immunosuppressive drug weaning. Such spontaneous operational tolerance, which can take place after years of immunosuppression, is rare in kidney transplant recipients. However, determining exactly how this state arises and how it can be detected may make it possible to induce it in a greater number of patients and then to return to the drawing board to rationally design protocols that have a greater chance of clinical success. Moreover, the study of such patients should help in the identification of biomarkers of low immunological risk that could be used to select patients for potential weaning. Collaborative efforts through international networks, together with the application of newer and more powerful technologies to diagnostic, prognostic, and mechanistic research, may help transplanters to achieve this goal.

Frontiers in nephrology: immune tolerance to allografts in humans

Vascularized allografts are rejected unless some indefinite modification to the recipient's immune system is made. This modification is typically achieved through the long-term administration of immunosuppressive drugs. Patients thus trade their end-stage organ failure for dependence on daily drug therapy and the accompanying chronic condition of immunodeficiency. However, it is clear from studies in experimental animals that rejection can be prevented through the use of several therapeutic approaches, including donor hematopoietic cell infusion, chimerism, T cell depletion, and/or co-stimulation blockade. Successfully treated animals avoid rejection beyond the period of therapy without a phenotype of chronic immunosuppression and are thus considered to be tolerant of their grafts. Although intriguing, this success in animals has yet to be reproducibly translated to the clinic, and human transplant recipients remain tethered to immunosuppressive drugs with rare exceptions. This article provides an overview of the existing, largely anecdotal, clinical experience with organ allograft tolerance. It reviews the various approaches that are being applied in pilot human trials and suggests avenues for future clinical investigation.

Is clinical tolerance realistic in the next decade?

Tolerance to allografts would mean a better quality of life and prognosis for transplant patients. Despite the first descriptions of tolerance to alloantigens over 50 years ago, deliberately induced tolerance in the clinic on a wide scale remains a goal that is not quite in reach. However, much progress has been made in understanding tolerance in rodent models and in the few reports of induced or spontaneously occurring tolerance in humans. Here, we review this progress made in the quest to achieve clinical tolerance.

Tolerance Assays: Measuring the Unknown

Distinguishing transplant recipients who will benefit from a reduction in, or even the withdrawal of, immunosuppression from those who require intensive, lifelong immunosuppression will be dependent on developing strategies for immune monitoring. Currently, no assays have been shown to accurately predict the development or presence of donor-specific tolerance in humans after transplantation. In this overview we describe and discuss those assays that we believe may be useful for identifying tolerant transplant recipients. Validation of "tolerance" assays will be critical for the safe development of tolerance regimens in humans.

Clinical operational tolerance after kidney transplantation

Induction of allograft-specific tolerance and the detection of a "tolerance" state in recipients under immunosuppression with long-term stable graft function are major challenges in transplantation. Clinical "operational tolerance," defined as stable and acceptable graft function without immunosuppression for years, is a rare event. There is no report on the clinical history of such patients. In this article, we report on the medical history of 10 kidney recipients who display an immunosuppressive drug-free "operational tolerance" for 9.4 +/- 5.2 years. Clinical factors that may favor such a tolerant state are underlined. Firstly, most of the patients interrupted immunosuppression over a long time period (until 4 years), which mimics the procedure of intentional immunosuppression weaning following liver transplantation. Secondly, donor age was younger (median 25 years) than the one of the general transplanted population, suggesting that graft quality is one of the conditions favoring "operational tolerance." Moreover, the "operationally tolerant" recipients may be 'low responders' to blood transfusions (PRA 6 +/- 5.4%, six blood transfusions). We also show that "operational tolerance" occurs in the presence of anti-donor class II antibodies, as assessed in two patients. Finally, two patients degraded their renal function 9 to 13 years after treatment withdrawal, however only one presented histological lesions of chronic rejection.

Prognostic assays for rejection and tolerance in organ transplantation

In this review, I have summarised our understanding of acute rejection of organ transplants, and for convenience I have identified three processes, recognition, rejection and regulation. In stark contrast to this text-book picture of acute rejection, I have drawn attention to some of the clinical realities, where processes are altered by powerful immunosuppressive drugs, and where many transplant recipients are pre-sensitised to transplantation antigens prior to engraftment. The ultimate goal is to encourage the emergence of a utopian immunological state, wherein patients tolerate organ transplants for life after being weaned from all immunosuppressive drugs. Assays that may be used in the future to reliably monitor this process are still at a very exciting stage of development.

Immunomodulation by intrathymic injection of donor leukocytes in rhesus monkeys

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that intrathymic injection of donor cells into adult rodents can result in long-term allograft survival. The rationale for using the intrathymic route of donor cell administration is that in the thymic environment immature T cells are educated to discriminate between self and non-self antigens. The validity of this approach was tested in non-human primates.

METHODS

The effect of the intrathymic injection of allogeneic donor cells was investigated in rhesus monkeys and compared with IV and intracutaneous administration of donor cells. Intrathymic injections were carried out without and with antithymocyte globulin. All animals received subsequently an allogeneic skin graft of the same donor and no immunosuppression post transplantation.

RESULTS

Skin graft survival was slightly shorter in animals treated with IC donor cell injections (mean survival time [MST]=8.9+/-0.52) than untreated control animals (MST=10.0+/-0.44), indicating that this route caused sensitisation. Intravenous donor cell injection showed prolongation of graft survival times (MST=11.6+/-1.69). Intrathymic donor cell injection resulted in a graft survival of 9.2+/-1.44 days although addition of antithymocyte globulin slightly prolonged graft survival to 10.3+/-2.84 (not significant). Whereas the cellular responses after intrathymic and intravenous donor cell injections increased, antithymocyte globulin treated animals did not show an increased cellular response. Recipients of intrathymic donor cells showed a significantly decreased humoral anti-donor response as compared to other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor cell pretreatment alters the subsequent response to an allogeneic skin graft in monkeys and is dependent on the route of donor cell administration. This is also reflected in the alloantibody response and the in vitro cellular reactivity. Intrathymic administration of donor cells does not lead to prolonged skin graft acceptance.

Interleukin-10 and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of transplantation, which comprises a morphologically and clinically heterogeneous spectrum of B-lymphocyte diseases. Risk factors include primary or reactivated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and the type and duration of immunosuppression. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a pleiotropic cytokine, produced primarily by T-helper 2 (Th2) lymphocytes in the later stages of T-cell activation, suggested to play a role in EBV-associated PTLD. We recently reported preliminary findings on IL-10 in relation to the development of PTLD in three kidney transplanted patients. The study now includes nine patients that could be followed before and/or after the occurrence of lymphoma.

METHODS

Nine patients with lymphomas (eight PTLDs and one Hodgkin's disease) were diagnosed among 268 consecutive renal transplantations (1990-1997). All were treated with cyclosporine with an initial 10-day course of antilymphocyte globulin, supplemented from 1995 with mycophenolate mofetil. Serum antibodies against EBV were detected using recombinant antigens. A double sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using rabbit antibodies to purified human recombinant IL-10 was employed; the assay is specific for human natural and viral IL-10.

RESULTS

Three patients experienced primary EBV infection, five reactivated EBV infections, and one did not change EBV status. Three patients had a fulminant course and died with EBV-associated PTLD confirmed post mortem. The other six are alive and are apparently cured. Treatment was immediate discontinuation of immunosuppression (in all PTLDs) and long-term high-dose aciclovir in all but one. Two patients have maintained excellent graft function for 3 and 2 years, respectively, without immunosuppression and are now in a state of operational tolerance. In three of four cases with initial lymphoma, EBV infection (primary or reactivation) preceded the increase in IL-10. In all four cases, the IL-10 increase preceded the PTLD diagnosis. In six cases, IL-10 could be followed after treatment showing either immediate zero or a decrease to zero.

CONCLUSION

IL-10 seems to play a role in EBV-associated PTLD. Moreover, IL-10 may have an important role in transplant tolerance by inducing long-lasting anergy to donor- and host-specific alloantigens, perhaps caused by down-regulation of Th1 cytokines in the graft. If substantiated, this may provide new insight into the pathogenesis of PTLD introducing new strategies for prevention and therapy of PTLD, and for the induction of tolerance in transplanted patients.

Immunosuppression without immunosuppression? How to be a tolerant individual in a dangerous world

The field of transplantation has developed based on two principles: allografts are rejected because they express foreign antigens, and the immune system must be suppressed to prevent rejection. Recently, in vitro and in vivo experimental evidence has accumulated that calls both of these beliefs into question. This article reviews an alternative approach to transplantation that focuses on tissue injury as the instigator of graft rejection and employs physiological mechanisms of tolerance to avoid graft loss. Methods that allow for defense against infectious microbes while at the same time allowing for graft survival are proposed. In particular, the rationale behind the use of anti-CD154 antibody treatment is highlighted. A model is introduced that takes into consideration the experimental successes seen with anti-CD154 therapies.