Minimizing the risk of recurrent or progressive invasive mold infections during stem cell transplantation or further intensive chemotherapy

Preventing invasive fungal disease in patients with haematological malignancies and the recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: practical aspects

Invasive fungal disease (IFD), predominantly aspergillosis, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, especially those with haematological malignancies and recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. There has been a great deal of scientific debate as to the effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing infection in different patient groups and in which patients it is an appropriate management option. Deciding on an appropriate prophylaxis regimen for IFD is challenging as the incidence varies among different patient groups, due to the varied nature of their underlying haematological disease, and in different regions and centres. Attempts have been made to define risk factors and include them in treatment protocols. Impaired immune status of the patient, especially neutropenia, is a key risk factor for IFD and can sometimes be related to specific polymorphisms of genes controlling innate immunity. Risk factors also vary according to the type of fungal pathogen. Consequently, prophylaxis needs to be tailored to individual patient groups. Furthermore, the choice of antifungal agent for prophylaxis depends on the potential for drug-drug interactions with the patients' concomitant medications. Additional challenges are optimal timing of antifungal prophylaxis, when to change from prophylaxis to antifungal treatment and how to prevent recurrence of IFD. This article considers the use of antifungal prophylaxis for patients at risk of IFD in daily clinical practice, with clinical profiles that may be distinct from those covered by guidelines, and aims to provide practical advice for treatment of these patient groups.

A risk prediction score for invasive mold disease in patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

A risk score for invasive mold disease (IMD) in patients with hematological malignancies could facilitate patient screening and improve the targeted use of antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1,709 hospital admissions of 840 patients with hematological malignancies (2005-2008) to collect data on 17 epidemiological and treatment-related risk factors for IMD. Multivariate regression was used to develop a weighted risk score based on independent risk factors associated with proven or probable IMD, which was prospectively validated during 1,746 hospital admissions of 855 patients from 2009-2012.

RESULTS

Of the 17 candidate variables analyzed, 11 correlated with IMD by univariate analysis, but only 4 risk factors (neutropenia, lymphocytopenia or lymphocyte dysfunction in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, malignancy status, and prior IMD) were retained in the final multivariate model, resulting in a weighted risk score 0-13. A risk score of < 6 discriminated patients with low (< 1%) versus higher incidence rates (> 5%) of IMD, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99, (95% CI 0.98-0.99). During 2009-2012, patients with a calculated risk score at admission of < 6 had significantly lower 90-day incidence rates of IMD compared to patients with scores > 6 (0.9% vs. 10.6%, P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

An objective, weighted risk score for IMD can accurately discriminate patients with hematological malignancies at low risk for developing mold disease, and could possibly facilitate "screening-out" of low risk patients less likely to benefit from intensive diagnostic monitoring or mold-directed antifungal prophylaxis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a very high risk group of patients with the support of granulocyte transfusion

High risk patients with active fungal infection who had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with the support of granulocyte transfusions (GTX) as an adjunct to antifungal agents are reviewed retrospectively. Patients requiring immediate allogeneic HSCT for their primary hematological disorders (two severe aplastic anemia, one T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in second complete remission, one acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-in first complete remission, one T-ALL in refractory relapse) but were denied by other transplant programs due to active invasive fungal infections had undergone HSCT with the support of GTX at the stem cell transplantation unit of Gazi University. Five patients who had undergone six transplants were included in the study and received a total of 38 (3-13) granulocyte transfusions during these six transplants. The median granulocyte concentration was 3.4 × 10(11) per apheresis bag. Full clinical and radiological recovery was achieved in three of the five high risk patients with active invasive fungal infection with the combination of antifungal agents and GTX. Even a very high risk patient with aplastic anemia who had undergone two consecutive transplants due to secondary graft failure was also cured of his primary disease despite the presence of multiple pulmonary fungus balls. Three of the five patients with very high risk features due to the underlying hematological disease and the associated active fungal infection were rescued with allogeneic HSCT performed with the support of GTX combined with antifungal agents. Despite the limitations of this report due to its retrospective nature, it suggests that GTX might be an alternative in patients with active fungal infections who otherwise are denied by the transplant programs. However, prospective randomized studies are required to draw a solid conclusion regarding the role of GTX in HSCT recipients in desperate situations such as active fungal infections.

Invasive mould infections in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation: current trends and new challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive mould infections remain major causes of infection-related mortality following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this review, we summarize the recent advances in the diagnosis, prevention, and management of invasive mould infections in HSCT recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evolving epidemiologic characteristics of post-HSCT invasive mould infections, specifically the rising incidence of Aspergillus and non-Aspergillus mould infections in the postengraftment period, necessitate the development of preventive strategies. The efficacy of prophylactic broad-spectrum triazoles against invasive mould infections in HSCT recipients has now been demonstrated in two large prospective studies. However, concerns over drug absorption, interactions, and costs may shift attention from universal prophylaxis to risk stratification and preemptive strategies. In this regard, recent studies have highlighted the potential of genetic polymorphism analysis to identify HSCT recipients at risk for invasive aspergillosis, and efforts are underway to improve the predictive values of antigen and nucleic acid detection assays. Emerging data on risk factors for invasive aspergillosis relapse after HSCT, antifungal drug monitoring, and the use of galactomannan testing to monitor treatment response may help inform therapeutic decisions for HSCT recipients.

SUMMARY

Evidence-driven management of invasive mould infections in HSCT recipients is becoming increasingly individualized, integrating host factors and pharmacologic and epidemiologic considerations. However, the optimal approach to invasive mould infection prevention in HSCT recipients remains to be resolved by prospective clinical studies.

Introducing mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases

Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases (MJHID) is a new open access, peer-reviewed, online journal, which encompasses different aspects of clinical and translational research providing an insight into the relationship between acute and chronic infections and hematological diseases. MJHID will be a topical journal on subjects of current importance in clinical haematology and infectious diseases. Every issue should have, beside the editor in chief, a guest editor. Both editor in chief and guest editor provide to invite experts in the selected topic to performe a complete update of the arguments readily available for practising phisicians. The journal will have also a section devoted to original papers, case reports and letters to editor and Editorial comment mostly focusing on the arguments treated in the previous topical issues.

Surgical management of invasive pulmonary fungal infection in hematology patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze our institutional results with pulmonary resection in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and suspected invasive pulmonary fungal infections.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective medical record review of 25 immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent pulmonary resection between 2000 and 2007. We analyzed preoperative diagnostic technique, degree of pulmonary resection, and postoperative morbidity and mortality to determine whether surgery is a viable treatment option in this subset of patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 25 patients had a minithoracotomy compared with 2 who had video-assisted thorascopic surgery resection only. Thirteen had wedge resections, 9 had lobectomies, and 3 had segmentectomies. Early surgical morbidity was 2 of 25, involving 1 pneumothorax and 1 empyema. In-hospital mortality was 2, with 1 death primarily related to surgery. Median survival was 342 days, and survival was significantly better in patients with only one lesion. No patient experienced late recurrence of invasive pulmonary fungal infection. Resected pulmonary tissue also provided the best chance for a proven diagnosis in 19 of 25 (76%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that pulmonary resection in high-risk immunocompromised patients with suspected invasive fungal infection can be carried out with excellent operative morbidity and mortality.