Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Nocardia infections in lung transplant recipients

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

Outcomes of Nocardiosis and Treatment of Disseminated Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Nocardia is an environmental pathogen with a predilection for causing opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Although risk factors have been identified for developing nocardiosis in this population, little is known regarding clinical factors resulting in poor outcomes. We evaluated a cohort of SOT recipients with nocardiosis for associations with 12-month mortality.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult SOT recipients diagnosed with culture-confirmed nocardiosis from 2000 to 2020. Patients were followed for 12 months after diagnosis, unless abbreviated by mortality. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to analyze associations with 12-month mortality. A subgroup analysis of patients with disseminated nocardiosis was performed to analyze treatment variables.

RESULTS

A total of 125 SOT recipients met inclusion criteria; 12-month mortality was 16.8%. Liver transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-9.76) and time from symptom onset to presentation (HR 0.92/d; 95% CI 0.86-0.99) were independently associated with 12-month mortality, whereas disseminated infection was not (HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.49-3.13). No treatment-specific factors were significantly associated with mortality in 33 patients with disseminated nocardiosis, although survivors had a higher rate of linezolid use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified 2 independent associations with 12-month mortality, representing demographics and infection severity. Disseminated infection was not independently associated with poor outcomes, and specific sites of infection may be more important than dissemination itself. No treatment-specific factors were associated with mortality, though this analysis was likely underpowered. Further study of treatment strategies based on specific Nocardia syndromes is warranted.

Design of a multi-epitope vaccine against six Nocardia species based on reverse vaccinology combined with immunoinformatics

Background

Nocardia genus, a complex group of species classified to be aerobic actinomycete, can lead to severe concurrent infection as well as disseminated infection, typically in immunocompromised patients. With the expansion of the susceptible population, the incidence of Nocardia has been gradually growing, accompanied by increased resistance of the pathogen to existing therapeutics. However, there is no effective vaccine against this pathogen yet. In this study, a multi-epitope vaccine was designed against the Nocardia infection using reverse vaccinology combined with immunoinformatics approaches.

Methods

First, the proteomes of 6 Nocardia subspecies Nocardia subspecies (Nocardia farcinica, Nocardia cyriacigeorgica, Nocardia abscessus, Nocardia otitidiscaviarum, Nocardia brasiliensis and Nocardia nova) were download NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database on May 1st, 2022 for the target proteins selection. The essential, virulent-associated or resistant-associated, surface-exposed, antigenic, non-toxic, and non-homologous with the human proteome proteins were selected for epitope identification. The shortlisted T-cell and B-cell epitopes were fused with appropriate adjuvants and linkers to construct vaccines. The physicochemical properties of the designed vaccine were predicted using multiple online servers. The Molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were performed to understand the binding pattern and binding stability between the vaccine candidate and Toll-like receptors (TLRs). The immunogenicity of the designed vaccines was evaluated via immune simulation.

Results

3 proteins that are essential, virulent-associated or resistant-associated, surface-exposed, antigenic, non-toxic, and non-homologous with the human proteome were selected from 218 complete proteome sequences of the 6 Nocardia subspecies epitope identification. After screening, only 4 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes, 6 helper T lymphocyte (HTL) epitopes, and 8 B cell epitopes that were antigenic, non-allergenic, and non-toxic were included in the final vaccine construct. The results of molecular docking and MD simulation showed that the vaccine candidate has a strong affinity for TLR2 and TLR4 of the host and the vaccine-TLR complexes were dynamically stable in the natural environment. The results of the immune simulation indicated that the designed vaccine had the potential to induce strong protective immune responses in the host. The codon optimization and cloned analysis showed that the vaccine was available for mass production.

Conclusion

The designed vaccine has the potential to stimulate long-lasting immunity in the host, but further studies are required to validate its safety and efficacy.

Lung and Cerebral Nocardiosis Caused by Nocardia elegans in a Lung Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Patients after lung transplantation are at risk for Nocardia infections. We herein report a case of lung and cerebral nocardiosis caused by Nocardia elegans, a rare species of Nocardia, in a lung transplant recipient. Antibiotic therapy, including sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST), and brain abscess drainage improved symptoms and imaging findings. A literature review of N. elegans infections showed that 12 of 14 cases (85.7%) were reported from East Asia, particularly Japan (9 cases, 64.2%). The lungs were the predominant site (12/14 cases, 85.7%), and most of the cases were susceptible to ST (9/10 cases, 90%).

Updated Review on Nocardia Species: 2006-2021

This review serves as an update to the previous Nocardia review by Brown-Elliott et al. published in 2006 (B. A. Brown-Elliott, J. M. Brown, P. S. Conville, and R. J. Wallace. Jr., Clin Microbiol Rev 19:259-282, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.2.259-282.2006). Included is a discussion on the taxonomic expansion of the genus, current identification methods, and the impact of new technology (including matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight [MALDI-TOF] and whole genome sequencing) on diagnosis and treatment. Clinical manifestations, the epidemiology, and geographic distribution are briefly discussed. An additional section on actinomycotic mycetoma is added to address this often-neglected disease.

Disseminated Nocardiosis with Pulmonary Fungus and Secondary Epilepsy: A Case Report

Disseminated nocardiosis is a rare, life-threatening disease that usually found in immunocompromised patients, and Nocardia farcinica is one of the most common causative pathogens. The difficulty in identifying the bacterium and the delay in initiating appropriate therapy often influence the prognosis of patients with disseminated nocardiosis. Here, we present a rare case of disseminated nocardiosis in a 61-year-old female with pulmonary fungus and secondary epilepsy. She received targeted antibiotic therapy and showed a great recovery in clinical symptoms and radiological signs. Disseminated nocardiosis can be easily overlooked due to the absence of characteristic symptoms and limitations of clinical examinations. Given the variability in antibiotic susceptibility patterns, the management of disseminated nocardiosis must be individualized. Therefore, early diagnosis and targeted antibiotic treatment are critical for the prognosis of disseminated nocardiosis.

Recurrent nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: An evaluation of secondary prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Immunocompromised individuals are at risk for Nocardia infection, with a recurrence rate of approximately 5%. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients often receive secondary prophylaxis due to their requirement of lifelong immunosuppression. However, data supporting this practice is sparse. We sought to evaluate Nocardia recurrence in SOT recipients, specifically evaluating secondary prophylaxis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients diagnosed with nocardiosis from 2000 through 2020. We included adult SOT recipients who completed their course of Nocardia therapy and had at least 6 months of posttherapy follow-up. The primary outcome was Nocardia recurrence, which included relapse and reinfection.

RESULTS

One hundred two patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six (64.7%) were male and mean age was 58.6 ± 11.7 years. Most common SOT types were kidney (46.1%), heart (18.6%), kidney-pancreas (11.8%), and lung (10.8%). Most common sites of infection were lung (85.3%), skin (17.6%), and brain (14.7%). Secondary prophylaxis was utilized in 53 (52.0%) patients. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) single-strength daily was the most common prophylaxis agent and dose. Five patients (4.9%) experienced Nocardia recurrence, three of which were receiving secondary prophylaxis at time of recurrence. Two recurrences were with the same Nocardia species. Factors associated with recurrence were lung transplantation (p = .011), chronic lung disease (p = .032), and treatment ≤120 days (p = .006). Time from treatment completion to recurrence ranged from 107 to 875 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Nocardia recurrence in SOT recipients is an uncommon event. TMP-SMX secondary prophylaxis is incompletely protective and recurrence may be dependent upon other factors. Further study of secondary prophylaxis is warranted.

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: Real-life data from a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the optimal management of nocardiosis among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. It is often suggested to avoid trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) monotherapy in heavily immunocompromised patients (such as SOT recipients) and/or in case of severe or disseminated nocardiosis. Our aim was to report our experience with TMP-SMX monotherapy in SOT recipients with nocardiosis.

METHODS

Using data from a previously published European study, we assessed the incidence of adverse events in SOT recipients receiving TMP-SMX monotherapy and assessed its effectiveness.

RESULTS

Thirty-one SOT recipients with nocardiosis were included, mostly kidney transplant recipients (20/31, 65%). Eleven (36%) had disseminated infection, and four (13%) had brain nocardiosis. Most patients had lung and/or pleural involvement (26/31, 84%). Daily dose of trimethoprim at initiation was 10 [6.4-14.8] mg/kg. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis of nocardiosis was 44 [30-62] ml/min/1.73 m². TMP-SMX was discontinued prematurely in one third of the patients (10/31, 32%, mostly for hematological toxicity [n = 3] or increased serum creatinine [n = 3]). Focusing on the 24 (77%) patients who completed at least 30 days of TMP-SMX monotherapy, 4 had late (>30 days) drug discontinuation, 1 experienced treatment failure, and 19 completed planned TMP-SMX monotherapy. Clinical outcome was favorable in these 19 patients, despite the fact that 8 (42%) had disseminated infection and 2 (11%) brain nocardiosis. Overall, all-cause 1-year mortality was 10% (3/31).

CONCLUSIONS

TMP-SMX monotherapy appears to be effective for the treatment of most nocardiosis among SOT recipients. Interventional studies are needed to compare its safety and effectiveness with those of other regimens used to treat posttransplant nocardiosis.

Update on Nocardia infections in solid-organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nocardia is a ubiquitous pathogen associated with life-threatening opportunistic infections. Organ transplant recipients are uniquely predisposed to Nocardia infections due to their iatrogenic cell-mediated immune deficit necessary to maintain allograft function. This review aims to address recent updates in the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes of Nocardia infections in solid-organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of Nocardia infection depends on multiple patient and environmental factors. Among transplant recipients, lung recipients are most commonly affected. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are critical for optimizing therapy as substantial variation occurs among and within Nocardia spp. This has been increasingly accomplished through advances in molecular methods leading to improved accuracy and wider accessibility to testing. There are emerging data applying novel therapeutics and short course therapy that may offer alternative management approaches for transplant associated nocardiosis to minimize drug toxicity and intolerance.

SUMMARY

Further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to better characterize the epidemiology of Nocardia in transplant recipients, as well as evaluate the impact of diagnostic advancements and new treatment strategies.

Understanding rare infections post-lung transplantation

Introduction: Lung transplant recipients are at the highest risk of infectious complications among all solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. In the current era, many standardized protocols in terms of diagnostic algorithms, prophylaxis, and therapeutic strategies have improved the management of the most common infectious complications. Conversely, diagnosis of rare infections can be particularly challenging and this can delay appropriate treatment.Areas covered: This article will review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic management of certain rarely reported viral, fungal, bacterial and parasitic infections in lung transplant recipients.Expert opinion: Once the most frequent infections are excluded, clinical suspicion combined with molecular diagnostic methods such as targeted and broad-spectrum PCRs can allow diagnosis of a rare infection. A multidisciplinary team, including transplant pulmonologists, transplant infectious diseases specialists, microbiologists and pathologists is essential for prompt diagnosis and optimal therapeutic management.

Nocardia prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes of infection in lung transplant recipients: A matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients are at heightened risk for nocardiosis compared to other solid organ transplant recipients, with incidence rates as high as 9% and up to 30% associated mortality. No controlled studies assessing risk factors for nocardiosis in this high-risk population have been reported.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lung transplantation at a single center between 2012 and 2018 and diagnosed with nocardiosis post-transplant were matched 1:2 to uninfected control subjects on the basis of age, transplant date, and sex.

RESULTS

The incidence of nocardiosis in this lung transplant population was 3.4% (20/586), occurring a median of 9.4 months (range 4.4-55.2) post-transplant. In multivariable analysis, consistent use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in the 12 weeks prior to diagnosis was independently associated with protection against nocardiosis (OR 0.038; 95% CI 0.01-0.29; P = .002). Augmented immunosuppression in the 6 months prior to diagnosis was independently associated with the development of nocardiosis (OR 9.94; 95% CI 1.62- 61.00; P = .013). Six case patients (30%) had disseminated disease; all-cause 6-month mortality was 25%. The most common species was Nocardia farcinica (7/17 isolates), which was associated with dissemination and mortality. The most active antibiotics were TMP/SMX (100%), linezolid (100%), and amikacin (76%). Imipenem was only active against 4/17 isolates (24% susceptibility), with two isolates becoming non-susceptible later in therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was shown to be protective against nocardiosis in lung transplant recipients, while augmented immunosuppression conferred increased risk. Institutional epidemiologic data are needed to best guide empiric therapy for Nocardia, as historical in vitro data may not predict local susceptibilities.

Prevalence and Etiology of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients

Background

The correct management of immunocompromised patients with pneumonia is debated. We evaluated the prevalence, risk factors, and characteristics of immunocompromised patients coming from the community with pneumonia.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of an international, multicenter study enrolling adult patients coming from the community with pneumonia and hospitalized in 222 hospitals in 54 countries worldwide. Risk factors for immunocompromise included AIDS, aplastic anemia, asplenia, hematological cancer, chemotherapy, neutropenia, biological drug use, lung transplantation, chronic steroid use, and solid tumor.

Results

At least 1 risk factor for immunocompromise was recorded in 18% of the 3702 patients enrolled. The prevalences of risk factors significantly differed across continents and countries, with chronic steroid use (45%), hematological cancer (25%), and chemotherapy (22%) the most common. Among immunocompromised patients, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens were the most frequently identified, and prevalences did not differ from those in immunocompetent patients. Risk factors for immunocompromise were independently associated with neither Pseudomonas aeruginosa nor non–community-acquired bacteria. Specific risk factors were independently associated with fungal infections (odds ratio for AIDS and hematological cancer, 15.10 and 4.65, respectively; both P = .001), mycobacterial infections (AIDS; P = .006), and viral infections other than influenza (hematological cancer, 5.49; P < .001).

Conclusions

Our findings could be considered by clinicians in prescribing empiric antibiotic therapy for CAP in immunocompromised patients. Patients with AIDS and hematological cancer admitted with CAP may have higher prevalences of fungi, mycobacteria, and noninfluenza viruses.

Management and prophylaxis of bacterial and mycobacterial infections among lung transplant recipients

Bacterial and mycobacterial infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Infectious complications are categorized by timing post-transplant: <1, 1–6, and >6 months. The first month post-transplant is associated with the highest risk of infection. During this period, infections are most commonly healthcare-associated, and include infections related to surgical complications. The lungs and bloodstream are common sites of infections. Common healthcare-associated organisms include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Gram-negative bacilli such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Clostridioides difficile. More than 1-month post-transplant, opportunistic infections can occur. Tuberculosis occurs in 0.8–10% of lung transplant recipients which reflects variation in background prevalence. The majority of post-transplant tuberculosis stems from reactivation of untreated or undiagnosed latent tuberculosis. Most post-transplant tuberculosis occurs in the lungs and develops within a year of transplant. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria commonly colonize the lungs of lung transplant candidates and are often hard to eradicate even with prolonged courses of antimycobacterial agents. Drug interactions between antimycobacterial agents and calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors also complicates treatment post-transplant. Given that infection adversely impacts outcomes after lung transplant, and that anti-infective therapy is often less effective after transplant, infection prevention is key to long-term success. A comprehensive approach that includes pre-transplant evaluation, perioperative prophylaxis, long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis, immunization, and safer living at home and in the community, should be employed to minimize the risk of infection.

Updates on Nocardia Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to their immunocompromised status, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for Nocardia infections. These infections often necessitate early invasive diagnostics alongside prolonged, often combination antimicrobial therapy. This review summarizes the importance of this pathogen in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in SOT recipients inclusive of recently reported cases in the literature and an update on the epidemiology, diagnostics, and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Six studies with 13 isolated SSTIs due to Nocardia have been published in the last 5 years in SOT recipients. The most common underlying type of transplant was kidney and time from transplantation to infection varied from 6 months to 16 years. Misdiagnosis was frequent. Available identified species included N. brasiliensis (2), N. farcinica (2), N. flavorosea (1), N. abscessus (1), N. anaemiae (1), N. asteroides (1), N. nova (1), and N. vinacea (1). Treatment choice and duration varied widely, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was utilized most often with no documented infection relapse. Nocardia SSTIs can occur both in isolation and as a component of a disseminated infection. Overall, isolated Nocardia SSTIs are uncommon in SOT recipients and are often initially misdiagnosed. They present multiple challenges to the clinician including evaluation for potential co-pathogens and/or non-infectious processes and ruling out the presence of disseminated infection. While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remains the agent of choice for management of most isolated SSTIs, therapy must be tailored to the individual patient based on species-specific susceptibility patterns and formal susceptibility testing, site(s) of infection, and patient tolerability.

Nocardia infections in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of Nocardia infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Nocardia infections have increased in the last two decades, likely due to improved detection and identification methods and an expanding immunocompromised population. The risk of developing nocardiosis after transplantation varies with the type of organ transplanted and the immunosuppression regimen used. Nocardia infection most commonly involves the lung. Disseminated infection can occur, with spread to the bloodstream, skin, or central nervous system. Early recognition of the infection and initial appropriate treatment is important to achieve good outcomes. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are strongly recommended, as inter- and intraspecies susceptibility patterns can vary. Sulfonamide is the first-line treatment of Nocardia infections, and combination therapy with at least two antimicrobial agents should be used initially for disseminated or severe nocardiosis. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis may be helpful in preventing Nocardia infection after SOT.

Infections in Heart, Lung, and Heart-Lung Transplantation

Half a century has passed since the first orthotopic heart transplant took place. Surgical innovations allowed for heart, lung, and heart-lung transplantation to save lives of patients with incurable chronic cardiopulmonary conditions. The complexity of the surgical interventions, chronic host health conditions, and antirejection immunosuppressive medications makes infectious complications common. Infections have remained one of the main barriers for successful transplantation and a source of significant morbidity and mortality. Recognition of infections and its management in this setting require outstanding clinical skills since transplant recipients may not exhibit classic signs or symptoms of disease, and laboratory work has some pitfalls. The prevention, identification, and management of infectious diseases complications in this population are a priority to undertake to improve the medical outcomes of transplantation. Herein, we reviewed the historical aspects, epidemiology, and prophylaxis of infections in heart, lung, and heart-lung transplantation. We also discuss the most prevalent organisms affecting the host and the organ systems involved.

Infections after lung transplantation

The good clinical result of lung transplantation is constantly undermined by the high incidence of infection, which negatively impacts on function and survival. Moreover, infections may also have immunological interactions that play a role in the acute rejection and in the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. There is a temporal sequence in the types of infection that affects lung allograft: in the first postoperative month bacteria are the most frequent cause of infection; following this phase, cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis carinii are common. Fungal infections are particularly feared due to their association with bronchial complication and high mortality. Scrupulous postoperative surveillance is mandatory for the successful management of lung transplantation patients with respect to early detection and treatment of infections. This paper is aimed to address clinicians in the management of the major infectious complications that affect the lung transplant population.

Primary Nocardia Infection Causing a Fluorodeoxyglucose-Avid Right Renal Mass in a Redo Lung Transplant Recipient

Immunosuppression after lung transplantation may increase susceptibility to opportunistic infection and is associated with early and delayed deaths in lung transplant recipients. Factors that may predispose lung transplant recipients to opportunistic bacterial and fungal infections include prolonged corticosteroid use, renal impairment, treatment of acute rejection, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus. We present a unique case of a 63-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus who underwent redo lung transplantation. Three years after her right-sided single redo lung transplant, she presented with right-sided abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Upon examination, computed tomography showed a 4.5 × 3.3 cm heterogeneous, enhancing right renal mass with a patent renal vein. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a T1/T2 hypointense, diffusion-restricting, right mid-renal mass that was fluorodeoxyglucose-avid on positron emission tomography. We initially suspected primary renal cell carcinoma. However, after a right nephrectomy, no evidence of neoplasia was observed; instead, a renal abscess containing filamentous bacteria was noted, raising suspicion for infection of the Nocardia species. Special stains confirmed a diagnosis of Nocardia renal abscess. Computed tomography of the chest and brain revealed no lesions consistent with infection. We initiated a long-term therapeutic regimen of anti-Nocardia therapy with imipenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

[Respiratory infections caused by slow-growing bacteria: Nocardia, Actinomyces, Rhodococcus]

INTRODUCTION

Pneumonia caused by slow-growing bacteria is rare but sometimes severe.

STATE OF THE ART

These infections share many similarities such as several differential diagnoses, difficulties to identify the pathogen, the importance of involving the microbiologist in the diagnostic investigation and the need for prolonged antibiotic treatment. However, major differences distinguish them: Nocardia and Rhodococcus infect mainly immunocompromised patients while actinomycosis also concerns immunocompetent patients; the severity of nocardioses is related to their hematogenous spread while locoregional extension by contiguity makes the gravity of actinomycosis.

PROSPECTIVE

For these diseases, molecular diagnostic tools are essential, either to obtain a species identification and guide treatment in the case of nocardiosis or to confirm the diagnosis from a biological sample. Treatment of these infections is complex due to: (1) the limited data in the literature; (2) the need for prolonged treatment of several months; (3) the management of toxicities and drug interactions for the treatment of Nocardia and Rhodococcus.

CONCLUSION

Close cooperation between pneumonologists, infectious disease specialists and microbiologists is essential for the management of these patients.

Outcome and Treatment of Nocardiosis After Solid Organ Transplantation: New Insights From a European Study

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk of nocardiosis, a rare opportunistic bacterial infection, but prognosis and outcome of these patients are poorly defined. Our objectives were to identify factors associated with 1-year mortality after nocardiosis and describe the outcome of patients receiving short-course antibiotics (≤120 days).

METHODS

We analyzed data from a multicenter European case-control study that included 117 SOT recipients with nocardiosis diagnosed between 2000 and 2014. Factors associated with 1-year all-cause mortality were identified using multivariable conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

One-year mortality was 10-fold higher in patients with nocardiosis (16.2%, 19/117) than in control transplant recipients (1.3%, 3/233, P < .001). A history of tumor (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.8), invasive fungal infection (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), and donor age (OR, 1.0046; 95% CI, 1.0007-1.0083) were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Acute rejection in the year before nocardiosis was associated with improved survival (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98). Seventeen patients received short-course antibiotics (median duration 56 [24-120] days) with a 1-year success rate (cured and surviving) of 88% and a 5.9% risk of relapse (median follow-up 49 [6-136] months).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year mortality was 10-fold higher in SOT patients with nocardiosis than in those without. Four factors, largely reflecting general medical condition rather than severity and/or management of nocardiosis, were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Patients who received short-course antibiotic treatment had good outcomes, suggesting that this may be a strategy for further study.

Tuberculosis 'The Great Imitator': A usual disease with unusual presentations

BACKGROUND

A number of infectious diseases have been referred to by the phrase 'The Great Imitator', of which the oldest is syphilis; others include Lyme disease, nocardiosis, etc. Tuberculosis has been described as the second great imitator as it can imitate various other disease processes. An awareness of the atypical clinical manifestations of tuberculosis is important, especially in regions where tuberculosis continues to be a major public health problem, such as India. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) constitutes about 15-20% of all cases of tuberculosis in immunocompetent patients and accounts for more than 50% of the cases in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals.

METHODS

We hereby report 4 cases of tuberculosis at unusual sites, which were not suspected clinically and were subsequently diagnosed by pathological examination and by ancillary techniques.

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

In all the four cases, the involvement was extrapulmonary in nature and at unusual sites. Three cases were diagnosed by a positive Ziehl Neelsen stain while culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was positive in three cases. All the four patients tested negative for HIV status on serology.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Unusual presentations, which mimic many diverse conditions, as seen in this series, highlight the importance of a high index of suspicion in the timely diagnosis of tuberculosis. Evidence of systemic or lung involvement may not always be present and laboratory and radiological findings play an important role.

Immunosuppression and a serious opportunistic infection: an unfortunate price to pay

A 57-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus type 1, status postcadaveric pancreas transplant alone 11 years ago, on chronic immunosuppression, and dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, presented with 2 months of progressive generalised weakness, lumbar back pain with right lower extremity radiculopathy and episodic symptomatic hypotension. Preliminary infectious disease work up was unremarkable. She was discharged following symptomatic improvement. She represented 3 days later with continued functional decline and leucocytosis. Chest X-ray demonstrated diffuse pulmonary nodules, confirmed on chest CT scan. CT-guided biopsy of a right upper lobe nodule was performed; studies confirmed Nocardia farcinica. Further imaging revealed bilateral white matter intracranial lesions, and extensive Nocardia-positive fluid collections in the right gluteal and vastus musculature, requiring periodic surgical debridement. She was treated with multiple antimicrobials, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate and moxifloxacin. She was discharged after a 6-month hospitalisation.

Nocardiosis presenting as a lung mass in a kidney transplant recipient

Nocardiosis is a potentially life-threatening disease in renal transplant recipients. It is an uncommon infection with high lethality if left untreated. We report a case of a 67 year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed pulmonary nocardiosis and presented with pleural effusion along with an underlying lung mass, which was successfully treated with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in conjunction with a reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Five months later, graft function remains stable with complete regression of radiological abnormalities and absence of symptoms. Nocardiosis should be suspected in the presence of pulmonary symptoms in a transplant patient with unusual radiological presentation.

Nocardiosis in transplant recipients

Nocardiosis is a rare opportunistic infection caused by Nocardia spp., an aerobic actinomycete, that mainly affects patients with cell-mediated immunity defects, such as transplant recipients. Despite recent progress regarding Nocardia identification and changes in taxonomic assignment, many challenges remain for the diagnosis or management of nocardiosis. This opportunistic infection affects 0.04 to 3.5 % of patients with solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, depending on the organ transplanted, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, corticosteroids dose and calcineurin inhibitors level. Nocardiosis diagnosis relies on appropriate clinical, radiological and microbiological workup that includes the sampling of an accessible involved site and molecular microbiology tools. In parallel, extensive clinical and radiological evaluations are mandatory, including brain imaging, even in the absence of neurological signs. In transplanted patients, differential diagnosis is challenging, with co-infections reported in 20 to 64 % of cases. As the antibiotic susceptibility pattern varies among species, the antimicrobial regimen before species identification should rely on the association of antibiotics active on all species of Nocardia. Bactericidal antibiotics are required in cases of severe or disseminated disease. Furthermore, in transplant recipients, combination therapy is difficult to manage because of cumulative toxicity and interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Because of a high recurrence rate, antibiotic therapy should be prescribed for 6 to 12 months.

Surgery for other pulmonary fungal infections, Actinomyces, and Nocardia

Surgical participation in the management of fungal infections has changed since the advent of effective antimicrobials. Even so, a surgeon may be called on for a variety of reasons, depending on the specific fungal infection and the evolution of thoracic disease. Specific fungal infections are enumerated. Each organism, its clinical picture, and method of diagnosis are briefly described and the medical and surgical management of thoracic disease are discussed.

Pulmonary infections in transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hematopoietic stem cell as well as solid-organ transplantation is being carried out with increasing frequency throughout the world. Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a common life-threatening complication faced by the transplant recipients. The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date information on pulmonary infections among the transplant recipients, especially emphasizing the endemicity of microorganisms, epidemiology, work-up of infections, and principles of their management.

RECENT FINDINGS

A lower respiratory tract infection such as pneumonia is the most frequent of all the infections and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Factors increasing the risk of pulmonary infections include surgical techniques, immune status, chemoradiotherapy, alloimmune mechanisms between the host and the graft, and the environment. A high degree of suspicion, computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, and flexible bronchoscopy are required in most to establish the diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Proper management of LRTI in transplant recipients requires a high degree of suspicion, thorough knowledge of the epidemiology and endemicity of the suspected organisms, CT scan of the chest, and expertise at bronchoscopy. Utmost teamwork among transplant physicians, infectious disease specialist, and bronchoscopist is essential.

Purulent pericarditis and cardiac tamponade caused by Nocardia farcinica in a nephrotic syndrome patient

Nocardiosis is an uncommon infection that occurs primarily in immunocompromised patients. We herein report an extremely rare case of Nocardia farcinica (N. farcinica) pericarditis. A 53-year-old man with nephrotic syndrome that required chronic corticosteroid therapy presented with pleuritic chest pain and cardiac tamponade. Pericardiocentesis revealed purulent pericardial effusion and a bacteriological examination showed the characteristic branching filamentous bacteria identified as N. farcinica. Aggressive surgical drainage and a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole based regimen resulted in clinical improvement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of N. farcinica pericarditis in Thailand.

Disseminated Nocardia farcinica: literature review and fatal outcome in an immunocompetent patient

BACKGROUND

Nocardia farcinica is a gram-positive, partially acid-fast, methenamine silver-positive aerobic actinomycete. Nocardia spp. are opportunistic pathogens, and N. farcinica is the least common species of clinical importance.

METHODS

Review of the recent literature and description of a immunocompetent patient with no known risk factors who contracted fatal N. farcinica sepsis.

RESULTS

Positive pre-mortem and post-mortem cultures from the lung and synovium correlated with acute bronchopneumonia and synovitis at autopsy. Colonies of filamentous bacteria, which were not apparent in conventional hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, were observed with gram and methenamine silver stains, but acid-fast stains were negative. A literature review revealed that disseminated N. farcinica often is associated with an underlying malignant tumor or autoimmune disease (88% of patients). Chemotherapy or corticosteroid treatments are additional risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole typically is the first-line therapy for N. farcinica; treatment with amikacin and imipenem-cilastatin is used less often (7% of patients). Despite aggressive therapy, we observed that the death rate (39%) associated with N. farcinica in recent publications was eight percentage points higher than reported in a review from 2000.

[Young girl with abscesses in the face]

Skin and soft tissue infections are most often caused by Staphylococcus aureus or various species of streptococcus. This case report summarizes the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and clinical outcome of a facial infection presenting as multiple abscesses in a young and otherwise healthy girl. Nocardia brasiliensis was recovered from abscess aspiration, and treatment failure was eventually recognized for the recommended empirical antibiotic treatment, broad-spectrum antibiotics and surgery.

Immunological risk factors for infection after immunosuppressive and biologic therapies

Immunosuppressive and biologic therapies are costly and can involve a considerable risk of infection. Noninvasive diagnostic tools for early prediction of infection before and after administration of these therapies are of major interest. Serial longitudinal immune monitoring would provide data on immunocompetence and complement clinical follow-up protocols. Biomarkers of immune response may be useful to identify patients at risk of developing infection and who could be candidates for immunosuppressant dose reduction. This article focuses on the potential use of biomarkers of immune response to predict development of infection after immunosuppressive and biologic therapies in selected settings of autoimmune disease (rituximab for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis) and solid organ transplantation.

In vitro activity of multiple antibiotic combinations against Nocardia: relationship with a short-term treatment strategy in heart transplant recipients with pulmonary nocardiosis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary nocardiosis (PN) chiefly affects immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant recipients. Cotrimoxazole is still the mainstay of treatment, but it is associated with nephro- and myelo-toxicity, and can show unpredictable activity against Nocardia isolates.

METHODS

Over a 20-year period, Nocardia isolates were identified from 12 heart transplant (HTx) recipients with PN. The in vitro activity of various antibacterials, alone or in combination, was assessed using disk-diffusion, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), and time-kill methodology. The in vitro results were compared with the clinical outcome of the patients.

RESULTS

Seven different Nocardia strains were identified. Disk diffusion and MIC determinations showed that all isolates were susceptible to amikacin, netilmicin, and linezolid, and that moxifloxacin was the most active of the fluoroquinolones. All but 1 of the isolates were susceptible to imipenem. Time-kill studies showed that imipenem/amikacin and imipenem/moxifloxacin combinations were bactericidal for most isolates. Of 12 patients who received 3-4 weeks' intravenous (IV) treatment with amikacin or ciprofloxacin in combination with a beta-lactam, followed by 1-3 months' oral cotrimoxazole, moxifloxacin, or linezolid, 11 were cured; 1 patient died, but not related to Nocardia.

CONCLUSION

Initial PN treatment in HTx recipients can be successfully carried out with bactericidal combinations such as imipenem plus amikacin or moxifloxacin, administered IV for 3-4 weeks. Within 1 month, a significant clinical and radiological improvement may be observed. In our experience, a <3 month oral regimen with cotrimoxazole, moxifloxacin, or doxycycline may then be used. This may allow a reduction of side effects and treatment-related burden, without any recurrence.

Nocardiosis at the turn of the century

Nocardia species is an uncommon pathogen that affects both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients. The clinical and microbiologic spectrum of nocardiosis has changed recently due to the widespread use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, the emergence of new types of immunosuppressed patients, and the improved identification of isolates using molecular techniques. Nocardia asteroides was traditionally considered the predominant organism, and prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole was considered almost universally protective. We conducted the current study to determine the incidence of nocardiosis and its microbiologic and clinical characteristics in a general hospital over the last 12 years. We reviewed the clinical records of all patients in whom Nocardia species was isolated from clinical specimens between 1995 and 2006. Nocardia isolates were identified by standard procedures and by 5' end 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. Susceptibility to cotrimoxazole, minocycline, imipenem, linezolid, and amikacin was determined by the broth microdilution method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.The incidence of Nocardia infections did not increase significantly during the study period (0.39/100,000 inhabitants in 1995-1998 and 0.55/100,000 inhabitants in 2003-2006). Nocardia was recovered from 43 patients. Six were considered to be colonized. The colonizing species were N. farcinica, N. nova, and N. asteroides. All colonized patients had severe underlying pulmonary conditions and were treated with antimicrobials (6 patients) or corticosteroids (4 patients). Invasive nocardiosis was diagnosed in 37 patients (86.5% were men, and their mean age was 55.8 +/- 17.3 yr). The most common underlying condition in our institution was human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (10 patients; 27%), followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8 patients; 21.6%), autoimmune diseases (8 patients; 21.6%), solid organ transplantation (7 patients; 18.9%), and cancer (4 patients; 10.8%). The most important risk factor for nocardiosis was corticosteroid administration (23 patients; 62.2%). Nocardiosis affected the lungs in 26 cases (70.3%), the skin in 3 cases (8.1%), and the central nervous system in 2 cases (5.4%). It was disseminated in 5 cases (13.5%) and caused otomastoiditis in 1 (2.7%). The species identified were N. cyriacigeorgica (32.4%), N. farcinica (24.3%), N. otitidiscaviarum (10.8%), N. veterana (8.1%), N. nova (5.4%), N. abscessus (5.4%), N. asiatica (2.7%), N. beijingensis (2.7%), N. brasiliensis (2.7%), N. carnea (2.7%), and Nocardia species (2.7%).Linezolid and amikacin were uniformly active against all the isolates, whereas 29.7% of isolates showed intermediate susceptibility to minocycline (minimum inhibitory concentration = 2 mg/L), 10.8% were resistant to cotrimoxazole, and 5.4% were resistant to imipenem. Nocardiosis occurred while the patients were on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in 8 cases (21.6%). The strains isolated from these patients were susceptible to cotrimoxazole in 5 cases (62.5%) and resistant in 3 (37.5%). Overall, 13 patients died (35.1%); related mortality was 21.6% (8 patients). We conclude that HIV infection has become the most common underlying condition for invasive nocardiosis in our institution, followed by chronic lung disease. Previous use of corticosteroids was the main risk factor and was present in more than half the patients. New species of Nocardia have been identified, and administration of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis should no longer be considered highly reliable protection against nocardiosis. Larger studies of nocardiosis are required to better identify risk factors associated with mortality, and alternative and more effective methods of prevention must be developed.

Respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunosuppressive states and therapies are becoming common in clinical practice. Recent advances and trends in bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic pulmonary infections in immunosuppressed patients are described.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pulmonary infections can jeopardize the prognosis of immunosuppressed patients. The number of patients infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria or opportunistic pathogens like rapid-growing environmental mycobacteria, Strongyloides stercoralis or Rhodococcus equi is increasing with the increased numbers of immunosuppressed patients due to HIV/AIDS and the potent immunosuppressive therapies used in solid-organ and haematopoietic transplantations, cancer and systemic illnesses. The slow development of more effective antibiotics underlines the necessity of preventive measures, development of rapid detection tests for pathogens and appropriate treatment regimens to avoid development of further resistance.

SUMMARY

Adequate prophylaxis, clinical suspicion, microbiological and molecular investigations, drug susceptibility-based antibiotic treatment and new drug development are strategies required to face up to the challenge of pulmonary infections in immunodepressed patients.