1
|
Shulman R, Miller FA, Stukel TA, Daneman D, Guttmann A. Resources and population served: a description of the Ontario Paediatric Diabetes Network. CMAJ Open 2016; 4:E141-6. [PMID: 27398356 PMCID: PMC4933641 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20150006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Network of Ontario Pediatric Diabetes Programs was established in 2001 to provide access to specialized pediatric diabetes care. Universal funding for pediatric insulin pump therapy has been available in Ontario since 2006. The objective of this study was to describe the distribution of patients, resources and insulin pump use across centres within the network, now called the Ontario Paediatric Diabetes Network. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2012 of the 35 pediatric diabetes centres in Ontario to measure centre characteristics, patient volume and available clinical and social resources. We used health administrative data from the provincial Assistive Devices Program to describe patients aged 18 years or less using insulin pumps by centre as a measure of technology uptake. RESULTS All 35 centres participated, reporting a total of 6676 children with type 1 diabetes and 368 with type 2 diabetes. Most (> 80%) children with type 1 diabetes were followed at tertiary (n = 5) or large community (n = 14) centres. Nursing patient load was similar between centre types, but there was a large range across centres within any type. Overall, percent insulin pump use was 38.1% and varied widely across centres (5.3%-66.7%). Funded 24-hour support for pump users was available at 5 (36%) small community centres, 3 (19%) large community centres and 2 (40%) tertiary centres. INTERPRETATION Our study showed differences in access to specialized and after-hours care for children with diabetes in Ontario. Pump use varied widely across centres. Further research is needed to assess the impact of these observed differences on quality of care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayzel Shulman
- Department of Pediatrics (Shulman, Daneman, Guttmann), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Shulman, Miller, Stukel, Guttmann), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Shulman, Stukel, Guttmann); Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Miller), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Fiona A Miller
- Department of Pediatrics (Shulman, Daneman, Guttmann), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Shulman, Miller, Stukel, Guttmann), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Shulman, Stukel, Guttmann); Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Miller), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Therese A Stukel
- Department of Pediatrics (Shulman, Daneman, Guttmann), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Shulman, Miller, Stukel, Guttmann), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Shulman, Stukel, Guttmann); Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Miller), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Denis Daneman
- Department of Pediatrics (Shulman, Daneman, Guttmann), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Shulman, Miller, Stukel, Guttmann), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Shulman, Stukel, Guttmann); Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Miller), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- Department of Pediatrics (Shulman, Daneman, Guttmann), The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Shulman, Miller, Stukel, Guttmann), University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Shulman, Stukel, Guttmann); Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative (Miller), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schwartz DD, Cline VD, Axelrad ME, Anderson BJ. Feasibility, acceptability, and predictive validity of a psychosocial screening program for children and youth newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34:326-31. [PMID: 21216856 PMCID: PMC3024342 DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosocial screening has been recommended for pediatric patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and their families. Our objective was to assess a psychosocial screening protocol in its feasibility, acceptability to families, and ability to predict early emerging complications, nonadherent family behavior, and use of preventive psychology services. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 125 patients and their caregivers were asked to participate in a standardized screening interview after admission at a large urban children's hospital with a new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Medical records were reviewed for subsequent diabetes-related emergency department (ED) admissions, missed diabetes clinic appointments, and psychology follow-up within 9 months of diagnosis. RESULTS Of 125 families, 121 (96.8%) agreed to participate in the screening, and a subsample of 30 surveyed caregivers indicated high levels of satisfaction. Risk factors at diagnosis predicted subsequent ED admissions with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.6%. Children from single-parent households with a history of behavior problems were nearly six times more likely to be seen in the ED after diagnosis. Missed appointments were likeliest among African Americans, 65% of whom missed at least one diabetes-related appointment. Psychology services for preventive intervention were underutilized, despite the high acceptability of the psychosocial screening. CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial screening of newly diagnosed patients with type 1 diabetes is feasible, acceptable to families, and able to identify families at risk for early emerging complications and nonadherence. Challenges remain with regards to reimbursement and fostering follow-up for preventive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jönsson L, Hallström I, Lundqvist A. A multi-disciplinary education process related to the discharging of children from hospital when the child has been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes--a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr 2010; 10:36. [PMID: 20507611 PMCID: PMC2889941 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2009] [Accepted: 05/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Worldwide, insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes is one of the most frequently diagnosed long-term endocrine disorders found in children and the incidences of this diseased is still increasing. In Sweden the routines are, according to national guidelines, when the child is diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, the child and its family remains at the hospital for about two weeks. There is limited knowledge about how a diabetes team handles a child and its family from admission to discharge, therefore the purpose of this study was to seek a deeper understanding of how the diabetes team's parent/child education process works, from admission to discharge, among families with a child newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Methods Qualitative data collection was used. Four focus-group interviews, with a sample of three diabetes teams from different paediatric hospitals in the south western part of Sweden, were conducted and the data recorded on tape and then analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The results indicate that achieving a status of self-care on the part of the patient is the goal of the diabetes education programme. Part of the programme is aimed at guiding the child and its parents towards self-help through the means of providing them with knowledge of the disease and its treatment to enable the whole family to understand the need for cooperation in the process. To do this requires an understanding, by the diabetes team, of the individualities of the family in order to gain an overall picture. Conclusion The results of this study show that the diabetes education programme is specifically designed for each family using the internationally recommended clinical practice guidelines with its specific aims and objectives. Achieving the families' willingness to assist in the self-care of the child care is the goal of the parent education process. To achieve this, the paediatric diabetes specialist nurse and the diabetes specialist paediatrician immediately and deliberately start the process of educating the family using a programme designed to give them the necessary knowledge and skills they will need to manage their child's type 1 diabetes at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Jönsson
- Division of Nursing, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|