The effect of i.v. enalaprilat in chronically treated hypertensive patients during cardiac surgery

Perioperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers for preventing mortality and morbidity in adults

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypertension requires careful management. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) have shown efficacy in treating hypertension associated with surgery. However, there is lack of consensus about whether they can prevent mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the benefits and harms of administration of ACEIs or ARBs perioperatively for the prevention of mortality and morbidity in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the current issue of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 8 December 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 8 December 2014), and references of the retrieved randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative administration of ACEIs or ARBs with placebo in adults (aged 18 years and above) undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. We excluded studies in which participants underwent procedures that required local anaesthesia only, or participants who had already been on ACEIs or ARBs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 571 participants in the review. Two of the seven trials involved 36 participants undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery (infrarenal aortic surgery), and five involved 535 participants undergoing cardiac surgery, including valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass surgery, and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. The intervention was started from 11 days to 25 minutes before surgery in six trials and during surgery in one trial. We considered all seven RCTs to carry a high risk of bias. The effects of ACEIs or ARBs on perioperative mortality and acute myocardial infarction were uncertain because the quality of the evidence was very low. The risk of death was 2.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 1.6% in the placebo group (risk ratio (RR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 5.85). The risk of acute myocardial infarction was 1.7% in the ACEIs or ARBs group and 3.0% in the placebo group (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.26). ACEIs or ARBs may improve congestive heart failure (cardiac index) perioperatively (mean difference (MD) -0.60; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.50, very low-quality evidence). In terms of rate of complications, there was no difference in perioperative cerebrovascular complications (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.28, very low-quality evidence) and hypotension (RR 1.95; 95% CI 0.86 to 4.41, very low-quality evidence). Cardiac surgery-related renal failure was not reported. ACEIs or ARBs were associated with shortened length of hospital stay (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, P value = 0.005, very low-quality evidence). These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to likely confounding by the clinical backgrounds of the participants. ACEIs or ARBs may shorten the length of hospital stay, (MD -0.54; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.16, very low-quality evidence) Two studies reported adverse events, and there was no evidence of a difference between the ACEIs or ARBs and control groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this review did not find evidence to support that perioperative ACEIs or ARBs can prevent mortality, morbidity, and complications (hypotension, perioperative cerebrovascular complications, and cardiac surgery-related renal failure). We found no evidence showing that the use of these drugs may reduce the rate of acute myocardial infarction. However, ACEIs or ARBs may increase cardiac output perioperatively. Due to the low and very low methodology quality, high risk of bias, and lack of power of the included studies, the true effect may be substantially different from the observed estimates. Perioperative (mainly elective cardiac surgery, according to included studies) initiation of ACEIs or ARBs therapy should be individualized.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and blood pressure response during total intravenous anaesthesia for minor surgery

BACKGROUND

This study investigates whether long-term treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) impairs the haemodynamic regulation during total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for minor surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective, two-armed observational study, 36 patients undergoing TIVA for minor surgery were studied. Seventeen were taking ACEIs regularly but no other antihypertensive medication (ACEI group); 19 patients without any cardiovascular medication served as controls (non-ACEI group). Haemodynamic variables were measured every minute during induction and every 5 min during surgery. The plasma levels of renin, angiotensin II, vasopressin and catecholamines were measured before and 18 min after the induction of anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The mean arterial pressure decreased to the same extent in both the groups during the induction of TIVA. There were also no differences between the groups regarding the heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, as well as the use of vasoconstrictors, and fluids during induction and throughout surgery. In the ACEI group, the plasma renin concentration was higher at baseline and after the induction of anaesthesia presumably due to the interruption of the negative renin-angiotensin feedback loop (P<0.05). Angiotensin II increased only in the non-ACEI group (6.2 ± 2.2 before vs. 9.6 ± 3.5 pg/ml after induction; P<0.05). In both groups, the plasma norepinephrine concentration decreased after the induction of TIVA (P<0.05). Plasma vasopressin and plasma epinephrine concentrations did not change in either group.

CONCLUSION

Long-term ACEI treatment does not further aggravate the blood pressure decrease under TIVA during minor surgery, provided the induction procedure is slow, the patient is kept well hydrated and vasoconstrictors are promptly applied.

Drugs for the perioperative control of hypertension: current issues and future directions

The management of hypertension continues to pose important challenges. Recent developments have established the importance of more rigorous blood pressure control in the community. In the perioperative setting, hypertension has long been recognised as undesirable, although the adverse impact of high blood pressure on the acute risks of elective surgery may have been previously overstated.A number of agents and techniques are available to control blood pressure perioperatively. These include principally general and regional anaesthetics, alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, peripheral alpha(1)- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists, dopamine D(1A)-receptor agonists (fenoldopam), and nitric oxide donors. Recent years have seen important developments in the receptor selectivity of new compounds and in pharmacokinetics, particularly esterase metabolism. The future study of genomics may enable us to identify patients at risk for hypertension-related adverse events and target therapies most effectively to these high-risk groups.

Zur perioperativen Gabe von ACE-Hemmern

INTRODUCTION

The discussion about perioperative withdrawal or continuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) remains controversial. Should it be continued to avoid peaks in blood pressure and heart rate during anesthesia? Or should it be discontinued the day before to avoid clinically relevant hypotonia? What is the greater risk? Since there are only a few studies dealing with this question, we compared the cardio-circulatory reaction during anesthesia after withdrawal and with continuation of ACEI therapy.

METHODS

A total of 100 hypertonic patients chronically treated with ACEIs were included in this prospective, randomized, double blind study. The last ACEI medication was given with the premedication in the morning (premed) or on the day before (withdrawal). Blood pressure and heart rate during induction and termination of anesthesia were compared between both groups. A threshold value for vasopressor therapy was determined to be a mean arterial pressure of 60 mmHg.

RESULTS

In the premed group Akrinor was necessary significantly more often and in higher dosages. Nevertheless, following induction the blood pressure and heart rates were significantly lower compared to the withdrawal group. The highest blood pressure and heart rate during induction and termination of anesthesia did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuation of ACEI therapy in the morning is not associated with a better control of blood pressure and heart rate but causes a more pronounced hypotension which forced a therapy more often. Patients chronically treated with ACEI should receive the ACEI the last time on the day before the operation and not with the premedication in the morning.

Beneficial hemodynamic and renal effects of intravenous enalaprilat following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are an effective therapy for all stages of heart failure due to reduced systolic left ventricular function. Because sufficient data on intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction are unavailable, the efficacy and safety of intravenously administered enalaprilat were evaluated.

DESIGN

A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind protocol.

SETTING

Postoperative intensive care unit at the German Heart Institute Berlin.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% following coronary artery bypass surgery on the second postoperative day or after weaning from intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

INTERVENTIONS

A loading dose of enalaprilat 0.625 mg infused over 1 hr was followed by 5 mg/24 hrs administered continuously for up to 72 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic variables, blood gases, hormonal variables, renal function, and electrolytes were measured before and repeatedly during therapy. Acute effects were as follows: At 1 hr, enalaprilat increased the cardiac index (p <.001), stroke volume index (p <.001), and right ventricular stroke work index (p <.03) compared with placebo, whereas mean arterial pressure (p <.008) and both systemic (p <.001) and pulmonary (p <.02) vascular resistance decreased. Continuous effects were as follows: Over 72 hrs, enalaprilat decreased diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (p <.019), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (p <.02), and central venous pressure (p <.02). The cardiac and stroke volume indexes were consistently higher in the enalaprilat group, whereas systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances were lower. The arterial blood-pressure lowering effect was blunted and heart rate remained unchanged. Mixed venous oxygenation (p <.02) was higher and arterial oxygenation was not modified. Finally, enalaprilat increased creatinine clearance (p <.002) and decreased creatinine (p <.02) and urea (p <.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous enalaprilat safely and effectively improves cardiac and renal function following coronary artery bypass surgery complicated by postoperative left ventricular dysfunction.