Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique

Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12

A significant number of surgical patients are at risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both, which are associated with increased lengths of stay, costs, and mortality. Reducing these risks is important for the individual patient but also for health-care planners and managers. Insufficient tissue perfusion and cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction or both is one of the leading causes of perioperative complications. Adequate perioperative management guided by effective and timely hemodynamic monitoring can help reduce the risk of complications and thus potentially improve outcomes. In this review, we describe the various available hemodynamic monitoring systems and how they can best be used to guide cardiovascular and fluid management in the perioperative period in high-risk surgical patients.

Basic and clinical assessment of initial distribution volume of glucose in hemodynamically stable pediatric intensive care patients

Background

Initial distribution volume of glucose (IDVG), which is not associated with significant modification of glucose metabolism, has been proposed as an indicator of the central extracellular fluid volume status in adults. However, data on IDVG in children are lacking. This study examined pharmacokinetic data on IDVG in children and compared IDVG with other clinical variables.

Methods

In total, 128 daily data sets from 60 consecutive pediatric intensive care patients (body weight ≥8.0 kg), consisting mostly of children undergoing cardiovascular surgery, were studied. Either 1 or 2 g of glucose based on body weight (approximately 0.1 g/kg) was administered. IDVG could not be determined from ten data sets from eight children because of body movement-associated glucose fluctuation during measurement. In the remaining 113 data sets from 55 children, IDVG was determined by applying the one-compartment model. Approximated IDVG based on the incremental plasma glucose level at 3 min postinjection (1-point IDVG), and approximated IDVG based on incremental plasma glucose levels at 3 and 5 min postinjection (2-point IDVG), were also calculated. Postoperative daily IDVG and the relationship between IDVG and cardiac output or circulating blood volume (CBV) were evaluated when data were available.

Results

Convergence was assumed in each glucose clearance curve. Mean indexed IDVG (IDVGI) of the first measurement in 55 children was 144 ± 22 (SD) mL/kg, which was associated with a plasma glucose disappearance rate (Ke-glucose) of 0.094 ± 0.033/min. Bias and precision were smaller between 2-point IDVG and standard IDVG than between 1-point IDVG and standard IDVG (−0.02 ± 0.13 L versus 0.07 ± 0.20 L, p <0.001). Postoperative IDVGI in 37 children after cardiovascular surgery increased daily on postoperative days 1–2 (p ≤0.011). Linear correlations were observed between IDVGI and indexed cardiac output (r = 0.588, n = 28, p <0.001) and between IDVGI and indexed CBV (r = 0.547, n = 25, p = 0.0047).

Conclusions

IDVG is a potential marker of fluid volume status in children, even though body movement-associated glucose fluctuation is a major limitation. Two-point IDVG is preferable to 1-point IDVG for approximated IDVG.

Less-invasive approaches to perioperative haemodynamic optimization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A number of less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring devices have been introduced in recent years, largely replacing the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) as a standard monitoring tool. Apart from tracking cardiac output (CO), these monitors provide additional haemodynamic parameters. The aim of this article is to review the most widely used less-invasive monitoring modalities, their technical characteristics and limitations regarding their clinical performance.

RECENT FINDINGS

The utilization of CO monitoring in the perioperative setting has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes if integrated into a haemodynamic optimization strategy. These findings provide the basis of recent recommendations for perioperative monitoring.

SUMMARY

An array of monitoring modalities have been introduced that can reliably track CO in the perioperative setting and make the PAC dispensable in most clinical situations. In order to be used safely and efficiently, knowledge regarding the inherent monitoring techniques and their limitations, their clinical validity and the utility of the parameters provided is crucial.

Emerging technologies

Hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients has been considered part of the standard of care in managing patients with shock and/or acute lung injury, but outcome benefit, particularly in pediatric patients, has been questioned. There is difficulty in validating the reliability of monitoring devices, especially since this validation requires comparison to the pulmonary artery catheter, which has its own problems as a measurement tool. Interpretation of the available evidence reveals advantages and disadvantages of the available hemodynamic monitoring devices.

Cardiovascular monitoring by pulse dye densitometry or arterial indocyanine green dilution

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring is possible by indocyanine green (ICG) dilution measured by pulse dye densitometry (PDD). To validate the precision of this method, we compared hemodynamic variables derived from PDD (DDG-2001, Nihon Kohden, Japan) with those derived from simultaneously taken arterial blood ICG concentrations.

METHODS

In 20 patients (6 M/14 F), ASA I or II, 36 sessions were performed (n = 24 with the PDD-finger probe, n = 10 with the PDD-nose probe). After IV administration of 10 mg ICG, 34 arterial blood samples were taken during each session, with 20 samples taken during the first 2 min. CO, central blood volume (CBV), and total blood volume (TBV) were calculated independently from ICG and PDD and the results compared between methods using Bland-Altman analysis. The results are reported as mean difference (bias) and limits of agreement (LOA = +/- 2 sd).

RESULTS

PDD using the finger probe underestimated CO (LOA) by 5% (-56% and 47%); overestimated CBV by 21% (-54% and 96%) and underestimated TBV by -15% (-38% and 8%). PDD using the nose probe overestimated CO (LOA) by 30% (-67% and 127%); CBV by 48% (-98% and 193%) and underestimated TBV by -10% (-47% and 27%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the permissible bias, the wide LOA of the PDD-derived hemodynamic variables CO and CBV, compared with those simultaneously obtained by invasive arterial ICG measurements, suggest that PDD is unsuitable for evaluation of cardiovascular variables in the individual patient. Hence, the reliability and clinical use of this method seem limited.

Noninvasive cardiac output determination: broadening the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring

Although cardiac output (CO) monitoring is usually only used in intensive care units (ICUs) and operating rooms, there is increasing evidence that CO should be determined and optimized as early as possible, even before admission to the ICU, in the care of hemodynamically compromised patients. A variety of different minimally or noninvasive CO determination techniques have been developed, but not all of them are suitable for early hemodynamic monitoring outside the ICU. In this review, the different available methods for CO monitoring are presented and their potential for early hemodynamic assessment is discussed.

What technique should I use to measure cardiac output?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several less invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques are now commercially available and have the potential to replace the pulmonary artery catheter under certain clinical circumstances. The aim of this review is to give a synopsis of the currently available cardiac output measurement methods. This information should help in selecting the appropriate technique in a particular clinical setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview is given of the currently available techniques for cardiac output monitoring. Recent validation studies demonstrate that pulse wave analysis may be used reliably as an alternative to the pulmonary artery catheter in different clinical settings. The use of transesophageal echocardiography and Doppler measurements is limited due to high operator dependency, the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique should be applied in a precisely defined clinical setting to mechanically ventilated patients only, and pulsed dye densitometry as well as the bioimpedance technique are currently primarily applied in an investigational setting.

SUMMARY

Less invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques may replace the pulmonary artery catheter in different clinical settings considering the specific properties of these techniques. The pulmonary artery catheter, however, may still be recommended for cardiac output measurement in specific clinical situations when monitoring of pulmonary artery pressures is desirable.

Comparison of oxygen consumption calculated by Fick's principle (using a central venous catheter) and measured by indirect calorimetry

We investigated the clinical usefulness of the Fick method using central venous oxygen saturation ScvO2 and cardiac output (CO) measured by pulse dye densitometry (PDD) for monitoring oxygen consumption VO2. This prospective clinical study was performed in 28 mechanically ventilated postoperative patients after major abdominal surgery. VO2 was determined by two methods, i.e., the Fick method and indirect calorimetry. The Fick method was employed using CO measured by PDD and VO2 obtained from a central venous catheter (CVC). VO2 measured by indirect calorimetry was averaged for 15 min. Fifty-six sets of measurements were performed. VO2 values determined by the Fick method were significantly lower than those measured by indirect calorimetry (110 +/- 29 vs 148 +/- 28 ml x min(-1) x m(-2); P < 0.01). Bland and Altma analysis showed that the mean bias and precision were 33 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) and 32 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively. The correlation between the two measurements of VO2 was weak (r (2) = 0.145; P = 0.0038), indicating that the Fick method using PDD and ScvO2 is not clinically acceptable for the monitoring of VO2.

Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution in post-cardiac surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

Pulse-dye densitometry (PDD) could be a suitable, low-invasive alternative to thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) for monitoring cardiac output. The aim of our study was to assess the reproducibility and validity of PDD compared to PAC-thermodilution.

METHODS

In 43 post-cardiac surgery patients, the mean of triplicate readings of cardiac output was assessed using both methods. In a subgroup of 26 patients, a second set of measurements was obtained on average 2 h later.

RESULTS

Reproducibility of consecutive measurements was slightly better for PAC-thermodilution than for PDD (median coefficient of variation of the triplicate measurements: 3.5% versus 5.4%, P < 0.01). Both methods correlated well (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Using Bland and Altman analyses with PAC-thermodilution as the reference method, PDD showed a bias of -0.68 +/- 0.82 L/min, mainly due to differences in higher ranges of cardiac output (>6.5 L/min). Measured changes in cardiac output were 81% concordant (i.e. <1 L/min different) between both methods.

CONCLUSION

PDD correlates well with PAC-thermodilution and thus deserves consideration as a low-invasive alternative for measurement and follow-up of cardiac output.

Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry in cardiac surgery

Summary The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of pulse dye densitometry with that of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurement in patients before and after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Twenty-eight patients were studied. Agreement between mean thermodilution and pulse dye densitometry cardiac output values was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Preoperative median [range] cardiac output was 3.87 [2.37-6.0] l.min(-1) by thermodilution, and 3.11 [1.7-5.45] l.min(-1) by pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 5 mg. Pulse dye densitometry underestimated cardiac output (mean bias - 0.42 l.min(-1)); the limits of agreement were +/- 1.91 l.min(-1), and mean error was 50.3%, indicating low precision. Preoperative median [range] cardiac output was 3.85 [2.2-6.0] l.min(-1) for bolus thermodilution cardiac output and 4.2 [2.0-7.2] l.min(-1) for pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 20 mg. Mean bias was + 0.566 l.min(-1), the limits of agreement were +/- 2.51 l.min(-1) and mean error was 60.9%. Postoperative cardiac output data were not analysed because pulse dye densitometry signals were low or absent in > 50% of the patients. We conclude that pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green 5 mg or 20 mg is inaccurate in anaesthetised patients before coronary artery bypass surgery and cannot be used after surgery because of a high incidence of low pulse dye densitometry signal amplitudes.