1
|
Chang MG, Berra L, Bittner EA. Bedside Ultrasound: The Silent Guardian for Upper Airway Assessment and Management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2024; 45:46-57. [PMID: 38056793 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound evaluation of the upper airway has emerged as an essential instrument for clinicians, offering real-time assessment that can help to guide interventions and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide health care providers with a practical approach to performing ultrasound evaluation of the upper airway, covering basic physics relevant to upper airway ultrasound, the identification of key anatomical structures, and elucidating its various clinical applications, such as prediction of difficult airway, confirmation of endotracheal intubation, and guidance for surgical airway procedures and airway blocks. We also discuss evidence-based training programs, limitations, and future directions of ultrasound imaging of the upper airway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin G Chang
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Lorenzo Berra
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Edward A Bittner
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chrimes N, Higgs A, Hagberg CA, Baker PA, Cooper RM, Greif R, Kovacs G, Law JA, Marshall SD, Myatra SN, O'Sullivan EP, Rosenblatt WH, Ross CH, Sakles JC, Sorbello M, Cook TM. Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:1395-1415. [PMID: 35977431 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Across multiple disciplines undertaking airway management globally, preventable episodes of unrecognised oesophageal intubation result in profound hypoxaemia, brain injury and death. These events occur in the hands of both inexperienced and experienced practitioners. Current evidence shows that unrecognised oesophageal intubation occurs sufficiently frequently to be a major concern and to merit a co-ordinated approach to address it. Harm from unrecognised oesophageal intubation is avoidable through reducing the rate of oesophageal intubation, combined with prompt detection and immediate action when it occurs. The detection of 'sustained exhaled carbon dioxide' using waveform capnography is the mainstay for excluding oesophageal placement of an intended tracheal tube. Tube removal should be the default response when sustained exhaled carbon dioxide cannot be detected. If default tube removal is considered dangerous, urgent exclusion of oesophageal intubation using valid alternative techniques is indicated, in parallel with evaluation of other causes of inability to detect carbon dioxide. The tube should be removed if timely restoration of sustained exhaled carbon dioxide cannot be achieved. In addition to technical interventions, strategies are required to address cognitive biases and the deterioration of individual and team performance in stressful situations, to which all practitioners are vulnerable. These guidelines provide recommendations for preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation that are relevant to all airway practitioners independent of geography, clinical location, discipline or patient type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Chrimes
- Department of Anaesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Higgs
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Warrington Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheshire, UK
| | - C A Hagberg
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P A Baker
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R M Cooper
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Greif
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Medical Education, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Kovacs
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia, Medical Neurosciences and Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - J A Law
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Peri-operative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - S D Marshall
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S N Myatra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - E P O'Sullivan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W H Rosenblatt
- Department of Anesthesia, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - C H Ross
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mercy Health, Javon Bea Hospital, Rockton and Riverside Campuses, Rockford, IL, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J C Sakles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - M Sorbello
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - T M Cook
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kodali BS, Urman RD. Capnography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Current evidence and future directions. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2014; 7:332-40. [PMID: 25400399 PMCID: PMC4231274 DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.142778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Capnography continues to be an important tool in measuring expired carbon dioxide (CO2). Most recent Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines now recommend using capnography to ascertain the effectiveness of chest compressions and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Based on an extensive review of available published literature, we selected all available peer-reviewed research investigations and case reports. Available evidence suggests that there is significant correlation between partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) and cardiac output that can indicate the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Additional evidence favoring the use of capnography during CPR includes definitive proof of correct placement of the endotracheal tube and possible prediction of patient survival following cardiac arrest, although the latter will require further investigations. There is emerging evidence that PETCO2 values can guide the initiation of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in refractory cardiac arrest (RCA). There is also increasing recognition of the value of capnography in intensive care settings in intubated patients. Future directions include determining the outcomes based on capnography waveforms PETCO2 values and determining a reasonable duration of CPR. In the future, given increasing use of capnography during CPR large databases can be analyzed to predict outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavani Shankar Kodali
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paal P, Neurauter A, Loedl M, Pehböck D, Herff H, von Goedecke A, Lindner KH, Wenzel V. Effects of stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs. Resuscitation 2009; 80:365-71. [PMID: 19150160 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2008] [Revised: 11/27/2008] [Accepted: 12/01/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM Stomach inflation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is frequent, but the effect on haemodynamic and pulmonary function is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of clinically realistic stomach inflation on haemodynamic and pulmonary function during CPR in a porcine model. METHODS After baseline measurements ventricular fibrillation was induced in 21 pigs, and the stomach was inflated with 0L (n=7), 5L (n=7) or 10L air (n=7) before initiating CPR. RESULTS During CPR, 0, 5, and 10L stomach inflation resulted in higher mean pulmonary artery pressure [median (min-max)] [35 (28-40), 47 (25-50), and 51 (49-75) mmHg; P<0.05], but comparable coronary perfusion pressure [10 (2-20), 8 (4-35) and 5 (2-13) mmHg; P=0.54]. Increasing (0, 5, and 10L) stomach inflation decreased static pulmonary compliance [52 (38-98), 19 (8-32), and 12 (7-15) mL/cmH(2)O; P<0.05], and increased peak airway pressure [33 (27-36), 53 (45-104), and 103 (96-110) cmH(2)O; P<0.05). Arterial oxygen partial pressure was higher with 0L when compared with 5 and 10L stomach inflation [378 (88-440), 58 (47-113), and 54 (43-126) mmHg; P<0.05). Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower with 0L when compared with 5 and 10L stomach inflation [30 (24-36), 41(34-51), and 56 (45-68) mmHg; P<0.05]. Return of spontaneous circulation was comparable between groups (5/7 in 0L, 4/7 in 5L, and 3/7 in 10L stomach inflation; P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS Increasing levels of stomach inflation had adverse effects on haemodynamic and pulmonary function, indicating an acute abdominal compartment syndrome in this CPR model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Paal
- Department of Anesthesiology and General Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|