Schulze TJ, Goebel M, Scharberg EA, Bugert P, Janetzko K. Development of Anti-G, Anti-C and Anti-Jk(b) in a 22-Year-Old Mother during Her Fourth Pregnancy.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013;
40:207-9. [PMID:
23921643 DOI:
10.1159/000351518]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 11/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Anti-G antibodies are rarely found since anti-D, in combination with anti-C, are difficult to discriminate from anti-G antibodies in routine testing.
CASE REPORT
A 22-year-old, gravida-3, para-1, woman with blood group A Rh D neg ccddee and known antibody anti-Jk(b), gave birth to her second child. While anti-Jk(b) could not be detected at birth, a new anti-C was found. Antibody screening tests (IAT) were performed using gel cards and rare G positive rGr erythrocytes. Genotyping for RHD and RHCE was performed using PCR-SSP.
RESULTS
The child's blood group was A Rh D neg Ccddee. Genotyping revealed Cde/cde haplotypes. The erythrocytes of the new-born showed a positive direct antiglobulin test with IgG; anti-D and anti-C could be eluted. Erythrocytes with the rare phenotype rGr were reactive with the serum of the mother.
CONCLUSION
The presence of anti-D and anti-C in the eluate from then newborn's Ccddee erythrocytes proved anti-G or anti-G in combination with anti-D. When anti-C and anti-D are seen during a pregnancy, possibly anti-G is present. This observation is of relevance since women with anti-G can still develop anti-D and require rhesus prophylaxis.
Collapse