Interdonor incompatibility due to anti-Kell antibody undetectable by automated antibody screening

Analytic Reviews : Hemolytic Transfusion Reactions: A Review of Mechanisms, Sequelae, and Management

The transfusion of blood and blood products is an im portant therapeutic procedure, but it is associated with several potentially serious adverse effects. Among these complications are hemalytic reactions, which in most cases result from the interaction between donor red cell antigens and recipient plasma antibodies. Clinical mani festations and sequelae are largely determined by the physical and immunological characteristics of the anti gens and antibodies. Early recognition may be difficult in the anesthetized or intensively monitored patient. Acute hemolytic reactions are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality and may lead to life-threatening shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and renal failure. Fortunately, fatal hemolytic transfusion reactions are rare; they usually result from clerical errors. Proper diagnosis and management requires sound clinical judg ment, thorough laboratory investigation, and timely therapeutic intervention.

Comparison of antibody titers in donor specimens and associated AS-1 leukoreduced donor units

BACKGROUND

Donor units with unexpected antibodies to red blood cell (RBC) antigens have transfusion restrictions and are often discarded by collection facilities. This study examined the antibody titer reduction in AS-1 leukoreduced RBC (LR-RBC) units and potential acceptability of these units for unrestricted transfusions.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donor specimens and AS-1 LR-RBC segment samples from donors with positive antibody screens and group O donors were analyzed. Antibody identifications were performed, and titer results from the matched serum samples and segment supernatants were compared.

RESULTS

During the 5-month study, 39 donor samples with positive antibody screens, five random group O donor samples, and the associated LR-RBC unit segments were assessed. The median donor sample and segment supernatant titers were 4 and 1, respectively. Alloantibodies were undetectable in 28% of the donor segment supernatants. The median anti-A and anti-B titers in the group O donor samples were 128 and were reduced to 32 in the donor segment supernatants. All ABO and other antibodies were diluted by the AS-1 to a titer of not more than 32.

CONCLUSION

Antibody titers in AS-1 LR-RBC units were significantly decreased compared to donor specimens and were lower than anti-A and -B titers in group O AS-1 LR-RBC units, which are frequently transfused to non-group O recipients. If a "clinically significant" titer for donor alloantibodies was established, blood centers could determine eligibility of units for unrestricted transfusions. This would decrease unnecessary RBC wastage and increase units available for transfusion.

Platelet transfusion reaction associated with interdonor HLA incompatibility

An HLA-compatible platelet transfusion was followed by chills, fever, and severe respiratory distress in a multitransfused patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. During the previous 7 days the patient had received blood products without incident, including 8 units of red blood cells (RBC), 24 units of pooled random donor platelet concentrates, and five HLA-compatible platelet pheresis products. The patient had no demonstrable RBC, HLA lymphocytotoxic, platelet or granulocyte antibodies. The platelet donor, a multiparous female, had no granulocyte or RBC antibodies but had lymphocytotoxic antibodies against HLA-A2 CREG (cross-reacting group A2, A28, A23, A24) which reacted not with lymphocytes of the patient but with lymphocytes of the donor whose RBC were transfused 24 h prior to the platelet transfusion reaction and whose HLA type is A23, A24; B44, B57. No RBC donors had HLA lymphocytotoxic, granulocyte, or platelet antibodies against the platelet donor. The patient received three subsequent platelet transfusions from the same donor after removal of the antibody-laden plasma with no adverse reaction. These data suggest an interdonor reaction caused by the presence of cells from the RBC donor received by the patient 24 h prior to the transfusion of donor lymphocytotoxic antibody to HLA-A2 CREG antigens.