Association of messenger RNA with the cytoskeletal framework in rat L6 myogenic cells

Physiological factors influencing the growth of skeletal muscle

The growth of muscle can be regulated by developmental changes or by alterations in hormone levels or in the rate or amount of work demanded. The mechanisms and structures involved in growth processes can be studied by controlling these factors. The models used are chicken anterior latissimus dorsi (ALD) muscle under the influence of overloading and rabbit tibialis anterior (TA) muscle under the influence of chronic nerve stimulation. Both models involve changes in the isoform of myosin that is expressed. Methods of study include quantitative ultrastructural analysis, immunofluorescence and in situ mRNA hybridization. In overloaded chick ALD fibres polysomes are nonuniformly distributed between the myofibrils and in a peripheral annulus even though subcellular concentrations of the new isoform are not found. In normal rabbit muscle the highest concentration of myosin mRNA detected by in situ hybridization is found in the subsarcolemmal zone. In stimulated TA polysomes are found between myofibrils. It appears that the myosin mRNA accumulates at specific cell locations before translation; then diffusion of isomyosin and rapid exchange into myofibrils follows. Therefore, regulation of growth may be possible at the transcriptional, translational and assembly stages.

Compartmentalisation and localisation of the translation initiation factor (eIF) 4F complex in normally growing fibroblasts

Previous observations of association of mRNAs and ribosomes with subcellular structures highlight the importance of localised translation. However, little is known regarding associations between eukaryotic translation initiation factors and cellular structures within the cytoplasm of normally growing cells. We have used detergent-based cellular fractionation coupled with immunofluorescence microscopy to investigate the subcellular localisation in NIH3T3 fibroblasts of the initiation factors involved in recruitment of mRNA for translation, focussing on eIF4E, the mRNA cap-binding protein, the scaffold protein eIF4GI and poly(A) binding protein (PABP). We find that these proteins exist mainly in a soluble cytosolic pool, with only a subfraction tightly associated with cellular structures. However, this "associated" fraction was enriched in active "eIF4F" complexes (eIF4E.eIF4G.eIF4A.PABP). Immunofluorescence analysis reveals both a diffuse and a perinuclear distribution of eIF4G, with the perinuclear staining pattern similar to that of the endoplasmic reticulum. eIF4E also shows both a diffuse staining pattern and a tighter perinuclear stain, partly coincident with vimentin intermediate filaments. All three proteins localise to the lamellipodia of migrating cells in close proximity to ribosomes, microtubules, microfilaments and focal adhesions, with eIF4G and eIF4E at the periphery showing a similar staining pattern to the focal adhesion protein vinculin.

Poly(A) RNA codistribution with microfilaments: evaluation by in situ hybridization and quantitative digital imaging microscopy

The distribution of poly(A) RNA has been visualized in single cells using high-resolution fluorescent in situ hybridization. Digital imaging microscopy was used to quantitate the signal in various cellular compartments. Most of the poly(A) signal remained associated with the cellular filament systems after solubilization of membranes with Triton, dissociation of ribosomes with puromycin, and digestion of non-poly(A) RNA with ribonuclease A and T1. The actin filaments were shown to be the predominant cellular structural elements associating with the poly(A) because low doses of cytochalasin released about two- thirds of the poly(A). An approach to assess the extent of colocalization of two images was devised using in situ hybridization to poly(A) in combination with probes for ribosomes, membranes, or F- actin. Digital imaging microscopy showed that most poly(A) spatially distributes most significantly with ribosomes, slightly less with F- actin, and least of all with membranes. The results suggest a mechanism for anchoring (and perhaps moving) much of the cellular mRNA utilizing the interaction between actin filaments and poly(A).

Alteration of translation and stability of mRNA for the poly(A)-binding protein during myogenesis

The regulation of synthesis of various factors involved in mRNA translation during differentiation of muscle cells was examined. The steady-state levels of mRNAs coding for eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2 alpha, 2 beta and elongation factor (eEF)-1 alpha were measured in both proliferating rat L6 myoblast and differentiated myotubes. The steady-state levels of these mRNAs were not altered during myogenesis. Furthermore, the distribution of these mRNAs between repressed and translated populations remained unchanged. Recent studies suggest a role for poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) in translation initiation. Therefore, we also examined the expression of PABP mRNA during myogenesis. The PABP mRNA was less abundant in myotubes compared to myoblasts. However, the synthesis of PABP remained unchanged. In myoblasts, approximately 50-60% of the total mRNA was associated with polyribosomes, whereas in myotubes more than 80% of the mRNA was associated with polyribosomes. These results, therefore, suggest that the PABP mRNA was more efficiently translated in differentiated myotubes than in the proliferating myoblasts. Measurement of the stability and transcription of PABP mRNA showed that, while transcription was not affected during myogenesis, the stability of the mRNA was reduced in differentiated cells. The t1/2 of PABP mRNA in myoblasts was 13 h compared to 7.5 h in myotubes. This observation suggests that the reduced steady-state level of PABP mRNA in myotube were largely due to the change in stability of this mRNA during myogenesis.

Mechanisms for intracellular distribution of mRNA: in situ hybridization studies in muscle

The intracellular distribution of mRNA in striated muscle fibers is highly ordered, as is the structural organization of the fibers' contractile apparatus. Results from in situ hybridization of muscle mRNA are reviewed in an attempt to discern the mechanisms involved in mRNA distribution and to determine its relationship to developmental, growth, and repair processes in muscle. Nonradioactively labeled complementary RNA probes allow anatomic localization of mRNA at the light and electron microscopic level. Myosin mRNA in striated muscle is concentrated around transcriptionally active nuclei, myosin mRNA is excluded by the myofibrillar mass, myosin mRNA distribution correlates with that of cytoskeletal elements, and myosin mRNA is concentrated in regions of rapid growth and repair. The even distribution of myosin mRNA along the length of myofibrils gives no indication of specific association with either the thick or thin filaments. Of the possible mechanisms directing mRNA distribution, results from in situ hybridization and other analyses support a restricted diffusion model. Diffusion of mRNA (and polysomes) is severely limited by the myofibrillar lattice. It is possible that myosin mRNA is also associated with a cytoskeletal element, which may direct the mRNA to specific intracellular locations and affect translational activity.

Beta actin and its mRNA are localized at the plasma membrane and the regions of moving cytoplasm during the cellular response to injury

Previous work in our laboratory has shown that microvascular pericytes sort muscle and nonmuscle actin isoforms into discrete cytoplasmic domains (Herman, I. M., and P. A. D'Amore. 1985. J. Cell Biol. 101:43-52; DeNofrio, D.T.C. Hoock, and I. M. Herman. J. Cell. Biol. 109:191-202). Specifically, muscle (alpha-smooth) actin is present on the stress fibers while nonmuscle actins (beta and gamma) are located on stress fibers and in regions of moving cytoplasm (e.g., ruffles, lamellae). To determine the form and function of beta actin in microvascular pericytes and endothelial cells recovering from injury, we prepared isoform-specific antibodies and cDNA probes for immunolocalization, Western and Northern blotting, as well as in situ hybridization. Anti-beta actin IgG was prepared by adsorption and release of beta actin-specific IgG from electrophoretically purified pericyte beta actin bound to nitrocellulose paper. Anti-beta actin IgGs prepared by this affinity selection procedure showed exclusive binding to beta actin present in crude cell lysates containing all three actin isoforms. For controls, we localized beta actin as a bright rim of staining beneath the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Anti-beta actin IgG, absorbed with beta actin bound to nitrocellulose, failed to stain erythrocytes. Simultaneous localization of beta actin with the entire F-actin pool was performed on microvascular pericytes or endothelial cells and 3T3 fibroblasts recovering from injury using anti-beta actin IgG in combination with fluorescent phalloidin. Results of these experiments revealed that pericyte beta actin is localized beneath the plasma membrane in association with filopods, pseudopods, and fan lamellae. Additionally, we observed bright focal fluorescence within fan lamellae and in association with the ends of stress fibers that are preferentially associated with the ventral plasmalemma. Whereas fluorescent phalloidin staining along the stress fibers is continuous, anti-beta actin IgG localization is discontinuous. When injured endothelial and 3T3 cells were stained through wound closure, we localized beta actin only in motile cytoplasm at the wound edge. Staining disappeared as cells became quiescent upon monolayer restoration. Appearance of beta actin at the wound edge correlated with a two- to threefold increase in steady-state levels of beta actin mRNA, which rose within 15-60 min after injury and returned to noninjury levels during monolayer restoration. In situ hybridization revealed that transcripts encoding beta actin were localized at the wound edge in association with the repositioned protein. Results of these experiments indicate that beta actin and its encoded mRNA are polarized at the membrane-cytoskeletal interface within regions of moving cytoplasm.

Distribution of myosin mRNA during development and regeneration of skeletal muscle fibers

Myosin mRNA distribution among subcellular compartments of anterior tibialis muscles in rabbit is monitored by in situ hybridization. A high density of mRNA was widely distributed throughout myotubes from 29-day fetal muscle and from regenerating adult muscle. All cytoplasmic spaces contained mRNA except where scattered myofibrils and centrally located nuclei were found. In fibers from 22-week-old rabbits, myosin mRNA was concentrated under the sarcolemma and excluded from the consolidated myofibrils and peripheral nuclei. The dispersal of mRNA through the cytoplasm in myotubes suggests that translation of myosin is widespread and that rapid myofibril assembly can occur throughout the fiber.

Redistribution of myosin heavy chain mRNA in the midregion of stretched muscle fibers

Myosin mRNA distribution was compared to the distribution of striations, nuclei, and cytoskeletal components in normal fibers and in fibers undergoing growth and repair processes in response to stretch. Plantarflexion of rabbit lower hindlimb for 4 or 6 days resulted in a 35% increase in weight of the tibialis anterior muscle. Slow myosin expression in stretched fibers increased such that the proportion of fibers shifted from the fast type towards an intermediate type. Semi-quantitative in situ hybridization revealed a large increase in concentration of slow myosin mRNA in stretched fibers. Polysomes translating myosin heavy chain were excluded from the intact myofibrillar lattice. Significant increases of myosin mRNA concentration occurred only in the outer 8 microns subsarcolemmal annulus of these stretched fibers (P less than 0.001) where myofibril formation also was evident. In some fibers, stretch caused myofibrillar disorder where nuclei became centrally located, and focal concentrations of myosin mRNA also occurred. We discuss mechanisms for mRNA accumulation and favor free diffusion to loosely packed cytoplasmic regions where myosin is needed for myofibrillar growth and repair.

Cytoskeleton-bound mRNA for a 40-kDa polypeptide in rat L6 cells is not always translated

The relationship between attachment of mRNA to the cytoskeletal framework and its translation was examined using the mRNA for a polypeptide of 40 kDa (P-40) which is translated in rat L6 myoblasts but not in the myotubes. In both myoblasts and myotubes this mRNA was found to be associated with the cytoskeletal framework. Furthermore, the stability of the association between P-40 mRNA and the cytoskeletal framework in absence of RNA and protein synthesis was examined by using actinomycin D and NaF to block RNA and protein synthesis, respectively. In absence of RNA synthesis portions of both nontranslated P-40 mRNA and translated actin mRNA of myotubes were released into the soluble fraction. In myoblasts, however, both mRNAs remained associated with the cytoskeletal framework following inhibition of RNA synthesis. Inhibition of protein synthesis, on the other hand, had a more dramatic effect on the association between the cytoskeletal framework and P-40 mRNA in myoblasts but not in myotubes. In contrast, the association between actin mRNA and cytoskeletal framework was unaffected by inhibition of protein synthesis in both myoblasts and myotubes. The results of these studies show that the molecular nature of association between cytoskeletal framework and mRNA may differ among mRNAs and may also depend on whether the cells are dividing or are terminally differentiated. Furthermore, no direct relationship between the translation of mRNA and its attachment to the cytoskeletal framework was observed.

Expression of muscle-specific proteins is necessary to regulate translation of the mRNA for a 40-kDa housekeeping polypeptide in rat L6 cells

Translation of the mRNA for a housekeeping polypeptide of 40 kDa (P40) was found to be regulated under a variety of conditions in rat L6 cells. This mRNA was translated in the proliferating myoblasts but not in the non-proliferating myotubes. A number of chemicals, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, sodium butyrate and aphidicolin, were used to prevent expression of muscle-specific genes in mitogen-poor differentiation medium. In the absence of any detectable accumulation of muscle-specific alpha-actin mRNA, the P40 mRNA remained in the translated state. A fourth chemical, EGTA, a known inhibitor of fusion of muscle cells, blocked translation of muscle-specific actin and tropomyosin mRNAs. On the other hand, it showed no effect on the translation of P40 mRNA. Addition of Ca2+ to the EGTA-treated cultures, however, almost completely reversed the block of translation of actin tropomyosin mRNAs within four days. Concomitant to Ca2+ reversal of the translational block of muscle mRNAs, P40 mRNA entered the non-translated state. An inverse relationship, therefore, was observed between the translation of housekeeping P40 mRNA and muscle-specific mRNAs. The ability to mimic in vivo regulation of P40 mRNA translation was examined in mRNA-dependent micrococcal-nuclease-treated homologous cell-free extracts. The extracts from myoblasts and myotubes were able to translate P40 mRNA. Furthermore, ribosomes of both myoblast and myotube extracts containing endogenous mRNAs were also able to bind to P40 and actin mRNAs. Myotube extract, however, showed a lower binding ability to P40 mRNA than to the actin mRNA. The ability of ribosomes of myotube extract to bind P40 mRNA was somewhat enhanced by addition of proteins derived from washing these ribosomes with a high-ionic-strength buffer. In order to elucidate the role of interaction between mRNA and proteins in translational control of P40 mRNA, the polypeptide complements of polysomal and free P40 mRNA-protein (mRNP) complexes were also examined. Hybrid selection of polysomal and free P40 mRNP complexes followed the covalent joining of the RNA and protein moieties of mRNP complexes by ultraviolet irradiation of rat L6 cells. Analysis of buoyant densities of these complexes showed that free P40 mRNP had slightly less protein than polysomal P40 mRNP. Furthermore, analysis of the polypeptide complements of both free and polysomal P40 mRNP complexes showed that they were composed of identical polypeptides. The only detectable difference between the polypeptide complements of these complexes was that two polypeptides of 72 kDa and 55 kDa were more abundant in the polysomal P40 mRNP than free P40 mRNP.

Association of mRNA and eIF-2 alpha with the cytoskeleton in cells lacking vimentin

The human bladder carcinoma cell lines RT4 and T24 and the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 were found to be negative for vimentin when studied by means of immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Northern blot analysis revealed that these cells lacked detectable levels of vimentin mRNA with the exception of T24, which contains trace amounts of vimentin mRNA compared to the RNA level in vimentin-containing HeLa cells. CAT assays performed on these cells showed that a hamster vimentin promoter is inactive in RT4 and MCF-7 cells. In the vimentin-lacking cells, the binding of polyribosomes, specific mRNAs, and translation factor eIF-2 alpha to the cytoskeletal fraction was examined. Our results indicate that the presence of a vimentin network is not crucial for the association of the translation machinery with the cytoskeleton. Furthermore, in these vimentin-negative cell lines the immunofluorescence staining pattern of eIF-2 alpha shows a fibro-granular structure that has no resemblance to the cytokeratin or actin cytoskeleton present in these cells.