Preservation of the recipient inferior vena cava in liver transplantation

Comparison of the modified piggyback with standard piggyback and conventional orthotopic liver transplantation techniques: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In conventional orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the recipient's retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) is completely clamped and replaced with the donor IVC. The piggyback technique has been used to preserve venous return, either via an end-to-side or standard piggyback (SPB), or via a side-to-side or modified piggyback (MPB) anastomosis, using a venous cuff from the recipient hepatic veins with partially clamping and preserves the recipient's inferior vena cava. However, whether these piggyback techniques improve the efficacy of OLT is unclear. To address the low quality of the available evidence, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of conventional, MPB, and SPB techniques.

METHODS

Literature was searched in Medline and Web of Science databases for relevant articles published until 2021 without any time restriction. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of conventional OLT, MPB, and SPB techniques.

RESULTS

Forty studies were included, comprising 10,238 patients. MPB and SPB had significantly shorter operation times and fewer transfusions of red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma than conventional techniques. However, there were no differences between MPB and SPB in operation time and blood product transfusion. There were also no differences in primary non-function, retransplantation, portal vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, renal dysfunction, venous outflow complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, 90-day mortality rate, and graft survival between the three techniques.

CONCLUSION

MBP and SBP techniques reduce the operation time and need for blood transfusion compared with conventional OLT, but postoperative outcomes are similar. This indicates that all techniques can be implemented based on the experience and policy of the transplant center.

Early results of orthotopic liver transplantations using the technique of inferior vena cava anastomosis

INTRODUCTION

We compared early results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in adults using the classic versus piggyback technique of inferior vena cava anastomosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed 100 consecutive patients who underwent OLT from 2000 to 2003. Group A included 50 patients operated with the classic technique with venovenous extracorporeal bypass, and group B, 50 patients with the piggyback technique. The age range of the patients in group A was 21 to 63 years (mean, 43.5 years) and in group B, 20 to 65 years (mean, 46 years). The gender F/M distribution in group A was 24/26 and in group B, 28/22. The indications for OLT were acute hepatic failure (8%), chronic liver insufficiency (77%), liver tumors (8%), metabolic diseases (5%), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (2%). The degrees of liver insufficiency evaluated according to the Child classification were A, 18; B, 52; and C, 30 patients. The urgency for OLT on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) scale was UNOS 1-group A, 2 patients; group B, 7 patients; UNOS 2a-group A, 7 patients; group B, 6 patients; UNOS 2b-group A, 29 patients; group B, 30 patients; UNOS 3-group A, 12 patients; group B, 7 patients.

RESULTS

The average cold ischemia time in group A was 530 minutes and in group B, 515 minutes. The average results on the 10th postoperative day: aspartate transaminase (AST)-group A, 52.5 U/L; group B, 54.5 U/L; alanine transaminase (ALT)-group A, 131.5 U/L; group B, 153 U/L; gamma glutyl transpeptidase (GGTP)-group A, 299 U/L; group B, 285.5 U/L; alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-group A, 164 U/L; group B, 150.5 U/L; bilirubin-group A, 4.37 mg%; group B, 2.71 mg%; activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-group A, 37.6 seconds; group B, 34.8 seconds; platelets (PLT)-group A, 167 10(2)/mm(2); group B, 171 10(2)/mm(2). The incidence of postoperative complications was 36% in group A; it was 30% in group B. The mean hospitalization times in the surgical department were 17 days in group A and 16 days in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results, morbidity and mortality with both applied techniques were similar. Individualization in qualifying the patients for a given operative technique is important. The lower complication rate and reduced treatment cost of the piggyback technique group suggested advantages of this technique when compared with the classical OLT technique.