Hepatitis C virus genotypes and the influence of the induction of immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) on chronic hepatitis in renal graft recipients

Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns that antithymocyte globulin (ATG) might increase HCV-related complications.

METHODS

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims data, we studied 6780 HCV+ and 139 681 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for induction. We first examined the association of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (versus IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression. Then, we studied the association of ATG (versus IL2RA) with KT outcomes (rejection, graft failure, and death) and hepatic complications (liver transplant registration and cirrhosis) among HCV+ recipients using logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.640.770.91; deceased donor, aOR = 0.710.810.92). In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to those who received IL2RA (1-y crude incidence = 11.6% versus 12.6%; aOR = 0.680.820.99). There was no significant difference in the risks of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861.001.17), death (aHR = 0.850.951.07), liver transplant registration (aHR = 0.580.971.61), and cirrhosis (aHR = 0.730.921.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ATG, as compared to IL2RA, may lower the risk of acute rejection without increasing hepatic complications in HCV+ KT recipients. Given the higher rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipients.

Epidemic history of hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes in Portugal

Any successful strategy to prevent and control HCV infection requires an understanding of the epidemic behaviour among the different genotypes. Here, we performed the first characterization of the epidemic history and transmission dynamics of HCV subtypes in Portugal. Direct sequencing of NS5B was performed on 230 direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAA)-treatment naïve patients in Lisbon. Phylogenetic analysis was used for subtyping and transmission cluster identification. Bayesian methods were used to reconstruct the epidemic history of HCV subtypes. Sequences were analysed for resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). The majority of strains were HCV-GT1 (62.6%), GT3 (18.3%, all subtype 3a) and GT4 (16.1%). Among GT1, the most frequent were subtypes 1a (75.5%) and 1b (24.5%). Polyphyletic patterns were found in all but 12 lineages suggesting multiple introductions of the different subtypes in this population. Five distinct epidemics were identified. The first significant HCV epidemic in Portugal occurred between 1930s and 1960s, was caused almost exclusively by GT1b and was likely associated with blood transfusions. Rapid expansion of GT3a occurred in the 1960s and GT1a in the 1980s, associated with intravenous drug use. The most recent epidemics were caused by GT4a and GT4d and seem to be associated with the resurgence of opioid use. The C316N substitution was found in 31.4% of GT1b-patients. Close surveillance of patients bearing this mutation and undergoing dasabuvir-based regimens will be important to determine its impact on treatment outcome.

Impact of immunosuppressive regimen on survival of kidney transplant recipients with hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among end-stage renal disease patients receiving hemodialysis and a kidney transplant. HCV-positive kidney transplant recipients have worse clinical outcomes than those who are HCV negative. The optimal immunosuppressive regimen in this group of patients remains uncertain.

METHODS

Using data obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we studied the impact of induction and maintenance immunosuppression on risk of patient death, with death-censored graft failure and death with a functioning graft as secondary endpoints. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for donor, recipient, and transplant variables. A total of 3708 HCV-positive and 75,629 HCV-negative kidney transplant recipients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient survival was negatively affected by HCV-positive serology. Among HCV-positive kidney transplant recipients, a reduced HR for patient death was observed with the use of induction therapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.90, P=0.003) and with the use of mycophenolate mofetil (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.92, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In kidney transplant recipients with HCV-positive serology, the use of antibody induction did not negatively affect patient survival and the use of mycophenolate mofetil as part of maintenance immunosuppression was associated with better patient survival.