Does a visual analogue colour chart carried by the retrieval team help in assessment of the fat content of donor livers?

Assessment of Liver Graft Steatosis: Where Do We Stand?

The growing number of patients on waiting lists for liver transplantation and the shortage of organs have forced many centers to adopt extended criteria for graft selection, moving the limit of acceptance for marginal livers. Steatotic grafts that were, in the past, considered strictly unacceptable for transplantation because of the high risk of early nonfunction are now considered as a potential resource for organ implementation. Several methods to diagnose, measure, classify, and stage steatosis exist, but none can be considered qualitatively and quantitatively "the ideal method" to date. Clinical, biological, and imaging data can be very helpful to estimate graft steatosis, but histology still remains the gold standard. There is an increasing need for rapid and reliable tools to assess graft steatosis. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the approaches that are currently used to quantify steatosis in liver grafts.

Assessment of hepatic steatosis by transplant surgeon and expert pathologist: a prospective, double-blind evaluation of 201 donor livers

An accurate clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis before transplantation is critical for successful outcomes after liver transplantation, especially if a pathologist is not available at the time of procurement. This prospective study investigated the surgeon's accuracy in predicting hepatic steatosis and organ quality in 201 adult donor livers. A steatosis assessment by a blinded expert pathologist served as the reference gold standard. The surgeon's steatosis estimate correlated more strongly with large-droplet macrovesicular steatosis [ld-MaS; nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient (rS ) = 0.504] versus small-droplet macrovesicular steatosis (sd-MaS; rS  = 0.398). True microvesicular steatosis was present in only 2 donors (1%). Liver texture criteria (yellowness, absence of scratch marks, and round edges) were mainly associated with ld-MaS (variance = 0.619) and were less associated with sd-MaS (variance = 0.264). The prediction of ≥30% ld-MaS versus <30% ld-MaS was excellent when liver texture criteria were used (accuracy = 86.2%), but it was less accurate when the surgeon's direct estimation of the steatosis percentage was used (accuracy = 75.5%). The surgeon's quality grading correlated with the degree of ld-MaS and the surgeon's steatosis estimate as well as the incidence of poor initial function and primary nonfunction. In conclusion, the precise estimation of steatosis remains challenging even in experienced hands. Liver texture characteristics are more helpful in identifying macrosteatotic organs than the surgeon's actual perception of steatosis. These findings are especially important when histological assessment is not available at the donor's hospital.