Incidence of minor and major amputations after pancreas/kidney transplantation

Incidence and Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot Syndrome in Patients Early After Pancreas or Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation and its Association with Preventive Measures

Diabetic foot (DF) can develop in diabetic patients after organ transplantation (Tx) due to several factors including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), diabetic neuropathy and inappropriate DF prevention. Aim: To assess the occurrence of DF and associated risk factors in transplant patients. Methods: Fifty-seven diabetic patients were enrolled as part of this prospective study. All patients underwent organ Tx (01/2013-12/2015) and were followed up for minimum of 12 months up to a maximum of 50 months. Over the study period we evaluated DF incidence and identified a number of factors likely to influence DF development, including organ function, presence of late complications, PAD, history of DF, levels of physical activity before and after Tx, patient education and standards of DF prevention. Results: Active DF developed in 31.6% (18/57) of patients after organ Tx within 11 months on average (10.7 ± 8 months). The following factors significantly correlated with DF development: diabetes control (p = .0065), PAD (p<0.0001), transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2;p = .01), history of DF (p = .0031), deformities (p = .0021) and increased leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) before Tx (p = .037). However, based on logistic stepwise regression analysis, the only factors significantly associated with DF during the post-transplant period were: PAD, deformities and increased LTPA. Education was provided to patients periodically (2.6 ± 2.5 times) during the observation period. Although 94.7% of patients regularly inspected their feet (4.5 ± 2.9 times/week), only 26.3% of transplant patients used appropriate footwear. Conclusions: Incidence of DF was relatively high, affecting almost 1/3 of pancreas and kidney/pancreas recipients. The predominant risk factors were: presence of PAD, foot deformities and higher LTPA before Tx. Therefore, we recommend a programme involving more detailed vascular and physical examinations and more intensive education focusing on physical activity and DF prevention in at-risk patients before transplantation.

The influence of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on the evolution of diabetic foot lesions and peripheral arterial disease

PURPOSE

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) remains the best treatment option in patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic kidney failure. There are only a few studies addressing the potential ischemic deterioration of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) due to blood diverting from the iliac artery to the kidney graft. We aimed to evaluate diabetic foot lesions and PAD evolution in SPKT recipients and investigate if they are more frequent in ipsilateral lower limb of kidney graft.

METHODS

We developed a retrospective cohort, including patients submitted to SPKT in our tertiary center, between 2000 and 2017. Diabetic foot lesions and PAD frequencies were compared in the period before and after transplantation.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eleven patients were included, 50.2% (n = 106) female, with a median age at transplantation of 35 years (IQR 9). After a median follow-up period of 10 years (IQR 7), patient, kidney, and pancreatic graft survival were 90.5% (n = 191), 83.4% (n = 176), and 74.9% (n = 158), respectively. Before transplant, 2.8% (n = 6) had PAD and 5.3% (n = 11) had history of foot lesions. In post-transplant period, 17.1% (n = 36) patients presented PAD and 25.6% (n = 54) developed diabetic foot ulcers, 47.6% (n = 35) of which in the ipsilateral and 53.3% (n = 40) in the contralateral lower limb of the kidney graft (p = 0.48). Nine patients (4.3%) underwent major lower limb amputation, 3 (30%) ipsilateral and 7 (70%) contralateral to the kidney graft (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic foot lesions were not more frequent in the ipsilateral lower limb of the kidney graft, therefore downgrading the 'steal syndrome' role in these patients.

Long-term Lower Extremity and Cardiovascular Complications after Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant

Lower extremity (LE) vascular disease and adverse cardiovascular events (ACEs) cause significant long-term morbidity after simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. This study's purpose was to describe the incidence of, and risk factors associated with, LE vascular complications and related ACEs following SPK. All SPKs performed at the authors' institution from 2000 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was any LE vascular event, defined as LE endovascular intervention, open surgery, amputation, or invasive podiatry intervention. Secondary outcomes included post-SPK ACE. A total of 363 patients were included, of whom 54 (14.9%) required at least one LE vascular intervention following SPK. Only 3 patients received pre-SPK ankle brachial indices (ABIs). A history of peripheral artery disease (PAD) (HR 2.95, CI 1.4-6.2) was a risk factor for post-SPK LE vascular intervention even after adjustment for other factors. Fifty-nine (16.3%) patients experienced an ACE in follow-up. Requiring a LE intervention post-SPK was associated with a subsequent ACE (HR 2.3, CI 1.2-4.5). LE vascular and cardiovascular complications continue to be significant sources of morbidity for SPK patients, especially for patients with preexisting PAD. The highest risk patients may benefit from more intensive pre- and post-SPK workup with ABIs and follow-up with a vascular surgeon.

Effects of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and kidney transplantation alone on the outcome of peripheral vascular diseases

Background

The effects of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation (SPKT) on Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) warrants additional study and more target focus, since little is known about the mid- and long-term effects on the progression of PVD after transplantation.

Methods

101 SPKT and 26 Kidney Transplantation Alone (KTA) recipients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were retrospectively evaluated with regard to graft and metabolic outcome. Special subgroup analysis was directed towards the development and progression of peripheral vascular complications (PVC) (amputation, ischemic ulceration, lower extremity angioplasty/ bypass surgery) after transplantation.

Results

The 10-year patient survival was significantly higher in the SPKT group (SPKT: 82% versus KTA 40%; P < 0.001). KTA recipients had a higher prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors, including coronary artery disease (P < 0.001), higher serum triglyceride levels (P = 0.049), higher systolic (P = 0.03) and diastolic (P = 0.02) blood pressure levels. The incidence of PVD before transplantation was comparable between both groups (P = 0.114). Risk factor adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that patients with SPKT had a significant lower amount (32%) of PVCs (32 PVCs in 21 out of 101 SPKT; P < 0.001) when compared to the KTA patients who developed a significant increase in PVCs to 69% of cases (18 PVCs in 11 out of 26 KTA; P < 0.001). In line mean values of HbA_1c (P < 0.01) and serum triglycerides (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients with SPKT > 8 years after transplantation.

Conclusion

SPKT favorably slows down development and progression of PVD by maintaining a superior metabolic vascular risk profile in patients with IDDM1.

Clinical features and burden of new onset diabetic foot ulcers post simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation and kidney only transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes and kidney disease are at risk of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). Whether this risk is modified post simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) or kidney only (KO) transplant is unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated the incidence of new onset DFU post SPK and KO transplant in 235 patients with diabetic kidney disease and diabetic neuropathy. In total 90 (51% male) SPK patients and 145 KO (66% male, 26% Type 1 DM) were evaluated in a single centre retrospective study. Median (range) follow up was 6 (3 to 13) years for both cohorts.

RESULTS

We observed that 16 (17%) of SPK and 22 (15%) KO patients respectively developed a DFU during follow up. In both cohorts a history of peripheral arterial disease [37.5% vs. 4%] and pre-transplant history of DFU were associated with post transplant DFU (p ≪ 0.05). In KO cohort, patients who developed a DFU were more likely to have T1DM than T2DM (29% vs. 10%), p ≪ 0.05. There was no impact of DFU on SPK transplant failure. In contrast patients with DFU post KO transplant had more than five fold increased hazard ratio (HR) of transplant failure as compared to those without DFU independent of other risk factors [HR 5.19 95% CI (2.05 to 13.18) p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Nearly 1 in 7 patients develop a new onset DFU post KO or SPK transplantation and DFU also significantly increases risk of failure of the transplanted kidney. Our results highlight the need for greater awareness of regular foot examination, DFU prevention and risk evaluation in post-transplant patients.

RESEARCH IN CONTEXT

Evidence before this study Patients with diabetes and kidney disease are at enhanced risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Whether this risk is modified post successful kidney only (KO) or simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is unknown. Small case series and studies with short term follow up report varied rates of incidence and are from historical cohorts before the use of modern anti-transplant medications and treatments. Short term studies also suggest that post SPK the resultant normoglycaemia may reverse some features and risk markers of DFU. There are no long term studies on the incidence and impact of diabetic foot ulcers in patients with diabetic kidney disease post SPK or KO transplantation. Added value of this study We report the long term follow up results on DFU incidence, clinical features and related impact on transplant viability in 235 patients with diabetic kidney disease and neuropathy post successful SPK and KO transplant at a single centre. We observed that nearly 1 in 7 patients developed a DFU during follow up and that in patients who received KO transplant onset of DFU was associated with more than 5 fold increase of transplant failure. Implications of all the available evidence Our results highlight the need for greater awareness of regular foot examination, DFU prevention and risk evaluation in post-transplant patients. Despite normoglycaemia post SPK there is a residual burden and risk of DFU. Our work establishes a clinical rationale for further research to explore putative mechanisms that could explain the association between DFU and renal transplant dysfunction.

A prospective cohort study of risk prediction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Current risk prediction scoring systems in pancreas transplantation are limited to organ factors and are specific to predicting graft outcome. They do not consider recipient factors or inform regarding recipient morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of commonly used general surgical risk prediction models (P-POSSUM [Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity], MODS [multiple organ dysfunction score], Charlson co-morbidity index, revised cardiac risk index, ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] grade and Waterlow score), and to correlate them with total length of hospital stay (LOS) and critical care unit (CCU) LOS, important surrogate markers of patient outcome.

METHODS

All risk prediction scores were calculated prospectively for all simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients from November 2011 to October 2013, and correlated with outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 SPK transplant recipients were analysed. The mean age was 42.0 years (standard deviation [SD]: 7.60 years), 27 (52%) were male and the mean body mass index was 25.43kg/m(2) (SD: 3.11kg/m(2)). The mean pancreas and kidney cold ischaemic times were 703 minutes (SD: 182 minutes) and 850 minutes (SD: 192 minutes) respectively. The median total LOS and mean CCU LOS was 17 days (range: 8-79 days) and 7 days (SD: 4.04 days) respectively. When correlated with risk prediction scores, Waterlow score was the only significant predictor of total LOS and CCU LOS (p<0.001 [Spearman's correlation] and p=0.001 [Pearson's correlation] respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative risk prediction plays an important part in planning perioperative care. To date, no validated risk prediction scoring system exists for SPK transplantation. This prospective study indicates that Waterlow score identifies high risk individuals and has value in the prediction of outcome following SPK transplantation.

Reamputation after minor foot amputation in diabetic patients: risk factors leading to limb loss

The prevalence of lower extremity reamputation in diabetic patients has been well-documented. We sought to determine the risk factors for major lower extremity amputation (LEA) after minor foot amputation in diabetic patients. We studied 163 diabetic patients who had undergone an initial minor foot amputation and then had undergone at least 1 subsequent major or minor LEA. The patients were separated into a minor LEA group (initial minor LEA followed by at least 1 subsequent minor LEA) and a major LEA group (initial minor LEA followed by at least 1 subsequent major LEA). We then studied the possible risk factors for both groups. The possible risk factors analyzed were age, glycemic control, kidney function, previous kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation, smoking history, and presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). No statistical significance was found between the 2 groups for hemoglobin A1c, smoking status, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis, kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation, or vascular intervention (peripheral arterial bypass). In the minor group, 22.23% had severe PAD. In the major group, 71.15% had severe PAD. This was statistically significant (p < .001). The average interval to major amputation in those without PAD, mild to moderate PAD, and severe PAD was 1,180.9, 591.0, and 559.6 days, respectively. This demonstrates the importance of assessing the peripheral vascular status in all diabetic patients with minor LEA. Early referral to a vascular surgeon might delay (or prevent) major LEA.

Kidney transplant in diabetic patients: modalities, indications and results

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a disease of increasing worldwide prevalence and is the main cause of chronic renal failure. Type 1 diabetic patients with chronic renal failure have the following therapy options: kidney transplant from a living donor, pancreas after kidney transplant, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant, or awaiting a deceased donor kidney transplant. For type 2 diabetic patients, only kidney transplant from deceased or living donors are recommended. Patient survival after kidney transplant has been improving for all age ranges in comparison to the dialysis therapy. The main causes of mortality after transplant are cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, infections and neoplasias. Five-year patient survival for type 2 diabetic patients is lower than the non-diabetics' because they are older and have higher body mass index on the occasion of the transplant and both pre- and posttransplant cardiovascular diseases prevalences. The increased postransplant cardiovascular mortality in these patients is attributed to the presence of well-known risk factors, such as insulin resistance, higher triglycerides values, lower HDL-cholesterol values, abnormalities in fibrinolysis and coagulation and endothelial dysfunction. In type 1 diabetic patients, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant is associated with lower prevalence of vascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction, stroke and amputation in comparison to isolated kidney transplant and dialysis therapy.

CONCLUSION

Type 1 and 2 diabetic patients present higher survival rates after transplant in comparison to the dialysis therapy, although the prevalence of cardiovascular events and infectious complications remain higher than in the general population.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Peripheral Arterial Disease and Renal Transplantation

It was hypothesized that peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is less frequent after kidney transplantation than among comparable patients who are on the deceased-donor waiting list. The cumulative incidences and risk factors for PAD were compared among 43,427 adult transplant recipients and 53,309 adults who were placed on the renal transplant waiting list between 1995 and 2003. All patients had Medicare primary insurance coverage, and Medicare claims were used to identify PAD. For patients with diabetes, the 3-yr cumulative incidence of de novo PAD was 24% on the waiting list versus 20% after transplantation. For patients without diabetes, the 3-yr cumulative incidence was 9% on the waiting list versus 5% after transplantation. The adjusted relative risk (RR) for PAD among patients without diabetes was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.80; P < 0.0001) in the transplant population versus the waiting list population, whereas among patients with diabetes, it was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.96; P = 0.0024). A diagnosis of PAD on the waiting list was associated with an almost three-fold increase in the RR for death for patients without diabetes (2.98; 95% CI 2.71 to 3.27; P < 0.0001) and with diabetes (2.92; 95% CI 2.71 to 3.15; P < 0.0001). After transplantation, de novo PAD increased the RR for death almost two-fold in patients without diabetes (1.92; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.26; P < 0.0001) and with diabetes (1.83; 95% CI 1.58 to 2.12; P < 0.0001). The incidence of PAD is higher on the waiting list than after transplantation and is associated with an increased risk for death among patients with and without diabetes.

Preemptive versus Non-preemptive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single-center, long-term, follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the timing-before or after initiation of dialysis-of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with end-stage renal failure are sparse. We studied the effect of preemptive transplantation on patient survival, cardiovascular endpoints, and graft survival, as compared with non-preemptive transplantation.

METHODS

All 180 SPKT recipients (aged 23-58 years) who received a SPKT in Leiden between December 1986 and May 2004 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five patients (36.1%) were transplanted preemptively. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years.

RESULTS

Up to 8.2 years after transplantation, we found no differences in patient survival. Later on, divergence occurred: 10-year patient survival was 71.3% in the preemptive group versus 63.8% in the dialysis group and 15-year patient survival was 64.8% versus 45.1% in the dialysis group, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio for mortality of 0.50 (95% CI 0.23-1.06, P=0.070). Cause of death was less often of cardiac origin in the preemptive group (adjusted HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.026-0.95, P=0.044). Graft survival did not follow the same trend. No significant differences were found between the two groups considering allograft survival, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction. The percentage of patients with minor or major amputation(s) after transplantation was slightly lower in the preemptive group (24.6 vs. 32.1%; adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.42-1.82, P=0.72).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive SPKT offered a patient survival benefit as compared with transplantation performed while already on dialysis and was associated with a lower rate of cardiac deaths.

Evaluation of Type 1 Diabetics for Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation With Regard to Cardiovascular Risk

The main cause of death for diabetic patients and patients on dialysis is coronary artery disease (CAD). The most common cause of graft loss following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) is death with a functioning graft due to CAD. Therefore, careful pretransplantation evaluation of CAD is mandatory. In our series, every patient undergoes a noninvasive cardiac function test like dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or myocardial thallium scintigraphy using adenosine to induce medical stress. Thirty patients were evaluated for SPK: 15 patients with myocardial scintigraphy and 8 with DSE. Seven investigations showed pathological findings and we performed coronary angiograms, none of which showed coronary artery stenosis. Seven primary coronary angiograms were performed: four due to a history of CAD and three as a primary diagnostic. Following SPK one patient died at 21 days after transplantation due to myocardial infarction. He had a history of CAD with angioplasty and stent implantation. Noninvasive cardiac function tests like DSE or myocardial scintigraphy are reliable methods to evaluate CAD in patients with diabetic nephropathy awaiting SPK. In case of a suspicious finding or a history of CAD, a coronary angiogram should be performed to assess the need for revascularization. Following this algorithm we may further reduce the mortality of SPK.

Progression of macrovascular diseases is reduced in type 1 diabetic patients after more than 5 years successful combined pancreas-kidney transplantation in comparison to kidney transplantation alone

Recent reports have demonstrated an improved cardiovascular outcome after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) compared with kidney transplantation alone (KTA) in type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of SKPT and KTA on the progression of cerebrovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) 5 and 10 years after transplantation. Only patients with graft survival more than 5 years, were included in this study. In summary, 12 type 1 diabetic patients with SPKT and 10 diabetic subjects with KTA were evaluated. The immunosuppressive therapy was similar in both patient groups. The mean observation period was 124 (72-184) months in the SPKT group and 122 (64-216) months in the group with KTA. To investigate the vascular risk profile we examined mean HbA1c, blood pressure and lipid levels in both patient groups during the first 5 years (period I) and the second 5 years (period II) after transplantation (measurements at least at 3-month intervals). Additionally, we evaluated the prevalence of moderate (stage I-II) and severe (stage III-IV) macrovascular diseases prior as well as 5 and 10 years after transplantation. During period I the mean HbA1c-value was 5.7+/-0.4% in the group with SPKT versus 7.4+/-0.8% in the KTA group, and in period II 5.8+/-0.4% in the SPKT group versus 7.6+/-0.9% (P<0.001) in the patients with KTA. The cholesterol levels were approximately the same in both groups, the triglycerides were lower in the patients with SPKT than in the subjects with KTA with 1.3+/-0.4 vs. 2.2+/-0.9 mmol/l in period I, and 1.4+/-0.5 vs. 2.3+/-0.6 mmol/l in period II (P<0.05). The BP-values were similar in both groups. Five years after transplantation the prevalence of vascular diseases was not significantly different between both groups. During the following 5 years the prevalence of macrovascular diseases increased more in the KTA than in the SKPT group. After a mean observation period of 10 years the SKPT group showed a lower prevalence of vascular diseases (stage I-IV) with 41% CVD, 50% CHD and 50% PAV in comparison to the KTA group with a prevalence of 80% CVD, 90% CHD and 80% PAV), the difference was not statistically significant because of the small patient groups. The frequency of the vascular complications myocardial infarction (16% vs. 50%), stroke (16% vs. 40%) and amputations (16% vs. 30%) was in summary significant lower in the patients with SPKT than in the patients with KTA (P<0.05). In conclusion, while for the first 5 years after transplantation the progression of macroangiopathy in patients with SPKT and KTA was not significantly different, after a mean 10-year observation period the progression of macrovascular diseases was significantly lower in recipients with a functioning SPKT compared to patients with a KTA; this can be explained by a better vascular risk profile after SPKT. The 10-year patient survival was 83% in the SPKT group and 70% in patients with KTA.

Pancreas transplantation: indications and consequences

Pancreas transplantation continues to evolve as a strategy in the management of diabetes mellitus. The first combined pancreas-kidney transplant was reported in 1967, but pancreas transplant now represents a number of procedures, each with different indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. This review will summarize these procedures, including their risks and outcomes in comparison to kidney transplantation alone, and how or if they affect the consequences of diabetes: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and microvascular and macrovascular complications. In addition, the new risks introduced by immunosuppression will be reviewed, including infections, cancer, osteoporosis, reproductive function, and the impact of immunosuppression medications on blood pressure, lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is imperative that an endocrinologist remain involved in the care of the pancreas transplant recipient, even when glucose is normal, because of the myriad of issues encountered post transplant, including ongoing management of diabetic complications, prevention of bone loss, and screening for failure of the pancreas graft with reinstitution of treatment when indicated. Although long-term patient and graft survival have improved greatly after pancreas transplant, a multidisciplinary team is needed to maximize long-term quality, as well as quantity, of life for the pancreas transplant recipient.

Macrovascular disease after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) with focus on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in relation to graft function. From January 1985 through 1999, 87 SPK were performed in the unit. Sixty recipients were males, median age at diabetes onset 13 yr (1-40) and age at transplantation 39 yr (29-54). No case was lost to follow-up. Morbidity and mortality during median 8 yr of follow-up (range 1-15 yr) were recorded. Major macrovascular disease (MVD) was defined as myocardial infarction or sudden death (AMI), stroke or peripheral gangrene requiring amputation of leg, foot or fingers. At the evaluation, 26 of 87 patients (30%) had died, 19 after loss of the pancreas graft and 20 after loss of the kidney. MVD was the dominant cause of death. Non-lethal MVD had previously been recorded in 62%. Of the 61 patients alive, 22 had lost their pancreas graft and 12 the concomitant kidney. MVD had occurred in 32%. Whereas 89% of the concomitant kidneys functioned when the pancreas graft did so, only 37% of the kidneys functioned if the pancreas had been lost, p < 0.0001. The mortality rate was significantly higher among patients who lost both grafts (16/26) than in those who lost only the pancreas graft (3/15), p = 0.01. Progressive MVD is a major clinical problem for SPK transplant patients, particularly if the kidney fails.

The effect of pancreas transplantation on peripheral vascular disease complications

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether pancreas transplantation reduced the incidence of peripheral vascular complications in diabetics with renal insufficiency.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review was done of 36 kidney-pancreas (KP) and 88 kidney-alone (KA) recipients with a diagnosis of diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) transplanted between May 1997 and July 2002. Risk factors studied included type of transplant, age, gender, history of smoking, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The endpoint was first peripheral vascular event occurring after transplantation, defined as either an amputation or revascularization procedure.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 51 +/- 9 years, 64% of patients were of male gender, 20% with a history of smoking, 98% with hypertension, 15% with coronary artery disease (CAD), and 12% with a history of PVD. With a median follow-up of 45 months (12 to 79 months), 3/36 (8%) of KP recipients suffered a PVD complication, compared to 10/88 (11%) of KA recipients (P = NS). Similarly, age, gender, a past history of smoking, CAD, and hypertension were not predictive of PVD complications. Five of 15 patients (33%) with a pretransplant history of PVD suffered a postoperative PVD event compared to only 8 of 109 patients (7%) with no prior history of PVD (P =.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of normoglycemia by pancreas transplantation did not reduce the risk of PVD complications in diabetics with renal failure. A pretransplant history of PVD was the only risk factor associated with posttransplant PVD events.